ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Protoplanet frozen in time

Posted: Thursday, October 08, 2009 2:01 PM by Alan Boyle


Science / AAAS
Click for video: The left view is a computer model of Pallas' surface, based on
the Hubble imagery at right. The circle indicates a large crater that is likely deeper
than shown in the model. Click on the image to watch a 3-D animation.

Images from the Hubble Space Telescope suggest that the asteroid Pallas should be grouped along with two other big space rocks as protoplanets - "planetary embryos" that were big enough to stay pretty much as they were during the formation of the solar system, but too small to progress to the next stage of development.

"These are the first really high-resolution images of Pallas that come from Hubble," said Britney Schmidt, a planetary scientist at the University of California at Los Angeles and lead author of the study in Friday's issue of the journal Science. "This was a suite of observations that haven't been made before."

The imagery was collected in 2007 by a camera that's no longer on the Hubble, the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2, or WFPC2. That instrument was replaced with a next-generation wide-field camera during May's final Hubble servicing mission.

Getting the pictures down from WFPC2 was just the beginning of a two-year-long process to put together a picture of Pallas, similar to the Hubble imagery already collected for its asteroidal siblings Ceres and Vesta.

Schmidt and her colleagues painstakingly looked at the asteroid's profile from different perspectives, then fit all those views together using a computer modeling program called Maya. They also analyzed the slight color differences in the pictures and matched them up with Pallas' 3-D shape.

The result? Pallas turns out to be almost but not quite round, falling just short of a state known as hydrostatic equilibrium. Its mean radius is 170 miles (272 kilometers), which makes it the second-largest asteroid after Ceres, which has a 297-mile (475-kilometer) radius. But at 449 quintillion pounds (2.04 × 1020 kilograms), it's the third most massive asteroid, ranking behind Ceres as well as Vesta.


B.E. Schmidt and S.C. Radcliffe
An artist's conception shows an impact event on the asteroid Pallas.

The asteroid has several depressions of various sizes, including what appears to be a monster crater about 150 miles (240 kilometers) wide. Such craters were likely caused by early impacts that knocked loose a family of asteroidal fragments linked to Pallas, the researchers said.

The analysis also turned up bright and dark spots in ultraviolet light, suggesting differences in composition. "What's great to see is that heterogeneity actually exists, because it gives us some idea that there's some processing going on," Schmidt said.

Pallas' composition suggests that it had liquid water and an active geology at an early point in its multibillion-year history. "There aren't going to be volcanoes on Pallas, and there aren't going to be continents, but it's heading in a direction where it's going to be a planet," Schmidt said.

Much of that activity was frozen in place, making Pallas something of a planet interrupted - what the researchers call "an evolved body with planetlike properties," or a protoplanet. Scientists believe even the biggest planets in the solar system passed through the protoplanetary stage, gravitationally glomming onto bigger and bigger chunks of material until they got where they are today.

Worlds such as Ceres, Pallas and Vesta were stuck in a state of arrested development because nearby Jupiter pushed the asteroids around and grabbed a lot of the good stuff for itself. At least that's how the favored scenario plays out.

Ceres had grown large enough to keep a roundish shape, even after numerous impacts, and thus is now considered a dwarf planet alongside Pluto, Eris and potentially scores of other worlds beyond Neptune. Pallas and Vesta, however, aren't quite in the same league. "They're not quite perfectly round, and potentially because of impact," Schmidt said.

The bottom line is that Pallas is, well, right on the line when it comes to the important features dividing the solar system's big planets and dwarfs (and, for that matter, roundish natural satellites such as our moon) from irregular objects such as small asteroids and comets. The researchers say it's closer to a planet than to a typical asteroid, but Schmidt said the most interesting thing about Pallas isn't its precise classification.

"What's more interesting than just the classification is to think of the process," Schmidt said. "What's unique about this object is that it probably stayed almost completely intact from the early days of the solar system. It hasn't been broken up, and there are only a few of those kinds of objects left."

Protoplanets such as Pallas - and Ceres and Vesta - can thus serve as a fossil record for an important time in our solar system's development. "They were not only the building blocks of planets, but they're also what planets looked like for a short period of time," Schmidt said. "They just never really got to form into something bigger."


For comparison's sake, Eris' mean radius is an estimated 800 miles (1,300 kilometers); Pluto's is 721 miles (1,153 kilometers); and Earth's is 3,959 miles (6,371 kilometers). All those worlds are thus more than twice as wide as Ceres, Pallas and Vesta.

For more about the planet quest, check out my book, "The Case for Pluto." You can also join the Cosmic Log team by signing up as my Facebook friend or following b0yle on Twitter.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Do we know if there are any worth while materials to be found there in Pallas and other proto-planets?  My thinking is that if we can put enough of them together, we might be able to create a planet and possibly have a place to live there.  Maybe it could be like the astroid in the orginal Star Trek series; a generational ship.  
HMMM?  Mayhaps we get Adastra working on moving the Vermin of Space to the big three (Ceres, Vesta and Pallas) to create something useful in the Belt?

The new ion engine (next model) could really reduce transit times and a bolt-on engine with a nuclear reactor we could properly reorganize things.

We could also make Earth a true planet and clear the orbit of objectionable materials.  Park the junk in one of the L points sort out useful materials and dump the trash into the Sun!

Might also be a good way to scan for advanced civilizations!  Look for "excess" silicon in the solar spectra.  Then hide!  Might not be possible since we've been advertising more and more since Marconi!
When Pluto was "demoted", causing angst among a lot of people who should know better, someone on the New Horizon's probe team (which should get to Pluto in about 6 years) was asked if it mattered. The answers was "no, regardless of what it's called, Pluto is still there".

