ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Why space repairs aren't easy

Posted: Friday, May 15, 2009 6:00 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA
Click for video: Perched on the end of the space shuttle Atlantis' robotic arm,
spacewalker Andrew Feustel works on the Hubble Space Telescope with his Pistol
Grip Tool tucked at his side like a sword. Click on the image for a larger
version, or click here for a video about the tools developed for the mission.

Stray rivets? Stuck bolts? Parts that don't quite fit? Sometimes it sounds as if fixing the Hubble Space Telescope is like trying to put a new headlight in my VW Beetle. OK, there are a couple of differences - like the fact that all this is happening in zero-G, where a stray rivet or a broken bolt could ruin a $10 billion investment.

The differences between space repairs and earthly repairs go a long way toward explaining why spacewalkers' tools have to be built from scratch rather than bought off the shelf, and why it takes seven hours or more to install parts that would take much less time on Earth.

The big reason doesn't have as much to do with the technology as it does with the fact that the help desk is a few hundred miles below. During this mission, the small cameras attached to the spacewalkers' helmets ("helmet-cams") have been instrumental for showing Mission Control how the job is going so that experts on the ground can offer timely advice. Nevertheless, nice and easy does it, particularly when you're wearing thick gloves that have been compared to oven mitts.

We've already seen several examples of typical fix-it troubles, writ large because of the space environment:

  • When veteran Hubble spacewalker John Grunsfeld opened his tool bag, a stray rivet started rising up in zero-G. Fortunately, Grunsfeld made a goalie grab and rescued the rivet. Just imagine the worries that bit of metal might have caused if it floated up and around Hubble's delicate instruments. (It could have been worse.)

  • Grunsfeld's partner, Drew Feustel, had lots of trouble freeing up Hubble's Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 for removal. The bolt holding WFPC2 in place wouldn't budge: When Feustel pushed too hard, his power tool would engage a mechanism designed to avoid putting too much torque on the bolt. He got the go-ahead to override that mechanism, but he had to be careful not to push so hard that he broke the bolt. If that happened, WFPC2 would have to stay in the telescope, and its $130 million replacement camera would have to be sent back down to Earth unused. Fortunately, the bolt loosened up with a little extra elbow grease.

  • During today's spacewalk, one of the three replacement gyroscope units just wouldn't fit in its slot, no matter how hard the astronauts tried. (Maybe they tried too hard. At least that was the problem with my VW headlight.) Fortunately, Atlantis' crew packed along a spare refurbished unit that did the trick.

  • Throughout the spacewalks so far, astronauts had to deal with doors that were tricky to open and close (what do you expect when the doors haven't been used for seven years?), and tight spots that made it hard to use some of the custom-made tools (such as the "PikStik" gyro grabber).

More than 60 new tools were created for the Hubble mission, in part because the tools have to fit those bulky gloved hands. As I mentioned last fall, tool designers at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center brought an astronaut glove with them to the local hardware store so they could see what kinds of grips worked best for the Mini Power Tool they were making.

The Mini Power Tool is due to get its prime workout this weekend, when Atlantis' spacewalkers try to replace balky circuitry for the Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys and the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS for short). That's an unprecedented repair job in space, and if it works, it would be a testament to the cleverness of the gearheads at Goddard and ATK.

Your typical power tool would never work in space - and not just because it's hard to hold the darn thing with your glove. The materials and mechanisms have to stand up to the rough environment in space, where temperatures can fluctuate by dozens of degrees in the course of just one orbit. Even the lubricants have to be different: Dry-film lubricants are used in place of the wet lubricants and oils used in earthly tools.

The outer-space power tool of choice, for Hubble as well as the international space station, is the Pistol Grip Tool  - a hefty version of a cordless drill/screwdriver. That tool came into play quite a bit during today's replacement of the space telescope's gyroscopes and batteries. But it's too big for unscrewing the more than 100 screws that need to be taken out in order to fix STIS and the Advanced Camera for Surveys.

The Mini Power Tool is smaller, with a screwdriver bit that's sized just right to poke through the holes in specially designed plastic capture plates. The plates will be fitted over the access panels for the two instruments to be repaired, and catch all the screws before they float away. The tool is designed for speed rather than torque: With that many screws, you can't wait around and count the turns one by one, as spacewalkers have done during previous fix-up jobs. For the STIS repair job, one screw should be removed every 15 seconds on average (which adds up to almost a half-hour of solid unscrewing).

