ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Moonwalk video gets a makeover

Posted: Thursday, July 16, 2009 7:01 AM by Alan Boyle


NASA / GSFC
Click for video: A side-by-side comparison shows a frame from NASA's archival
video of Apollo 11's Neil Armstrong making his way down the lunar module's ladder
at left, and a restored version of the same frame at right. Click on the image to
watch a video in which NASA's Dick Nafzger explains the differences in depth.

That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for video restoration.

Forty years after the fact, some of the most historic moments of Apollo 11's televised moonwalk have been brought into sharper focus using computerized image processing techniques.

The black-and-white video still pales in comparison with today's high-definition space extravaganzas, but the experts behind the restoration project emphasize that this is a work in progress. NASA promises that when the restoration of the moonwalk video is complete, the public will see "the highest-quality video of this historic event."

How TV was done in 1969
Samples of the restored video - including Apollo 11 commander Neil Armstrong's climb down the lunar module's ladder, his "one small step" onto the lunar surface and the raising of the American flag - were released today at the Newseum in Washington to commemorate the 1969 moon mission. Today marks the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11's launch, and on Monday it will be 40 years to the day since Armstrong and crewmate Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon.

The first TV pictures from another world were captured by a small camera mounted on a hinged assembly on the Apollo 11 lunar module. When Armstrong stepped out onto the module's platform, he swung the assembly into position - setting up the view of the astronauts on the ladder and footpad. Later in the moonwalk, Armstrong removed the camera from the assembly and mounted it on a tripod for scenes such as the flag-raising.

The TV signal was transmitted from the moon using a special slow-scan video format, which had to be converted into the standard broadcast format at downlink stations in Australia (as immortalized in the movie "The Dish") and California. Then the standard signal was relayed to NASA and broadcasters around the world.

The restoration brings out additional details in the fuzzy video that Americans saw on their television sets on July 20, 1969, and at the same time smooths out the electronic "snow" in the picture. When Armstrong steps down the ladder, for instance, his visor and the outline of his spacesuit can be seen within the shadows - something that most viewers couldn't see nearly as well 40 years ago.

'Lost' tapes may be lost for good
Today's announcement blended some bad news with the good news: For years, video sleuths have been looking for the cleaner slow-scan view of the moonwalk, which had been saved on tape during the mission. NASA engineer Dick Nafzger and others crossed the globe, searching for those "lost" tapes, but came up empty-handed.

"The slow-scan recordings are no longer," Nafzger said.

Nafzger explained that the video was preserved as one track on a 14-track magnetic tape that also recorded telemetry from the Apollo 11 mission. "This is the only time in the Apollo program we recorded television on a telemetry tape," he said.

After the flight, about 45 tapes thought to contain the slow-scan moonwalk video data were archived as part of a 200,000-tape inventory that NASA kept at Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland. Through the years, the archive's managers would determine which tapes were no longer needed. Those tapes would be erased and reused for telemetry from the missions that followed.

Nafzger surmised that the tapes with the slow-scan data were put into the queue for reuse and eventually were recorded over - perhaps even during a later Apollo or Skylab flight. Because the tapes were primarily used for telemetry, it's likely that no one at the time realized that they were erasing the best video record of the Apollo 11 moonwalk, Nafzger said.

There's still one ray of hope, however: Nafzger and his fellow sleuths discovered that an experiment in slow-scan TV conversion was being conducted at the Parkes Observatory in Australia at the time of the moonwalk, and that two slow-scan tapes might have been made during the moonwalk. "These two tapes, consisting of an hour each, approximately, are still missing. ... they're not in the system," Nafzger said.

Doing something for history
So if the "lost tapes" are still lost, how was the restoration done? Nafzger said he and the rest of his team were "desperate to do something for history if we could." In the course of their search, they turned up some broadcast-quality imagery that hadn't been seen in nearly 40 years. Some of it came from CBS News, some came from the National Archives, some came from Australia. Some of it even came from an 8mm wind-up film camera that was held up and aimed at a video monitor at NASA's Mission Control Center.


NASA / GSFC
Apollo 11's Buzz Aldrin looks somewhat sharper in a
frame from a restored version of NASA video from
the moon landing on July 20, 1969.

