<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Your daily dose of science on the Web</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/10/27/1596243.aspx</link><description>
Slate: Think globally, date locally 
Science News: Long live plastics! 
New York Times: The wonders of blood 
Scientific American: The science of snacks </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Your daily dose of science on the Web</title><link>http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/10/27/1596243.aspx#1601325</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:37:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1601325</guid><dc:creator>Ray Bilodeau</dc:creator><description>Well, well. I guess we definitely are behind the curve when our college students cannot qualify for a scientific study requiring them to read and summarize a text paragraph. [Scientific American article] When are we going to wake up and DO something?</description></item></channel></rss>