ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Hubble's new superpowers

Posted: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:50 AM by Alan Boyle


ESA
Click for video: Atlantis grabs hold of the Hubble Space
Telescope in this artwork illustrating the mission plan. Click on
the image for more about Hubble and its new instruments.

When astronauts from the shuttle Atlantis open up the Hubble Space Telescope for its final extreme makeover, much of the work will be aimed at fixing what's been ailing the world's premier orbiting observatory. It'll get fresh batteries and brand-new gyros, and if all goes well, Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys and the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph will be back in full working order for the first time in years.

But this is not just a fix-up mission. Two new instruments are due to be swapped into the mix, and those enhancements should give Hubble superpowers it never had before: for example, three-in-one vision that spans the spectrum from ultraviolet to infrared, and the ability to make out the cosmic cobwebs that stretch out between galaxies.

"We're all looking forward to seeing how well the new installations and the instrument repairs go," Ken Sembach, Hubble project scientist at the Baltimore-based Space Telescope Science Institute, told me this week. "We're looking forward to an improved Hubble."

The new instruments, known as the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3, or "Wiff-see-three") and the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (or COS), should open the way for new wonders and speed up the pace of discovery during Hubble's final five years. They're designed to complement the two instruments being repaired - or replace them in case they can't be fixed.

Here's a quick guide to Hubble's future superpowers and how they'll mesh with the space telescope's pre-existing capabilities:


NASA
Computer-generated graphics show where the Wide Field Camera 3 will go.

WFC3: Superman's three-in-one vision
The $75 million Wide Field Camera 3's superpowers have their roots in its enhanced sensitivity in wavelengths ranging from the ultraviolet part of the electromagnetic spectrum, through visible wavelengths and into the infrared.

"This camera basically is doing the work of two or even three cameras, if you think about the previous generations of instruments," Sembach said. He said its sensitivity to infrared light is 10 to 30 times that of Hubble's old workhorse for those wavelengths, the now-dormant Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer, a.k.a. NICMOS.

WFC3 takes full advantage of manufacturing standards that just weren't available for earlier instruments - such as the camera it's replacing, the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2, or "Wiff-pic-two"). During image processing, engineers usually have to work around the small blemishes caused by imperfections in the camera detectors, but with WFC3, "we can remove almost all of those to very high precision," Sembach said.

Once the camera gets to work, you can expect bunches of eye-popping, color-enhanced images that combine ultraviolet, visible-light and infrared data. "One of the real drivers behind this camera, scientifically, was really wanting to understand what's going on in star-forming regions," Sembach explained.

The infrared detectors can pick up the light that filters through warm clouds of interstellar dust, while the ultraviolet/visible light detectors can spot the hot blue stars that are just crackling into existence. "You can start to build up a more complete picture of how these stars are forming, and how they're interacting," Sembach said.

To get an idea how observations from multiple wavelengths can be put together, check out the Hubble/Spitzer/GALEX image of the galaxy M81, and the Chandra/Hubble/Spitzer/GALEX view of the galaxy M51.

WFC3 also is equipped with "grisms" - grating-equipped prisms that can analyze the spectral signature of light and determine how distant a celestial object is, based on its redshift.

"One of the other things that WFC3 was really designed for is to look back at earlier times of the universe and pick out really red things, as a precursor to what we'll be doing with the James Webb Space Telescope in the 2013-2014 time frame," Sembach said. "It's going to be a very interesting time to look at, when galaxies are just first coming together."

The new camera could help Hubble double or triple the rate of discovery for extremely distant supernovae. Those are just the kinds of observations that can help sort out the mysteries surrounding the accelerating expansion of the universe. For more about that and other WFC3 wonders, check out this NASA Web page.


NASA
An artist's rendition shows an astronaut installing the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph.

COS: The Flash's speediness for spectroscopy
We've already mentioned how WFC3 can analyze the characteristics of light from distant galaxies to figure out how far away they are. When it comes to ultraviolet wavelengths, the $70 million Cosmic Origins Spectrograph is built to conduct that kind of analysis with far greater sensitivity than WFC3 or the space telescope's other spectrograph could manage.

The Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph, or STIS, performed a similar duty before it broke down in 2004. But COS is built to handle light far more efficiently. "In STIS, there are many, many bounces before the light gets into the detector. In COS, there's only one bounce. ... You gain a lot just by not absorbing that light," Sembach said.

As a result, COS will be 10 to 30 times more sensitive than STIS was, depending on the brightness of the object you're observing. "If you want to take a spectrum of a star or a quasar or galaxy, what normally would have taken you 10 orbits will just take one orbit," Sembach said.

And when it comes to dimmer objects, COS can do more in two weeks than STIS could do in a year. That opens up whole new vistas in astronomy. Job No. 1 is to chart the ethereal cosmic web that apparently provided the framework for galaxy clusters soon after the universe was born - hence the reference to "Cosmic Origins" in the contraption's name. Learning more about the cosmic web may also tell astronomers more about the mysterious unseen stuff known as dark matter.

"That cosmic webbing can't currently be imaged with Hubble or any other observatory up there," Sembach said. "There's no way to study it other than to observe the light that's processed through it. You're looking for the 'fingerprint' of that stuff on the light, basically."

Eventually, COS' scientists will use hundreds of fingerprint analyses, pointing in all directions into the sky, to build up what they call a "CAT scan of the universe."

But wait ... there's more: COS should be able to track the flow stellar winds and even sample the starlight shining through the atmospheres of alien planets. "For example, you might be able to see whether a planet's atmosphere has hydrogen or carbon or oxygen in it," Sembach said.

COS will be installed in a slot currently taken up by a corrective-optics package known as COSTAR. Spacewalkers installed COSTAR back in 1993 to compensate for Hubble's incorrectly shaped mirror. But now all of Hubble's instruments have their own built-in corrective optics, so COSTAR is no longer needed. It will be brought back down to Earth aboard Atlantis, along with WFPC2.

What's ahead: The League of Extraordinary Instruments
If everything goes right, Hubble will have two cameras, WFC3 (new) and ACS (repaired) ... and two spectrographs, COS (new) and STIS (repaired). Does it sound as if there's some NASA-style redundancy going on? Maybe a little bit. After all, it's by no means certain that ACS and STIS will be repaired.


NASA
A diagram shows the location of Hubble's instruments after servicing: Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3), Near
Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer
(NICMOS), Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph
(STIS), Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS);
Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) and Fine
Guidance Sensors (FGS) for pointing and astrometry.

Hubble's handlers say the instruments will complement each other instead of duplicating each other. For example, ACS is particularly good at taking pictures in visible-light wavelengths, but not as good at either end of the spectrum. In contrast, WFC3 is optimized for the ultraviolet and the infrared wavelengths.

When it comes to taking pictures of the dusty protoplanetary disks around stars, or even directly imaging planets around other stars, ACS will be the instrument of choice because it has a coronagraph that can block out a star's glare. WFC3, which was designed before ACS went on the fritz in 2007, doesn't have one.

That doesn't mean WFC3 is totally incapable of seeing an extrasolar planet. "If conditions are right, it might be possible to get a direct image with some clever observing techniques," Sembach said. But the example does show that the old instruments can still do some things better than the new ones.

It's the same with STIS: "It's capable of spectroscopy at optical wavelengths, which COS is not," Sembach said. If STIS is returned to working order, it will be the instrument of choice for analyzing alien atmospheres and watching black holes gobble up gas. Generally speaking, COS can gather light more efficiently, but STIS can study areas of the sky in higher resolution.

Having instruments with overlapping capabilities is a good thing, Sembach said: "Being able to do something two different ways provides validation that what you're seeing is correct, or maybe confirmation that it isn't."

Sembach and his colleagues on the Hubble team should find out how much capability they'll have soon after each of the Atlantis crew's five spacewalks. First there'll be an "aliveness test" to make sure all the circuitry is hooked up correctly. If the connections needs tweaking, the job might have to be handled during a later spacewalk. Later, Hubble's engineers will conduct functional tests and calibrate the instruments.

