ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



New moon vistas revealed

Posted: Thursday, July 02, 2009 1:20 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / GSFC / ASU
This image shows a cratered region near the moon's Mare Nubium (Sea of Clouds)
region, as photographed by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera. Click on
the image for a larger version from NASA's Web site.

Today's first images from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter provide a fresh perspective on the moon, just weeks before the 40th anniversary of the first manned lunar landing.

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, was launched on June 18, along with another probe destined to crash into the moon's south pole - known as the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, or LCROSS.

LRO entered lunar orbit just last week, on the same day that LCROSS transmitted its own first imagery of the moon. Mission managers had figured it would take longer for LRO to send back higher-resolution images worth sharing. However, when they activated the orbiter's cameras for a test on Tuesday, they were surprised to find that the pictures they got back were real stunners.

This YouTube video provides a flyover of the region near Mare Nubium (Sea of Clouds), and there's also a zoomable version of the imagery.

"Our first images were taken along the moon's terminator - the dividing line between day and night - making us initially unsure of how they would turn out," Arizona State University's Mark Robinson, the principal investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, said in today's image advisory.

"Because of the deep shadowing, subtle topography is exaggerated, suggesting a craggy and inhospitable surface," he said. "In reality, the area is similar to the region where the Apollo 16 astronauts safely explored in 1972. While these are magnificent in their own right, the main message is that LROC is nearly ready to begin its mission."

Later today, Robinson explained why the mission team had such low expectations for Tuesday's pictures. "The point of that test was not to take pictures of the lunar surface," he told me. "It was to collect engineering data to make sure that all of our settings are correct for Friday."

Starting Friday, LRO's cameras will be in operation for two and a half days, snapping pictures of some of the lesser-known areas of the moon's far side, Robinson said. Then the cameras will be shut off again for further commissioning. "We still are not completely finished baking out the moisture from the telescope," he said.

By next month, LRO will be in full picture-taking mode, acquiring much sharper views of the lunar surface. The orbiter's camera should be able to make out some of the traces left behind by the Apollo moon missions four decades ago, including lunar module leavings and rover tracks. "I promise you we will get spectacular images of all the Apollo landing sites before all is said and done," Robinson told me.

It's been a whole decade since the last U.S. moon probe smashed into the lunar surface, but it's not as if the moon has been terra incognita over the past few years. Several international spacecraft have been sending back pictures of our nearest celestial neighbor - including Europe's SMART-1, China's Chang'e 1, India's Chandrayaan 1 and Japan's Kaguya probe.

Nevertheless, LRO is a big deal: Its pictures and other data will be used to plan NASA's future push to the moon, designed to climax in a manned lunar landings sometime around 2020.

This month, the world will be remembering the Apollo 11 lunar landing and the explorations that followed between 1969 and 1972. The pictures coming from LRO should remind people that the best is yet to come.


NASA / GSFC / ASU
This image shows another cratered area near the moon's Mare Nubium region, as photographed by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera. The region pictured is about 1,400 meters (0.87 miles) wide. The bottom of the image faces lunar north. Click on the image for a larger version from NASA's Web site.

Here's more about LRO's progress from the NASA news release issued today:

"... The satellite also has started to activate its six other instruments. The Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector will look for regions with enriched hydrogen that potentially could have water ice deposits. The Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation is designed to measure the moon's radiation environment. Both were activated on June 19 and are functioning normally.

"Instruments expected to be activated during the next week and calibrated are the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter, designed to build 3-D topographic maps of the moon's landscape; the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment, which will make temperature maps of the lunar surface; and the Miniature Radio Frequency, or Mini-RF, an experimental radar and radio transmitter that will search for subsurface ice and create detailed images of permanently shaded craters.

"The final instrument, the Lyman Alpha Mapping Project, will be activated after the other instruments have completed their calibrations, allowing more time for residual contaminants from the manufacture and launch of LRO to escape into the vacuum of space. This instrument is an ultraviolet-light imager that will use starlight to search for surface ice. It will take pictures of the permanently-shaded areas in deep craters at the lunar poles.

" 'Accomplishing these significant milestones moves us closer to our goals of preparing for safe human return to the moon, mapping the moon in unprecedented detail, and searching for resources,' said LRO Project Scientist Richard Vondrak of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

"While its instruments are being activated and tested, the spacecraft is in a special elliptical commissioning orbit around the moon. The orbit takes less fuel to maintain than the mission's primary orbit. The commissioning orbit's closest point to the lunar surface is about 19 miles over the moon's south pole, and its farthest point is approximately 124 miles over the lunar north pole.