NASA digitized the imagery and enlisted California-based Lowry Digital to do some heavy-duty reprocessing. Lowry's technique has been compared to "digital botox." Its proprietary software analyzes each frame of video and selects the best pixels for an averaged-out, smoothed-out, cleaned-up version. 

The technique was pioneered back in 1971 by company founder John Lowry, when it was used to restore film from the Apollo 16 and 17 missions. More recently, Lowry has lent a hand with restoring classic movies such as "Casablanca" and "Citizen Kane," and sweetening up the visuals for contemporary films such as the Oscar-nominated Brad Pitt movie, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button."

NASA set strict limits on how much restoration could be done. The first part of the complete moonwalk video will be upside down, just as it was when it was aired in 1969. Dust on the lens and internal reflections are being left in as well. "We could make these images 'perfect,' but at a certain point you begin to lose authenticity," Patrick Edquist, Lowry's project manager for the restoration, said in a company statement.

During today's briefing, Nafzger was asked whether asking a company with Hollywood connections to restore the video might give more ammunition to moon-hoax conspiracy theorists. In response, he pointed out that Lowry's roots with NASA go even deeper than its roots with Hollywood. "I don't care where they're from. This company is restoring historic video," Nafzger said. "This particular company has a history with NASA. ... There couldn't be a more perfect match."

He emphasized that the Apollo 11 restoration project has only been in the works for a few weeks, and estimated that the restoration was about 40 percent complete. The costs are being covered by a $230,000 contract that Lowry has with NASA. NASA says the complete moonwalk video should be ready for release in HD format in September.

Nafzger acknowledged that the quality in the 1969 broadcast, and most likely in the restored video as well, could have been better. "Some of the degradation that you saw was not necessary," he said. But he pointed out that getting a great picture was not the first priority at the time.

"The goal was to land and come back safely," he said. "It was not television."

Update for 5:45 p.m. ET: Here's a video from ITN that delves into another Apollo 11 restoration project. The documentary "Moonwalk One" was commissioned by NASA to chronicle the Apollo 11 mission, but fizzled out when it made the rounds in the early 1970s. Recently the original footage was remastered and reissued in a "director's cut" version. Good thing the director had the original 35mm film sitting in boxes under his desk for all those years.

Update for 6:50 p.m. ET: The Associated Press' Seth Borenstein passes along the dismayed reactions from outside historians to today's good-news/bad-news report:

"It's surprising to me that NASA didn't have the common sense to save perhaps the most important historical footage of the 20th century," said Rice University historian and author Douglas Brinkley. He noted that NASA saved all sorts of data and artifacts from Apollo 11, and it is "mind-boggling that the tapes just disappeared."

The remastered copies may look good, but "when dealing with historical film footage, you always want the original to study," Brinkley said.

Smithsonian Institution space curator Roger Launius, a former NASA chief historian, said the loss of the original video "doesn't surprise me that much."

"It was a mistake, no doubt about that," Launius said. "This is a problem inside the entire federal government. ... They don't think that preservation is all that important."

Launius said federal warehouses where historical artifacts are saved are "kind of like the last scene of `Raiders of the Lost Ark.' It just goes away in this place with other big boxes."

Update for 8:15 p.m. ET: Don't miss this "Nightly News" report from NBC News' Tom Costello about the moonwalk makeover, with commentary from anchor Brian Williams (as well as an anchorman from the past, David Brinkley).

More about moon imagery:

More about the Apollo 11 anniversary: 


Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. If you really want to be friendly, ask me about my upcoming book, "The Case for Pluto."  You can pre-order it from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or Borders.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Looking more and more like the Mojava desert. Can't you see the cactus in the background?
Will the restored video still include an astronaut with a Hasselblat camera with no lense filters or protection against cosmic rays hanging from his neck?   It is the best evidence the video was made by Stanley Kubrick and  crew at Kubrick's 2001 Space Odessey movie set, in London.
I thought Michael Jackson was the first to do the moonwalk!
This moon video 'redone', starting at 1:53 on the American flag star field to the 2:00 minute mark - it looks like the presidential portrait of President Obama!!
When I saw this title, I thought it was about Michael Jackson but it ended up something else!  The title is misleading!

