ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



How smart can the grid get?

Posted: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:45 PM by Alan Boyle


Charlie Riedel / AP file
Click for video: Smarter grids can save money and the environment. Click on the image above to watch a video from NBC's TODAY show.

Utilities and energy companies are flocking to roll out pilot projects for a smarter electric grid, taking advantage of billions of dollars in federal stimulus money. The idea is to deliver energy more efficiently and cut back on fossil-fuel use.

Great idea ... but just how smart should a power grid get? That's a question raised when you pair the reports about potential electric-grid investments with reports about potential electric-grid intrusions.

"You hear some people say, 'At last I can have a programmable thermostat,'" said Stewart Baker, a former assistant secretary for the Department of Homeland Security. "I almost expect them to add, '... and someone from Nigeria can program it for me.'"

Baker, who now specializes in technology and security issues at the law firm Steptoe & Johnson in Washington, isn't opposed to smart-grid technology per se. "We have only begun to see the most obvious ways in which a smarter grid would help us," he said. He's just worried that security concerns might get brushed aside in the rush to computerize the country's antiquated electric distribution systems.

The discussions over the electric grid's future touch on a tangle of top issues - not just national security, but energy, economics, the environment and engineering as well.

The payoff from a smarter grid
Experts say there's a crying need for grid modernization. More efficient transmission and use of electricity is good for the environment: Smoothing out the peaks and valleys of power consumption could reduce the need for more power facilities, many of which are fueled by non-renewable, carbon-emitting sources such as coal, oil and natural gas.

In addition to the environmental factors, there are economic factors to consider: Some experts claim that grid glitches cost the American economy more than $100 billion a year. At the same time, upgrading the grid doesn't come cheap: The total price tag, spread out over years or even decades, has been set at figures ranging from $200 billion to more than $800 billion.

In light of those numbers, the nearly $4 billion in stimulus money offered last week by the Energy Department for smart-grid projects might look like a pittance. But it's enough to get the attention of power-industry heavyweights.

Among the companies announcing projects in the wake of last week's announcement are National Grid, which is planning a $240 million smart-grid upgrade in upstate New York; a Northwest utility consortium led by the Bonneville Power Administration that's reportedly seeking around $200 million; and another consortium led by Florida Power & Light that is planning a $200 million initiative in Miami-Dade County. (One of FPL's partners is GE, which owns NBC Universal, which in turn is a partner in the msnbc.com joint venture.)

The Miami project would involve installing high-tech control systems at power stations, as well as encouraging the use of energy-smart appliances, thermostats and electric meters in homes and businesses. For example, smart washers and dryers can be programmed to do their business during off-peak hours, leveling the load on the local grid. Smart thermostats can automatically adjust themselves to your daily routine. Smart meters can show you how to trim back on power consumption (and your power bill).

The cost savings can range from less than 5 percent to more than 25 percent, depending on whether you're a lackadaisical power user or the home-electricity equivalent of a hypermiler. Kevin and Jodi Linn, a Miami couple profiled on NBC's TODAY show as early adopters of smart-grid technology, say they're saving $100 a month by keeping a close watch on their in-home energy display.

"You can see the fruits of your labor - you really can. You can see it on a graph, and eventually you'll see it in your bill," Kevin Linn said.

"He doesn't compare his bill with his neighbors," Jodi Linn added. "He shows off his bill to his neighbors."

Working out the financial angle
The Miami project will start out with infrastructure upgrades that will benefit about 1 million customers over the next two years. About 1,000 homes will be enrolled in a trial of advanced technology like the Linns' "eco-panel" energy display. If the $200 million project goes well, Florida Power & Light would move forward with a $500 million second phase, extending the program to all of its 4.5 million Florida customers.

One little snag is that the Energy Department's draft guidelines would limit its matching grants for smart-grid upgrades to a range of $100,000 to $20 million. But the companies behind most of these projects want the federal government to cover half the cost, which means they're hoping for grants on the order of $100 million per project.