"After the spacecraft and instruments have completed their initial calibrations, the spacecraft will be directed into its primary mission orbit in August, a nearly circular orbit about 31 miles above the lunar surface.

"Goddard built and manages LRO, a NASA mission with international participation from the Institute for Space Research in Moscow. Russia provides the neutron detector aboard the spacecraft."

Still more about LRO imagery:

Update for 12:55 a.m. ET July 6: The Web address for the YouTube video has changed, so I corrected my Web link accordingly. Check out this YouTube channel for more about Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.


Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about my upcoming book, "The Case for Pluto."

This item was last updated at 12:55 a.m. ET July 6.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

wow great photo now let see some photo on what was left on the moon by Apollo moon land
Clearly some people will always hide their head in the sand rather than admit we as a nation ever went to the moon.Anyone who says we are wasting money by exploring space needs to take a look at all the technology derived from space exploration.
Brain Damage.  

The lunatic is on the grass
The lunatic is on the grass
Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs
Got to keep the loonies on the path.

The lunatic is in the hall
The lunatics are in my hall
The paper holds their folded faces to the floor
And every day the paper boy brings more.

And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head explodes with dark forbodings too
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon.

The lunatic is in my head
The lunatic is in my head
You raise the blade, you make the change
You re-arrange me 'till I'm sane.

You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me

And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear
You shout and no one seems to hear
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon.  
That photo was amazing.
I remember being somewhat involved in the entire business regarding the trip to the moon. Including visiting the Cape several times, including when they were just getting started for manned trips into space. I believe I know the entire Cape area around the 39 Complex rather well... But that moon photo was amazing...
Of course we went to the moon, we've got the photos and the rocks to confirm it. The need for shielding of the spacecraft was covered during the Pegasus missions. And during the Explorer series who found the Van Allen belts. Our only problems were keeping cool and of course breathing....
One of the many things I've always liked in your Cosmic Log, Alan, is that someone can pose a pertinent question and expect to receive a dozen answers from the other readers.  

BTW, Luna turns the same face toward Terra, her "day" co-inciding with her "month" rotation because her internal structure is lop-sided, the more massive portion being located on the side closer to Terra.  Other satellites of other planets do not appear to share that anomaly of construction with her.  
Remember, you will only see the pictures they want you to see. Get yourself a good telescope. At least a 4 in. refractor or 8 in. SCT like me.
Len, time to quit carrying around the club and come out of the cave . . . the technology you are using was decendent of that which was specifically designed for the Space Programs that you don't beleive in. Really?

I was a wide eyed child when the Space Race was in full swing and during those times what I seen first hand and since could not have been made up. They had us hiding in hallways with our hands over our heads in fear (like that was going to help) of what major nations in the world rapidly became capable of doing from technological advances the Space Race produced.

Still yet I support space exploration. We as humans should always strive for bettering ourselves with true knowledge of the universe around us. In this way then we may finally learn that it is wonderful to prove how we exist but without a doubt only God himself knows WHY we exist!

I'm just glad to have had the chance to exist and see it all come to be . . .Thanks for the pics can't wait for more.
why can't the hubble take images of the moon? it would be so cool to see the supposedly flag and other bits of equipment left behind. it would also quell the people who claim we never went to the moon.
The United States needs another space race to encourage colonizing the moon and other celestial bodies.  Without the space race, NASA has not been able to achieve very much in manned space flight. NASA's last greatest human flight was Apollo 17's lunar mission which ended in 1972.
Oh wow, awesome B&W photos from the MOON!!!
Speaking as someone born in 1960:
ZZZZZZZZZ
Well, interesting conversation.......the original question was, "where were You", and out of respect for the USA, I think we should set aside our usual pontifications, and answer the question.

I was 11 years old, standing in our living room with my parents, I am an IBM brat, and my 5 sisters, watching this historical event, oblivious of all the other political events in the world except for the adult whispers about the war, and what my older sisters were wearing that might be unappropriate. I remember thinking, I want to go there, so I asked my Mom, "how do I get to the moon?" She said, "be an astronaut". And so, my scientist path was set at 11  years of age, in spite of the fact that I was a girl.