[ALAN ADDS: Michael who?]
So thay are filling in all the mistakes made of the false landing
The snow, the fuzziness--all of that was part of what I saw, what the world saw, that day; that was part of the history of it. A restoration should restore, not enhance. A painting or building restoration aims to restore its subject back to its original condition, not improve on it. On the other hand, this so-called video restoration does no such thing; it is an invention, an algorithmic simulation of what we television witnesses might have seen with slightly better technology on that historic day. The original video was perfect as it was, precisely because it was the original.
Great opening line Alan and wonderful story about how the Apollo video is being digitized and upgraded to better quality.  I remember being jazzed at seeing the whole thing unfold in black and white with crummy picture quality, now we wouldn't put up with that kind of low quality video.  It's nice to see the video get an extreme makeover so that current and future generations can enjoy seeing what we saw so long ago.
so rather than "finding" the "lost" superior images of the moon landing that they have "misplaced" for forty years, we'll choose to enhance the bad images we payed billions of dollars to shoot on the moon. Great, that makes all the sense in the world.

I'm still a bit curious as to WHO actually TOOK the video in the first place? I've always assumed a camera was perched on one of the other landing "limbs" but that then raises questions about why NASA would have placed such a crappy camera there to capture such a historical event, AND, just why the rest of the videos and pictures are EQUALLY lousy?

[ALAN ADDS: Right, many other people are very familiar with this Apollo lore and will probably correct me, but the camera showing the ladder view was mounted on a "door" that Armstrong flipped down when he was on the lunar module platform. The camera was 1960s vintage, of course, so it wasn't that great. The team behind the transmissions marveled that it worked at all. Also, there was a conversion process in getting the signal from the radio downlink to the rest of the world that degraded quality.]

Let's face it, if they find a lunar rover on the moon, some of us will be bummed out. A moonhoax pulled off by our government would be much more impressive than actually landing there.  
I'm confused, I thought I had just read a story in the last month or two stating that the missing original tapes from Australia had been finally found.

I'm sure this project was started long before those original tapes were found however... the article doesn't clearly state whether this restoration project is working on the recently located original tapes or whether they started with the standard fuzzy Apollo 11 footage we've watched for decades.
It is great that they can get better resolution on these.  I can't wait for more people to get to the moon.  

I love all these people who claim that it was faked.  They will never be convinced that it actually happened no matter what they are told or shown. They might as well believe that the Earth is flat and all the items in the sky are fakes.
It's wierd that that as Aldrin steps down the ladder you see the horizon proceed right through his leg and body. Also toward the end of the clip when you see the whole LEM, the horizon is visible passing through the right portion of it.

I have always wondered how that can be. It's a funny effect on the video. I see it all the time whenever I view it.

Why is it that in the footage of Neil stepping onto the Moon surface, we are able to see through his legs and view the background very clearly? His legs look transparent...I am not questioning the validity just want to understand if there is a lens effect from the old cameras causing this or perhaps the video cleanup process.

[ALAN ADDS: This was mentioned during the news conference. The "ghostly" or "ethereal" effect is related to the conversion from the slow-scan to the standard signal. Here's what TVTechnology.com says about it:]

In order to provide video to the estimated 600 million persons watching that evening, NASA also had special standards converters constructed for each of the tracking stations that would be in acquisition with the lunar lander. As electronic components weren’t nearly so sophisticated then, the converters relied on simple optical conversion─a standard NTSC television camera trained on the screen of a special slow-scan monitor being fed with the lowered line number and frame rate video.

While this simple conversion tactic worked, it was far from satisfactory. Contrast was blocked up and a large amount of noise and other distortion was added to the video. The overall effect could be described as rather “ghostly” or “ethereal,” especially when coupled to the unnatural presentation of motion caused by the reduced frame rate.

http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/84074

[By the way, the Clavius Web site is a great resource for debunking moon-hoax conspiracy theories:]

http://www.clavius.org/index.html

 

Thanks! I can't wait to see us get the lunar environments built and placed on the lunar surface to allow the astronauts/scientists to live on the surface for an extaned period of time. After that we can do the same on Mar's. Too bad it takes time and money.
I am just curious why it's taking them so long to get back to the moon!
With all the access high quality news people have to government files, at least one of them  would have “made the big story” besides the tabloids.  Makes you wonder what some people use for brains if they think this was a hoax.
"I thought Michael Jackson was the first to do the moonwalk!"