It looks as if something's got to give: The grant limit will have to be raised, or larger projects will have to be broken up into smaller pieces, or companies will have to pick up more of the bill for grid upgrades. All this could be sorted out next month when federal officials are due to meet with energy-industry executives.

Working out the security angle
And then there are the computer security concerns: Some security experts say the increased level of computer networking that comes along with smart-grid technology could leave utilities more vulnerable to cyberattacks. That's not a happy thought, particularly in light of reports that foreign governments have been mapping out network vulnerabilities at U.S. utilities.

Msnbc.com's Red Tape chronicler, Bob Sullivan, reported that the issue generated a lot of buzz at a recent conference. He quoted Alan Paller of the security firm SANS as saying, "There was real anger by the security guys, saying these people are out selling new meters that can be taken over by a computer worm."

Baker shares that concern. "It is all too easy to imagine that people would sabotage the system," he told me this week.

He said he had "no doubt that people are trying to improve the security of this system and trying to build it in from the start," but he worried that the job required the kind of spy-vs.-spy mind-set that companies aren't accustomed to using.

"You can't expect companies to fully protect themselves from threats that might include nation-state attacks," Baker said.

Some security experts worry that smart-grid networks tend to rely on Internet Protocol, or IP, the same open standard that's used on the Internet. But Mark Bubriski, a spokesman for Florida Power & Light, told me that next-generation power management systems will take advantage of all the security measures that have been developed since the Internet was born.

He noted that FPL's partners included a couple of the biggest names in networking. "Over the past 20 years, we have witnessed the transition of key infrastructure to IP, and Cisco Systems has actually helped lead this transition," Bubriski said. "GE has been a global leader in providing grid automation and protection for more than 25 years."

He voiced confidence that the "most extensive and holistic smart-grid implementation in the country" would be secure from cyberattackers as well.

Baker said the utilities and their network-savvy partners might have to walk a fine line in order to make their smart-grid systems easy for consumers to use and hard for hackers to ruin. "When you're done, some of the advantages that you want to have start to diminish," he said. "It's a lot less attractive if what you have to do is remember a 15-character password that changes every three months."

It just goes to show that whenever you're talking about vital infrastructure, saving money and saving the environment aren't the only factors you have to consider.

"We should not say, 'Oh, gosh, that sounds great! I want to have a system for the grid that's just like the system we have on the Internet!'" Baker said. "We ought to be a little conservative, and we ought to build in safeguards."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

