ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



New moon vistas revealed

Posted: Thursday, July 02, 2009 1:20 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / GSFC / ASU
This image shows a cratered region near the moon's Mare Nubium (Sea of Clouds)
region, as photographed by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera. Click on
the image for a larger version from NASA's Web site.

Today's first images from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter provide a fresh perspective on the moon, just weeks before the 40th anniversary of the first manned lunar landing.

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, was launched on June 18, along with another probe destined to crash into the moon's south pole - known as the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, or LCROSS.

LRO entered lunar orbit just last week, on the same day that LCROSS transmitted its own first imagery of the moon. Mission managers had figured it would take longer for LRO to send back higher-resolution images worth sharing. However, when they activated the orbiter's cameras for a test on Tuesday, they were surprised to find that the pictures they got back were real stunners.

This YouTube video provides a flyover of the region near Mare Nubium (Sea of Clouds), and there's also a zoomable version of the imagery.

"Our first images were taken along the moon's terminator - the dividing line between day and night - making us initially unsure of how they would turn out," Arizona State University's Mark Robinson, the principal investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, said in today's image advisory.

"Because of the deep shadowing, subtle topography is exaggerated, suggesting a craggy and inhospitable surface," he said. "In reality, the area is similar to the region where the Apollo 16 astronauts safely explored in 1972. While these are magnificent in their own right, the main message is that LROC is nearly ready to begin its mission."

Later today, Robinson explained why the mission team had such low expectations for Tuesday's pictures. "The point of that test was not to take pictures of the lunar surface," he told me. "It was to collect engineering data to make sure that all of our settings are correct for Friday."

Starting Friday, LRO's cameras will be in operation for two and a half days, snapping pictures of some of the lesser-known areas of the moon's far side, Robinson said. Then the cameras will be shut off again for further commissioning. "We still are not completely finished baking out the moisture from the telescope," he said.

By next month, LRO will be in full picture-taking mode, acquiring much sharper views of the lunar surface. The orbiter's camera should be able to make out some of the traces left behind by the Apollo moon missions four decades ago, including lunar module leavings and rover tracks. "I promise you we will get spectacular images of all the Apollo landing sites before all is said and done," Robinson told me.

It's been a whole decade since the last U.S. moon probe smashed into the lunar surface, but it's not as if the moon has been terra incognita over the past few years. Several international spacecraft have been sending back pictures of our nearest celestial neighbor - including Europe's SMART-1, China's Chang'e 1, India's Chandrayaan 1 and Japan's Kaguya probe.

Nevertheless, LRO is a big deal: Its pictures and other data will be used to plan NASA's future push to the moon, designed to climax in a manned lunar landings sometime around 2020.

This month, the world will be remembering the Apollo 11 lunar landing and the explorations that followed between 1969 and 1972. The pictures coming from LRO should remind people that the best is yet to come.


NASA / GSFC / ASU
This image shows another cratered area near the moon's Mare Nubium region, as photographed by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera. The region pictured is about 1,400 meters (0.87 miles) wide. The bottom of the image faces lunar north. Click on the image for a larger version from NASA's Web site.

Here's more about LRO's progress from the NASA news release issued today:

"... The satellite also has started to activate its six other instruments. The Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector will look for regions with enriched hydrogen that potentially could have water ice deposits. The Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation is designed to measure the moon's radiation environment. Both were activated on June 19 and are functioning normally.

"Instruments expected to be activated during the next week and calibrated are the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter, designed to build 3-D topographic maps of the moon's landscape; the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment, which will make temperature maps of the lunar surface; and the Miniature Radio Frequency, or Mini-RF, an experimental radar and radio transmitter that will search for subsurface ice and create detailed images of permanently shaded craters.

"The final instrument, the Lyman Alpha Mapping Project, will be activated after the other instruments have completed their calibrations, allowing more time for residual contaminants from the manufacture and launch of LRO to escape into the vacuum of space. This instrument is an ultraviolet-light imager that will use starlight to search for surface ice. It will take pictures of the permanently-shaded areas in deep craters at the lunar poles.

" 'Accomplishing these significant milestones moves us closer to our goals of preparing for safe human return to the moon, mapping the moon in unprecedented detail, and searching for resources,' said LRO Project Scientist Richard Vondrak of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

"While its instruments are being activated and tested, the spacecraft is in a special elliptical commissioning orbit around the moon. The orbit takes less fuel to maintain than the mission's primary orbit. The commissioning orbit's closest point to the lunar surface is about 19 miles over the moon's south pole, and its farthest point is approximately 124 miles over the lunar north pole.