"We'll start interleaving some science observations with the calibration observations sometime in July and August," Sembach said.

Meanwhile, the Hubble team will try to bring NICMOS back online as well. "It relies upon a cooling system that has been off since September of last year, and we've been unable to restart it," Sembach said. "We will try again to restart it this summer."

Look for the first fruits of Hubble's new (and restored) superpowers to be revealed shortly after Labor Day.

More about Hubble and Atlantis' mission:

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Could we eventually put something like the Hubble on the Moon?  There is little if any atmosphere to interfere with observations.  How can we do that?  I would think that multiple telescopes look could search more than just the one.
Great informative article on the upcoming Hubble mission to fix it up to new heights!  I am so jazzed that finally we're going to see even better pictures from Hubble and to watch the astronauts live on NASA tv doing their spacewalks.  I remember watching Gemini and Apollo space missions and the video quality and timing of what we could see when astronauts were in space and now we're blessed with video that's so many orders of magnitude better than those good old days.  You did a really nice job describing the new modules being put on this trip.

I sure wish Atlantis the best of weather for Monday's launch and hope there are no launch problems.  In one sense the shuttle accident years ago that pushed this mission back has been something of a blessing in disguise as now Hubble will get a better set of upgrades because of it.  Plus it was fortuitous that the previous launch date last fall was pushed back because of that communications problem helped NASA come up with a replacement for that problem as well.  I sure look forward to seeing the new pictures that the improved Hubble will show us in the future.

Go Atlantis!
Is there dust on the lunar regolith that the solar wind would kick up and coat the lenses with?
How about a mobile large aperature telescope. My company is designing a 120" system concept that will be totally mobile and able to be set up in less than three minutes. NASA is looking at it as we speak.
It would seem improbable that so many millions of dollars would be spent to look only at the stars.
  For my money there should be a two fold purpose;
For space research and for multiple military uses.
Combining existing directional controls and GPS should allow the Hubble users to pinpoint Earth and orbiting  targets for observation and destruction.
 I believe the military uses are in line with what the U.S. government wants and has always wanted.
You note how much effort must go into servicing the Hubble at a distance of only 200 miles--imagine how much harder that would become at 250,000 miles.
How do we get it done on the moon?  Get rid of all the politicians first, and put people with brains in office.  That way, we'd have the moon-scope within a decade.  OR, we could privatize the space program and it will be done in a couple of years.
Stein,

The moon would be problematic. If we place the telescope on the side of the moon facing the Earth, then radiation and reflection from Earth may greatly impact quality. Place it on the other side of the moon, and there is no way to get the images back to Earth. In either case, observations could only be carried out during times when the sun is not interfering. In space, you can just turn the telescope around so it's facing away from the sun.
I pled with Congress to keep Hubble serviced, up and running at least until the new telescope is ready to be launched.
In fact, if both can be kept in use, they should be.
Hubble has been our most remarkable window onto the Universe and is very historic.
It should be kept going as long as it can be useful for us.
It's a remarkable device which inspires us with every wonderful photograph it captures.
A story that made my day!! The great discoverer Hubble has been such a blessing to all of us. Thanks
As always a great article.  You mention the old misshaped mirror.  I remember my frustration as a taxpayer and a science enthusiast because I never found out if the government was reimbursed for the mistake and the cost of fixing it.  Does anyone know?
I sure hope that this and other articles and similar space activities start to lure our kids and young people back to the traditional child-hood dreams of being Astronauts, Engineers, and Pilots, as in the past, instead of today's goals of being hip-hop artists, welfare recipients, and criminals.
ok lets get the infrared up so some of us??? will get
a better look at planet x
Currently, we are spending a large amount of money (at a bad time)to build the VLA (Very Large Array). Which consists of many spread out telescopes linked together to gather a greater amount of light. InRe: S.B. Stein's comment. It would seem that a moon based VLA would be far more effecient than an earth based one. It could eventually replace all space telescopes and give a sound reason for future moon missions; perhaps largely performed by robots.
Indeed, GO ATLANTIS, God Speed!!
@ Eric
Putting something like that on the moon would be a waste of Government money, The moon is pelted with asteroids every year and its a bit of a high risk to place a couple telescopes on the moon.
Sweeeeeeeeet!!!
Placing a telescope on the moon would be expensive and dirty due to the electrostatic nature of any moon dust that might be kicked up during construction.  The GLAST telescope that will replace the Hubble will be placed in a location that trails the Earth by 1,000,000 miles and will be an improvement over the Hubble.
Regarding whether the gov't was reimbursed for the mirror flaw: No.  Since NASA accepted the mirror by its own test standards, the manufacturer was not liable.  In fact, the on-orbit performance bonus was paid to the mirror manufacturer because image quality was not one of the contractual specs on orbit (hey, it didn't break)  But because we figured out exactly what went wrong with the mirror fabrication process, we were able to design corrective optics that remove the aberration precisely. However, the cost of COSTAR and WF-PC2 was borne by the taxpayers.
Super mission coming up! I am mystified as to why they won't retreive the HST and hang it in the Smithsonian when that day comes to de-orbit it.