The sad thing is that's the only 'moonwalk' a whole generation knows about.


"Will the restored video still include an astronaut with a Hasselblat camera with no lense filters or protection against cosmic rays hanging from his neck?"


And your reasons for thinking a camera needs 'cosmic ray protection' is...?

When you can point to some peer-reviewed research showing that the intensity of galactic cosmic rays is such that exposure for the length of a Lunar mission is at or even close to lethal levels, I'll listen to you.


"I am just curious why it's taking them so long to get back to the moon!"

The same reason we stopped to begin with. (we did not originally intend to stop, you know...we didn't even fly the last three missions we already *had* the hardware for)

Money.

Rapidly bored public that was also occupied with Vietnam, the Cold War and other 60's stress (with Soviet adversaries who faked *disinterest* in sending men to the Moon, once they knew they couldn't do it first...and a lot of people who believed them). No public support means no Congressional support. No bucks, no Buck Rogers. No post-Apollo Lunar exploration. (You couldn't even *whisper* Mars in those winding-down days, even though we originally meant to get there on nuclear rockets in the early-to-mid 1980's.)

Of the three last Saturn Fives meant for the Moon, one launched Skylab instead, the others became lawn ornaments at KSC and JSC.

(Although today, now that we've actually decided to go back, the question is also, what's the best *way* to do it...and that debate *also* has a big funding component.)
I was not alive when the first moon landing occurred but i've always been a fan of space and astronomy. I would like for us to get back to the moon but I know it would not be the same. First back them every tv station was showing this moon landing and I think it brought America together now everyone has their own agenda and while I will be watching (if any station shows it) with amazment I know that all of America would not be involved the way it was before. I wonder if any thing could bring America together again? I truly hope so and I do love this country I just think we have lost our way a liitle bit and wish we could find it again. GO NASA!!!!
All I want is for them to point Hubble at the moon and take some actual pictures of landing site. Or can a land based telescope see this?
To all the idiots who still believe moonlanding was a hoax, eat your s**t now:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31966131/ns/technology_and_science-space/
Of course now you will say it was Photoshopped !
'"The goal was to land and come back safely," he [Nafzger] said. "It was not television."'  That's an aspect of the Moon landing that I don't think anybody foresaw even in 1968--that they would be broadcast live (with about a one second delay due to the distance of the Moon from the Earth).  NASA was taking a chance; if something had gone wrong, we would have witnessed the death of the astronauts.  And of course the TV cameras and transmitters added to the weight.
The Apollo rocket that carried astraunauts to the moon was a briliant achievement,one day future generations will refer to it as the first step that open the path to another planet with an ambient similar to our little EARTH that is becoming overcrowded poluted and miserable.

The landing was a hoax. NASA wanted a pyschological edge over the Soviets and thats why they came up with this fake video. Stanley Kubric was hired to film this.
Hey Alonso,
I was wondering if Nasa could possibly give the coordinates of the moon landings to another country's telescope (say russia or china) and that way they we can    make sure that even the images they're releasing today isnt another attempt to cover up the cover up .. dont u think ?!
Old encyclopedias list the moon temperature 350 degrees F.  In other words, about the temperature you bake a cake.  And in shadows, it was -250 degrees.  The space clothing (as listed on the Internet) was made of several layers of spandex and nylon, etc.  I don't think I'd want to step into the oven in that. The new encyclopedias omit mentioning the temperature on the moon.  Reader's Digest, march 2009 has an article about trying to invent a boot that will withstand moon temperatures.  I wonder why they can't just wear their PF Flyers like they did before.
some pepoles here are say that is imposiple walk at the moon watt is your opnion
Why cant they just admit they never went to the moon? Lets face it, the moon fiasco is probably the biggest and most idiotic lie in history.
NASA did not save (DESTROYED) the tape AFTER it was determined that mordern technology and analysis would determine it was FAKED!
My sister do not believe that happened,and we all saw it, her question is why the flag moves if is no gravity in the moon?
Rubbish... all of it. This was filmed in the Bronx. they were lucky they didn't fall of the edge of the planet when they filmed. Must have been quite a feat!