"After the spacecraft and instruments have completed their initial calibrations, the spacecraft will be directed into its primary mission orbit in August, a nearly circular orbit about 31 miles above the lunar surface.

"Goddard built and manages LRO, a NASA mission with international participation from the Institute for Space Research in Moscow. Russia provides the neutron detector aboard the spacecraft."

Still more about LRO imagery:

Update for 12:55 a.m. ET July 6: The Web address for the YouTube video has changed, so I corrected my Web link accordingly. Check out this YouTube channel for more about Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.


Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about my upcoming book, "The Case for Pluto."

This item was last updated at 12:55 a.m. ET July 6.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Thanks for showing us the first pictures from our new LRO orbiter around the moon Alan!  So nice to see new pics so soon after launch.  It will be interesting to see the pics from the LCROSS impact in a few months.  I sure hope that the scientists find usable water on the moon so we can put crews up there for really long duration visits.

I hope that President Obama will change our Ares program to allow for foreign cooperation, we don't need to do a space race again just to show off our technical prowess in space when it costs too much to do that kind of childish grandstanding.
I love the pictures we get from all the spacecraft. Just great stuff.
why do all the impact holes look like 90 degrees impacts, no angular impacts can be seen?
It would be really interesting if we can get pics from the dark side of the moon...
If the moon has gravity, why can't it hold 1 inch of atmosphere?
Are they going to take shots of Apollo to shut up the moon landing hoax idiots?
Ehy,
I was having the exact same thought (all the impacts look dead-on, which is impossible).  I think the answer is that, even for steeply angled hits, the impact looks pretty circular, like a bullet hitting ballistic gelatin.  If you look real close, you can see some asymetry in some of the crater edges which suggests to me an angled impact.
If our flag is still on the moon, are there any pictures of it?  
Marvin:

There are a couple of reasons the Moon has no significant atmosphere.  If a gas is heated by the Sun during the day on the Moon, the velocity of the molecules in the gas would mostly exceed the escape velocity required to leave the Moon's weak gravity field.  In addition since the Moon has no significant magnetic field to divert the solar wind around it, the solar wind would steadily blow any remaining atmosphere away into deep space.
Marvin,
Atoms of oxygen, nitrogen, water vapor, etc. randomly bounce off each other in their gaseous state (which they would be in if the moon had a true insulating atmosphere and were not so cold).  The velocities at which some of these atoms fly around are fast enough to reach "escape velocity" and fly out of the moon's gravitational feild altogether, if they don't hit another atom on the way.  The process is gradual, but eventually all of them escape out into open space.  On earth, the gravity is 6 times stronger than the moon and the escape velocity is too high for the atoms to attain at atmospheric pressures and temperatures.  They try to leave the earth's gravity, but fall back before they can escape.  If the moon suddenly had an atmosphere, it would last for a while because the weak gravity would keep it from simply blasting outward immediately (not sure how long it would last).  But it would gardually thin out until it was gone.  
We are all explorers at heart and we are just figuring out how to get off this rock. Let us see what else is out there....Great pictures! And if we all can not go...Thank you for the images, so we can all share in the excitement and know we had some part in it.
great photos
beautiful moon.....
"take only pictures, leave only footprints"
The reason all the holes are circular (which you are taking to mean that they are from 90 degree impacts) is because that's the way impact craters form.  The asteroids break up on impact and so can't create an oblong crater.  Try it in sand with something that breaks up (for example, compacted wet sand).  You'll always get circular impact craters even at the small scale.

Check out the following bing search: http://www.bing.com/search?q=why+are+impact+craters+round
Re:  Marvin:

I'd guess the moon has no atmosphere due to solar winds.
The moon does have an atmosphere of sorts, but it's extremely thin because the sun keeps stripping it away.

http://www.tsgc.utexas.edu/tadp/1995/spects/environment.html

If the moon were at the distance of Saturn, it probably would have a reasonable atmosphere.
Marvin, the moon cannot accumulate atmosphere because it does not have magnetic poles.  The Earth keeps its atmosphere because its poles create a magnetic sphere that diverts most solar particles.  Without the magnetic protection, the solar particles will soon strip away any atmospheric particles that may exist.

Check out these bing search results: http://www.bing.com/search?q=Why+doesn%27t+the+moon+have+an+atmosphere
Pat H: It would be really interesting if we can get pics from the dark side of the moon...