So what happens when the work is done? Will all those screws have to be screwed back in? Fortunately, no. STIS' original electronics access panel wasn't meant to be taken off easily, but spacewalkers should be able to clamp down the redesigned panel in a snap, just by throwing two levers. Chalk up another one for the gearheads.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Replacing a headlight in a VW Beetle ain't rocket science.  Up to 66 on the glass enclosed models, it shouldn't take more then 10 minutes tops, that is if yer not all thumbs.  67-later are more like the American style, shouldn't take more than 5 minutes tops.  Now in a weightless environment, it might be a different story altogether.......

[ALAN ADDS: As I said, I was trying too hard.   ;-)  ]

Didn't former NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe blither that "Rocket science isn't rocket science, any more."

Seems under-accurate.
It would have been cheaper to replace the Hubble rather than repair with a manned mission.  Face it folks, manned spaceflight is a titanic waste of money.  We have nowhere to go.  I have always loved space exploration, but I've realized that people will never get to a habitable planet other than earth.  These sort of "space repairs" are nothing but political expenditures.  Spend the money on trying to clean up our home.
One question that isn't really answered is how much it cost to design and build those 60 tools. That figure is hard to come by. Last year, the folks at Goddard told me it cost $10 million or so to design and make seven Pistol Grip Tools, so my guess is that the Mini Power Tool and all the other devices that had to be made for the current Hubble mission should cost at least that much. But I could be wrong. If anyone has any pointers to better estimates, please feel free to send them along.
It shouldn't cost a million dollars to create a power tool from scratch. That's ridiculous. I'm sorry, I love space stuff as much as anyone but I do think it's a collosal waste of money especially considering the state of the world and our economy right now.
Mapes is way, WAY off target.

The colonization of space is necessary for the long-term survival of our species. (Just ask Steven Hawking). As for habitability, the entire Earth was once a marginally habitable wilderness to our distant ancestors who used courage & technology to conquer it. (I take it that you don't live in a tree & forage for food, Mr. Mapes?)

If we had chosen to make Olduvai Gorge into Paradise before venturing further, then we would have become extinct millions of years ago. Manned spaceflight therefore is the most important activity of our present civilization.
Some of them tools might come in handy soon like when trying to do mechanical work in COLD weather and be able to keep the thick gloves on!!!

COOL!!!
for those that see no benefit from manned space travel... they are short sighted morons! First off there is the plethora of information that we have learned not only of our own planet, but of general science and physics that cannot be learned in any other manner that through direct experimentation and observation. Add to that the HUNDREDS of everyday products that have made our lives here on earth more convenient, safer and healthier. NASA developed heart monitors to monitor astronauts health in space. Think of the lives that have been saved by that one invention! Then there's products like Velcro, Mylar, and thousands of types of plastics that are in use in our every day lives. NASA has been invaluable.

Is a Magnet still a Magnet out in space ??

[ALAN ADDS: Yes]

Sorry, Mr. Mapes, but without manned spaceflight there would not be the political support for ANY kind of spaceflight. It may be financially irrational, but so was hurrying to beat the Russians to the moon -- we spent all that money mostly for the prestige value. We send humans into space for the same reason we sent them to the Antarctic. There was no money to be made; we send them because it is an expression of the human spirit that uplifts us.

"Some may ask, 'Why go to the moon?' And they may well ask, 'Why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas? We CHOOSE to go to the moon." -- John F. Kennedy
Are all of you serious? Talking about "it would have been cheaper to send another one up than fix this one" and "we have nowhere to go". America is being a bunch of sticks in the mud. Where's your sense of exploration? Maybe you are all just jeleous because you didn't become astronauts... who knows? All I can say is that these missions are exciting and a great example of working with other countries to accomplish a mutual goal. I don't think the EU scientists think these missions are a waste of time. I'm glad NASA continues to explore and discover the universe around us. Anything else we can learn about space isn't because we have nowhere to go, but more about what surrounds us and how we may have to rely more on it in the future. Just be a little open-minded.
Jon Mapes, We may not get to a habitable world in our lifetime, but there is more to space exploration than colonizing other plants. The advances to our technology, the knowledge we gain of the universe and ourselves, the inspiration we provide to young children. These are all beneficial to us.

Some advances are less so than others....the space pen or pencil? (Of course what happens if you break the lead on the pencil and sharpen it and the shavings or lead piece float off into instruments, so maybe the space pen was a good investment). A great advancement were these little micro bubbles that are used to soak up oil spills (You said spend it on cleaning up our home). They now sell the stuff at your local paint store. The advancement in computers. Im sure there are dozens of other examples.

Also, even un-inhabital places can offer a WEALTH of resources. Imagine miniing an asteroid for rare metals, or a comet for the water.

