<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx</link><description>




CWRU

The new lunar meteorite is shown here cracked open to reveal a pinkish-tan interior. The cube, used for calibration,&amp;nbsp;is&amp;nbsp;1 centimeter (a half-inch) on each side.

Meteorite hunters have found a rock in Antarctica that they’ve</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3852</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:42:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3852</guid><dc:creator>Gaetano Marano</dc:creator><description>.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About the Orion moon missions SAFETY ...and the quantity of moon-rocks they can bring back to earth...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that the NASA/ESAS/LockMart Orion's Service Module design has a GIANT mistake built-in!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I explain my opinion in my latest article here: www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/013orionSM.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new Orion's SM design is different from Apollo since (now) it can't perform (both) the Lunar Orbit Insertion and Trans Earth Injection with MANY safety and operational problems for the astronauts and moon missions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The most dangerous issue of this (bad!) choice is that, if the LSAM engines will fail in LOI, the Orion will have not sufficient propellant to enter the lunar orbit or ONLY the propellant for that operation (without the LSAM docked) but NOT for TEI to come back to earth!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3853</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:46:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3853</guid><dc:creator>Ed Pardo, Forest Lake, PA</dc:creator><description>I'm a little confused on this one. Per current theory the moon is made from earth rock after a planetary impact. How can you distinguish earth rock from the moon from earth rock from the earth? Is the origin not identical?</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3856</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:49:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3856</guid><dc:creator>Alan Boyle</dc:creator><description>For what it's worth, Ed, here's more on how lunar meteorites are identified: &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://epsc.wustl.edu/admin/resources/moon/howdoweknow.html" target=_new rel=nofollow&gt;http://epsc.wustl.edu/admin/&lt;BR&gt;resources/moon/howdoweknow.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The distribution of elements in the rock and the way the rock is formed can be analyzed to determine whether the darn thing came from the moon. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I didn't include this information in the posting, but you can read it in the linked news release: &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"The main constituents of the rock [are] the mineral pyroxene (brightly colored and mosaicized) and maskelynite (dark dull gray), a material formed when the mineral feldspar is converted to glass by high levels of shock. The mineralogy is typical of a planetary basalt; but the relatively coarse grain size and the presence of maskelynite are unusual for lunar specimens, suggesting this rock represents a time period in the moon's history poorly recorded by other lunar samples." &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Hope this helps.... &lt;BR&gt;</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3857</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:52:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3857</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Stright, Mount Airy , MD</dc:creator><description>I'm with Ed on this one, if the moon is made from earth rock, there has to be similarities even after millions of years apart. </description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3859</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:02:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3859</guid><dc:creator>Emilienne</dc:creator><description>Tell you what,after they lost the original tape of the trip to the moon,how do they prove they been there for sure and why they never went back?? So if they never been there how do they know what kind of rocks the moon has? Well this sounds like another hoaks if you ask me .Have a nice down to earth day.</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3866</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:14:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3866</guid><dc:creator>Waldo Emerson</dc:creator><description>This is all wrong. &amp;nbsp;The moon is made of cheese... </description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3880</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:26:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3880</guid><dc:creator>Wade Whitlock, Aberdeen, MD</dc:creator><description>A footnote to Mr. Marano's comments. &amp;nbsp;L-M got a contract to upgrade Coast Guard cutters and assigned the job to software engineers. &amp;nbsp;Fills me with confidence, it does! &amp;nbsp;The Loughheed (yes, that is how they spelled their name (Scotish), it was anglicized to make it easier for the sales staff) Brothers and Mr. Martin must be doing about 900 RPM!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ideally, the new spam can will be used to establish the permanent settlement that should have been put there in the 1970's. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps we can build a &amp;quot;fleet&amp;quot; of purpose-built craft to do the transorbital and surface to orbit work on each end. &amp;nbsp;Actually more efficient since they could be optimized for the task.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I'd be happier if I just kept to reading the Onion, but it does seem to be getting more realistic.&lt;br&gt;Red Oxygen, hmm? &amp;nbsp;The concept of 900 GIGA Pascals defeats me, diamond anvils or not. &amp;nbsp;There was a theory that Jupiter had a core of metallic hydrogen and diamond a while back. &amp;nbsp;Maybe things would be even more colorful, if we could get lights and a camera in there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3916</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:00:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3916</guid><dc:creator>Jo-ann Jaocbson, Alamo, CA..</dc:creator><description>I still do not understand how we know this is from the moon. &amp;nbsp;Could you explain it in lay person's language...and are you sure or is it just postulation?</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3927</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:14:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3927</guid><dc:creator>jethro bodeen, cranston, RI</dc:creator><description>we will never really know the composition of the moon. we have bits and pieces. &amp;nbsp;it's like going into a gravel pit in brooklyn and proclaiming the rocks found there are what the earth is composed of. I do in fact believe the moon to be molten at the core. and water is present. &amp;nbsp;a deep excavation needs to be sent to the moon. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3934</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:47:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3934</guid><dc:creator>Alan Boyle</dc:creator><description>This Web page might help explain in more depth this idea that we can tell moonrock from earthrock by doing a chemical analysis:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.permanent.com/l-compos.htm"&gt;http://www.permanent.com/l-compos.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, you can sometimes determine more exactly where on the moon a particular meteorite came from:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;amp;id=2341"&gt;http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;amp;id=2341&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#3938</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:00:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:3938</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>Ed,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Moon is indeed a chip off the old block (created by debris an impact of a large asteroid with the Earth). &amp;nbsp;The material that coalesced to become the Moon went through a very rough ride: it reached a very high temperature that drove off volatiles (like water, for example). &amp;nbsp;The Moon had a molten lava ocean, which cooled and hardened to form its anothosite crust. &amp;nbsp;The Earth, meanwhile, had a very different history, plate tectonics, weathering, lots of water. &amp;nbsp;These different histories have led to different chemistries in the rocks of the two bodies.</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#4149</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:12:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:4149</guid><dc:creator>Ed Pardo, Forrest Lake, PA</dc:creator><description>Thank You. John's answer and the articles that you linked make it a whole lot clearer. May I assume that the material from the intruder is also fairly equally mixed on both Earth and Moon as well so that any difference between a piece of the intruder can not be distinguished from an original piece of earth rock?</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#54078</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 05:03:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:54078</guid><dc:creator>Jim Flanigan Bellaire Ohio</dc:creator><description>I have allways been interested in meteorites and was wondering if there is any place in ohio that would be good to look for them. Thank You Jim</description></item><item><title>Moonrock unearthed</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/13/3839.aspx#234209</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:12:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:234209</guid><dc:creator>JC, Fairbanks, AK</dc:creator><description>Jim Flanigan: &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Ice caps and deserts are the best places to find M's because they're bare of vegetation and other things that can hide them, because there are few other rocks lying around, and because geo-processes there tend to expose them. They're found just about everywhere, but very hard to find and identify. I've never found one, and not for lack of trying.... &amp;nbsp; keep looking, well.. down. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;ps. metal detectors can find iron-type meteorites...</description></item></channel></rss>