You're gonna need a REALLY big flash...  :-)

P.S. There is no "dark" side, but there are dark areas at the poles.
I would assume Marvin that either the solar winds would blow any atmosphere away, or the sun would heat any atmosphere causing it to rise and dissipate.
Gravity is a relatively weak force. A simple bar magnet just a few inches long will pull a metal pin or other small metal object off the ground against the force of gravity. Remember that the earth's entire mass is pulling that pin to the ground, so the electromagnetic force is much stronger than gravity. The operant conditions on the moon easily overcome the force of gravity, and thus the moon has no atmosphere.
Besides me, I think a lot of other people want to see the Apollo landing sites photographed ... if for no other reason than to shut up the poor sad little man with the bad teeth and all the cats living in his ramshackle trailer in the Nevada desert ... and the Science Channel, Discovery Channel, and The History Channel who all keep shining the light of publicity on him.  And, for the other people who want "international cooperation" with Ares, Orion, and whatever else ... I'm for that as soon as Russia lets us put our flag on their Soyuz spacecraft.  I wish someone would publish a pie chart showing the financial contributions in percentages for the expense of the Space Station ... "International" Space Station?  Yeah!  Right!
For those who don't already know, there is no "dark side" of the moon. There IS a "far side" or "back side." The moon keeps the same side facing earth as it orbits around the earth, so there is a side we never see from earth, but it isn't always dark. It takes one month for the moon to make one orbit of earth and simultaneously one turn on its axis. Therefore, a lunar "day" is one month long - two weeks of daylight and two weeks of darkness - if you stay in the same spot on the moon unless you are in a deep crater at a lunar pole where it would always be dark, except for a possible glint of sunlight along the upper rim. When we see a full moon, it is lunar noon on the middle of the near side. When we "see" (or don't see) a new moon, it is lunar noon on the middle of the far side.
I wish we could have a color photo of earth from the moon during a total lunar eclipse. The earth would appear as a huge dark spot in the lunar sky and, with enough resolution, city lights on earth might possibly be visible. The really big bonus would be that the dark earth would be completely surrounded by a glowing red-orange ring of sunset.
Has anyone ever seriously considered the possibility that the type of pock marks shown come from inside the Moon...bubbling up of some internal flow?
They sure look that way...and it answers the 'why are they all so direct looking, with no angular strikes' question.
There's a beach across from Aberdeen Proving grounds with sand geode type objects that bubble up from the constant vibration of the surrounding Earth.
The holes left behind when one breaks off would look exactly like the Moon if not for tidal effects preventing wind blown erosion from softening the mounds around their perimeter ala the pics above.
They don't last long enough between big tides to get smoothed over.
Never though of it before...has anyone else?
I hope people from some other planet got a less boring natural satellite; what we have here is a pathetic joke - boring and lifeless piece of rock.
You'' never make me believe that they landed a man on the moon because I know of the radiation belt that is out there and it would have fried any human that goes through it.  I have seen the capsule that supposedly make the trip and it did not have lead shielding. Too many unanswered questions for me to believe it. If it was so easy, why haven't we been back?  Now a trip is planned for 2020.  Maybe we will have the technology then.  
Perhaps its me because when i look at the picture I see plenty of non 90 degree impacts.
The only dark side of the moon is the 1973 Pink Floyd album.
"There is no dark side of the moon, really. It's all dark." - P. Floyd
   Look into the Eletric Universe, For you just might be amazed at the theory of it all.
Why is it that every other moon that we have found in our solar system has been given a name but not our own?  It's simply "the moon".

I think its funny how the political houses can tell us we are in terrible finacial straits, but put more people out on the streets or out of jobs. Yet The rich still support the Auto Bail outs and keep sending people into Space and have vacations and benefits the average people can not afford. Where is the money tree!
What an absolute complete waste of money to take black and white picture of a sandy rock
The reason that the craters most all look circular is because of the nature of the physics of impact.  The impactors are traveling (usually) at speeds on the order of kilometers per second.  When the object impacts and comes to a very sudden (i.e. instantaneous) stop, even at an angle, the resultant release of energy and forces treats the point of impact as a point-source and radiates outward in all directions.

The forces directed downward shock and compress the underlying material, which eventually rebounds back upwards.  The forces directed upward and outward blow material out and away, leaving a crater.

Because of the way things 'weather' on the Moon, constant bombardment by even microscopic dust and stuff tends to wear down the rough edges, softening the appearance of the surface.  Irregularities in crater rims or ray patterns tends to be the result of the characteristics of the material underlying the point of impact.

It's only at really shallow angles (<12 degrees or something like that) that you'll tend to see oblong craters.

