<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Back in the game</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/28/5052.aspx</link><description>It's been only a few days since Oklahoma-based Rocketplane Kistler and Virginia-based Orbital Sciences Corp. acknowledged that they had irreconcilable differences over the development of&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;Kistler K-1 rocket as a system to deliver supplies</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Back in the game</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/28/5052.aspx#5103</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:44:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:5103</guid><dc:creator>Guy S. Newell</dc:creator><description>I've always said that the ISS is just a glorified motel with lousy room service. Looks like I was closer to the truth than I thought. To think we laughed at the French for the Concorde. </description></item><item><title>Back in the game</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/28/5052.aspx#5105</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:50:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:5105</guid><dc:creator>Tony Rusi, Mukilteo, WA</dc:creator><description>I'd really like to see some investigative reporting done here. Really, how much of the K-1 is built already? How much must still to be designed? What are the milestones at which NASA will begin to pay off? And why are we sending test flights to Australia? Poor starving US aerospace test engineers are demanding to know!</description></item></channel></rss>