[ALAN ADDS: By the time Hubble ends operation, the shuttle fleet will have been retired (with one of the shuttles probably sitting in the Smithsonian). Right now there's no other way to bring Hubble down intact.]
what are they really looking for? shurely not wheat
Stupid.
I've heard that for the cost of 1 Hubble service mission we could launch a whole new Hubble telescope. We could have a dozen specialized super powerful telescopes pointing in multiple directions by now. Scientists wouldn't be limited to only 1 telescope for research.
So disappointing.
Why not make it or upgrade it with recargable battery with solar and rocket booster to make it more efficient.
If we are to place a telescope on the surface of the moon and occasionally make repairs wouldn"t we first have to actually land on the moon?     Since its approaching a half century since we allegedly landed on the moon i am wandering if any of us will live long enough to see people walking on its surface.    I truly hope we really were on the moon and not just one more government lie like so many others for example Vietnahm,70"s gas shortage,weapons of mass destruction,end of cold war peace dividend,chicken in every pot,40 acreas and a mule,bonuses for 1st world war veterans etc. etc. etc etc.
excellent.
Wow, Im sad to see some people would rather Hubble were used to 'find targets on Earth for destruction', and that would 'justify' its price. Some Americans no longer seem to care for expanding what we know about the universe around us, only how we can 'rule Earth' or 'target terrorists'. Personally this is my favorite use of taxes, I feel I am contibuting to humans understanding, rather than paying for missles to kill someone. Bravo to the other Americans that relish the thrill of discovery over destruction.  
I just wanna add a thought here I love the space program.My issue is any planets we find that could possibly sustain life is to far out of reach for man kind to get there.We are looking for life on Mars why? what will we gain from that?If a distant planet out there is earth like in nature who to say they are friendly.Plus in our life time no one will reach it via a space craft.Star trek and star wars has put the wrong ideas about space travel in some peoples head.even if we could travel at the speed of light it could possibly take 250 million light years to get some where.That longer then I will live.Just a thought not to down the program cause I do support NASA and everything about the space program.
In another 5 years the Hubble Space Telescope will have reached the nd of its useful life.  But why are we writing it off in 2015?  It would appear that its inherent design is such that it can be upgraded and performance significantly improved on a regular basis.  

Why are we so anxious to retire the shutle.  It is worthwhile to refurbish them and place them in semi-retirement to use as a backup to the Russians servicing the space station and flying the shuttle again when the new set of Hubble stablizing gyros wear out.  Not only are we writing off the shuttle but we are giving up the concept of the shuttle with nothing equal to its versatility to take its place.  
Frickin' Awesome!
"Could we eventually put something like the Hubble on the Moon?  There is little if any atmosphere to interfere with observations.  How can we do that?"

The Moon (preferably the farside) would be a great place for optical and radio telescopes...but it won't happen until it's economical to transport people and cargo there and back, to build and operate them.