How long before the major Hydro Electric Dams reach infrastructure obsolesence?
When it gets to the point that the cost of repowering some 1930s turbine driven Hydro Plant is prohibitive, the grid will get more efficient real fast.
Pushing enormous amounts of raw power was the idea.
Using it efficiently was not even on the radar.
Moving the same volume of power ( more, actually )from sources not so apparently abundant will demand a more efficient method of transmission.
Gotta live through the undo before we can redo...it's always been our way...unfortunately.
We could have been flying in fuel efficient Aramid Fibre aircraft since the mid eighties, except the economy of the Pacific Northwest would have gone South, because Boeing couldn't project the successful transition from Aluminum.
Those are the issues!
Who does the change hurt?
Much more important than who does it benefit?
In my humble opinion, the fact that hackers were able to penetrate the nation's electrical grid and other infrastructure (important word here) is not the result of cleverness on their part but short-sightedness on our's.  Infrastructure in general (whatever classification you wish to use -- roads, schools, etc.) has had little or no attention paid to it in decades.  If we pause as a nation for a decade or two and start filling in the gaps -- in our education, financial systems, roads and highways of all kinds (information, electrical, automotive) -- we stand a better chance of growing into the next century on a sustainable track.  Standing where we are now and looking back over the last few decades, we should realize that we were not on a sustainable path.  Not realizing this is simply denying the truth of our history up to this point in time.
We don't need smarter grids.  We need basic redundancy first.
We can subsidize a LOT of solar power cells with 200-800 BILLION dollars and they use no fossil fuel and cannot be hacked at all.
Well...please, in 21st century there is no need for a smart grid, but for smart people who will not seek profit but benefit for human kind. Did you forgot of Tesla's free "wierless" energy even in means of electical one. I guess you haven't but it's propably the profit's sindroms...
Will this "Smart Grid" help protect against major outages if we have a monumental solar storm like the one that knocked out power all across the province of Quebec in March of 1989?
Mike from Phoenix, when they talk about the infrastructure being hacked, they aren't just talking about generating units/power stations. The high voltage transmission lines you see strung all over have sophisticated protection and communication schemes that if misapplied, can be very easily hacked into. Your subsidized solar arrays still have to get the power generated to users, most likely via transmission lines. Granted, if the solar arrays are numerous, small, and widely distributed (micro-generation), it may not be as great of an issue, but the issue is still there nevertheless.
Solar and wind are far from being practical. What most people don't know is they both only work 20% of the time and if a cloud comes by or the wind slows down or gets too fst they don't produce. THERE IS NO storage in the grid when these happen a regular generator has to run always to make up the difference. You can't just start up another generator, it takes hours to start and blend in so it runs always. Most of the time wind and solar are not working during peak times and that is also a big problem. And they can be hacked more than a regular generator.
Steve Smyth
In the late 1960’s Boeing came to the Downey plant in California to see how we examined honeycomb panels. They used the same type of panels on their aircraft that we used on the Apollo. I thought that was odd that I was showing them how to find small flaws in the bonding process. They’re Boeing, I’m just some guy doing Nondestructive Testing. Years later I moved to the Pacific Northwest. I’m sure Boeing’s up’s and down’s affected a lot of people but they never affected me. I’m the guy that showed them how to find small flaws in their honeycomb panels. I would think there's a lot of other people in the Pacific Northwest that didn’t go South based on Boeing.
The rest of the nation cold learn a real lesson from the REA's (rural electric Co-ops) of MN.  For years they have been utilizing 'off-peak' and 'load management programs to use "cheap" energy when it is not in high demand.  I heat my water in my water heater and my home between 11PM & 6 AM for .048/KW.  This is excellent & inexpensive technology that is tried & proven.  Utilities & elected officials need to really look at this.  The producer & transmission entity for this group of 28 co-ops is called Great River Energy.  Check it out, it works!
Steve, I thought they didn't go with aramid because they couldn't shrink fit it to the frame and it became embrittled in the sun.  Legitimate reasons.

We all know our companies aren't corporate profit whores.  That kind of thinking could destablise our economy.
These technologies are great.  All the power companies need to do is get serious with security.  Most of them do not have cyber security personel because there networks WERE (past tense) isolated.  These companies tend to have management that averages 20+ years in the company.  They need to let the new ideas in.
I think a few Americans need to get of there fat back sides and start walking, riding more and eating, driving, and consuming for wanting sake less. Ban electrical devices that have a stand by mode, remotes should be for changing chennels only. All things should have a propper OFF switch that isolates them from the supply. Ban regular light bulbs and use fluros. Put a 100% price deposit on all fluro lamps to ensure they are exchanged when buying a new one so they do not get thrown in the trash. Oh one more thing, If any of you have a problem with any of this, think yore self lucky you are not working down a F***ing coal mine because they all come up the same colour after a shift down there. It is not being a communist, it is called common sense and thinking about yore brother first and every ones environment before the self.  
Smart enough to become sentient create robotic humanoids to terminate human existence from the planet because of the failings and inefficiencies.  
I think building a "smart grid" is the wrong approach entirely.  What we need to do is get AWAY from the idea of a grid.  Most people aren't aware of the invasiveness of a "smart grid".  Do you want the power company deciding if you are allowed to turn on the air conditioner, do a load of laundry, or take a hot shower?  "Smart grid" is a euphemism for taking total control of every electrical item in your home.  (By the way you don't need a smart grid in order to get a programmable thermostat!  You can buy one now in any building supply or hardware store.)

We need to make individual structures (houses, businesses, etc.) energy independent and get rid of the grid (or use it as a backup system).  Imagine how great that would be!  No more widespread blackouts because of damage to the grid!  No more power outages because a neighbor's tree fell on the power line!

