ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



DNA twisted into pretzels

Posted: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:40 PM by Alan Boyle


H. Dietz / TUM
This schematic shows some of the
nanoscale shapes made from DNA.
Click on the image for larger view.

Scientists are improving their technique for bending DNA into origami shapes. The latest twist uses custom-made chemicals to turn bunches of molecules into smoothly curving circlets and gears - a trick that eventually could set the stage for practical nanomachines.

DNA origami is a technique for folding the double helixes into programmed patterns. Some of the experiments have produced whimsical demonstrations such as a microscopic "happy face" or a map of the Americas. But the purpose behind all this is not mere child's play.

"Instead of just programming abstract software, we're programming matter," Harvard biochemist William Shih, one of the researchers behind the latest yoga tricks, told me today.

Shih and his colleagues - Harvard's Shawn Douglas and Hendrik Dietz of the Technische Universität München in Germany - report on their efforts in Friday's issue of the journal Science.

Previous tricks have taken advantage of angular bends in chemical bonds to create structures that "staple" themselves together with strands of DNA. In May, for example, Danish researchers unveiled nanoscale boxes made in this manner, complete with locks and keys.


Science
This graphic shows how bundles of DNA molecules can be bent. Base pairs are removed from the orange strands of DNA, and added to the blue strands.

These new twists use the same type of readily available raw material: DNA from a virus that commonly infects bacteria, a critter known as M13.

The stapling technique, however, is different. Instead of twisting off at a sudden angle, the stapled-together bundles of DNA strands are chemically tweaked in such a way that base pairs are inserted in one strand, or removed in a different strand. In this way, the molecular bundles can be programmed to take on gradual curves or twists.

The biochemists behind the Science research did almost as good a job as Mother Nature: Inside the cell, DNA molecules can loop themselves into curls with a radius of about 4.5 nanometers. In comparison, the artificial structures had a minimum radius of 6 nanometers. Among the resulting shapes was a beachball-shaped latticework measuring just 50 nanometers wide.

The rounded curves and twists are the latest additions to a growing nanotech toolbox. "The DNA origami method is only three years old, so there hasn't been that much time for people to explore," Shih said. "We didn't realize how flexible, how malleable DNA is."

Now the big challenge is to reduce the defect rate for DNA self-assembly. Shih said his team's molecule-programming technique produces the desired shapes only 25 to 50 percent of the time. At the current scale, that's not such a problem, but if the technology is scaled up to create more complex structures, the defects would ruin any type of nanomachine you tried to make.

"We currently cannot build something intricate such as an ant's leg or, much smaller, a 10-nanometer-small chemical planet such as a protein enzyme," Dietz said in today's news release about the research. "We expect many benefits if only we could build super-miniaturized devices on the nanoscale using materials that work robustly in the cells of our bodies - biomolecules such as DNA."

One of the ways to reduce the defect rate might be to use biological processes rather than artificial chemistry to program the DNA molecules. "It's great chemistry, but you can't compete with enzymes," Shih explained.

"As engineers, we have to solve the same problems that nature has solved," he said. "We're optimistic that this will be possible."

Shih said he and his colleagues take their inspiration from the development of integrated-circuit technology, where small but steady advances have led to exponential increases in reliability and complexity.

He said the research has already yielded one piece of "low-lying fruit" - an artificially tweaked molecular structure that can shepherd protein molecules into a particular orientation for analysis. Once the protein molecules take on a non-random orientation, researchers can use nuclear magnetic resonance imaging to gain more information about how those molecules are folded. That could lead to better 3-D models for membrane protein structure, and better medications as well.

Looking farther down the road, Shih said nanomachines made from DNA could help build electronic (or plasmonic) circuitry, extending Moore's Law to molecular scales.

They could also deliver drugs or therapeutic genetic material directly into the cell. After all, the masters of molecular origami use DNA from a virus that does the same sort of thing for darker purposes.

"Things like viruses have evolved over millions of years to solve these problems," Shih said. "We'd like to be able to approach the efficiency with which viruses deliver their cargo to cells, but do it in a safer way."

More about nano-tricks:


Join the Cosmic Log team by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. And reserve your copy of my upcoming book, "The Case for Pluto."  You can pre-order it from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or Borders.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Well this is an article that sure wasn't expected Alan.  I'm still struggling with paper origami and scientists are learning how to ply DNA with origami.  It will prove interesting in future years as scientists figure out how enzymes do their magic act and it will be interesting to see what pruposes they can use for the DNA origami trick.
Really cool stuff from an engineering viewpoint, but just how do they envision protecting these "naked" DNA structures from the body and the enzymes inside cells if this is where they are to be used?  I would imagine a cell would make mincemeat of a complex DNA machine, since they already have natural defenses against free roaming genetic material.  Biomolecules (especially DNA) may have other serious drawbacks for use in cells as well.  There would be a risk of cells responding with inflammatory cytokines and other signaling molecules meant to ward off viral invasion.  This would stress the cells and tissues and would probably defeat the purpose of putting a nano-machine there in the first place assuming they were meant to do some good.  

