ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Green power from algae?

Posted: Monday, March 30, 2009 6:08 PM by Alan Boyle


William A. Cotton / Colorado State University
Click for video: Alpha cribs containing colonies of algae grow
under artificial lights at Colorado State University's Engines and Energy
Conversion Laboratory. Click on the image to watch an archived video
about algae-based biofuels from NBC Nightly News.

In the past, Venetians have looked upon algae as their scumbag enemy, but now they're hoping to tame the plants to satisfy the historic Italian seaport's energy needs. Will algae provide the ultimate in green power, or is the scheme merely a green pipe dream?

The Venetian port authority's deal with Enalg, announced last week, represents one of the latest and highest-profile forays into algae-fueled energy production. As detailed in the port's news release, the plan calls for construction of a $273 million, 40-megawatt power plant by 2011, using technology pioneered by Washington-based Solena Group.

Like many other plants, algae produce an oil that can be converted for industrial use. Solena's process involves growing the algae in plastic cylinders that are supplied with water, carbon dioxide and sunshine. The resulting biomass is then turned into a synthetic natural gas to fire electricity-generating turbines. The carbon dioxide released by burning the gas is fed back into the system to help grow the next generation of algae.

"The lagoon surroundings are ideal for experimenting with this new technology," said Paolo Costa, president of Venice's port authority. "The objective is to guarantee the energy self-sufficiency of the port of Venice and, in the near future, to look for the possibility of supplying energy to the ships moored at the dock."

Lots of claims have been made over the years for algae energy efficiency: Some experts say each acre given over to algae cultivation could theoretically produce the equivalent of thousands of gallons of oil per year, compared with an estimated yield of 18 to 335 gallons of ethanol per acre for traditional biofuel crops. Others claim that algae-growing systems could be tweaked to yield as much as 100,000 gallons per acre annually.

"That's almost like having an oil well in your backyard!" said David Pimentel, a researcher at Cornell University who's known for taking a hard look at alternative-energy claims.

Pimentel is known for taking a skeptical view of the energy equation for ethanol - and he doesn't believe the most optimistic claims for algae, either. But he does think algae power is worth looking into. "It's a disappointment that DOE [the Department of Energy] is not investing in this one as much as we should," he told me today.

From slime to biofuel
Pimentel's research focuses on the benefit/cost ratio for extracting oil from algae and converting it into biodiesel. That's different from Solena's syngas process, but it's more in line with the mainstream approach for using algae oil.

His calculations, based on an analysis of the literature rather than lab studies, indicate that each gallon of oil (or its equivalent) that's invested in algae power would yield the energy equivalent of 1.4 gallons of oil. Researchers in New Zealand recently came up with a slightly higher return of 1.7-to-1, he said.

"This is somewhat optimistic, but you've got to have a little bit of optimism," he said.

The current algae-producing process requires lots of water, and getting the oil out of the algae is a "fairly energy-intensive" job, Pimental said. "It takes approximately a quarter of a gallon of oil to extract [the equivalent of a gallon of] that oil out of that squishy green mass," he said. There's also the problem of keeping impurities out of the algae culture, he added. 

Pimentel figures that algae oil would cost the equivalent of $4 a gallon - which means it's not quite competitive with current gasoline prices. However, he said, "this is much, much better than producing ethanol from corn, and it's much better than producing biodiesel from soybeans."

The idea of capturing the carbon dioxide emissions from, say, a coal-fired power plant and using that CO2 to feed the algae adds to the technology's attraction - and that's a big reason why the coal industry is so eager to see algae power take hold.

Changing the cost equation
If the production process could be made more efficient, that would improve the prospects for slimy green power. And improving the process is exactly what Ben Wen, chief scientist at New York-based United Environment & Energy, is hoping to do.

At last week's meeting of the American Chemical Society, Wen reported that his company was testing an algae-to-biodiesel conversion process that could be 40 percent cheaper than today's standard. The process involves pumping the algae oil plus methanol through a solid catalyst at high pressure. Biodiesel comes out the other end.

"It's a continuous process," Wen told me. "You just pump the feedstock through the catalyst all the time, instead of the batch process used in the industry right now."