There is more to space than just finding another inhabitable planet. It seems to me that all of you who complain about the cost of our space program, easily forget all the good it has done this country and the world. The inspiration it gives to our children alone is worth the cost.
Love the space programs, and all those nifty, clever and brave people. Up is space or down on the ground what a beautiful crew of men and women. God bless you all and keep flying, finding and fixing.  
Its only money lol we can print more.
Sorry Jon,
we will inhabit other planets , but we will be known as space roaches, trails of crap and rubbish will follow where ever we go.

Earth,  orbit round earth ,etc ,etc ,  and we wonder why no one bothers to contact us, it would be like god   inviting big business to eden.
Watching our astronauts fix Hubble while our incomparably beautiful planet slowly passing below I think back to my senior year in high school and how it's a far cry from watching Alan Shepard arc up and over and plop in the Atlantic after his 15-minute suborbital hop in the tiny Mercury capsule.  Hubble is pure science.  Absolutely no military applications.  A genuine quest for ultimate knowledge.  And I get a very nice feeling in my gut observing these courageous and skilled astronauts making repairs 350 miles straight up and I am continually amazed that I can sit here on the ground and watch the whole process on my desktop.  It is good to be amazed from time to time, and this is one of those times.  To those Hubble fixers, God speed and a safe trip home.  I'll be watching til those tires kiss the runway at The Cape.    
NASA's budget...0.7 of 1% of the federal budget. What a bargain!!!
Jon Mapes - Typical all-new power tools from Black and Decker, for instance, probably do cost somewhere on the order of several $100,000 to a million to develop.  The difference is that that B&D expects to sell several 100,000 to a million units, so the amortization is only a few bucks per drill.

Billy Bob - A magnet is still a magnet, but electricity on the other hand is very different.  I was surprised that Alan didn't mention arcing, which becomes a huge problem in anything electrical when you try to use it in a vacuum.  You basically need to insulate everything - no exposed (or scratched) motor windings, no screw-down terminal blocks for wires, no circuit boards with simple solders or even exposed test points.  It makes things a lot more difficult to develop and build.

[ALAN ADDS: Excellent point about the arcing, I only wish I had thought of that. The Space Telescope Operations Control Center (STOCC) makes sure it powers down all the instruments that the spacewalkers are working on before they start, but they still have to be very careful, not only to avoid hurting the circuitry (or getting hurt by it) but also to avoid breaking things like the star trackers. After new instruments are installed, Hubble's handlers have to wait a while before turning them on in order to allow for outgassing. The engineers have to make sure there are no lingering wisps of volatiles that could contribute to arcing when it's time to send the juice flowing through the circuitry. That's a big reason why we probably won't see pictures from the new instruments until after Labor Day.] 
It may cost a lot of money to do all this stuff.  But think of all those well fed pets of engineers and contractor firms.  

Not only that, but if some day we do decide to send a crew of nymphos out into space to inhabit some random place, it'ld be nice if they can fix their own stuff as I'm sure triple A memberships has an exclusion clause for breakdowns occurring more than 5000 miles from earth.
...Although if not! a few bucks for nasa to join triple a could be the most intelligent investment they ever make.
I'd rather spend the money on space exploration and knowledge than more bombs and bail-outs for Goldman Sachs...
Just a thought.
Down the line they should design these space satellites or telescopes with an internal access where the astronaut doesn't have to spacewalk, where they can just dock and have all the parts accessible from there for repair.  
1)Follow-on instruments are in development (look for James Webb telescope on the internet, for example).

2)The optics of the Hubble are in great shape. Detection devices have made incredible strides since it was orbited.

3) The improved instruments were already finished and ready to go.

4) Telescopes built up to a century ago are still in use on earth. The Hale telescope (Palomar) was put in operation in the late 1940's and still does great work. The Hooker telescope (early 20th century, Mt. Wilson) has been revived. If the basic platform was well thought out, it can be bumped up as technology moves forward.

5) The argument "We could use the money to..." fix this or that was old when I watched Apollo landings. Sorry, but NASA is chump change, compared to the money used to do most everything else. The cost of bailing out a large money cemetery (i.e., large investment company)is gigantic compared to what it costs to go to Saturn.
I had to replace a headlight on a '58 VW Beetle the day I bought it -- the previous owner had installed it upside-down.  One of the damned retaining springs shot off and hit me square on the eyeball!