God Bless America! AJ
h.c. petley, I really enjoy your comments...they have the fervent desire of a space traveler, and remind me of Ray Bradbury's lifelong yearning to be on his way, in space, off to another planet!  Usually Mars...my first statement when we got the general information regarding the prelimary "proof" that there appeared to be no signs of life on Mars was:  "I hope Ray Bradbury doesn't hear of this..." God it is still so fun to stare at the night sky and enjoy all the "what ifs".  I love your eloquent way of expressing it. Thank you!
There is for sure one man than can certify that indeed the USA placed men on the moon. That man would be President Obama, our Commander in Chief. He remains under oath and carries the promise of truth and transparenticy.....So ask?
If the same side of the moon is always facing the earth, it would seem that this close side should have far fewer craters than the far side, which does not enjoy this continual "protection" from asteroids, comets, and other things that would crash into it. Has anyone compared "relative crateredness" of the two sides of the moon?
One says NASA "Photoshops... out" the "good stuff"? Like the aforementioned mothership on the "dark side"? Another believes Richard Nixon, the most friendless Republican president ever and a man who couldn't keep a lid on a burglary, concocted a fraud of sufficient magnitude to fool the entire scientific world. No, all the photos of human footprints on the moon will not satisfy such minds, who are obviously possessed of the REAL truth.

Now, Fox and Friends, are they part of the Intergalactic Overlord conspiracy or merely its unwitting dupes? I've noticed the folks at that network are also in possession of a Secret Truth, of which the rest of us are sadly ignorant. The Truth is Out There, that's for sure, but the conspirators won't admit it without a little "enhanced interrogation". Just remember that They reproduce through skin contact and They don't fear death because God didn't give them souls. Their hatred of God is the reason all so-called "science" is little more than thinly-veiled attacks on religion, and the Socialists are part of their plan. When the Worldwide Atheistic Socialist State is established, Niburu will sweep into view, our Alien Overlords will reveal themselves, and Richard Nixon (no more "dead" than Elvis or Michael Jackson, thank you very much) will personally command the subjugation of Earth. Why do you think Palin is pinning her hopes on 2012 and the end of the Mayan Long Count? Do you people think all of this is a coincidence?

Alan, thanks for the pictures. And may our Alien Overlords continue to bless and keep Dr. Dave Wingert!
   Hubble can not see an un-enhanced view of the other side (incorrectly refered to as the "Dark" side). That is to say when the the shaded parts of the Moon are facing the earth Hubble has to use special special types of imagry to view it like infra-red and ultra-violet, ect.

  Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't one of the poles hidden from plain sight too ? ? ?
I will only be satisfied when they finally release the high res pics of artificial structures that exist on the moon. Stop hiding the truth from us.
The video on You Tube has been removed for some unknown reason.

[ALAN ADDS: Looks like the Web address has changed ... I've changed the link as well. Thanks for the heads up.]
Thank you to those knowledgeable people who have offered so much plausable information to those of us who are not as lunar compliant. To those who offer nothing,I say pffffft,you are a waste of space.  
Nothing short of taking them on a visit to the moon would shut up the moon-landing hoax people. Even that might not do it. When you are dealing with someone who doesn't use logic to come to conclusions, you aren't going to change their mind using logic.
What a colossal waste of taxpayer money... to what end?
derondo do you also protest the use of tax payer gold to send Columbus on his exploration? if so, when are you moving to Europe?
I was a 17 years old white kid when we landed on the moon. During that time, I was a war protester, supported the Black Panthers, read Elridge Cleaver, debated war, poverty and race issues, and never trusted the government and worked to defeat tricky Dicky Nixon. But I never doubted that we actually landed on the moon. Until I was 42 years old, I had never heard that people believed it was a hoax. The argument goes something like this: since our cell phones now have more computing power than those on board computers back in the 1960's, how could we possibly have made it to the moon and back with that limited technology? After thinking about it for a while, the decision became simple: If we had NOT been to the moon, don't you think the Soviets, our main reason to go to the moon in the first place, would have found a way to expose the fraud? Were they in on the conspiracy too???

For me, case closed.

As a side note, I find that many of the same crowd who doubt that we went to the moon, also believe that the Bible is a literal history of man i.e, the earth is only about 6,500 years old, dinosaurs either existed side by side with man or that God made fossils to put in the ground to confuse us. My mother always told me that people judge you by the company you keep. Enough said.
Derondo, knowledge is NOT a waste of money!
Why can't it see the lunar module ??
Google earth can zoom in on me picking my nose in the back garden, yet they still have no images of previous lunar landings ????
"You'' never make me believe..."


  There's half the problem. You've already made up your mind, facts and evidence be damned.


"...that they landed a man on the moon because I know of the radiation belt that is out there and it would have fried any human that goes through it.  I have seen the capsule that supposedly make the trip and it did not have lead shielding."


 which shows how little you understand about the intensity of the VanAllen belts (I assume that's what you're referring to), their size, or how fast an Apollo spacecraft (or *anything* sent to Earth escape velocity) passes through them.


"Too many unanswered questions for me to believe it. If it was so easy..."


  Who said it was? It was neither easy nor cheap, which brings us to the following:


"...why haven't we been back?"