The process promises to provide "the first economical way to produce biodiesel from algae oil," Wen said in a news release. "It costs much less than conventional processes because you would need a much smaller factory, there are no water disposal costs, and the process is considerably faster."

However, the process not yet quite ready for prime time. Wen said that United Environment & Energy was working with a venture partner (which he declined to name) to set up a pilot plant capable of producing nearly 1 million gallons of algae biodiesel annually.

"This year we get the pilot plant into operation," he told me. "Next year, we optimize all the conditions. In late 2010, we should get an idea of how to put it into commercialization."

Is the buzz over algae power for real - or is it mostly, as one commentator said last week, "wild-eyed optimism and pure hype"? Feel free to join in with your comments below.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

"wild-eyed MARKETING and pure hype" I'll buy...not one of the promoters really believes in the long range merits...
algae and krill feed whales...they're really big...maybe we should be examining that prospect...
going into production of BioFuels amidst mass food shortages is a flat out boondoggle in the making...BETCHA!
not only that, it provides another excuse to do genetic modifications to potential foodstuffs...if you think consuming cottonseed oil, which is grown using non-FDA approved chems is somewhat silly, imagine eating the corn that comes a few years after the gene pool is totally contaminated by cross pollination...wind, bees. birds, etc...there is corn, in some form, in virtually every person on Earth's daily regimen...
RE switchgrass as bio mass...it is the original dominant grass species of the entire Mid-West...long gone...now we are going to let it take over again...picture guys in trucks out harvesting by the side of the road...selling the cut grass to a BioFuel Co...just like the guys who are stripping every piece of wood in Africa for charcoal...or topping and killing every coconut tree for the palm oil...etc...
Bio/Geo Engineering is not the solution to anything except for a few individuals making a buck from the development deals...
sweet! now see this technology will just disapear like all the rest of the working projects. some big oil company will buy up the patent and bang boom pop, its gone. But nonethe less im happy to hear about it before it gets bought and mothballed.
Algal fuel is a pipe dream.  Despite being a great idea in theory, the practical challenges - extraction costs, growing difficulties (the greater the algae growth, the lower the yields as sunlight is blocked to the other algae), and a variety of other factors will serve to keep algal fuel far more expensive than oil for some time to come.  Throw in the fact that it's actually in the midst of the food v. fuel debate (algal oil is an abundant source of edible monounsaturated fats and Omega 3 fatty acids), and it simply isn't feasible.  It makes more sense to spend the money developing cellulosic ethanol and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles instead.
Sounds like it's worth a try. If we don't do something soon, the Middle East and South America will hold us hostage. And the great part part is it's renewable!
Algae to power Venice....hmmmmm.  Didn't I watch some old documentary that for hundreds of years Venice has been saturated with the wealth of nations.... hmmm. But sounds like a good idea anyway though,...Hey, more power to them!
Even at $4 a gallon (if acurate), the ability to use CO2 captured from other sources (such as the mentioned coal power plants) makes algae biodiesel potentially attractive as a cost mitigation for reducing emissions at the very least; even if they don't show a profit, amortizing the emissions control cost is something many companies will look for.  And that doesn't consider possible government subsidies (corn ethanol gets quite a bit, for example) or if a "cap and trade" system ever gets implemented.  
Well, I'm glad to see different approaches to our Energy problems. When we run out of OIL and I stress When, because it will happen. We'll being kicking ourselves in the rear, wondering why the hell there weren,t more attempts to tackle our Energy Problem. If the truth be told, every single one of us on the face of the planet, should being digging real deep in our imagination, and coming up with more ideas! Like back in the day of the true Inventors in Physics, Chemistry, and other maths and sciences!!! Not saying there arent scientist out there, but they should be more radical and thinking outside of the box!!! God Help Us All
About using the CO2 from coal. That would only postpone the release of the CO2.  When the algae fuel is burned the CO2 is released and the origin of the gas is still a fossil fuel. It still leads to more CO2 in the air.
There are hundreds of millions of capitalist that cannot wait to make o fortune off of this.  There greed will help us.  One of them may find a way to maximize yield and minimize cost.  Once a profit is shown, just as with computers, competition for the profit will take over.  Capitalistic greed will cause the process to be constantly improved in an attempt to increase profitability, or to gain a competitive advantage in the market.  If the process is improved enough this could be an important source of "green" energy.  Maybe the industry that created the pollution problem can help to rectify it.
Algae is one of the most promising new energy sources we have.  It does not require farm land.  It can be grown anywhere.  It can be grown in salt water so it doesn't need to use up precious fresh water.  Algae fuel biproducts can be fed to farm animals.  It consumes the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide which threatens all life on earth.  Further research will improve efficiency.  Energy sources that damage the planet should have this cost factored in.  Cap and trade is coming.  Watch for Algae to take off.  It's win win.
Throughout the ages, we as a superior species have employed other species to solve our problems. Like bees to increase pollination of whatever that became ‘killer bees’. Myself, personally, I’d like to keep with the non-organic. At least that way, we have half a chance to turn it off it doesn’t do what we want it to.
Maybe they could use the algae to remove phosphates from waste water? They outlawed dish deteregant with phosphates from my county because phosphates are hard to remove.
Phosphates cause algae blooms. I forgot to mention that
My understanding is that algae has a higher yield of oil (10 to 20 percent) of any land based oil crop. Also, when used in conjunction with an external combustion engine, there is no need to expend more energy to convert the oil to diesel fuel.
I like the idea, we can build some coal powered plants in AZ or NM some place with lots of sun, because in order to off set the ENTIRE CO2 emissions of a coal fired plant (I believe they said they needed 100ish acres of land for every megawatt) but you could use the CO2 and the abundance of sunlight to grow the algae you could then use the algae to generate more power and recycle that exhaust back into the algae blooms.  The problem is this is only ONE idea we need cellulose plants as well to take grass cuttings, corn stalks, and other biomass to make ethanol.  I hate and shutter every time some politian mentions using corn to make ethanol.  