[ALAN ADDS: There but for the grace of God go eye.]
Don't be surprised at the cost. I'm an aircraft mechanic in the Army, and a couple of years ago we had to replace a couple of broken knobs on an old radio. They weren't stocked by the Army anymore, so we had to custom-order them from the manufacturer. At a cost of 300 dollars...EACH. For some quarter-inch by half-inch knobs, and we could have gotten comparable subsituted form Radio Shack for 89 cents. But we had to go with what the Army says to use. Yes, it's all politics there, and a waste of your tax dollars. Do astronauts need special tools? They definitely do, but not for THAT much money.
i view the exploration of space a colossal waste of money given the problems humanity faces. Famine disease and war still trouble mankind. Homelessness has become a problem. The destruction from Hurricane Katrina is still evident. The government has done more fixing a telescope in outerspace than helping fix one of its major cities.
Amen! Have you seen some of those pics from Hubble? The one with all of the galaxies from an empty spot in the sky!
     How else are our children to overcome the mess we've made of this world? Trvael to another and not waste it like we so recklessly have with this one. Maybe there is not a forseeable gain from exploration in the near future. But do you think all of the valuable info is worthless?
i agree that manned spaceflight is cool, and i am a huge science advocate. i do agree that we have nowhere to go. until the archaic method of riding a controlled explosion to space and polluting along the way is replaced with some method advanced physics will develop, we may as well be trying to fly around in a steam powered airplane. i the last 10 years, can anybody name anything that came out of the space pogram that benefitted the earth or humanity? better satellites to monitor erosion and climate change and deforestation are well worth it, but ultimately space is a huge boondoggle until we can collapse time/space and really go "somewhere".
Actually, I don't think it would have been less expensive to build another telescope.  Building the original telescope cost $1.175 BILLION back in the early 80s.  Can you imagine how much it would cost if they did that now??
Without these programs, humans would not grow.  It's human nature to see what is beyond.  The program (NASA)has done, has made our lives here better either by way of invention or modification.  Yes we went to the moon.  Yes the ISS does experiments for us. So what ever it takes I'm all for.  Keep up the good work.  Keep the telescope going.
Mapes is also wrong about replacing the Hubble with another ready-made space telescope.  The design and testing of these craft are all entirely custom, which requires huge cost.  You don't just crank out another unit and deploy it...if you think the spherical aberration from Hubble's initial deployment was bad, I can't wait to show you the hundreds of defects which can easily occur with any remotely controlled spacecraft.  This mission is a small price to pay for the gushing data fountain that Hubble has been for over 15 years.
Actually, I think it would be much more expensive to construct and send up a new version of the Hubble than to retrofit it.  Simply because it would cost billions to build the new device and then it would take at least a couple of shuttle flights to get the telescope into space.  Then it would have to be assembled which would require the creation of a set of custom tools etc.

Frankly, as long as the Hubble is able to meet the needs of NASA there is no reason to replace it.
Thank you to all the people who have a positive view of space exploration! Space is indeed the final frontier and we will one day inhabit it to a greater extent than we do already. I just hope that before the dreadful day that the Earth is no longer inhabitable and hospitable to us we will have the technology to live in space somewhere on a large enough scale to continue the human race. It is our only hope in the long run. For whether we destroy our environment or not, it is a fact that the world we enjoy and take for granted will not always be able to sustain our fragile existence. If we do not learn how to live in space then the human race will indeed one day perish forever.

Anyway, Hubble is GREAT! The incredible science it has taught us as well as the breathtaking imagery it has produced is worth far more than the $10 Billion invested! And I'm sure the brave people who have given their lives for the sake of it would whole-heartedly agree!

LONG LIVE HUBBLE!
Only after the last of 100 screws have been inserted,will it be discovered that the gasket has been left out.
Understanding space can help us understand other ways to stop air pollution, learning to control UV and many other things that we currently destroy in our own system. There have been many great advances in space that have significantly changed the way we look and do things here on earth. If man just stopped exploring period even the greatest technology we have would seize to exsist. We may not like the price we pay to do things but in time it's all worth the wait and the cost it took to get there.
Space exploration provides many countries an opportunity to work together towards a common goal.  The pride this instills in citizens of each participating nation helps to strengthen the ties that bind us.  Space exploration has everyone looking up!

It seems to me that the money would be better spent designing a better glove.