Dwarf planet, asteroid, proto-planet...whatever makes you pleased.  They're all rare, special places - in the universe any place that is not essentially a vacuum is the exception, and worth study.
Moving 5 Quintillion kilograms doesn't sound super easy, but maybe a solar sail could be made from the material in the asteroids.  Also, does anyone think this thing looks a little like "The Death Star"?  Anyone else worried that ol' Darth is just biding his time?  The citizens of Alderon never saw it coming!  :)
Schmidt conducted a wonderful, very informative presentation on Pallas and Vesta at the Great Planet Debate in Laurel, MD in August 2008. It seems we may need yet another classification for these protoplanets that are not quite planets yet far more like planets than like the asteroids with which they are currently classified.

Ed, the demotion of Pluto was wrong, as it was done in a highly flawed process and via the creation of a very poor planet definition, so those of us who rejected the decision had and continued to have very strong scientific reasons for doing so. Blurring the categories between objects that are very different (eg, those in hydrostatic equilibrium and those not) and artificially limiting the number of planets in our solar system just to avoid having a large number are bad science and very good reason for opposition.
Wouldn't it be something with the development of technology over the next 500 years that the future generations begin a massive Terraforming project.   Building ships the size of small moons then extracting the water and mineral deposits from the larger protoplanets and Oort Cloud objects.  

The next 500 years will be exciting.
For what it's worth, I hope the next 500 years aren't nearly as exciting as the last 500...
nice computer model....shows we need more rovers!!...call it what you want...by it's size I will call it "a small planet in formation"...what the next billion years will bring who knows...messing with plutos classification was an arrogant move, maybe to sell more books, either way, pluto gets a grandfather clause in all but the most ignorant of scientists and will eventually be promoted back to planetary status, even by thier own methods...the universe is STILL forming (but do not tell them, you might obsolete someones book)...messing with the orbit of pallas might not be smart.  Sometime down the road when mankind really needs it, it should be there.  Of course, tossing other asteriods at it now to move the orbit in and add more mass does sound like dumb fun!!  anyone measure it's temperature lately? (love cranking you green-folk...hehe)
I don't know why there are no satellites in orbit around such things and answering a lot of questions that have been asked for at least 50 years. Why would they fly by comets but not orbit this object or Ceres?
Strange priorites indeed.
The next 500 years will be exciting

Unfortunatly, we won't be able to see the exciting bits...
Wouldn't it be nice if NASA were to take all the money they spend on useless research and feed the homeless and hungry in America?
Interesting article Alan!  Nice to see those old Hubble photos of Pallas get processed finally.  Amazing how much we've learned about our solar system in the past few decades.
If we could develop the proper technology, the asteroid belt could be a great source of minerals and metals. Europa, if it doesn't have indigenous life, could be mined for water for an increasingly thirsty Earth. Or, alternatively, we could just control our numbers and learn to live within our planetary means. Not as exciting, but a whole lot cheaper!  
LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEXT 500 YEARS, THE PAST 500 YEARS WERE PRITTY BORING. BIN THERE, DUNE THAT!!!
Gathering useful materials for use in orbit. . . is within our knowledge, maybe within our wisdom. . . Where small changes can be observed over extended times. Think of how humans started global warming.
Think of human/scince growth events. Now we see what we have done; now we see how to avoid and promote events of our chosing. Redaing from "Thom's" comment; Thom, the old term was "ROCKETS OR RICKETS". Go back and look at our welfair state. People through out hist who have been intrusted with helping, spending public money, using power. . . what happened? Real science and not ego helps humans. Go back and study the US Welfair system. My tax money needs to go to people who really want to help. Please understand that only things/materals go into space. Money and knowledge are shared here, on earth. Microchips help people hear, walk, pump blood, and thousands of other things people take for granted. SO.... lets go look, touch, gather, study. . .  but for now leave planet building for god.
Oh, Thom Floyd, how silly and short-sighted of you.  Don't you realize that you wouldn't even be commenting here if it weren't for NASA'S "useless" research that made the internet possible?  NASA's "useless" research has been fundamental to our nation's economic, technological, and military superiority.  

The problem of homelessness and hunger in America has everything to do with politics and money, and nothing to do with research funding.  That is where the problem truly originates: with the politicians and lobbyists in DC who don't actually believe in helping the poor and the homeless.

I have no doubt that the hard-working folks at NASA, if given the problem, could come up with successful solutions, but any recommendations they made would be halted at the intersection of Politics, Partisanship, Ideology and Money. Put the blame where it belongs.
the gods havent talked with man yet these planets or asteroids caught in orbit will be a safe haven for the ones running to save man kind  like lice looking for more ground to cover from its dead host, the dead will have nothing to worry   but the living will wish they were ,global warming will be a test for coastal citys just think of all the wars that will be ended and the fight for more promised lands to die for
but i still say CLONE [ME]  i want to see stars after my death
Wow, fighting for your life, struggling ceaselessly to survive is boring... Who knew?!
Listen Thom, not to quash your argument, but maybe we could feed our homeless b not spending what we do on a war in a country where the population hates us. I see the need to help some of the homeless, but there are some people on welfare who just do it because they are too lazy to work and that's how they were raised. No statistics needed here I have had those people tell me first hand. Little girls getting knocked up at 12-16 to get started with their lives. Help those with a reason to need help the rest can be sorted out b natural selection. Spend the rest of that money on space research.
Here we go again, real simple, Pluto is and will continue to be the 9th planet, Eris is the 10th.
If we can get the right type of drives to get us out there we can strip mine Protoplanets and asteriods insted of our Homeworld. Just think of the new industries and jobs that whould create.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2092402

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google