ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



A parting shot from outer space

Posted: Monday, May 11, 2009 7:35 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / STScI / AURA
This view of the planetary nebula
Kohoutek 4-55 will be the last
"pretty picture" from Hubble's Wide
Field and Planetary Camera 2. Click
on the image for a larger view.

With only a few days before it goes dark, the camera that arguably saved the Hubble Space Telescope has delivered a stunning image of a dying star. The picture of planetary nebula Kohoutek 4-55 was snapped just last week by Hubble's Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (a.k.a. WFPC2), the instrument that also imaged the iconic "Pillars of Creation" and the Hubble Deep Field.

WFPC2 was built in the 1980s as a "clone" of the space telescope's first wide-field camera, to be used as a spare in case something went wrong with the original instrument. Something went wrong, all right, but not with the camera. Shortly after Hubble's launch in 1990, scientists discovered to their horror that the telescope's primary mirror was shaped incorrectly, crippling its optics.

Fortunately, the Hubble team figured out a way to adjust WFPC2's optics to compensate for the mirror flaw - turning the tide in the telescope's favor.

Another corrective-optics package, known as COSTAR, was built for Hubble's other instruments, and WFPC2 and COSTAR were installed during a famous set of spacewalks in 1993. It wasn't long after that that Hubble came into its own. WFPC2 served as Hubble's primary observing instrument in visible-light wavelengths until the Advanced Camera for Surveys arrived in 2002.


NASA / STScI
Click for slideshow:
Revisit Hubble's highs
and lows, including the
Pillars of Creation.

WFPC2's best-known picture just might be 1995's Pillars of Creation - a view of the Eagle Nebula that shows fingers of gas and dust enshrouding newborn stars. NASA's science mission chief, Ed Weiler, frequently points to the Eagle Nebula as Hubble's hallmark. "You don't see Eagle Nebulas on the cover of Time magazine taken from the ground," he said recently. "You see them from Hubble. Hubble still has a unique niche."

Toward the end of 1995, Hubble's handlers pointed the telescope toward a seemingly empty patch of sky - and came up with what was then the deepest view of the universe ever captured. WFPC2's Hubble Deep Field includes some galaxies that are more than 12 billion light-years away.

Since then, there have been somewhat deeper views - including the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, created using the Advanced Camera for Surveys and the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer. But there'll never be any deep field like the first Deep Field. "It is hard to remember an image that has had such an impact in such a short time," astronomer Richard Ellis has been quoted as saying.

The camera also produced trailblazing images of Saturn, Mars, Jupiter and other planets. It was one of the best witnesses to Comet Shoemaker-Levy's impact on Jupiter in 1994. And then there are those planetary nebulae. When a star nears the end of its life, it can throw off billowing bubbles of colorful gas and dust. Back in the 18th and 19th centuries, some astronomers wondered whether these puffballs were actually planets - sparking the not-quite-accurate name for the nebulae.

WFPC2 has seen lots of nebulae in its day. The best-known may well be Eta Carinae, a supermassive star that looks as if it could go supernova any day now.

The color-coded picture of Kohoutek 4-55, taken on May 4 and released on Sunday, shows a bright inner ring surrounded by a bipolar structure reminiscent of Eta Carinae's double bubble. The entire system is shrouded by a faint, red, swirling halo - which is "fairly uncommon in planetary nebulae," according to a news release from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The red colors represent nitrogen emissions, green represents hydrogen, and blue stands for oxygen.

Kohoutek 4-55, or K 4-55 for short, is one of a series of planetary nebulae that were named after their discoverer, Czech astronomer Lubos Kohoutek. Yes, that Kohoutek. It's nearly 4,600 light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Cygnus.

NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute say this view of K 4-55 will serve as WFPC2's final "pretty picture." The shuttle Atlantis' astronauts are due to remove the 16-year-old camera from Hubble's chest later this week and replace it with a new, improved instrument called Wide Field Camera 3.

During the buildup to today's Atlantis launch, Weiler said he remembered the exact moment when WFPC2 was put into Hubble, and he'll remember the moment when it's taken out. "But I really look forward to the moment when I get to walk up to it and touch it someday in the Smithsonian and say, 'That is the camera that saved Hubble.'"

For more reminiscences of WFPC2's wonders, check out Universe Today's list of the camera's greatest hits, NASA's WFPC2 gallery and this tribute from Music of the Spheres. Our Space Gallery includes more stunners from all of Hubble's instruments, and our Human Spaceflight section keeps you up to date on the Atlantis mission.

Update for 11:22 a.m. ET May 12: Some commenters may have gotten the misimpression that Hubble itself is passing away. Actually, the current shuttle mission will give Hubble a new lease on life, as we've described in more than one report. It's just WFPC2 that is going out of business. However, the camera played such a big role in reviving Hubble that it's eminently worthy of a place in the Smithsonian. I can visualize it on display alongside a mockup of the space telescope. At one time there had been talk about bringing the actual telescope back down for veneration in a space shuttle payload bay, but because the shuttle fleet is due to be retired next year, there's currently no way to bring the thing down intact.