The new thin solar cell technology should bring a tremendous reduction in the price of solar energy.  Other advances such as small corkscrew type wind generators can be used in conjunction with solar cells to provide power.  There are many other options that can contribute like a gasifier to turn household waste into power.  Best of all there's no monthly electric bill!  Of course that is the problem with technologies like these--they don't make money for power companies.  Unfortunately that will impede real progress.  It's a bummer because that all sounded pretty good.
For a "smart grid" to work, it has to be universal. Those who opt-in at this time for power-company control of their appliances are subsidizing greed by their neighbors.

It doesn't work that way. All or none.
I work in the power industry and am very familiar with the smart-grid technology.  Most of this technology is very new and the total benefit is very uncertain.  The numbers you often hear are at the top end of potential savings and rely mostly on the consumer choosing to run their appliances at the most efficient time.  Do you really want your power company turning off your heat pump during the most extreme conditions?  Sadly, most of this equipment is like the guy who bought a new $30,000 car to save $20 a month in gas.  It's just not practical.  
@ steve smyth

Actually, the dam construction is the highest capital expense in a hydro facility.  With turbine maintenance and periodic replacement, you get a relatively consitent, cheap, clean source of power.  There are actually quite a few new hydro facilities being constructed on existing dams.  There are far more expensive and dirty sources of power out there.  The point of the article is that we need redundancy and efficiency.  Hydro power does both by supplying consistent clean power throughout the grid.
"Well...please, in 21st century there is no need for a smart grid, but for smart people who will not seek profit but benefit for human kind. Did you forgot of Tesla's free "wierless" energy even in means of electical one. I guess you haven't but it's propably the profit's sindroms... "

LOL...there is no such thing as a free lunch.
I am disappointed that you did not provide more detail in how the Linn's are supposedly saving $100 per month.  From what I have read, consumer savings from these smart grid trials do not result from less electricity usage (conservation) but result from changing the time of day the electricity is used.  This is based on a dubious assumption that smart grid utility companies will adopt variable billing policies that reduce rates at off peak times.  I have a very hard time believing that these giant businesses will be so altruistic.  I suspect that smart grid utility companies will actually maintain off peak rates at levels similar to today's flat rates and significantly increase peak rates.  In the end, smart grid will be a boondoggle used by utility companies to continually increase billing rates in such a subtle and complex manner that the customer will have no hope of understanding or protesting them.  Also, this cost savings model fails as more customers join the smart grid.  There will be fewer and, ultimately, no opportunities to take advantage of off peak rates because there will be no off peak times.  Smart grid may offer improve efficiency, but it will result in significantly increased costs to electricity users.
I think the Utility Companies should work together to work out a way that a compromised section does not overload and pull down another section. Also, I think using the internet (with all of its vulnerability) is a very bad idea.  
Let me ask this, if the following happened, would this help enough?

1.  Everyone switch to CFL, LED lighting (the poor using grants, stimulus money).
2.  Everyone get programmable thermostats and instruction on how to use them.  Again with grant money.
3.  Everyone get water heater blankets and programmable thermostats for water heater.
4.  Insulation replacement and window replacement for homes, again with help with grant money.
5.  Where practical, homes have small wind generators.
6.  Where practical, homes get solar panels.
7.  Use hydrogen fuel cells at homes to supplement power.
8.  Green office buildings, similar to what is being done with the Empire State building.
9.  Have all power needs generated by nuclear, wind, solar, geothermal, tides, currents, waves, etc.  Phasing out coal.

It prevents hacking, reduces power consumption, we know it will work.  Why can't we just use more nuclear power?  Yes there is nuclear waste, but that can be dealt with much more easily than global climate change.

So why don't we do this???  Having the power generated at the home is the ultimate smart grid.