"Is there dust on the lunar regolith that the solar wind would kick up and coat the lenses with? "

Don't take the 'wind' part of Solar Wind too literally. These subatomic particles (mostly protons and electrons) interact with the Lunar surface on impact, but don't move any of it as an atmospheric wind would.

"It would seem improbable that so many millions of dollars would be spent to look only at the stars.
 For my money there should be a two fold purpose;
For space research and for multiple military uses."

Hubble's sensitivity and sensors are optomized for astronomical objects and its observing time is booked well into the future. There are plenty of specific objects to examine out there.

The Defense Department and assorted intelligence agencies already have their own satellites (some of which have optics approaching the size of Hubble's) designed specifically for Earth operations, whose detail and resolution is kept quite secret.

As opposed to HST whose specs are available to anyone, especially those researchers (including non-US ones) who *must* know exactly what the instrument is capable of...
If all the orbiting space satellites and garbage that circles us was to eventually "bump" into each other as their orbit starts to deteriorate, what would happen? Would that destabilize the orbits of those hit, causing a domino effect and causing even bigger problems?
STepper and anyone else confused about "solar wind" - the term is a little misleading.  It's a flow of charged particles - individual electrons and protons mostly - and it is far, far too gentle to appreciably disturb lunar dust.
Well maybe they will now be able to find what they don't want.  God had it written in His word that "mens hearts would fail them because of fear, of things that are comming to those who live on earth" The earth is getting warmer all of a suddent, why?  Global warming? what is really going on? It is predicted that the oceans would be over full in the end time. If the ice caps melt that water will seek its own level, if that happens it will throw the earth into a wobble, in the bible it says,"It will be pulled partly out of its orbit, to reel and weave like a drunken man." What then?
why do we not point more of this technology at the earth so we can better understand our own planet
Hopefully these improvements will give light to unresolved questions about the universe. More fodder for Steven Hawking into black holes, dark matter, antimatter. We desperately need a quantum leap to free us from fossil fuel dependency and science like this eventually will fuel that discovery.
Off topic, but if "blog" is short for "weblog", is this column a "clog"?

Good article.  I got a chance to see the HST hanging in the high bay clean room at Perkin Elmer in Danbury CT before it was launched.  It was open house for employees there. It's big, almost as big as a bus.  I think they might have been the ones responsible for the aberrant mirror.
W. Scott Standiford, Delaware.....You are ABSOLUTELY right !  They made one of the finest expressions of human ingenuity of the 20th century and a milestone for space science while bringing the universe to anyone !

It is truly mystifying about the US agencies attitude about the HST. Hopefully people will speak out about this and possibly save it.
What a pleasure to read thoughtful comments from those who posted here instead of the profanity riddled mindless drivel we so often have to bear. Of course, the uneducated video game playing crowd would never open an article like this, would they?
The operational lifetime of HST could be extended beyond the current planned shutdown with additional servicing.  We like to refer to this mission as SM5 (servicing mission 5), as this one is SM4.  Internally, the joke is to call it SM4B.  (there was an SM3A and SM3B to get around a congressional mandate that SM4 be the final servicing mission.)  However, this would require the extension of the shuttle program, or the modification of the Orion program to accomodate HST servicing.  A docking ring is being installed on HST during SM4, ostensibly for the de-orbit mission (to attach a rocket pack to de-orbit HST) but the ring matches the Orion docking ring.  Just in case.
the SM4 (launch, parts, etc.) costs over $2 Bn
add 2-3 months life support only a few dollars
As a school physics student, it's amazing to find articles like this. This is what they should be teaching us! the Hubble is an amazing piece of equipment, which i believe should be kept up and running for as long as possible but young people don't know enough about it to be interested in it, more needs to be done to show us what this machine can really do within our curriculum.
Cool!!!
"why do we not point more of this technology at the earth so we can better understand our own planet"

Are you under the impression that there aren't many such satellites? (just as HST isn't the only satellite doing space science)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_observation_satellite

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Earth_observation_satellites

Hubble gets the lion's share of attention because it produces a lot of spectacular (and a great many relatively mundane, to the untrained viewer) mostly visible light images of cosmic phenomena. But many other sats do less 'sexy,' but still important theoretical and applied science involving deep space and near Earth.