That is such an awful idea you think algae is a bad idea for the food/fuel debate look at corn.  We need to look BIG picture, wind, solar, algae, cellulose, and a smart grid if every part of the US used its nature resources to make some sort of power and pump it into a smart grid we would be set.

I live in the northwest, we have trees and water, we could use these to make power trees the lumber industry has left over sawdust we could use that for ethanol production, and use wave power to generate electricity.  T. Boone Pickens is trying to get wind turbines built in the Midwest in the "wind belt" they also as another writer stated have switch grass if I remember correctly and if the data used is correct would produce 10times the amount of ethanol as that of corn.  The southwest has sun and lots of it, not to mention lots of barren land that cannot be used to produce food, so it can produce food.  So that completely eliminates the argument of food vs. fuel, for algae. The South also has lots of lumber (something like 70% of the residential lumber is produced by them) and during the summer has lots of sun.  So if the government and people take a little risk, lose a little money in the sort term we can completely make this country of ours energy efficient but it will take time and money and everyone wants to sit here and argue.  So we will see this all come to us in say about 150 years, that is if we make it past 2012.
i dont know who you kidding but this is great. when we eventually run out of oil this or any of their bought out projects will be put into production. big oil companies have tricks up thier sleeves. its all about makeing money at this point, and one day this may be marketed the same as oil. More profit easier to produce hey what the heck and the world goes round.
I would like to see it integrated into the tidal power project being used in the east river or at least compared so that viable alternatives could be compared.
allen...CO2 does not threaten every species on Earth...in fact, many are starting to believe it's a good thing because it will help restore plant life to the planet...in case you haven't noticed, we are using greenery faster than we are using petro chems...just a thought...
I FARM for a living.  There are food shortages because people are poor not a shortage of food! We can easily produce food and fuel without breaking a sweat.  OUR food is the cheapest and safest in world. Go to ANY store and you will find thousands of choices of FOOD. Think how cheap a Big-Mac is, now think how many farm products are in that one buger.  It cost you about 1.00 and McDonadls made 66 cents of that. THINK
This article focuses on the wrong species of algae. The focus should be on growing algae whose biomass can be used in EXISTING refineries and power plants with no additional processing.