  A simple five-letter word. Something invented by the Phonecians very long ago: Money. Not enough of it. A public and Congress becoming rapidly disinterested at the time and also dealing with an unpopular war in Southeast Asia and assorted social changes. Congress will generally vote as the public mood goes (after all, priority one is pleasing enough constituents to stay in office) and there wasn't (and still isn't) a powerful 'space' lobby.

Even in *this* thread, someone has already said:

"I hope people from some other planet got a less boring natural satellite; what we have here is a pathetic joke - boring and lifeless piece of rock."

  Now, imagine enough people having that attitude after the first few landings and the near-disaster of Apollo 13. Even today, you can get a 'been there, done that, so what?' Attitude about the Moon, as if there isn't still more to learn.

(And strangely enough, it can come from either those who still don't want to fund going back to the Moon or any other manned space project *and* from those who want to skip that and go straight to their beloved Mars...and the latter *will* take long enough for galactic cosmic ray exposure and possibly solar flares to be a concern)

This isn't about the 'radiation' boogeyman and don't kid yourself into thinking it is. Like most anything else, it's about money.

"Now a trip is planned for 2020.  Maybe we will have the technology then. "

Only if we have the R&D money now. And the issue *still* won't be radiation.

(And perhaps only if we switch to a more affordable and efficient architecture than the one being debated today, but that's a slightly different story...)
"Why is it that every other moon that we have found in our solar system has been given a name but not our own?  It's simply "the moon"."

Some use 'Luna' as a proper name. It's not official, but it works for me.
"If we went to the moon why not go out to the garage turn the key on and land on it again, this should only take a few months; definitely not over 10 years. So know the world is exited that we can take close pictures of the moon, hmhmhm one should wonder what all the excitement is about."

Sorry, no Moon-capable ships under a tarp in MY garage.

If you've got one, please feel free to demonstrate...

"If the same side of the moon is always facing the earth, it would seem that this close side should have far fewer craters than the far side..."

It does, but that's not why.

Earth doesn't cover enough of an angular part of the sky to 'protect' that side. Indeed, one could have a situation wherein an approaching object was deflected *to* the Moon by Earth's gravity...


"Why can't it see the lunar module ??
Google earth can zoom in on me picking my nose in the back garden, yet they still have no images of previous lunar landings ???? "

Maybe because there's a greater demand *read: 'willingness to pay for') for high-resolution imagery of large parts of Earth, than for the Moon?

Maybe Earth satellites are also cheaper to launch?

Maybe because Google Earth images are also shot from lower-altitude *airplanes* that don't work so well on the Moon?

"Oh wow, awesome B&W photos from the MOON!!!
Speaking as someone born in 1960:
ZZZZZZZZZ"

As someone six years older, I still think it's pretty cool.

Besides, the Moon is *not* known for having a wide range of color. I remember that well, too.


"There is for sure one man than can certify that indeed the USA placed men on the moon. That man would be President Obama, our Commander in Chief. He remains under oath and carries the promise of truth and transparenticy.....So ask?"

Now, I don't believe the hoaxers either, but...what makes you think that would prove anything? What was Barack Obama doing back in 1969?

And of course, NO president has ever, ever lied...

"After thinking about it for a while, the decision became simple: If we had NOT been to the moon, don't you think the Soviets, our main reason to go to the moon in the first place, would have found a way to expose the fraud? Were they in on the conspiracy too???"


God bless you, that's my biggest argument against the conspiracy theorists, too. They have to think they have better resources than the KGB, *and* not understand the nature of the Cold War.

It would have been the greatest propaganda coup of ALL TIME if the Soviets could have proved we were faking it, yet they never so much as hinted at that.

And it would have cost them almost nothing. They would not necessarily have to follow it up with a landing of their own, to reap the rewards of exposing the fraud. (Though if they did, so much the better for them. Indeed, they may have come within a few weeks of trying to send one man *around* the Moon before Apollo 8. I almost wish they had, even if so they could not claim later that they had no interest in a manned Lunar program. If anything, they took the *opposite* tact of faking disinterest when it was clear they couldn't win, instead of faking success. As the expression goes; 'If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.')

And yes, in spite of that, I once skimmed through a Moon-hoax book that *does* claim the Soviets were in on it. Maybe it's because I'm old enough to remember Cold War rivalry, yet I have to think anyone with any knowledge of history will, at that point, just shake their heads and walk away from the whole hoax thing...

Your cosmic log is most interesting.  You might also want to see some additional amazing sights and read some more very interesting material on the special web site:  http://Astrophysics21.Tripod.com

This place will surprise you.  And yes, it's not commercial.  It's pure space science, visual and otherwise.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1985241

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google