The “Smart Grid” means that someone in some remote office will control the appliances that you will be allowed to use. Electricity can only be “moved” so far before there is nothing left due to “line losses.” So it is not going to be moved very far. They move the demand not the electricity. The “Smart” part of the Smart Grid is that someone “smarter” than you gets to decide what you can use. When it is 115 in the shade and you just came in from working outside do you want your AC locked out by the "Smart Energy Dispatcher" in his air-conditioned office downtown? When you need to wash and dry that white uniform so that you can go to work, do you want to find your washer and dryer locked out by the “Smart Meter” on the side of your house? Yes, there MAY be bypasses allowed but will have extreme penalties attached. Some people may even fireup their gasoline generator to avoid them and where does that leave us?
Why is the grid on the www anyway?  I'd suggest a grid intrAnet, that is physically separate from the www.  There would be no physical connection to the www.  While this would not be a 100% secure system and would require significant wiring, I think the security of the system is a high enough priority.  Systems that require security should have their own separate system.  Hackers on the web would never "see" any infrastructure web, unless they figured out a way to hack through the air.  Separate, wired connections are the way to go.
I have to say that I have been thinking the same thing as Jim.  To have small locations that can generate power like solar panels on roofs of homes and businesses would certainly reduce some demand for power during the day.  I would hope that we could get nuclear fission power plants to take over and provide power for the night and whatever the solar and wind power generating facilities can't do.  Fission waste products just need to have a secure way to be reprocessed.  The trans-uranic elements also need to be used in fission reactors when they are developed.  
RE Aramid Fibre use...DuPont had a gimbaled/articulated arm which spewed fibre strand  w/resin over whatever shape the arm was programmed to follow...I saw a six foot scale of some proposed airliner's wing, spun over a mold...much like the way FibreGlass fishing poles and flagpoles are made...with carefully plotted criss-crosses and overweaves for strength...in a matter of minutes at DuPont's, Wilmington, Centre Road facility.
There were hull, tail section, and other components in the works for the same treatment.
Unfortunately, before things went anywhere, the resulting paper said, "Put it on the shelf, Boeing, et al, can't transition in any reasonable amount of time. The effects on Pacific NW Economy would be devastating"
You will recall that logging in the same area ( #2 industry, I think ) was under pretty heavy flak at the time...locals couldn't handle any more downturn.
The process got dissipated throughout the airline industry over the ensuing years, and we got what we got.
The originally envisioned process would have made full size, stick together airliners, just like the ones kids pop out of their model airplane boxes every day.
How cool would that be?
Friggin' Economic Imperative...and the currently universal belief that it's the only way to go!
We bought it lock, stock, and barrel...now we are married to all our bad decisions...for a long time.

Don't forget folks. The same people who are now shouting global warming and no more coal burning are the same ones that shouted no nuclear energy in the 70's. That killed cheap energy for us (ask the French) but most of all halted the technology needed to build hydrogen powered vehicles, especially locomotives and trucks. The cheapest technology to date to manufacture hydrogen exist in a nuclear power plant. And the emissions from hydrogen is water and oxygen. This was the plan of the Nuclear Scientist and Engineering Association at that time. What a bummer.
Great article Alan!  I like the concept of the smart grid, but it has to be smart enough to preclude hacking or it ends up being dumber than dirt.  I wish we'd concentrate more on local power production, getting more houses and commercial buildings hooked up with solar panels so they produce much of the energy they need.  It really is pathetic that a regular winter storm can pull down an electricty grid like what happened this past winter around the Appalachian states.

While I'm worried about someone from outside the country being able to hack into our system I'm even more concerned with the hackers here that would have easier access.  I'm not so confident in the IP Internet system being hacker proof, not if Microsoft has anything to do with it.