Lets see ,how they alter the video this time , by hiding the mistakes previously made in the video, using the technology and equipment they will try to make it a real moonwalk this time .
Michal Jackson will remain the greatest, Rest in peace Michal  
There's actually a very good episode of Myth busters that goes through and debunks EVERY single one of the conspiracy theories surrounding the 'hoax'.  The flag actually doesn't move like it is in a wind but how it would in the moons gravity.
Has anyone noticed the stick or rod at the top of the American flag that holds the flag out and still?  You can see the impression right through the material.
If this was a hoax our government had to do whatever it took to have a psychological edge or advantage over it's competition; every country in technology and in other fields.  Tactics like these, if this was a "hoax" is the reason USA is the world leader in just about everything out there.    
Wow to all of you who think that this thing was a hoax. the leg thing is strange, but i dont think that this was some government trick just to pretend that we beat the russians to the moon. it was not THAT big of a deal.
what I want to know is how did they get past Van Allen radiation belts? The site mentioned above about debunking the hoax, mentions nothing scientific, just things about the recording.  The russians stated that the radition was so bad that you could see it penterating the eye sockets. IT fried them and they never attempted another launch.
You kidding me ??????
I agree with Dustin in San Antonio its a shame Americans have drifted so far apart. I also wish we could be one nation again. My father worked for TWA at the Cape during the Gemini and Apollo missions. When TWA's contract ended he was given a lot of Memorabilia which included some photos from different missions. I sat and looked through those photos yesterday and realized what they mean to me. The men and women who actually participated in the space program are the only ones who know the truth of what they witnessed. I for one belive what my father saw and heard during those years he worked at the cape. You people who belive it was a hoax are free to keep right on beliving that. But please stop trying to convince me that of all the people on this planet your the only one thats right.
   
"All I want is for them to point Hubble at the moon and take some actual pictures of landing site. Or can a land based telescope see this?"

and...

"I was wondering if Nasa could possibly give the coordinates of the moon landings to another country's telescope (say russia or china) and that way they we can    make sure that even the images they're releasing today isnt another attempt to cover up the cover up .. dont u think ?!"

Anyone who wants to know those coordinates can Google them in less than a minute, as I just did:

http://www.fi.edu/pieces/schutte/landchart.html

But no Earth-based telescope can resolve that kind of detail. Period.

The Hubble Space Telescope can't either, though it has looked at two of the landing areas to learn more about the regional geology:

http://ims.ivv.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_moon.html



"The landing was a hoax. NASA wanted a pyschological edge over the Soviets and thats why they came up with this fake video. Stanley Kubric was hired to film this."

If so, they should demand their money back. We *know* Stan can do better than that, even with the technology of the time...

"what I want to know is how did they get past Van Allen radiation belts?"

Quickly.

I'm serious. ANY spacecraft (and solid-state electronics don't like ionizing radiation, either. The Faster and lower-powered it is, the more that true) boosted to escape velocity isn't going to spend much time cutting across them, and just as well.

You *don't* want to use low-thrust engines (like ion engines) that would have you taking weeks to get up to escape velocity, gradually spiraling out from Earth, spending far too much time within them.

Old concepts for re-entry from deep space that involved multiple passes through the upper atmosphere and going out into an elliptical orbit (radiating heat from the previous entry away) that would get lower with each perigee were not used because those apogees (wherein the ship would be moving at its slowest) would *also* spend too much timein the belts.

But it's NOT like standing in the middle of a reactor. You don't waste time heading out, you're good...

"The site mentioned above about debunking the hoax, mentions nothing scientific,"

The URL, please?

"...just things about the recording.  The russians stated that the radition was so bad that you could see it penterating the eye sockets. IT fried them and they never attempted another launch."

That would be very interesting, considering the Russians NEVER sent a manned flight out where it would cross the belts.

Galactic cosmic rays can occasionally be detected by the closed human eye, but that's got nothing to do with the VanAllen belts.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962Natur.196.1013D

http://www.astronautix.com/details/rad15690.htm
"Old encyclopedias list the moon temperature 350 degrees F.  In other words, about the temperature you bake a cake.  And in shadows, it was -250 degrees.  The space clothing (as listed on the Internet) was made of several layers of spandex and nylon, etc.  I don't think I'd want to step into the oven in that."

Walking on *surfaces* that hot isn't the same as also being surrounded by *air* that's that hot. (ever walked on asphalt that was much hotter than the air?)

