ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



A parting shot from outer space

Posted: Monday, May 11, 2009 7:35 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / STScI / AURA
This view of the planetary nebula
Kohoutek 4-55 will be the last
"pretty picture" from Hubble's Wide
Field and Planetary Camera 2. Click
on the image for a larger view.

With only a few days before it goes dark, the camera that arguably saved the Hubble Space Telescope has delivered a stunning image of a dying star. The picture of planetary nebula Kohoutek 4-55 was snapped just last week by Hubble's Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (a.k.a. WFPC2), the instrument that also imaged the iconic "Pillars of Creation" and the Hubble Deep Field.

WFPC2 was built in the 1980s as a "clone" of the space telescope's first wide-field camera, to be used as a spare in case something went wrong with the original instrument. Something went wrong, all right, but not with the camera. Shortly after Hubble's launch in 1990, scientists discovered to their horror that the telescope's primary mirror was shaped incorrectly, crippling its optics.

Fortunately, the Hubble team figured out a way to adjust WFPC2's optics to compensate for the mirror flaw - turning the tide in the telescope's favor.

Another corrective-optics package, known as COSTAR, was built for Hubble's other instruments, and WFPC2 and COSTAR were installed during a famous set of spacewalks in 1993. It wasn't long after that that Hubble came into its own. WFPC2 served as Hubble's primary observing instrument in visible-light wavelengths until the Advanced Camera for Surveys arrived in 2002.


NASA / STScI
Click for slideshow:
Revisit Hubble's highs
and lows, including the
Pillars of Creation.

WFPC2's best-known picture just might be 1995's Pillars of Creation - a view of the Eagle Nebula that shows fingers of gas and dust enshrouding newborn stars. NASA's science mission chief, Ed Weiler, frequently points to the Eagle Nebula as Hubble's hallmark. "You don't see Eagle Nebulas on the cover of Time magazine taken from the ground," he said recently. "You see them from Hubble. Hubble still has a unique niche."

Toward the end of 1995, Hubble's handlers pointed the telescope toward a seemingly empty patch of sky - and came up with what was then the deepest view of the universe ever captured. WFPC2's Hubble Deep Field includes some galaxies that are more than 12 billion light-years away.

Since then, there have been somewhat deeper views - including the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, created using the Advanced Camera for Surveys and the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer. But there'll never be any deep field like the first Deep Field. "It is hard to remember an image that has had such an impact in such a short time," astronomer Richard Ellis has been quoted as saying.

The camera also produced trailblazing images of Saturn, Mars, Jupiter and other planets. It was one of the best witnesses to Comet Shoemaker-Levy's impact on Jupiter in 1994. And then there are those planetary nebulae. When a star nears the end of its life, it can throw off billowing bubbles of colorful gas and dust. Back in the 18th and 19th centuries, some astronomers wondered whether these puffballs were actually planets - sparking the not-quite-accurate name for the nebulae.

WFPC2 has seen lots of nebulae in its day. The best-known may well be Eta Carinae, a supermassive star that looks as if it could go supernova any day now.

The color-coded picture of Kohoutek 4-55, taken on May 4 and released on Sunday, shows a bright inner ring surrounded by a bipolar structure reminiscent of Eta Carinae's double bubble. The entire system is shrouded by a faint, red, swirling halo - which is "fairly uncommon in planetary nebulae," according to a news release from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The red colors represent nitrogen emissions, green represents hydrogen, and blue stands for oxygen.

Kohoutek 4-55, or K 4-55 for short, is one of a series of planetary nebulae that were named after their discoverer, Czech astronomer Lubos Kohoutek. Yes, that Kohoutek. It's nearly 4,600 light-years from Earth in the northern constellation Cygnus.

NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute say this view of K 4-55 will serve as WFPC2's final "pretty picture." The shuttle Atlantis' astronauts are due to remove the 16-year-old camera from Hubble's chest later this week and replace it with a new, improved instrument called Wide Field Camera 3.

During the buildup to today's Atlantis launch, Weiler said he remembered the exact moment when WFPC2 was put into Hubble, and he'll remember the moment when it's taken out. "But I really look forward to the moment when I get to walk up to it and touch it someday in the Smithsonian and say, 'That is the camera that saved Hubble.'"

For more reminiscences of WFPC2's wonders, check out Universe Today's list of the camera's greatest hits, NASA's WFPC2 gallery and this tribute from Music of the Spheres. Our Space Gallery includes more stunners from all of Hubble's instruments, and our Human Spaceflight section keeps you up to date on the Atlantis mission.