We need to make the investments in upgrading our electrical grid and we don't need some cheapskate whiners crying it's too expensive.  It will be far more expensive if our decrepit electrical grid goes down and tens of millions are without power for a long time.  Then the same cheapskate whiners will whine why didn't somebody do something before the problem occured.  We have to man up and pay the price now!
I lived the first years of my life without electric power in my home, clothes were washed on a rub board and kerosene lamps were used to get the job done when we  needed light. Bed time was early, we sat in the dark when we couldn't use the lamps. Today we see lights everywhere all night and all day. This business of a smart grid is nothing to worry about, when the demand is greater than the supply the grid will sure be something to recon with. We will learn to make our lives different without electrical power. Air-conditioning will possibly a thing of the past, the internet will be only for the financially blessed. I have been working in the electrical industry (power distribution) for 56 years and have experienced many changes during my tenure. Most of the stop-gap measures our governing body has initiated since the beginning of this country has been a fiasco---REA's, TVA's and BPA,WPA(Western Power Admin. and on and on. A nation wide crisis is an excuse to throw money at the problem. Over population, fluctuating economy, mass exodus to the warmer areas and many other reason that compound the Power problems. We must diversify our living requirements individually. Industry can build all the stuff needed to do this as far as generating power---instead of appliances that gobble up energy. Commuting distances have really simplyfied our dependance on oil---guess who is paying the bill for this, suburban living at its best. Mass transit gone to the dogs and forgot about.  
I'd be happy to have to start my generator to cirumvent the smart grid technology during peak usage hours. I'd do my best to adjust my schedule around those hours and when I can't I'll run the generator.

Provided... That including the additional cost of fuel and maintenence on the generator, it saved me half of what I currently pay the power company, otherwise, I'll just bypass the damned thing so I can live comfortable. You'd be amazed what you can do with a toggle switch, a relay, and a little knowledge.

If they work to make our lives better with this smart grid, people will love it. If they don't, it will begome the most bypassed technology of our lifetime.
Smart grid technology is a fancy name for the old Enron model so many Public Utilities are flocking to once more.  Here's YOUR future.  1.  A smart grid that goes to your house via a smart meter has an IQ of 30.  It won't be intelligent until the home owner spends thousands to upgrade their switch panel, and thousands MORE to purchase smart appliances.  Currently, those appliances aren't readily AVAILABLE!  2.  This smart grid will, in its currently proposed iteration, allow those utilities, and the City Councils they support with electric consumption revenue to put an end once and for all to fixed rates for electricity.  With a smart grid in place, you can FORGET about energy rates.  Instead, you will have the "opportunity" to purchase power when you need it, at market rates at that time.  This is the market deregulation that Reagan began and Bush 2 continued. You will never know what your next light bill is going to be even though you'll be able to see your meter spin on your computer and your cell phone.  Utilities will REQUIRE a VISA card to open an account, and charge you whatever it costs whenever you buy it.  I guarantee you, there's a light bill bigger than your mortgage payment in your smart-gird future.  3.  As the grid rolls out, employment at Public Utilities will DWINDLE to a tenth of it's current levels.  These companies will shrink themselves down to only the staffing it takes to buy and sell power from the grid.  The fewer traders there are, the more those fewer traders will make!  And if you can't pay, they will click off your meter and your lights will go out then they'll debit your credit card for doing it!  The problem with this smart grid concept is: It's smart for the Utilities and the Politicians who want more of your money, while the "services" it's promising YOU require that you sit in front of your computer 24/7!  But you won't be able to because you'll have to be out working to pay your light bill!
"Well...please, in 21st century there is no need for a smart grid, but for smart people who will not seek profit but benefit for human kind. Did you forgot of Tesla's free "wierless" energy even in means of electical one. I guess you haven't but it's propably the profit's sindroms"

How many spelling and grammatical errors can you find here?? This is why I hate reading most of your comments, people !!!!!!!
It's a step in the right direction. A truly smart grid concept would let you know when useage is getting excessive and make adjustments where needed without much human intervention. Initially for a time the householder could monitor it's power useage and then program in what they really need rather than excess.

But lets face it, you wouldn't want your lights shutting off or your oven going down in the process. At best the system would tell you exactly what you should be doing rather than having to guess !
El Ingeniero, the only reason nuclear power is cheap in the U.S. or France is because it's so heavily subsidized. In fact, 60% of energy subsidies in the U.S. are paid out to nuclear power, which is only 20% of energy produced in the U.S. and 8% of energy consumed.

When you strip away the subsidies and the clean up costs, renewable electricity generators are the cheapest for the entire economy. The main reason renewable generators aren't more common is because the people who reap the benefits from dirty sources of energy aren't the same people who have to pay to clean it up. It's called "tragedy of the commons," and with a resource (such as the atmosphere) that can't be divided into individual property, government regulation of the market is the only workable economic model.