[ALAN ADDS: Glad you mentioned that, Nathan. NASA is indeed working to design a better glove, as well as a better spacesuit. Here's a story I wrote about a contest NASA and private partners recently ran to encourage better astronaut gloves:]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18474732/

[And here's what happens if you don't have a good glove:]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20275977/

Those who see no value in manned space flight are those who are still dragging their knuckles with the last administration. Although I do agree the past was made possible by a race and prestige of being first today is much different. Then again once bill energy connected to the last administration gets to the moon and starts raping it too we will need to be able to move past that and let them rape Mars and any other object in space that may keep them in the cash. Its unfortunate that we must take the good with the bad but thank god the Neanderthals of the last administration are at least extinct.. for now
A private company committed to designing a high-quality cordless power hand tool so durable that it would work in space would (aside from being "crazy") spend the same amount on R&D.  We wouldn't hear about that cost because it would be amortized over the sale of some projected millions in units to be sold to consumers over the life of the design.  NASA doesn't get to amortize that cost by selling additional production models to us (although having one would be pretty cool, no?).
Do you think the technology to write this weblog and send it to millions of people would have existed if it weren't for the space program? Someone has to, suck it up and spend a few billion $ and move us forward as a civilization.
Space is a waste, we will never get to another planet. Machines break, just look at all the work hubble has required to keep it alive.  and its only 350 miles away.  If you get halfway to pluto and your power supply or you stiss breaks down the shuttle aint coming to give you another one.  YOU JUST DIE!!  You cant live in the vacuum of space. of course some of the posters here might be able too they already live with a vacuum between their ears!!
You have to start exploring somewhere, even though that somewhere may seem pointless. The reason most of the world was settled and developed, especially North and South America, was because individuals got it in there heads to start exploring while others laughed at them and said it was pointless. We learn every day new things about the effects of space on human anatomy, and what it would take to live in it.  Sending humans into space is just as crucial to space exploration as sending a probe into the vast unknown.

The large expense for developing space power tools probably comes from all the testing that has to be performed to insure they will work properly in a space environment.  The best comparison I can come up with is say asking for a pen and paper, but wanting that pen and paper to work submerged in a lake.  Yeah, sure everyone can get or make a pen and paper, but what will it take to develop a pen that works underwater and a piece of paper that will allow you to write on it underwater with a pen, as well as stay in one piece.  When you develop something for a environment that it was originally developed for, the cost to redevelop it can grow exponentially.
Why Space Repairs Aren't Easy??? Your Kidding me right? Do you want to know why they aren't easy? BECAUSE ITS OUTER- F&*$ing- SPACE!!!! I will never go to outer space and no one reading this article will ever go to outer space... Much less try to work on a spaceship in the middle of outer space. That why its hard... They are in SPACE!!!
I think it's remarkable that an article about space science, in this case the single most productive instrument in the history of human knowledge, usually spawns an argument about wasting money, but an article about a new weapons system usually does not.  Compare the costs and usefulness of the B-2 bomber or F-22 fighter versus the Hubble Telescope.  Compare the Defense Department's budget to NASA's budget.  Maybe both are a waste of money, or maybe neither, but I find it bizarre that people generally only complain about NASA.  Perhaps people assume that because spaceflight is so awesome NASA's budget must be outlandish, but it is not, not relatively.  Maybe there is a historical reason why people tend to angrily oppose science and exploration, perhaps something to do with its history of threatening their religious beliefs.
I do have a question. What speed the shuttle is traveling out of space? When they are doing these repairs at what speed they are doing this.
In space their is no gravity like on Earth. ask yourself what's hard and what's easy. for an example if their wasn't any space program their won't be NO other way to fix it.


Why didn't we just bring Hubble home, fix it, and send it back??
Vince, we've already gone to other planets, via machines. Heck we may even leave the solar system with Voyager 1 - now 108 AU from the sun, three times as far as Pluto and still ticking.  Pretty good for something launched in 1977.
Hubble is a month past it's 19th birthday. How many 19 year old cars have you had that didnt need repairs?
It is in space, that's why.
There are so many factors involved in the maintenance aspect of this mission that can/could go wrong - but they haven't and I hope Hubble is back to 100% as it has always been after the talented astronauts working on it have demonstrated time and again.
As far as the tool issues go, people think "oh, just use a regular screwdriver," or "the one I have at home would work." Gemini astronauts were the first to have a go at this problem - and found that the laws of physics here at 1g do not apply at 0g. Turn a screw and if you're not tied down you move the opposite direction. The same holds true for power tools - you have to incorporate reduction gearing and torque limits to prevent a stripped or broken head.
I'm sure NASA is not going to spend a lot of money on specialized tools without thinking "How can we modify this for the ISS, or Orion, or another project?" Knowing the system works gives the added benefit that with a modification or two, a tool can be reused again and saves the R&D costs from starting from scratch.
And VW's are pretty simple yet hearty machines - like the Hubble. I have my VW books - I'd love to see the repair guides for the Hubble.
Outer space is far cheaper than terrestrial warfare.  We are respected for one and hated for the other.  
Pretty simple in my mind.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1934029

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google