Update for 11:22 a.m. ET May 12: Some commenters may have gotten the misimpression that Hubble itself is passing away. Actually, the current shuttle mission will give Hubble a new lease on life, as we've described in more than one report. It's just WFPC2 that is going out of business. However, the camera played such a big role in reviving Hubble that it's eminently worthy of a place in the Smithsonian. I can visualize it on display alongside a mockup of the space telescope. At one time there had been talk about bringing the actual telescope back down for veneration in a space shuttle payload bay, but because the shuttle fleet is due to be retired next year, there's currently no way to bring the thing down intact.

On another matter, at least one commenter has questioned whether Eta Carinae should be classified as a planetary nebula - and just to be safe, I've revised this item to leave the question a bit more open. 

Update for 10:25 p.m. ET May 13: We may see WFPC2 at the Smithsonian sooner than I thought. D.C. Agle, a spokesman for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told me that the camera is due to go on temporary display in October, and become a permanent part of the Smithsonian's collection later.

You might ask whatever happened to Hubble's first wide-field camera, WFPC1. Well, it's too late to put that one on display anywhere: Many of its parts were recycled to build the Wide Field Camera 3, WFPC2's replacement.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The Hubble telescope has forever entrenched its place in the long and powerful history of human achievements. A darling to many enthusiasts, it will be missed.
With all that has been observed and learned about our universe, a replacement for Hubble is sorely needed.  So much of the value of our space program eludes the common man, but seeing these glimpses of the universe speaks volumes about the real value of NASA and all that work to keep it running.
SOME OF THE BEST PICTURES I HAVE EVER SEEN THANKS
The Hubble telescope has provided data of unimaginable richness for many years to the Earth's scientific and secular societies. We could not even begin to guess even at what would be discovered, however predecessors will provide even more adventures... In the meantime: Thank you Hubble telescope!
Wow.  If the new equpiment will make the pictures even better, we are going to be in for some amazing science!  This should tied us over until the JWST.
"JUST INCREDIBLE"
About 1940 my first astronomy book; a present from my aunt,was yet another spring that propelled me into a life in science that I have never regreted. Who could have imagined the "Hubble" along with so many other fasinating instruments and inventors could have brought us this far into the world of knowledge.  
The amazing views of the heavens from the Hubble tellescope have been monumental.  What a time to have lived when this was made possible!
I can't believe some of the amazing information that this camera has garnered for science.  Hubble's not going away though, just getting a much-needed facelift.  A technological botox shot if you will.  And it is even named after a deserving man too.  The Hubble is one of man's greatest achievements and ultimate successes.
Hopefully everything will go well. It would be a real bummer to replace something that seems to be working OK and then find out its replacement needs an adjustment and that’s not in the budget.
 About Hubble: What needs to be said other than Hubble has enriched our knowledge about the universe we live in?  An undestatement! Hubble is awesome!  Awesome!!!
 And in addition, a comment about that New Yorker article regarding Star Trek: The writer Anthony Lane....where did his little mind crawl out from? Okay, Tony, Trek's had a few setbacks. Yet Star Trek has inspired so many people to great things that there isn't enough room here to list them.  Do your research, or do you know what that word means?
 Alan, perhaps you just got to give the anti-types a little floor space now-and-then. Oh well.  So much for Alan Boyle.
It's worth noting that the bipolar formation is the characteristic shape of a laboratory plasma z-pinch.  Astrophysicists are not actually taught what z-pinches are, so when they see them in space, they fail to recognize the likeness.  Aristotle's empirical method demands that we consider likenesses between laboratory plasma experimentation and large-scale cosmic plasmas (these are not gases) to have roots in the same cause.  It's pre-existing belief about how cosmic plasmas behave which constrains their interpretations.  Plasmas can scale over 16 orders of magnitude, according to plasma researcher and IEEE peer-reviewer, Anthony Peratt, so our observations in the laboratory do indeed apply to space.