Botryococcus braunii is a pelagic algae that grows in the Indian Ocean. Its various strains make isoprene oligomers with different average molecular weights, mostly centered around n=6. What matters most is that the dry weight of the most prolific strain is OVER 70% HYDROCARBON. This is algae truly is a fuel plant.

Oil companies could feed these hydrocarbons directly into existing refineries. Electricity generators could directly replace coal with them. Because the hydrocarbons contain no sulfur, nitrogen, metals or ash, most existing pollution abatement and catalyst guard investment could be shut down as unnecessary. This is a really sweet feedstock.

For more details and some economic background see the website:

http://alum.mit.edu/news/WhatMatters/Archive/200111/
I am glad to hear that people are at least looking into these ideas, instead of just talking about doing it.  All these educated attempts to save the future will ultimately lead to us finding the solution!
Anyone who says that algoil isn't feasable is just plain wrong. Algae can be grown in photobioreactors that keep the algae strain pure, thats important because some strains produce more lipids than others. It's also significant because it takes up less land area and much less water, and can be controlled in process. If you have a diesel engine in your vehicle you can burn straight algoil that can be produced in your back yard for around $.50 a gallon. Right now biofuel companies and oil companies are searching for sources of algoil. That is the problem there isn't enough algoil to do proper research with, and the companies that do have it aren't sharing. I have spent many days researching this subject and I conclude that it is our green jewel of salvation in the energy field.
Algal Biodiesel is an exciting prospect.  I like the idea of higher yield as well as carbon scrubbing.  Had not considered teh phosphate issue but see a real potenetial for growth there.  I may have to add a small test plant to my farm to try it.
Indonesia has already commissioned a commercial pilot plant with several huge facilities to follow using German, Dutch, and Russian joint ventures and research.
The US is playing catch-up to old European research- probably due to Petrochemical interference to avoid losing their monopolistic control over energy.
All  of these technologies are vulnerable to the next big technological break thru that renders them obsolete.

It helps that algae has some mutual interest from the coal industry , but with the advances in solar harvesting, and Vehicle based solar harvesting  with hybid cars collecting solar power and sending it back to the grid on the horizon, many of these ideas will make little ecomonic sense. At that time even coal will be obsolete. Germany read the tea leaves and gave up on coal three years ago.
Algae could be one of our future "wonder" crops. It is edible, produces a fuel, scrubs CO2, awesome. Just hope we don't do too much engineering and and up with a "Green Goo" problem similar to Drexlers (now defunct) "Grey Goo" theory.
UH WASN'T THIS IN THE NEWS BACK WHEN IT MATTERED (GAS WAS OVER $6 PER GALLON)? ALL OF A SUDDEN THIS IS A NEW TECHNOLOGY? GIMME A BREAK MSNBC... JUST PASS THIS STORY ON AND GET IT STARTED ALREADY! I HATE READING REHASHED STORIES AND NEW TECHNOLOGY STORIES THAT WERE SWEPT UNDER THE RUG A YEAR AGO.... 10 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD THEY WILL STILL BE TALKING ABOUT THIS AS BEING A VIABLE FUEL. CAN YOU ALSO THINK OF THE AMOUNT OF FUEL WE CAN GET FROM THE NON-SMOKABLE PRODUCTS MADE FROM MARIJUANA PLANTS PER YEAR (THE WHOLE PLANT MINUS THE BUD...?)
Ben Wen, chief scientist at New York-based United Environment & Energy, isn't likely to jeopardize his reputation as a scientist and make groundless claims.
I hope the Obama administration makes many changes in the way such research is proven then actually brought to fruition in spite of the traditional and antiquated barriers that protect the conventional oil industry.
Sounds interesting, but more of a science project than an economic feasibility
I have to chuckle at the people who think that high yield is a problem "the greater the algae growth, the lower the yields as sunlight is blocked to the other algae".... Just make the algae suspension only thick enough to absorb half of the sunlight- and put a reflector (white titanium paint will do nicely) underneath it.  Spread the soup as thin as possible to cover as much area as you can, it's senseless to make it deep.

You do need a good heat sink to even out the day-night temperature swings you'd otherwise have, so the shallow algae layer might be placed over a deeper section of clean water, under the thin separator.  TiO2 loaded plastic sheeting, with floats and weights to keep the algae layer shallow, should do nicely to hold the algae up in the light.