Heat can only be transferred by conduction, convection and radiation. Heat from the Lunar surface can reach someone walking on it by reflected sunlight and radiated infrared from its surface, or conduction only through the boots.

If you don't plan on rolling around on the hot surface dust, you'll be okay.

"My sister do not believe that happened,and we all saw it, her question is why the flag moves if is no gravity in the moon?"


One sixth Earth gravity, not none at all...though this has nothing to do with the flag motion, anyway.

Fairly long, thin pole. Horizontal component to hold flag out.

Not waving, vibrating.

No air to help damp down those vibrations through friction.

We've seen ISS solar arrays and a discarded Hubble Solar array do much the same thing...
It's hard to believe any moon landing happened back then when you look at all the material they supposedly used to land/walk on the moon with (is that tinfoil wrapped around the legs of the landing unit?), which, to the eyes of people today, look like trashy props from an old B-grade science fiction movie.  It's funny that people put it into the region of crazy conspiracy theories while the same people would probably want to call someone with a tinfoil hat on their head crazy.  It's difficult to believe it because it seems unlikely for several reasons and most of us common people have no means to prove it, but it's also difficult to believe in conspiracies or outrageous claims because of the few means to disprove it as well.  We might as well just believe what we're told.

That being said, it would make perfect sense that it was a staged event for reasons like the space race against Russia and to raise hopes of the country's folk.  It's nothing new for people to do the wrong thing out of noble reasons.  The fact that they're editing non original material now doesn't help add credibility.
Anyone who believes the moon landing was a hoax is either a latent paranoid, a person with the inability to really think, or a whack job.  Or all of the above.
When I showed the Apollo 17 restored footage at the November 2004 HDEXPO event I co-produced, the audience was amazed by the quality. The original of that was degrading in storage and was originally shot in 8mm film. We showed it in full HDTV quality on a large HDTV projector to a 150 or so audience. Up conversion from a recording of an old broadcast is truly a feat worth congratulating. I know how hard it was to up convert the NTSC of the Shuttle imagery for NASA which I did in 2005 and the Space Ship One NTSC I up converted to HDTV for the HDEXPO.  I do not believe the part about accidentally or purposefully erasing the video but I am sure it turned to vinegar as all old video libraries are, in storage. It is time to save them and up convert our history like these Apollo 11 images. I remember thinking it was amazing at the time. Thanks to President Kennedy for that... and the moon measurement systems developed by the optical scientists at JILA in Boulder, Colorado.

The telescope integration can be done and we are working on that now. There is a lot of nasty competition for "space related funding".

The cosmic radiation in space, deep ultraviolet, destroys equipment and people. It is the reason we are not out there and it is not solved yet. Materials science is the answer to protection but "Cosmic" UV passes all the way down far into the earth, as evidenced by the blue worms found there.

The money and time to space is inflated and purposefully prolonged and many initiatives are overlooked by "winner take all types" who prevent competitors from participating in the money pool for innovation. This is the real problem. Feeding all those executives of big business instead of people with ideas and inspiration. The result is a takeover of Space by China and a few multinationals.
You people who believe the moon landing was a hoax need to get a frikkin'life!!!

Go back to your CAVE.
I have recently seen the Director's Cut of Moonwalk One, and it is absolutely amazing!  It is a vivid time capsule of society at the time of the Apollo 11 space mission.  A must-see film!

I got my copy at amazon.com and have been enjoying it ever since!
I have various opinions about why so many people feel the need to believe the moon landings are a fake.   I’ve settled on “idiocracy”  (yeah, it's spelled how I meant it).  

Just because your puny brains can't comprehend how a shadow casts on the moon, how momentum makes a stiff flag sway for a long time in a vacuum and 1/6th gravity, how camera exposures make it impossible to capture stars in the background while capturing sunlight moon in the foreground, or how anyone can be smarter than you and figure out how to create technology enabling us to walk on the moon doesn't mean it didn't happen.  No wonder the USA is no longer enjoys a huge lead at the forefront of technology and innovation.

Pssst... If you watch the video backward you will notice the reflection of man-like reptiles in Neil's helmet.  You may also notice those reptiles are wearing Illuminati T-shirts, and buttons that say "Next stop: 9/11 2001", and “How do you spell CIA?  A.I.D.S.”


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1997997

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google