This COS upgrade to Hubble (COS stands for Cosmic Origins Spectrograph) will study the plasma filaments that crisscross the universe.  Again, it's worth noting that within the laboratory, plasmas naturally form filaments, and these filaments are in fact electrical transmission lines.  We observe plasma filaments (oftentimes in twisted magnetic form) on all scales of observations -- including interplanetary, interstellar and intergalactic.  THEMIS, for instance, confirmed that magnetic ropes regularly connect the Sun with the Earth's atmosphere.  There is also the double helix nebula that originates from the core of our own Milky Way.  Magnetic ropes are called Birkeland Currents within the laboratory.  But, again, astrophysicists are not trained to look for them in space.  So, they've invented numerous terms to describe what they see.  "Flux ropes", "magnetic ropes", "magnetic flux ropes", "field aligned currents", "plasma ropes", "plasma cables", "magnetic cables", "current constrictions", "plasma rays", "electrical tornadoes" and even "magnetic slinkies" and "elephant trunks" may all show up in searches through astrophysical journals.  They are actually all the same thing -- Birkeland Currents.  And when you see them, you know that the plasma is conducting electrical current.  This is not the behavior of winds, fluids or gases.  Within the laboratory, we observe that plasma filaments possess both long-range attraction and short-range repulsion with one another, with the force of the electric force.  Astrophysicists like to imagine that the electric force is canceled on large scales (Debye shielding), but Debye shielding has nothing at all to do with Birkeland Currents.  The transmission lines in fact possess limitless range.  They are incredibly efficient.  What's especially interesting is that they can also emit microwaves and sort out elements of the periodic table into these filamentary structures.  A researcher named Gerritt Verschuur has identified 200 correlations between local galactic filaments and WMAP hotspots.  It is possible that the CMB is nothing more than an electromagnetic fog.

In fact, an astronomer Fred Hoyle once noted:

"A man who falls asleep on the top of a mountain and who awakes in a fog does not think he is looking at the origin of the Universe. He thinks he is in a fog."
This hubble photo looks just like the explosion on the cover of Boston's debut album :
http://www.ninjavspenguin.com/blog/2008/11/20/happy-birthday-roger/
getting close to the FIRST DAY... A CREATOR NOEBODYNOES???...NEVER WILL!!!...GETTING READY FOR THE FALL...DEADRISE...
When will we stop trying to apply our vague knowledge of physics to determine distance and "relative speed" of light? The universe has dimensions that we cannot even grasp yet.

Bzzt, the Carina Nebula is an Emission nebula, not a Planetary. Still, HST took a lot of pictures of planetary nebulae.

[ALAN ADDS: James, I kinda wondered about that myself, and I was reassured by the classification included on this NASA page:

http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/detail/NVA2~8~8~12498~113039:Doomed-Star-Eta-Carinae

[Planetary nebulae are a subset of emission nebulae, characterized by a central star that's in its death throes. Is Eta Carinae on its deathbed? Looks like she's about to blow, but no one can predict exactly when the end (which is expected to be spectacular) will come.]

If we find a way to see the universe in a better manner or less costly we should opt for it. Until then the money we spend on Hubble is no "earmark" and should be spent with pride.  
Wow! That's not merely enough to describe this but it will have to do

Great article and pretty picture Alan.  The link to click on K 4-55 is broken as we can't get a larger view.  It was amazing how NASA was able to put corrective lenses on the incorrectly ground big mirror to correct it's flawed vision.  A great launch yesterday and I can't wait for the astronauts to start doing the spacewalks to fix Hubble.  More prety pictures will be forthcoming soon.

[ALAN ADDS: Thanks so much, Eric: I missed that step to link to the larger picture but that's now been fixed. All the best to you and all of Hubble's fans.]

There is no doubt about it.  If you had to name one invention other then the Wheel that change the world it would have to be photography.  We take this invention for granted but it has given us so much and advanced our understanding of the arts, science and technology, Space ... the final frontier.
Let's not write Hubble's obituary just yet. With the latest servicing mission, we should hopefully get another 10 years of amazing photos from this wonderful technological achievement. The Hubble servicing missions are a fine example of what mankind can accomplish in space.
Color-coding? Isn't that another way to say "it's so photoshopped"?
GOD'S hands have finally reached us in such a magnificient way and that we can ALL  see.
I hope they keep Hubble going long after they put the new one up there.  I see no reason to get rid of it at this point.  Much better having two up there, they can see a lot more in a shorter time period.
QUESTION: When the Hubble looks into deep space is it seeing the object in real time or earth time? Will it see a supernova as it happens or years later as the light reaches the earth? I would think it is just magnifying the light that reaches the mirror. Therefore the supernova which the article refers to has happened hundreds of years ago...not in a future few days. Inquiring minds need to know.
John Calvin, the Hubble isn't going anywhere, the old camera is.
This is one of the greatest scientific achievements of the 20th, everyone who has any knowledge of this equipment should be both elated and upset.

