ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Beam me up ... for a prize!

Posted: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 6:53 PM by Alan Boyle


Reed Saxon / AP
  LaserMotive's David Bashford, right,
  prepares a robotic climber for its
  ascent on Wednesday.

Just days after $1.65 million was won in a NASA-backed rocket contest, it looks as if big money will be awarded in the $2 million Power Beaming Challenge as well.

Like the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge, the Power Beaming Challenge is part of NASA's Centennial Challenges, a program aimed at encouraging new technologies that could be adopted by the space agency for future exploration. This particular competition could eventually lay the groundwork for future space elevators - but power-beaming technology is likely to be put to work even if those space elevators are never built.

Teams entered in the challenge have been working on robotic transport systems that can be remotely powered by laser beams to climb up a long steel cable. The contest, part of the Space Elevator Games managed by the Spaceward Foundation, started up in 2005 and has been getting progressively harder every year.

This year, the teams have to get their laser-powered robots to zoom up to a height of 1 kilometer  (0.6 mile) on a cable that's attached to a helicopter hovering above NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center in California's Mojave Desert.

To win the big money, it's not enough just to get up to the top: To qualify for a $900,000 prize, the robot has to maintain an average speed of at least 2 meters (6.6 feet) per second. That's about as fast as Batman would rise on his super-strong bat rope in the movies, the Spaceward Foundation's Ben Shelef told me back in August. To qualify for an additional $1.1 million, the robot would have to go even faster: 5 meters (16.4 feet) per second.

Today LaserMotive, one of the three teams competing for the cash, sent its robot up the track in just a little more than four minutes, at an average speed of 3.72 meters per second. That's fast enough to qualify for the $900,000. Now it's up to the other teams - the Kansas City Space Pirates and the University of Saskatchewan's USST team - to see if they can claim a share of the prize as well.

The formula for determining how much money goes to whom under which circumstances is rather complicated - and rather than troubling you with the math, I'll just point you to the competition handbook.


Spaceward via Ustream
LaserMotive's climber rises to vie for a prize.

The Spaceward Foundation came up with the power-beaming contest - plus another competition that encourages the development of super-strong tether materials - in order to encourage technologies that would be needed to build a space elevator to Earth orbit. If such a system could be created, it would revolutionize access to outer space. But NASA says power-beaming technology would be of use long before such elevators are built.

If the technology is perfected, it could be used to keep remote-controlled rovers moving on the moon or Mars, even in situations where sunlight isn't available. Power-beaming also happens to be a key technology for transmitting solar power from space. In the shorter term, better laser control systems could have military applications as well.

The best way to stay on top of the ups and downs is to watch streaming video offered via Ustream.tv. Here are other ways to track the power-beamers: 

Update for 7:50 p.m. ET Nov. 5: LaserMotive improved their time by about 13 seconds during another series of runs on Thursday. Their best performance resulted in an estimated climbing speed just shy of 4 meters per second. The two other teams weren't able to make the required climb today, but the competition continues on Friday.


Join the Cosmic Log team by signing up as my Facebook friend or following b0yle on Twitter. And pick up a copy of my new book, "The Case for Pluto." If you're partial to the planetary underdogs, you'll be pleased to know that I've just set up a Facebook fan page for "The Case for Pluto."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I am stoked! Just sad I will be at work and cannot actually watch the live feed! As always thanks Alan for posting some great stuff!

Side note I had two profs in college laugh at me when I wrote some papers about this.  (I hope they are watching) buhahahaha
Gack!  Space elevators are an inherently bad idea despite the romantic notion in some peoples minds.  Ignoring the obscenely difficult engineering task of designing and deploying it.  Or how you would guard it against hard radiation decay or bombardment by plasma and massive electrical differentials created by sun "weather".  Or that it would make an obvious target to destroy for any terror group looking for some publicity.  Or that if it did fall to the surface of the earth it would wrap all the way around it causing an ecological disaster.  No, we can't build it because it would be absurdly expensive to attempt to without cost cutting eventually factoring into the project and compromising it's reliability, and no one knows how to repair/service something which mostly cannot be reached by any aircraft or spaceship due to orbital mechanics (no free floating orbit lets you "park" with an elevator until geostationary orbit at the top.)
force gravity energy

could this beat these omnipresent factors

good luck
With nanotechnology Im sure they can build a strong elevator cord. Just put it in Australia. Theres heaps of empty space and Im sure no terrorist will eva go there, wouldnt be an ecological disaster either. Wheres the 'Yes we can', 'can do' attitude! Good luck to the ppl involved.
Did anyone else see the animation on the History channel  (I think it was the History channel) of the space elevator 'failure'. That could be a problem.

Hmm. Anyways, I remember watching the high school kids at the 2006 X Cup beat out all the other competitor's that day in the space elevator games. That was just a few tens of feet on a vibrating ribbon.

Can't wait to see this next feat!
Sweet idea.
But what about thunderstorms?
A very obvious lightning rod...
A space tether would be a great lightening rod, and would therefore decrease the chances of a lightening strike since lightening rods are not designed to get struck by lightening, but to equalize the electrical potential before sufficient charge is allowed to build. By acting as a sky-to-ground conductor, the electrical charge that results in lightening would never have the opportunity to accumulate. I suppose therein lies a method for energy generation, you could possibly harvest some of the electrical charge (and idea I’ve been obsessed with since I was 5).

