ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Happy Pluto Day (and Pi Day)

Posted: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:02 AM by Alan Boyle

You win some, you lose some: That truism goes for planets as well as presidents. Pluto may have lost an election at the International Astronomical Union's general assembly almost three years ago, but it won the backing of the Illinois Senate last month.

Lawmakers approved a resolution that re-establishes Pluto's full planetary status as it "passes overhead through Illinois' night skies." The resolution sets today aside as "Pluto Day" in Illinois. March 13 is singled out because it's the 79th anniversary of the announcement that Pluto had been discovered.

Pluto's discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, was born in Streator, Ill., which explains why Illinois' state senators felt a special need to mark the occasion. In his later years, Tombaugh lived in New Mexico, where March 13 was similarly designated "Pluto Planet Day" in 2007.

The debate over the status of Pluto and the solar system's other smaller planets continues to this day. Illinois' resolution may be nonbinding - but come to think of it, so was the IAU's. So if you're looking for something to celebrate, raise a glass to Pluto today. Then, have a nice piece of pi tomorrow. (And while you're in a festive mood, sing "Happy Birthday, Dear Albert" as well.)

Update for noon ET: I've come across two more reasons to celebrate. First, the NASA probe that's bound for Pluto in 2015, known as New Horizons, has started sending back pictures of Neptune's moon, Triton. That's particularly interesting for the New Horizons team because Triton is Neptune's largest moon, spinning in a direction that's completely different from that of its adoptive parent planet. The current thinking is that Triton is a bigger cousin of Pluto's that broke out of the icy Kuiper Belt and was somehow captured in Neptunian orbit. Thus, studying Triton can yield insights into what Pluto is like as well.

This month also marks the 20th anniversary of the conception of the World Wide Web. Back in March 1989, CERN researcher Tim Berners-Lee, submitted a little paper called "Information Management: A Proposal" to Mike Sendall, his manager. Sendall was intrigued enough to write a note on the document's cover - "Vague, but exciting" - and gave Berners-Lee the go-ahead to follow up on the research. As a result, the first baby Web was born in 1990.

Twenty years later, working on the Web is still vague, but exciting. To see how far the Web has come since then, check out CERNland, the European research center's new portal site for kids. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Thanks for reminding everyone that the IAU's resolution is no more binding than that of the Illinois legislature. I plan to wear one of my many "Pluto is a Planet" shirts (yes, I have several).

The Illinois legislature has way more sense than the International Astronomical Union has shown in two-and-a-half years. It’s the IAU who have acted like idiots, with one tiny group forcing a nonsensical planet definition on everyone. The truth is there is NO scientific consensus that Pluto is not a planet. The criterion requiring that a planet “clear the neighborhood of its orbit” is not only controversial; it’s so vague as to be meaningless.

Even now, many astronomers and lay people are working to overturn the IAU demotion or are ignoring it altogether. Kudos to the Illinois Senate for standing up to this closed, out of touch organization whose leadership thinks they can just issue a decree and change reality.
It is amazing to see how much 'pull' Pluto has in Illinois. Perhaps this is just a start of a comeback with the International Astronomical Union's general assembly this summer!
What always gets me about those who criticize the IAU definition of a planet is they fail to give on of their own.  If you have a better alternative, please let me know.  Many are quick to come to the aid of Pluto, but will you also then classify Eris, Ceres, Makemake and others as planets as well?  

Do have eight planets, nine planets, or over 300 in our solar system?  

Not having a definition for so long is what caused this controversy.  Not having any formal definition is just bad science.  Imagine trying to do anything in regards to chemistry without a formal definition of matter.

If you disagree, fine, that is your right.  But, I have yet to hear an alternative definition that is any better.  Most of the time I here nothing at all but angry rhetoric on how wrong the IAU is.

Happy Pluto Day!

[The current thinking is that Triton is a bigger cousin of Pluto's that broke out of the icy Kuiper Belt and was somehow captured in Neptunian orbit.]
--So a planet has to be round, orbiting a star and have cleared it's orbit of debris.  It's the third one that's a issue.  I wish Pluto could be a planet (I'm resistant to change), but I can certainly understand and support it's demotion to a planetoid, or something like that.  Things need to be defined in a logical/objective manner.


--What I don't like is that politicians feel they can arbitrarily intervene with science results and debate--especially with no training or understanding in the field.  How many scientific fields to politicians need to get their grubby little hands on(I think we know what I'm getting at)?  It's not good for science, it doesn't allow for debate that teaches non-science people the subject and it minimizes the relevance of the field.
I have provided an alternate planet definition in responses to prior posts on this subject, one advocated by many planetary scientists such as Dr. Alan Stern. In the words of my first astronomy instructor, Al Witzgall, a planet is "a non-self-luminous spheroidal body in orbit around a star." In other words, if it is large enough to have attained hydrostatic equilibrium and pulled itself into a spherical shape or that of an oblate spheroid, it is a planet. Distinctions between types of planets can then be made through the use of subcategories such as terrestrial planets, gas giants, ice giants, dwarf planets, etc.
Gee...

I thought Al Gore said HE invented the internet!
Happy Pi Day!  

Check out the Pi Day Challenge:

www.PiDayChallenge.com
I agree we need a better definition of what a planet is, however I don't care if it keeps Pluto as a planet.
A definition could be similar to this: A planet is and spacial body that orbits a star and has an average diameter over 3000 km. if that body has a natural satellite greater then 1/3 of its diameter then the center of orbit of the satellite must be inside the diameter or within 1/10 of the diameter of the body. or something like this. I realize this definition excludes pluto, but oh well.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1835119

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google