Kenneth Kleinkennecht (Former NASA Engineer) once told me, "I worked on Gemini, Apollo and other such missions, but I wish I could have been there for that."

Thank you for all your hard oustanding work NASA! Thank you Hubble!
The Hubble, and the persons who built and maintained it, changed the way we see our universe and ourselves. Thank you!
Bye and Thank you Hubble for the fantastic views and deep inshghts you have given me - given Man - about our Universe. we see Life in a different way through your eyes.
This article was somewhat misleading.  It seems to imply that hubble is done.  It is not, they are just replacing the older camera with something new.  Hubble will still be there, so there is nothing to "miss"
good bye hubble space telescope
HUBBLE RULES!!!
Kudos to the Atlantis team working hard to keep this national treasure up and running as long as possible. Hubble will gain at least another decade of life after this service mission. The payoff for the entire human race is priceless.
Awestruck by the Hubble and what's it brought to us.  We can accomplish so much! It makes me proud.
Hubble is not being decommissioned!  Instead, it is getting a new, improved "wide field camera".  With an even stronger camera, Hubble should be able to find even deeper universal gems.  Yet despite these advances in optics, I often wonder if NASA will ever  find all of the dangerous asteroids near the earth.
The Hubble Telescope did well to sight The Tear Drop (Bubble) of Nebula Star in space.  Thanks for the image that will be treasured in our minds.  Job well done.
Considering the cost of a space shuttle flight being up to a billion dollars a pop, I'm surpised they didn't just spend the extra money (maybe $100-200 million) and build a new telescope to go with the camera.  Then we'd have 2 awesome cameras up there to explore with.
Well it it's time for another Hubble-type telescope,.....let some other government pay for it.  I'm tired of having my U.S. tax dollars spent for the good of humanity, only to be derided and hated by the rest of the world.  Step up, China.  How 'bout you Russia.  Y'all have lots of oil money.  Hey United Arab Emerates, why not spend some of your oil money on something good for the planet instead of indoor ski slopes, thoroghbred horses, and a replica of Churchill Downs.  France? Germany? Italy? Japan? ....Anybody?  Iran?...Buehler?...Anybody?  

Given what Hubble has provided mankind, can someone please tell me why they can't bring it back to Earth after it's service life is finished? It should be classified as a great achievement of Science and a national treasure and saved from destruction. Why can't it be placed in the Smithsonian with other great inventions? Is there something about it I don't know that would prevent this?

[ALAN B. ADDS: I've just added a little bit to the item in hopes of explaining this. The short answer is that the telescope appears likely to outlast the space shuttle fleet, and currently there's no other space vehicle capable of bringing Hubble down through the atmosphere intact. Now, if someone could develop and launch a new type of space van in the next five or 10 years, there might be a chance...]

Well that's pretty rad! watching a dying star... Let's just hope the sun doesn't die on us
The Hubble is a great thing created by man and tells us a lot about space but that alone should tell us how small we are in this vast universe and should put aside our petty differences and wars for space on this tiny planet and see how much we can accomplish working together as a human race that can succeed at anything when we look at the bigger picture.  
So, about this Eta Carinae, do such explosions happen fast?  It looks like an exploding photo-flash bulb, something I had plenty of experience with 50 years ago, that was caught on film by another camera using a high speed lens or stop-action photography.
It pleases me to no end that we are going to repair this marvelous machine to extend it useful life. Once it's days are ended, I hope we send up a "Hubble II" so that the work begun by the first can be continued.
Hubble to me as set a standed that will last a long time in each and every human mind on earth.Never in our history as one items created so much buzz about space and it many solar systems.Hubble as open our understanding on our place in the universe,and what a grand view it is.
If you see my Grandma up there say hello for me.
The Eta Carina nebula is definitely not a planetary. Planetary nebulae are the death throes of stars of modest size becoming a white dwarf. Eta Carina is an enormous star, acting more like a Wolf-Rayet star shedding "excess" mass in pulses. Its death throes will more likely be as a supernova than a white dwarf.
Nerds.
I cannot thank NASA and others who contributed photos to this collection enough.  I spent a wonderfully blissful morning looking at these spectacular images while having my "quiet time" with my cup of tea.  I cannot remember when I felt so in awe of the universe.  Thank you most sincerely.
Looks like a proto galaxy with two forming galactic arms...maybe in another 5-6 billion years.
We're a computer class that's learning about weblogs. Thanks for all the good information about Hubble.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1928665

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google