That said, I'm surprised the first step toward grid efficiency isn't constructing more 800kV power lines across the continental U.S. The cost-benefit comparison is much more appealing than a smartgrid, and the technology is already there.

Pauligirl, if the smartgrid is on a big enough scale, preventing outages will be one of the biggest benefits of having it.
Sorry Steve, what I was thinking of was a high tinsile cloth, not rigid.
Probably very smart, as long as we throw a lot of money at it, always seems to feel good and sounds even like a solid solution. Question is, why do we need all this smartness? Can we just make the grid work a little less? Would save quite some investment looking at the numbers.

Not possible to drive down energy consumption? Try it with a 10x increase of energy cost, lets see how fast peoples behaviour will change.
And then there are those like me who would no more give someone else the ability to remotely control my electrical usage than I would own a car with the ability to get wireless software updates...

The grid wouldn't be on the "www", but have an IP address accessible from the internet.  There is a difference.  Solar panels installed on a house is hackable??  Are you serious??  Doubt it.  Stimulus money is being wasted on these projects and won't create new jobs.  We need innovations at the home level to be efficient, not the grid level.  People waste more power than the grid does.  Good suggestions about CFL lighting, but don't run them all day, be smart about your power use and worry about your own utility bill.  The smart grid won't lower your bill for you.
It's exciting to see new technologies taking us into new eras.  However, I liken these smart grid 'test cases' to being the first person to try out a new operating system or the latest and greatest phone - there is always a steep learning curve (for everyone involved) while vulnerabilities and inconsistencies are worked out.  If these smart grid efforts are hackable, we'll know almost as soon as they 'flip the switch'.  I'm glad someone else is the guinea pig for these systems, but it is also a very necessary step in proving the validity of the smart grid concept.  The same goes for the concern of utility companies taking control of our lives - if they do something of that sort, these test cases will vet that out and resistence to those practices will slow their progress.

I'd like to see the urgency of a national smart grid slow down a bit (and tested and tested and tested) while more effort be put towards making today's systems more efficient.  I think we should be able to garner 50% more efficiency today by simply retooling and 'tightening up' our current systems, rather than essentially throwing them out and building anew.
smart grid is a brilliant idea
it s not switching your lights of or your aircon unit
it is about energy efficiency
appliances like hotwater systems or aircon units
switched off a couple of minutes won t affect your
lifestyle but have an impact on energy consumption
peak load from electricity suppliers.
So by sw. off energy supply to 1000 s of geysers
you can rotate peak demand in a whole province
and save generated energy
to generate energy costs 8 times more as to save ...
those savings can regenerate work and pay subsidies
as well photovoltaic and windturbines
to carry on saving even more.....
A
The problem is, the utilities are often the ones blurring things the fastest. The shining bright light of piles of federal dollars to pay for upgrades to internal problems, especially aging infrastructure, has led them to over-sell, and to over-promise. Hungry people say funny things when in sight of a free lunch.

One of the biggest barriers is a lack of architecture. The utilities have long run a seamless distribution control system, which makes a lot of sense to inexpensively manage real time events. Within that framework, direct control of devices in the end nodes makes sense as a proof of concept. But to extend beyond proof of concept, or short lived low penetration markets, a real IT architecture will need to be in place. That architecture will acknowledge interfaces, and what decision-making and capabilities should lay on either side of those interfaces.

The acknowledgement of those interfaces, and the agents that work on either side, is the moment it begins to move from “clever” to “smart” (I like that distinction). We are seeing this more in some of HAN areas, with agents built in to appliances that understand what each appliance is up to, and based on that, what sort of response is available now. In a distributed generation, or even micro-generation world, one can imagine analogous agents on the power sources.

Push this a little further by adding requirements of symmetry to each interface, and one can have device-based clever agents, responding to home (or business) based enterprise agents, negotiating with grid-based agents (whether on the micro-grid, distribution network, or at the edge of the transmission network.

