ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Xombie rocket goes the distance

Posted: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:13 PM by Alan Boyle


X Prize Foundation via AP
Masten Space Systems' Xombie rocket rises from its pad at California's Mojave Air
and Space Port during Wednesday's Lunar Lander Challenge flight.

Masten Space Systems' Xombie rocket has prevailed in its second attempt to qualify for a $150,000 rocket prize from NASA. The first attempt, back on Sept. 16, ended at the halfway point of the required round trip due to an engine leak, but today the rocket went the full distance.

The prize is being offered through the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge, a competition that was set up with NASA backing to encourage the development of new rocket technologies. Xombie was built to go after the second prize in what's known as the Level 1 competition. (Texas-based Armadillo Aerospace won the $350,000 first prize last year.)

To qualify for the $150,000, the alcohol-fueled rocket had to take off from a starting pad in California's Mojave Desert, rise up to a height of more than 160 feet (50 meters), hover for at least 90 seconds and then land on another pad for refueling. All that was done - and then Xombie retraced its steps through the air, back to the starting point.

Xombie satisfied all the requirements, hanging in the air for 91 seconds on the way home.

"We flew us a rocket ship!" David Masten, the team's leader and chief executive officer of Masten Space Systems, was quoted as saying.

Will Pomerantz, who is managing the Lunar Lander Challenge as director of space prizes for the X Prize Foundation, said Xombie came within 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) of its target on the pad for its final landing. Doug Graham, a spokesman for Masten Space Systems, told me that the average accuracy for today's two landings was around 16 centimeters (6.3 inches).

In its own Twitter update, NASA's Centennial Challenges program confirmed that Xombie's qualifying flight was "successfully complete."


NGLLC / X Prize Foundation
The Masten Space Systems team gathers around their Xombie rocket. Team leader David Masten is standing in the middle with his arms folded. XCOR Aerospace's Randall Clague holds the Xombie mascot as he kneels in front.

Masten and his teammates still have to wait until the end of the month to find out whether any of their competitors for the $150,000 prize - California-based Unreasonable Rocket or BonNovA - can do better.

The same goes for Armadillo Aerospace, which qualified for the challenge's more ambitious $1 million Level 2 prize last month. Masten, Unreasonable Rocket and BonNova are going after Level 2 prizes as well. (Second prize is $500,000.)

Graham said that if Masten and his team could maintain the kind of accuracy they achieved today during their upcoming Level 2 flight, "they'll beat Armadillo" for the million dollars. The best thing about today's outing was that it proved there's more than one prizeworthy competitor out there.

"Now it's no longer a one-man show," Graham said.

David Masten himself voiced that sentiment in a statement distributed by the Commercial Spaceflight Federation: "The Xombie's flights have established Masten Space Systems as a serious competitor. This is not just good for Masten, but good news for the commercial spaceflight industry. It shows that we have grown to the point that many teams now have the skills to build and fly successful rockets." 

Although the contest is called the Lunar Lander Challenge, the point of the exercise is not so much to produce an actual moon lander as it is to push ahead technologies that could be used in future suborbital or even orbital spacecraft. Such rockets could be useful for passenger space tourism as well as cut-rate space research.


To follow the action, search for the #NGLLC tag on Twitter. This item was last updated at 9:10 p.m. ET. 

Join the Cosmic Log team by signing up as my Facebook friend or following b0yle on Twitter. And reserve your copy of my book, "The Case for Pluto," which is coming out this month.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Congratulations to the Masten team!  It was a beautiful pair of flights- as the old saying goes, the hard part is to make it look easy!
Good business model.  This is how the Warp Drive was invented.  :)
This work has far greater implications than simply space tourism or cheap space research. If VTVL rockets can fly 100 pound payloads to a rotating zylon skyhook then a cloud of 60,000 solar powersats can be deployed that will beam down countless megawatts of energy from geosynchronous orbit. Cheap renewable clean space solar power can end the burning of fossil all fuels on earth. It would be the most disruptive technology ever put to useful purpose by mankind. Cheap access to space will have been achieved, the "holy grail of spaceflight".
I don't get the excitement. There is a huge difference in scale between 160 feet and NEO. With GPS, a steerable rocket engine and  some accelerometers and a good software program and I could get a Buick to fly for 90 seconds and come back to the pad.
Where is internet video available of the Xombie flight?
Cheers to Masten and his Team Members.
R McD Seattle, WA .... Instead of running your mouth about how this is no big feet, and about what you could acomplish; just post us a video of you and your amazing flying Buick. Until that happens, stop posting ridiculous claims.
Try youtube under xombie rocket!!
"With GPS, a steerable rocket engine and  some accelerometers and a good software program and I could get a Buick to fly for 90 seconds and come back to the pad."