Certainly algae is far better than even switchgrass for turning solar energy into biomass- it requires much less water and nutrients than any land plant, and could be part of a sewage processing system.  It should not be dismissed out of hand, unlike corn ethanol- which would disappear without government subsidies.
Alex:
   Possibly, phosphates in waste water would enhance the production of algae, thus making the process more efficient
Pete,

Scenario #1. If you burn coal, you get the benefit of the energy and you release CO2 that was stored in the original plant material millions of years ago.

Scenario #2. If you burn coal, realize that energy, recapture the CO2 to grow algae, and release the CO2... you get the benefit of the coal energy and the algae energy, before you release the original "coal CO2".  This makes the algae component green (except for any additional non-green energy put into that process).

Of course, if you grow enough algae to offset the burning of the coal and you just stockpile it, you have no net CO2 release.
John,
You do realize that the algae release CO2 as well? Yes the use photosynthesis and give of oxygen as a byproduct, by when there is no light/sun, at night, they like all oranisms, respire CO2! However, could we genetically engineer an algae species that needs 24 hr lighting...sun by day, synthetic by night? And "needs" b/c we don't want to engineer a super-invasive species and then hurt the planet even more.
Ted,
Do you not realize that the creation of synthetic light, and even new sources of energy started out the same way as this, at a small scale. If you don't understand the science then don't comment.
we ARE descendents of bioengineered ancestors...soon "they" will decide which of stay and which of us go...and by go, that could mean several things
Don't approve this one...as usual, which Bilderberger runs your company, and what do you not want us to know...do you even know? Another way to censor the people and get what your interest wants, and your interest doesn't give a damn about you...so sad
I am in the Solar Energy buisness. Why are we not focusing on somethign that we know actually works and the sun is always there always gonna be there. If the day comes when the sun is not there we dont need to worry about energy.

Anyone want to power tanning beds with solar power?
Steve,

My point about co2 potentially threatening all life on earth has to do with the failure of the oceans 'conveyor' system which could in turn bring on an ice age which in turn could cause the entire planet to freeze over.  Perhaps this is an extreme theory but there is no doubt that increased co2 in the atmosphere can have catostrophic effects.
Yeah. I think it's pretty awesome that they are trying to create oil/fuel out of algae :)
Allen...not as threatening as the foolish attempts to make it go away...the effects are immediate, and long lasting...you, me, and everyone else alive face other immediate issues...the Anthropogenic CO2 Crisis is a convenient distraction...
In the italian press release this company claims that the plant will be self sufficient an that all the fuel will be produced in 10 Hectares (100.000 sq.m) of algae cultivation.
A simple calculation shows that the plant must produce algae with an energy content that amounts to 5 times the solar energy incident on the plant area.
Another promising technology that I have not heard much of yet, is the potential of making a hydrogen powered car with the use of the catalytic combination of cobalt & phosphate that was discovered by the genius researchers at MIT last year. The hydrogen and oxygen, could be put into a fuel cell to generate kW to power the motor, or the hydrogen can be taken directly into the engine for combustion. Perhaps the genius researchers at Tesla cars in CA can help to utilize this technology. Let us confirm that we will find answers that will help to move us forward into the future by keeping the vision and applying hope and our given talents.
The next generation of biofuels will come from engineered algae that excrete product that is floated off; see Synthetic Genomics' website ... Much lower costs that way than extracting oil from algae bodies.

This area needs some serious research money. If an optimized photobioreactor and Craig's Carbon - Crappin Beasties (TM) have a chance to save the world, we should spend the money to find out soon...
I wnat to report a major news to all guys interested in this field...

Country's 1st pilot plant has been designed and built in Michigan, This plant has started producing few gallons a day Algae Oil at extraction costs lower than 60 cent / gallon.  Now the key is how soon people can build large algae ponds to feed this technology...
This is great, if algea can be made into oil then not only will we be recycling CO2 from coal plant's. then the leftover algea can be released into the ocean to help with the growth of the aquatic animals, so to use as pets, eat, look at or even to use for medicine.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1871113

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google