To ride the clever/smart distinction a little further, intelligence in biological systems can be described as an emergent behavior of many small automata-like systems. Each of those automata faces fierce evolutionary pressures, both to do its own job better, and to interface with the whole better. If we get the interfaces right (more attention to architecture), and the security right, the smart grid can emerge from the many clever automata.
But it won’t be by applying a little Intelligrid to a substation, or by merely adding a programmable thermostat.
I don't want a smarter grid. I want my own grid. You should, too. PCs were invented under pressure to find a way to prevent war from taking out massive computers operating behind the military. The concept of gigantic computers went the way of the dodo as DARPA figured out that by mimicking the human brain's massive array of tiny neurons and neural gateways the 'computer' could be composed of millions of smaller computers running together in a vast network. Damage part of the network, and the network would route around the damage and keep going.

This is assuredly where we're headed for energy needs. You're your own utility. I'm my own utility. The stupendous capital expense of wire, towers, stations, sub stations, power plants and management of this behemoth enterprise is already headed to the ash heap of history. and is suited only to enriching equally vast enterprises by legislatively forcing all of us into being Public Utility customers whether we want to be, or not.

I'm not a socialist. I'm for freedom. I can't stand being collared and corralled by anything for any reason. I make most of my own power and it's getting easier every day. I make my own pure potable water. My sewage is minimal and we compost it. I live far enough out that fire departments would have to pack a lunch so we aren't dependent upon them. Etc Etc. The point being ... imagine how strong our nation will be on the day that the majority of us create our own energy, rather than depending upon leviathan systems to make it for us. 300 million households making their own power. It's a lot closer than you think.
http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/greenbuilding/hydrogenhouse.asp
http://www.itm-power.com/

Big is the problem. Big medicine. Big education. Big government. Big finance. Big pensions. Big unions. Big transportation. Big food conglomerates. Big populations. Big energy. Big entertainment. Big insurance. You name it ... everything's big and getting bigger. But big is the problem. You wouldn't be reading this but that DARPA understood to render computing into a desktop environment and consequently, the technology was engineered and cost-engineered so you have the computer you're using to read this article. Do the same with energy. radically reduce the size of the infrastructure, downsize the unbelievable cost of public financing for a '
smarter grid' and radically reduce our exposure to system failures - weather, tectonic, war, environmental extremism you name it. Big is easiest to take down. Millions of small power plants is impossible. In a disaster you could well be still producing power while your neighbor is in need, whereas with a 'smart grid' the Big can still be easily disrupted.

Miniaturize. Reduce the grid to each of us. Vote for independence rather than dependence.
How Smart can the Grid get?
No matter how smart we can make it today, we have to remember Smart Grid is in its infancy. One of the most important things to build in now is the ability to learn and grow in the future. Meters have to be able to measure real time data and communicate with a wide variety of devices in two directions. Accurate information and the technology that makes it easy for people to program energy decisions into electrical devices make it easier to get to the real goal: Smart Consumers.
Again it seems that entrenched (monied) interests are putting their profit ahead of the greater good.

Given the amount of transmission losses, the direction we need to go is in distributed generation. Everyone has solar panels, wind turbines and other forms of local generation capacity. These are connected to batteries and an inverter. This energy is available to the homeowner and the grid. The consumer pays for the grid energy and gets paid for the energy he supplies the grid. These technologies are quite mature - there are no big inventions that need to occur to make this feasible. The cost question keeps coming up, but if the costs of releasing carbon were properly factored into coal fired power plant, the price would be right in line with current "cheap" power.

4 Billion dollars installs 800,000 five thousand dollar solar installations.

Our power company just put a 2 billion dollar upgrade on an old coal plant. That puts a solar installation on ALMOST EVERY HOME IN WISCONSIN!!!

WTF! Even our new progressive administration is WAY too beholden to the monied interestes.

Another example why we need campaign finance reform (the bottom line on every issue, it seems). If you can't vote for someone, you can't donate to their camaign (and no corporation will EVER be able to vote for ANYONE!).



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1903394

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google