ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Past and future of 'New Space'

Posted: Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:00 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA
The documentary "Orphans of Apollo" focuses on the effort to privatize Russia's Mir
space station, shown here during a 1995 space shuttle mission to the outpost. The
effort helped prolong Mir's life but ultimately failed, leading to its demise in 2001.

A behind-the-scenes documentary on the unsuccessful effort to turn Russia's Mir space station into a money-making operation serves as a cautionary tale for the private sector's present-day space ambitions.

"Orphans of Apollo," a movie that tells the story of the masterminds and millionaires behind MirCorp, has been making the film-festival circuit for months and is already on DVD. It's getting its London premiere on Friday, according to the documentary's director and executive producer, Michael Potter.

A decade ago, when the dot-com boom was going strong, a well-connected group of space enthusiasts and entrepreneurs laid plans to set up their own commercial beachhead in outer space. The title of the movie refers to the fact that many of these self-described revolutionaries were inspired by the Apollo moon landings that began 40 years ago - and then stopped 37 years ago.

"It was over in the government's minds, but a lot of young kids there, myself included, were ready for what was next," Peter Diamandis, the head of the X Prize Foundation, says in the film. "We drank the Kool-Aid."

Diamandis and many others anticipated an age when they themselves could follow Apollo's pioneers to the final frontier, and felt profoundly let down by what they saw as NASA's retreat. "We, as Apollo's children, felt we were Apollo's orphans. We had been left out in the cold," said Rick Tumlinson, co-founder of the Space Frontier Foundation.

So when Russia's space officials began thinking about getting rid of Mir and turning their attention to the international space station, the revolutionaries began thinking about the opportunities. The central figure in the fight to save Mir turned out to be Walt Anderson, an "anarcho-capitalist" telecom millionaire with a penchant for supporting space causes.

"I had approached Walt earlier and said to him, 'Would you like a space station, because I think we can get it,'" Tumlinson recalls in the movie. "And he said, 'Yeah.'"

"Orphans of Apollo" chronicles the rise and fall of MirCorp, the venture created to turn Mir into an orbiting commercial paradise, through present-day interviews as well as extraordinary home video shot during Anderson's business dealings.

One sequence of shots shows Anderson and his buddies feasting on take-out pizza and wine and playing Risk while they fly on the millionaire's private jet for a crucial round of talks in Russia. During the year 2000, MirCorp's team spun out grand plans to refurbish the space station as a tourist destination and the setting for a reality-TV show. At one point NBC, one of the partners in the msnbc.com joint venture, had a deal with MirCorp and "Survivor" creator Mark Burnett to use Mir as the centerpiece of a prime-time series.

Thanks to Anderson's millions, MirCorp got their Russian "landlords" to send one more crew up to the space station in mid-2000 and keep the place running. But that was the venture's high point. The grand ambitions of Apollo's orphans ran up against a perfect storm of personality clashes, politics and economics.

On the personality front, Anderson didn't even bother to hide his contempt for governments, particularly his own. The video shows him telling the Russians at one point during their negotiations, "We're dealing with some of the stupidest bureaucrats in Washington at the State Department."

Unfortunately for Anderson, those bureaucrats would turn his life into a special kind of hell. NASA and other government agencies were worried that keeping Mir in operation would siphon off Russian resources that were needed by the infant international space station.

"Our concern was that it was an old vehicle and was costing more and more to maintain," Leon Fuerth, Al Gore's former national security adviser, says of Mir in the film. "And we wanted the Russians, if they had to choose which way to put their money, to put the money on what was coming rather than keep it going to what was clearly no longer useful."

The veterans of MirCorp suggest that NASA pushed hard on the Russians, the State Department and anyone else who mattered to kill Mir off. "I put a reward out for $1,000 for the person who can come up with the smoking gun," Potter, the film's director, told me. "From the MirCorp side of things, they always felt there was this conspiracy."

It didn't help that Anderson was often portrayed as an eccentric space nut. One famous New York Times article was accompanied by a cartoon tracing the adventures of "Wacky Walt."

But the nail in MirCorp's coffin was the dot-com bust that started in 2000 and gathered momentum as the months went on. Anderson had anticipated adding to his fortune and bringing in new investors, but the money troubles worsened instead. The Russians lost patience, and in April 2001, Mir was deep-sixed for good.