On another matter, at least one commenter has questioned whether Eta Carinae should be classified as a planetary nebula - and just to be safe, I've revised this item to leave the question a bit more open. 

Update for 10:25 p.m. ET May 13: We may see WFPC2 at the Smithsonian sooner than I thought. D.C. Agle, a spokesman for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told me that the camera is due to go on temporary display in October, and become a permanent part of the Smithsonian's collection later.

You might ask whatever happened to Hubble's first wide-field camera, WFPC1. Well, it's too late to put that one on display anywhere: Many of its parts were recycled to build the Wide Field Camera 3, WFPC2's replacement.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Have we touched the face of God?
I haven't been able to find the magnification specifications. Does anybody know what the magnification power is on the WFPC2 and what it will be on the Wide Field Camera 3?

No doubt it should be much greater on the new camera.
Alan:
I like putting these type photos you have as my computer background.  I get so many people asking me what the pictures are.  I have fun telling them they are from millions or billions of years ago and we are just now seeing them for the first time.  It is so hard for some people to understand the concept.  I explain the time it takes our sun's rays to hit the earth.  It helps them somewhat, but to fathom light that has traveled billions of years are now being caught in the minutest time frame can be a bit overwhelming for some.  
I even suggest, that maybe we are looking at what our own galaxy looked like a billion years ago.
Great, Delmar: It's amazing to realize that we're seeing galaxies from a time before our own sun was formed. That's something we often take for granted, even when we hear that the galaxies are X billion light-years away.
@ David Breeson:  Whether we are observing from Earth or in the space around it, every star we see is in a "past" form.  If it is one lightyear away, we are seeing it as it was a year ago.  1 billion lightyears, then we are seeing it as it was 1 billion years ago.  The only way to see it in "real time" would be to travel to the actual star/planet/nebula/etc.  It's neat to have a kind of "time machine", but it would be even better to know what is out there NOW.  Hope that helped.
Without naysayers, life would be boring. Keep on truckin' Hubble!
The pictures of the Hubble telescope are all colored artificially.If they are showed exactly as pictured it would be impressive.Otherwise it is comic book art.
Hubble has triggered a constant of wanting to learn and discover for me and I hope it's the same for others. I just want to give thanks to everyone that made that possible cause it has changed my aspect on everything and everyone.
HUBBLE HAS BEEN AN OPENING EYE TO OUR PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE..... I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT AN UPGRADE WILL BRING US! SPACE IS AN INFINITE MYSTERY AND LITTLE BY LITTLE WE'RE TURNING THE SUSPENSEFUL PAGES.... I AM INTRIGUED AND DUMBFOUNDED BY THE BEAUTY THAT SURROUNDS US, THAT WE'VE ONLY BEGUN TO SEE THANKS TO NASA & HUBBLE!~ AND OF COURSE WE TAX PAYERS. :)
 To Chris Reeve: excellent expositional contribution.
 To John Ford: NASA spotting all the incoming? They can't even keep up with the junk they're creating.Which is what makes things so....interesting for the present crew aloft.
  In early march of this year, an object dubbed 2009 DD45,30-40 meters wide, travelling at 8.82 kilometers per second came within 72,200 km of of our planet. Astronomically speaking, this is very close. Nothing to worry about; the impact would only have been 10-15 megatons. The warning time was 3 days, but might as well have been 3 years. There is no real contingency plan in place.
  Limited efforts have been made to identify some of the larger objects, but Brownian motion and budgets have prevented stellar results.
"Will it see a supernova as it happens or years later as the light reaches the earth? I would think it is just magnifying the light that reaches the mirror. Therefore the supernova which the article refers to has happened hundreds of years ago...not in a future few days. Inquiring minds need to know."

Of course it's basically a big light collector, like any other telescope. The speed of light doesn't change just because the Hubble telescope is looking at it. If you point it at Alpha Centauri, it's seeing light that's been enroute for about 4.5 years.

Hubble's advantage is being above the atmosphere where that light would be distorted, some wavelengths absorbed (HST can see somewhat into the infrared as well. But infrared is strongly absorbed by water vapor in the lower atmosphere) and weather/daytime is not an issue, allowing more time for observations.

But the light it sees is just as old as it would be for anyone else...
The grand old warhorse carries on!  A moment to rember Lyman Spitzer who pushed it, the engineers who designed it, the technicians who built it, a certain instrument manufacturer who shall remain nameless and the astronauts who have, and will, nurture and nurse it!  The pity is that the thing cannot be recovered for the Smithsonian!

Now, let's all show our reverence for Hubble and start using only objective and verifiable facts in the discussions.  Drop the fairy tales and superstitions, please.
one wonders that if two such space telescopes were positioned on opposite sides of the Earth and both were pointed at the same area of space, would they be able to generate a 3D "photo", showing a region of space with depth?
wow that is soooooo cool when i grow up i wanna be a ashronut................but usally when i tell ppl they also say why or your wired or something like that but i dont reall y care


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1928665

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google