I would personally keep DNA machines out of biological systems and use them maybe for manufacturing purposes instead unless these problems could be overcome.
here we go again,messing with god
--
the main concern with so small DNA devices (and other nanostructures) is about their "stability" (to chemical agents, stress, radiations, etc.) when it will be used (someday) to build (e.g.) a "nanocomputer"
--
I believe this kind of nanodevices will need a very high level of redundancy and could be not used in aggressive and extreme environments like the Space
--
john doe, viewpoint US (8/6, 1951)
He obviously saw "DNA"

Mike, Long Island, NY (8/6, 1645)
The body probably won't recognize it.  If it does it could be engineered to have shapes recognized as safe.
Anouther link for you with some diagrams http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/04/dna-origami-self-assembled-growth.html . Sounds like some cool technology . So when do we see whearhouses with cloning and culturing set up's for growing new body parts ? Now as far as plasmonics and micro circutry looks like diamond will be used for the new quantum chips . 2 links here http://nanotechweb.org/cws/article/tech/39135 and http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/05/university-of-ulster-scientists-make.html . Oh well looks like I might get to contribute crunch time to a new project, if they use distributed computing like with BOINC .
Hey John Doe,(if I was you I wouldn't usde my real name either) as my believing friends tell me, god will reveal what "he" wants us to know. I guess we're supposed to know this stuff, huh? Besides your god, the genocidal, homophobic, megalomaniacal beast of the old testament, probably knows nothing of DNA anyway?
what in the he** are you guys talking about..I love science but was this article was not meant for the non bio engineer.How does this science help mankind??
How come we can manipulate DNA and observe gamma radiation from a single star that died 13 billion years ago at the edge of the universe, BUT WE CANT MAKE A VIABLE ELECTRIC CAR? Please explain.
Not Playing God, playing with what (your) the things that God gave us, like our imagination, intelligence, the need for determining the intent of such a complex master piece of creation. God or no god, any understanding is better than no understanding.
Maybe we could have organic machines building larger things like carbon nano tube fibers for various applications (space elevator and new body armor).  That would be a good thing for me.  This could also create nanites for medical and toxic waste clean up applications.  I just don't plan on it anytime soon.

Don't you know that socks are carnivorous?

Also do you have a surplus of coat hangers in your closet?

Want to know why?  If they aren't used, they breed
Jamie Charlotte NC (8/7, 1023)
Talking about two things.  First, the ability to manipulate, or build, things on a small scale.  New tech that allows for more shapes than before.  The ability to bend your garden hose around the corner of the house instead of cutting it to length, putting on an end, then a 90, then another hose.  Second, application, this is the helping mankind part.  It could lead to ways to deliver medicine, like pico-doses of poison, to specific cells, like cancer.  Killing the killer cells before they get a chance to kill us.  Or make an antihistamine without groggy side effects.  Or a nose spray that fills in the scent receptors that we find offensive.  Or do any number of small jobs.

Dex Packard
I think I may sometimes find digestive juices still on my feet when I take my shoes off.  Thought it was just sweat.
If you really want to bring up the unrelated we could talk about the way that people who aren’t equipped to take part in a technical conversation bring up absurd asides in an attempt to appear cute instead of stupid.
Or maybe some are just whimsical replies to other posts, such as "Silly mysteries solved."
This stuff is so amazing, that ignorant people will never wrap their brains around it. Thanks for the lesson in physics, chemistry and biology. Never mind the "hallelujah chorus."  They parked their brains in the church vestry!
The Genome Pack At Home


A. "New view reveals how DNA fits into cell"
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/48166/title/New_view_reveals_how_DNA_fits_into_cell
A new technique allows scientists to map the 3-D structure of the entire human genome.

"Now that we know the structure, we can ask questions like, why does it look like this?” Dekker also wants to understand how a gene and a regulatory element find each other in such a dense glob. As of now, “We simply don’t know,” he says.


B. Maybe it looks like this since this configuration is its survival selection

Maybe it looks like this since the genome is a multigenes organism as defined in the

"Updated Life's Manifest May 2009"
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321

Maybe it looks like this since after all there IS something in The Lifehood Of Genes as indicated by the many pieces of the puzzle of lifehood that I've been presenting so many years.

Maybe?...

Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
http://profiles.yahoo.com/blog/2SF3CJJM5OU6T27OC4MFQSDYEU

Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/180/122.page#3108


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2021783

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google