MirCorp tried to carry on, working on a reality-TV deal that called for pop singer Lance Bass to fly to the international space station in 2002. But Anderson eventually soured on the whole enterprise. And that wasn't the worst of it: In 2005, federal authorities arrested Anderson in what was then called the "biggest personal tax evasion case ever." Today, Anderson is serving a nine-year prison sentence and facing a $184 million tax bill.

Most of this seems like ancient history to those of us who covered MirCorp's rise and fall, but the movie clearly shows that Apollo's orphans have learned their lessons.

"This stuff really is rocket science," Potter said, "and it's not just the physics. It's the business model: How do you handle the risk assessment? How do you handle the insurance? It's really complicated - but it's not as complicated as NASA makes it."

The biggest lesson is that you want to have the government as your customer, not your enemy. "I think the slightly more commercial and realistic and politically savvy entrepreneurs who are now investing in private space understood where Walt went wrong," David Chambers, who was MirCorp's vice president of strategic planning, says in the movie. "And they're prepared to play nice with the various governments that they need to play nice with."

The examples are legion: SpaceX's Elon Musk has received millions from NASA to develop a new rocket and spaceship (with a crucial Falcon 9 launch planned this year). Scaled Composites' Burt Rutan has benefited from government contracts as well as investments from billionaires such as Paul Allen and Richard Branson. Robert Bigelow, a billionaire himself, is hoping government business will eventually help sustain his own privately funded space station program. XCOR Aerospace, Armadillo Aerospace and many other "New Space" companies rely on government contracts to keep the money coming in while they work on their rocket revolution.

Potter said he's applying the lessons from "Orphans of Apollo" in his own work with Odyssey Moon, one of the teams entered in the $30 million Google Lunar X Prize competition.

"We don't view ourselves as competing with NASA," he said. "We're just a gear in the cog. You want FedEx to the moon? We'll take care of that. ... We're pretty typical, if you compare us with a lot of Silicon Valley tech ventures."

And it's pretty typical that some ventures fade away while others keep going. To conclude, here's a quick rundown on how some of the space revolutionaries have fared since MirCorp faded:

  • One of MirCorp's founding directors, Indian-American tech entrepreneur Chirinjeev Kathuria, is now chairman of PlanetSpace, a launch venture that competed unsuccessfully for some of NASA's spaceship development funds. PlanetSpace recently lost an appeal of NASA's decision.

  • MirCorp's president and chief executive officer, Jeffrey Manber, went on to found Yuzoz, a space-themed company producing random-number generator software. Yuzoz has officially gone under, but Manber is now working on a book about Russia's space overtures to the West (including the MirCorp saga).

  • Tumlinson has founded business ventures to create flight suits for commercial space shots and offer "space diving" for thrill-seekers on the final frontier. (If you need help imagining what space diving would be like, check out the latest "Star Trek" movie.)

  • While MirCorp's principals were struggling to keep their rented space station alive, Diamandis was pushing ahead with the X Prize Foundation and Zero Gravity Corp. Zero G was sold to Space Adventures last year, but the X Prize Foundation has branched out into genetics, automotive innovation, health care and other fields as well as space. The foundation is still best-known for putting together the $10 million Ansari X Prize, which Rutan's SpaceShipOne captured almost five years ago. The next big thing on Diamandis' schedule is next month's Incentive2Innovate conference at the United Nations.

Update for 10:45 p.m. ET: By the way, Potter had these comments about reports indicating that former astronaut and retired Marine Charles Bolden is likely to be nominated to head NASA:

"Charles Bolden should be selected as NASA administrator because of his qualifications primarily as a battle-hardened warrior, not because of his outstanding record as astronaut. If Charlie ever forgets for a moment that he is locked into hand-to-hand combat with the goal of bringing humanity to the heavens, he will be crushed by bureaucracy and politics. Let's wish the man Godspeed, our future may depend on it."


Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about my upcoming book, "The Case for Pluto."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Very interesting article and can't wait to see the documentary on DVD.  I noticed you have an ongoing log on facebook but the link provided was unsuccessful.  If you could send me the proper link or how to search for it on facebook via email, that would be awesome.  Thanks again for an interesting article into the current privatization of space.