If you want to learn more about the 'geo'logical processes of our Moon, including cratering, then 'The Modern Moon' by Charles Woods is probably a good place to start.  That's where I learned what a glacis is.
These look like the same old colorless photos of the moon taken a generation ago: hills and craters and more hills and craters.  Isn't there anything colorful or interesting there?  Can't NASA drop a couple of gallons of paint on the moon? The Japanese at least crashed their orbiter into the moon to change the scenery a bit.
to Eric, Salinas, CA (Sent Thursday, July 02, 2009 2:12 PM), the earth's history is littered with murder for resources. the president needs be prudent?
"Houston, Tranquility base here. The Eagle has landed."

These would be the first words heard as man touched down on the moon on July 20, 1969 at 4:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, forty years ago this month. “That’s one small step for (a) man…” would not be heard until some six and a half hours later, when 528,000,000 people around the globe would watch a ghostly apparition of Neil Armstrong, place the first footprint on the lunar surface. (No one would remember that the second man on the moon Buzz Aldrin, described it as “Beautiful, just beautiful; a magnificent desolation.”)

This clearly was one of those “Where-were-you” moments. So exactly where in the world were you?

First off, there is a better than even chance you weren’t even born yet, as  60% of the U.S. population today is under 40. But if you were us, you were not only born, but married and holed up in a studio apartment in Queens, having gotten an eleventh hour draft deferment the previous July. The war in Nam would have to continue raging on without us.

If you were a group-minded type and living in New York City, there is a chance you might have wandered over to Central Park to view the event on one of the giant TV screens that were set up in the Sheep Meadow. A venue mostly known at the time for its war protests, “be-ins” and concerts, it would now ironically enough, serve as a setting for this “establishment” moment of triumph.

If you were Ted Kennedy, you were in Edgartown Massachusetts trying to explain to the authorities how you could have driven a car into a tidal channel on Chappaquiddick Island two days ago. And how in so doing, caused the death of a young girl named Mary Jo Kopechne. She would be 68 today.

Here was the last of the Kennedy brothers, copping a plea on a day he might have been in Washington as a surrogate for the JFK legacy. That being, the reestablishment of American pride and prestige through a stunning come-from-behind victory in the space race.

And while Chappaquiddick would still be page-two news in the New York tabloids on the day of the landing, it had now been relegated to page 19 in the New York Times, where two stories were headlined: Kennedy To Face Charge In Crash For Leaving The Site and Kennedy’s Career Feared Imperiled.

If you were a black leader or activist, a Jesse Jackson, a Charles Evers or Eldridge Cleaver, you were predictably deriding this phenomenal scientific and political achievement, as a project whose funds could have better been spent on the disenfranchised and the rebuilding of inner cities.

If you were Sammy Davis Jr. however, you were in the Old City of Jerusalem at The Wailing Wall, head bowed in prayer. No joke.

“It means nothing to me. I have no opinion about it and I don’t care,” is what you would say if you were Pablo Picasso and in possession of so massive an ego—all genius aside.

If you were a scientist or say a science writer for the Times, you might now be forgiven, if in a moment of ecstasy you began gushing things like “…I believe that we will use nuclear rocket engines to build a shuttle system…(to travel) between earth and the moon and eventually the planets. I foresee this taking place by the  end of the 1970’s (underline, ours). Oops!

Ah, but it was a great day to be a poet. There right on the front page of the New York Times, was a poem by Archibald McLeish. (Not to be confused with Cary Grant who was born Archibald Alec Leach).  And then even more verse on the inside, by more “names” such as Anthony Burgess and Anne Sexton (who would commit suicide ala Sylvia Plath, just five years later).

And finally, while perusing the yellowed newspapers taken from our closet with this upcoming  40th anniversary in mind— we could not help but notice one particularly incongruous attempt by an advertiser, to cash in on all the hoopla.

Purex Industries, the makers of Brillo soap pads at the time, offered a free map of the moon with two Brillo proof-of-purchase box tops (and 15¢ to cover postage and handling). Might we suppose that with all the lunar dust being kicked up in the landing, the metallic surface of the LEM (Lunar Excursion Module) might be in need of a good scrubbing? Though by extension, the laugh might be on us as well. We were literally working on Madison Avenue at the time, for an ad agency—speaking of the pot calling the kettle black.

We tend to take note of these seemingly disparate bits of history and culture, for we have always believed in the need for context. Events, both historical and personal, do not happen in a vacuum.

In reflecting on that first lunar landing— with the aid of these ancient newspaper accounts— we are reminded of a line we had written in a poem that had to do with the value of keeping a journal in lieu of keepsakes:

I do this to remind me not so much of where I’ve been
but what was on my mind while I was there.