They're not 'secret,' they're just not as interesting to the general public and don't grab headlines. (like, say, research of various kinds being done all the time in Antarctica) Just because you haven't heard of them, doesn't mean it isn't happening...

"But why are we writing it off in 2015?  It would appear that its inherent design is such that it can be upgraded and performance significantly improved on a regular basis."

and...

"It is truly mystifying about the US agencies attitude about the HST. Hopefully people will speak out about this and possibly save it."

The Hubble Space Telescope was designed from the start to be serviced on-orbit (indeed, Shuttle crews have been able to do repairs, such as the lenses that compensated for the misground mirror, in parts of the telescope *not* designed for easy access). The fact that it's received several visits for repairs and improvements proves this. It's understood that some parts, such as its gyroscopes *will* have a finite life.

But repairs also assume that the Shuttle, or a similar reuseable launch vehicle would always be available to bring people and large (solar panels, for example) parts to it. But we're retiring the Shuttle soon and Orion has nothing like the Shuttle's cargo capacity. It physically cannot take anything to HST that can't fit through its crew hatches, nor will it have anything lie the Shuttle remote manipulator arm.

No Shuttle, no Hubble repairs. (and, as today, there would be the continuing concern that an orbiter going to HST, that finds it has signifigant tile damage and can't re-enter also can't reach ISS. You'd again want to have still another orbiter ready to do a rescue mission)

And technology marches on. Eventually, you *would* want to replace Hubble with something better, rather than continue to repair it.



"Currently, we are spending a large amount of money (at a bad time)to build the VLA (Very Large Array)...It would seem that a moon based VLA would be far more effecient than an earth based one."

It would. And it would cost a great deal *more* money.

You can just *drive* people and materials to the VLA site and operate with no unusual life-support requirements. Try to duplicate that on the Moon, espically with existing spaceflight technology...

One day, getting to the Moon will be economical enough to consider such projects, but not today.
People complained during the Apollo missions the money could be better spent here on earth. Foolish thinking. The future is going to be in outer space, and the ability to observe earth too, to monitor changes. We should all embrace the space program. Tell your congress member to do so, please.
my family loves looking at the pictures taken by the Hubble telescope. I for one am glad they are upgrading it. As for space travel we are limited because we insist on trying to crash through the waves caused by the big band and our galaxial gravity. therefore we are limited by the laws of physics. Surfers have a hard time breaking through the waves to get out, but nothing but a smooth ride going in because they are riding the face being pushed effortlessly at great speed with little energy expended. The waves running through our universe are there for a reason. Air, water, space all containing a series of currents made to ride for our enjoyment.
The Space Shuttle is proven technology, insted of retiring one of mankinds greatest accomplishments it should be updated. People are complaining about the economy today, but our elected represenative can spend 30 million dollars on the Wood Harvest Field Mouse's environment. Sounds like we have some real intelectual people representing us these days LOL...
I'd much rather my tax money be spent on Space than on military but that is not realistic with all the crazies out there.

@ Gary
Traveling at the speed of light is not possible since it would take an infinite amount of energy. We're now looking at moving space and time around an object since http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30600749/
What if we could put a hubble like telescope on a comet the next time one swings by us.....
The shuttle itself works perfectly. The problem is the external fuel tank. With all the advances of the last 35 years it seems unlikely that a new design could not correct these problems. We have paid a lot in money and lives for the lessons we have learned from the shuttle program. I hate to throw that all away for a second rate system based on sixties technology.
Would it make sense to keep the shuttle fleet in orbit when they are decommissioned?  I realize we’re dealing with one of the most complicated and service intensive machines built to date, but can’t we avoid a great deal of the service issues if the orbiter doesn’t need to survive the stresses of reentry?  If we left the orbiters docked at the ISS they could be used as orbiting tugs.  Performing missions as dull as chasing down space junk and repositioning the ISS, or as exciting as picking up a cargo load boosted into orbit by Orion and completing a fifth HST upgrade.  We'd just have to keep it fueled up.  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1926148

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google