[ALAN ADDS: Wow, thanks for letting me know about that link glitch! It's been fixed.]

Very interesting article.
Why not create our own space station from previous scketch architectural designs or better yet create a lunar or martian base station.
The race to space colonization or commercialization would be comparable to that of when we crossed the vast ocean to the "New World". I can't imagine what would have happened if Jamestown had failed such as Mircorp did. It is a poor start to what is inevitably our future. Regardless of the bumps in the road, potholes even; the rise and fall of all the space ventures to come, it will never change the fact that it will always just be a matter of "WHEN" for it to become a reality. We are a commercially driven society after all!
Alan...you mention most of the Pretenders and TIN MEN...where's T.C. Swartz?
Diamanides goes nowhere without Society Expeditions, Rotary Rocket, and the early $$$ from Project Space Voyage.

want to see one of three MIRs built? http://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/13496
been there, seen it, its pretty cool.... and this MIR is making money
Alan

One thing that I would say is that Walt learned at least part of a lesson after MirCorp.  I worked with Walt and he and I founded Orbital Recovery.  Walt specifically came to me as he said that he did not want anymore "science experiments" but wanted to actually start a space business.  

The downside was that the very day that we successfully gained commitments from European governments for matching funds to our European aerospace partners (and Walt's) investment, and the very day that we successfully passed our preliminary design review (at ESTEC), and we had a signed customer, Walt was arrested.

Even with this incredible setback, Orbital Recovery survives as Orbital Satellite Services AB of Sweden, led by Swedish Space, and we have signed customers, and a path forward to a new and profitable space market sector.

The lesson that I have learned from this is that you must do due diligence on your investors as well as them doing due diligence on you.  This is, as Paul Harvey says, the rest of the story.
"Why not create our own space station from previous scketch architectural designs or better yet create a lunar or martian base station."


Easy to say. But as with most things the answer is simple: Money. And as with most things space: Lots of it.

And as this is about business, not a government funded program of pure exploration and research that doesn't have to show a profit (though it should still be as efficient as possible), you have to have some market, some reason to believe you'll make (significantly) more money back than you put in.

Arguments can be made for that, with private space stations. Private Lunar or Mars bases? At this time, not so much. (the start-up costs are astronomically higher, for one.)

(Unless someone, presumably a government agency, were to say something like; "I'll pay X billions of dollars to anyone who can set one (or more) up for me, with this set of requirements. There will be almost no oversight, no 'preferred' design. How you arrive at it is up to you, as long as it does what we want. Partial payment as certain developmental milestones are met, but you don't get all the money until you finish. *You* eat cost overruns, so be efficient and don't overestimate yourself or lowball the competition. And you're free [indeed, you're encouraged] to use any technologies you develop along the way, for any other commercial uses. We may want private logistical support of the base(s) later, but that will be a separate bid *after* completion."

No, I don't know what the most reasonable value of 'X' would be, nor am I'm holding my breath for this scenario to happen...)
Kids today take space travel for granted.They weren't around in the 1960's to see the first moon landing and the excitement the world felt about space travel. It has been only four decades or so since the first moon landing and it is essential that the Government and NASA do not monopolize or have the say so in everything that has to do with human's advancement in space.Hopefully we can get funding from enough civilians to make space travel new and exciting for all. Space is the most important thing.Space Colonies are the key to future human existence.
Hi Guys, I just want to say what we people spents on space station and exploration for finding about space, it has alreay been explained by some one 1400 years ago.

If we research we will find that man who said all this.
Jamestown wasn't the first attempt...  North America had tons of failed colonies.
Ok, it takes money, buckets of it, yes there are problems, if we took the attitude that we could not overcome them we'd still be in the primordial soup! All future endever's start with an idea. Embrace the Future, or you could slide on back to the swamp.
Thanks for the helpful review, Alan.  It is very important to periodically review not only where we are, and where we're trying to go, but also where we have been and how we got here.
I think I saw this documentary already at http://www.documentary-log.com/free-documentaries-online/category/12/astronomy-space/ but it got removed for some reason. Thanks for the article, Alan!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1939893

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google