We went to the moon. But what was on our minds while we were there? The answers to which might explain, why forty years later, we have yet to return.

                             * * *

Photos of the lunar landing sites won't shut the hoax crowd up. They'll simply insist that they were faked, just as they say the original photos were faked. Nothing will ever convince that crowd; they would rather NOT believe.
crappy pics. NASA always photoshops out or avoids the good stuff on the moon. why do we continue to support an agency that doesn't accomplish much yet costs hundreds of millions to operate, when the common folk are struggling to survive.
Maybe we can now see that disputed alien base with the parked mother ship, and mining operation on the dark side of the moon... lol???
I’m sure that any photos NASA provides of lunar landing sites will be “proven” falsified to the satisfaction of the hoaxters.  Never let evidence get in the way.

Bruce,
I’d love to see pictures from the dark side of the moon.  And there IS a dark side, we call it “night.”  During a new moon phase the earth may provide enough light for pics that don’t suffer the washout of daytime pics.  I think they’d be interesting.

Bruce,
You do already know that the small moon does not cast a shadow over the entire earth, don’t you?  The earth would be a huge bright spot in the lunar sky with a graduated dark spot on it.  You probably wouldn’t be able to see city lights for the same reason you don’t see stars in pictures from the moon.  (Oh, because pictures of a lunar eclipse from the moon would be faked on a soundstage in Texas?!)

Steve,
Maybe some kind of interior ice deposits that get heated in the long lunar day.
It's funny, some people are seeing 90 degree impacts,  I see orientation of the hills and other features to the upper-upper right in the picture.  Of course shadows do weird things but it also does not seem to orient toward the sun which appears to me to be toward the right-upper right, say at the 2:00 to 2:30 position, much lower. Vince
For someone who is a novice to astronomy, it is all fascinating to me. I enjoy reading and learning from the comments here. In particular, I like the fact that people take the time to answer other people's questions, rather than criticize them.
I hope people from some other planet got a less boring natural satellite; what we have here is a pathetic joke - boring and lifeless piece of rock. >>

The moon is not pathetic!
It's been nearly a half century since Richard Nixon allegedly landed men on the moon. These men used golf carts to drive around on the surface they placed a flag which should still be there. Why not take some pictures of the landing sites and prove once and for all that Mr. Nixon was really an honest guy who woud never concoct a hoax on the people of America for political gain?
slowly, slowly, all things are accomplished. The Moon, Luna, Selene goddess of the night, our stepping stone into the high frontier, a vast treasure trove of minerals, the proving ground for the colonization of the rest of our solar system. What we learn, what we accomplish, what we fabricate to survive on The Moon prepares the way to Mars  the outer planetary systems. Go For It!
Oh, no Pedro! The Moon is not boring but incredibly dramatic with soaring crater walls thousands of meters high,deep rilles, vast sunbaked flats, jumbled hi-lands,indelible black sky with unobstructed views of uncountable stars. You descendant, 500 yrs from now will marvel at The Moon's challenging landscapes on 10 day tourist junkets! Not boring at all!
Looking at the first photo I am wondering about the rock formation on the left side, center.  It looks like a human footprint in extremely muddy soil.  It must have taken an 'extremely interesting' impact to form that object!!  

I am glad we are back for several reasons, we have wasted too much time away when we could have learned AND ENGINEERED so much more.  What would modern life be like without velcro?  Sorry there are many more items to mention but the average person would probably not understand them all.

(Downside of velcro is my grand-child still cannot tie his shoes correctly but that is a small price).

I can remember the fuzzy black and white pictures and scratchy audio sitting on the living room floor when Apollo 11 landed.  

Unfortunately, the news media treats the Space Shuttle with little or no coverage.  I applaud Ocean County College, here in New Jersey, for dedicating as much as 6 hours of their television time for the ISS missions and some of the Hubble work.  
If we went to the moon why not go out to the garage turn the key on and land on it again, this should only take a few months; definitely not over 10 years. So know the world is exited that we can take close pictures of the moon, hmhmhm one should wonder what all the excitement is about.
Since it has been 40 years since the first moon landing, I would think there would be value in sending some type of ditch digger and collecting samples from, say, 5-10 feet below the surface.  Wiht new technology in last 40 years I would think we could do this.  Is there not value in it?  Since the moon is so much closer than other planets turnaround time would be faster.
To Len Dutton,
We did go back. Five more times, between '69 and '72!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1985241

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google