Saying it in a few words (essentially correct though your words are) and actually dong it (repeatedly), are two different things, as Armadillo and Masten have learned...
But where is Zefram Cochrane?
Amazing there is always someone who posts comments about how they dont see the big deal, this isnt news, that they themselves could do the same or better... but I dont see you getting stories written about you, and I dont see you achieving anything.
In regards to the flying Buick comment above:  I'd really like to see such a contraption that could be built for a price cheaper and be able to land with more accuracy than what these guys have been able to accomplish here with this task.  Sure, if you had a billion dollars on an open-ended cost-plus contract, you might be able to get anything to fly.

Masten deserves kudos first for doing this on a limited budget that has no guarantee of any sort of financial reward of any kind, and has paid for everything to this point on their own dime.  Only upon actually "winning" the prize are they going to be able to collect, and even that still isn't guaranteed.  They got a good shot at winning for this year, but that is hardly a business case.

What this accomplishment proves is that you can fly in space and do that cheaply, if necessary.  The vehicle that accomplishes the task of the LLC level 2 prize (which Armadillo Aerospace has already completed and which Masten is going to make a shot for shortly) will have a vehicle that is capable of going from lunar orbit to landing on the surface of the Moon, and then be able to return to a lunar orbit rendezvous.  In the history of mankind, there have been only two vehicle types and seven vehicles total that have ever accomplished this task.  Both the Masten and the Armadillo vehicles can be scaled up to accomplish this task as manned vehicles as well.

Big deal?  Yeah, I'd say.  These are guys using today's technology and current research ideas that could be used for a great many future projects that can happen in space.  As a demonstrator vehicle, they've certainly shown that they have the engineering skills capable of making something useful and meaningful in terms of spaceflight.  A trip to low-earth orbit is not the only task that needs to be done in that environment.
For R McD...if it was that easy to make a Buick fly, why didn't YOU do it and claim all that prize money? Having watched the process up close, I can testify that it's not as easy as it looks!
A small accomplishment blown out of proportion to it's worth Alan.  A small insignificant step compared to what NASA does.  Wake me up when they reach space or the moon, something to really brag about.
R McD,

Good luck with your level 2 attempt.  I look forward to seeing your Buick fly, land precisely, and do it again.  What will you do with the million dollars?

Best regards,

Mike Garceau
MSS
Good on ya!  Competition is a good thing.
To R McD: Uh, then do it, but excuse me if I don't wait.
@ R McD in Seattle:

You are right, there is a big difference between 160ft and NEO. But development of these types of technologies happens in phases - steps - and this is one. The big deal is that competition of this sort can drive innovation like no other force.

I'd suggest, if you can get a Buick to fly in the same manner as Masten's rocket, you should enter into the competition. Then maybe the next manned vehicle to land on the Moon will be a 2008 Buick Enclave (certified used, of course).

Dear Chris Dann,
Xombie rocket's spectacular flight was chronicled nicely on the You Tube video.  I want to see the rocket being fueled.

"A small accomplishment blown out of proportion to it's worth Alan.  A small insignificant step compared to what NASA does.  Wake me up when they reach space or the moon, something to really brag about."


Could NASA have done this on this kind of money? Even the DC-X wasn't originally a NASA project, it began under DARPA and cost less than $60 million USD.

On the other hand, NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center *has* recently seen fit to do something similar...

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2009/09/19/picture-nasas-lunar-lander-test-bed/

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/multimedia/photos/2009/robotic_lunar_lander.html

...And, Boeing and Masten are already collaborating on planetary lander studies:

http://selenianboondocks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Boeing_AIAA-2009-6571.pdf

http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=15423

...So maybe they see something in this that you don't?

(Not that one *needs* vindication by NASA or a big-name aerospace company, for an idea to be worth pursuing, but it's good to see them get on board, nevertheless.)
At last multiple truly low cost high flight rate reusable rocket vehicles have been demonstrated, something that NASA could never do. To me this accomplishment out shines Apollo, the shuttle and even spaceshipone, which were all mere technological demonstrations at exorbitant cost.

This deserves a truly big congratulations to all involved, the world has just changed. A sustainable space fairing future has finally become possible. This is the netscape moment, the tipping point, a time of great excitement!
The responses to R McD show that most people still don't know flame-bait when they see it.

Nasa would spend millions on paper alone before even thinking about real hardware. Its why they are still in low orbit 40 years after Apollo. Congrats to this team, maybe its time to get rid of the paper maker known as Nasa and start letting the Scaled composites,Armadillo and Masten's take us to Space.
To put this into perspective, the Level 2 flight (180 seconds airborne time, refuel, then 180 seconds more) is equal to the total engine impulse required to descend from Lunar orbit to the surface and then lift off again. For comparison, the round trip (total delta-v equivalent of about four thousand meters per second) is just under half of what is required to reach orbit from Earth's surface. In other words, if you could accomplish the Level 2 challenge without having to refuel at midpoint, then you're halfway to reaching Earth orbit.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2091980

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google