On another note, I would love to see a Stirling engine-based competitor to this, as Stirlings are typically more efficient than photovoltaics. If anyone would like to brainstorm this, contact me on facebook as I have been mentally sketching a few designs while I read the article.
An interesting competition to report on Alan!  It will be interesting to see how the competition goes for the space elevator teams.  I wonder how the wind and a moving chopper are going to impact the race upwards.  It sure would be cool if we could get a real space elevator working that could send stuff into low earth orbit at a fraction of the power consumption needed to lift a rocket into space.  Still I bet it will take significant power to do the trick and only green energy would be the way to go to power a space elevator.  I think that a space elevator could be problematic as all it would take is one wayward airplane to wreck a massively expensive space elevator.
"force gravity energy

could this beat these omnipresent factors

good luck"

Dude, was that a haiku?
I wonder if a physical displacement "wave" on the teather could be generated at the ground, and as it travels up the teather, the elevator "ride" it to gain altitude (or otherwise extract energy from it for vertical propulsion)...excess energy in the tether could be dissipated at the top via a dampner->friction->heat->space radiator (or to power handy palm warmers for the traveler's cold hands once they get there)...mechanical energy into the bottom of the teather could be generated by a heard of hamsters running on treadmills (renewable energy source, biodegradable waste products if not used to generate Methane).

Just a thought or two.
if the cable is conductive, then elctrical potential differences at the ends (including effects from storms and lightning) could provide additional power for the ride up.

"Or that it would make an obvious target to destroy for any terror group looking for some publicity."

I have great misgivings about the practicality (not so much the eventual possibility) of space elevators, but we should never allow that prospect to be one of them. To accept that, means *never* building or creating *anything* that your enemies may consider to be of great symbolic and/or economic value. (at which point, as the cliche goes, 'the terrorists win')

I mean, just how short *should* a skyscraper be, before Al Qaeda considers it too small to bother with?

And, even staying with rockets, would not attacking a spaceport itself be just as meaningful? (AIRports have been attacked before) There's a reason that KSC security has *always* been vigilant, especially at Shuttle launch times...

(Even in 1978, a TV series pilot 'Earth II' had an early scene wherein an offshore frogman/sniper is barely prevented from targeting a fueled, ready to launch Saturn 5:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_II_%28TV_series_pilot%29 )

NOTHING of value is completely safe, but you can't let that alone stop you from doing and creating things of value, or you might as well go live in caves, as some of the terrorists do...

But, whether this particular idea is a technically/economically *good* idea is something else again.
Power beaming or beamed energy is the way to go in space as said even if the space elevator doesn't get built. Let's face if they build the space elevator traveling at the 700 mph, about the speed of sound at 1 atm., moving up the tether would mean it would still take you 32 hours to get to geostationary orbit. then there is the case about space debris crashing into the tether.

Beamed energy can propel sails close to the speed of light towards the stars, get us to mars and the outer solar system in a timely manner and provide electricity to anywhere on earth using non renewable or renewable energy. 13 percent of natural gas seep out of pipes every day from all the natural pipeline we have, methane from the natural gas traps 23 times more heat than CO2. No tens of thousand miles of new infrastructures would be needed costing tens of billions of dollars to transport gas, electricity, oil etc cross vast regions of our planet to the customer by pipeline, copper wires, land, sea, or air. You process the energy at the source then beam it up then back down to the customer.

Here is one of the many places you can read more about beamed energy:

http://shineinnovations.com/6112.html
Sane - Thanks for the encouraging comments!!
ok, tethered at the bottom and NO solid anchor at the top?...wanna guess the lateral motion at the top end of the elevator rope?....LOL....no calculator abuse on THAT engineering challange eh? just on the checks amount though....anybody able to spell precession? resonant ablation? extreme G force?...nah...did not think so...still calculating the total volume of co2 in a very large and turbulant sphere they are...oh, never listen they don't.
Yes it can be done, but is there not another way?
LOL. and beamed energy, never listen they do not, they did not study their physics texts, always their head in the clouds...not on the matter at hand...someday perhaps the inverse square law will become clear to them, but not today....
heheheh...
I want in on one of these challanges...I think they are not as freindly to us small jedi as they should be, they want a big story with a big check, but where are the real innovators?....
HERE..on this side of the blog!!! let us participate or some other country will get OUR INVENTIONS!!!!for years now I have said, take a small rover to the station, boot it out the air chute,small assist to moon and charge uni-govs to drive it around the moon....never listen do they, spend all our money for themselves they must...LOL....LOL...LOL...
The case for tethers in space failed in 1996

http://www.iki.rssi.ru/mirrors/stern/Education//wtether.html

now what ever became of a kilometers long tether freely orbiting the earth as more space junk?
Power Beaming X-Prize, huh?  We experimented with that in high school, using parts from microwaves, old radios, etc.  The basis for PB is very little different from either cell phones or AM radio.
Do check out our song about this subject "Elevate" found at http://www.myspace.com/mpathmusic.
"Or how you would guard it against hard radiation decay or bombardment by plasma and massive electrical differentials created by sun "weather"."

Same way they protect the space station.

"Or that it would make an obvious target to destroy for any terror group looking for some publicity."

By that logic, nothing should ever be built.

"Or that if it did fall to the surface of the earth it would wrap all the way around it causing an ecological disaster."

More likely it would fling out into space.  If it extends past a lagrange point it *might* fall into the moon, but most likely it would fall into the sun in 10,000 years.



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2117873

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google