<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Scientific smorgasbord on the Web</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/28/75339.aspx</link><description>•&amp;nbsp;New Scientist: Microscope discerns atoms of different elements•&amp;nbsp;Nature: Graphene steps up to silicon's challenge •&amp;nbsp;ScienceDaily: Scientists invent real-life 'tricorder' •&amp;nbsp;UW-Madison: Major number theory puzzle unlocked</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Scientific smorgasbord on the Web</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/28/75339.aspx#75469</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:59:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:75469</guid><dc:creator>CJE</dc:creator><description>I love all of these!  I one time heard of a tricorder-like device that used radar to scan a patient for broken bones (in Pop-Sci I think), but then never heard anything further.</description></item><item><title>Scientific smorgasbord on the Web</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/28/75339.aspx#78025</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 04:25:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:78025</guid><dc:creator>CJE</dc:creator><description>I really think people need a list of A - Z of all this kind of technology and what we are capable of.  We could practically trip over ourselves and solve all of the world's problems which makes me wonder all the more why we are so dead set on war and destroying everything.  </description></item><item><title>Scientific smorgasbord on the Web</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/02/28/75339.aspx#79471</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:79471</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Ashby, Calgary</dc:creator><description>How can they be so certain they are looking at atoms when it isn't certain what atoms are?</description></item></channel></rss>