ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The race to find alien Earths

Posted: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 5:30 PM by Alan Boyle


ESA
An artist's conception shows a planet crossing the disk of an alien star. Planet-
hunting satellites watch for the dimming of starlight caused by such crossings.

NASA is gearing up for a space race that's expected to point to the first truly Earthlike worlds beyond our solar system - and, like the race to put the first human on the moon, this marathon will take several years to run.

The roots of the race go back more than a decade, as astrophysicist Alan Boss explains in his new book, "The Crowded Universe: The Search for Living Planets." That's when pioneers in the planet-hunting field started detecting worlds around suns beyond our own.

The techniques used back then couldn't find other Earths in planetary systems like our own. The first method, pioneered by Polish astronomer Alexander Wolszczan at the Arecibo Observatory in 1991, could detect Earth-scale planets (and perhaps even the first known extrasolar dwarf planet) around radio pulsars - but those planets were thought to be burned-out cinders and not Earthlike at all.

In 1995, astronomers began reporting the detection of Jupiter-scale planets around normal stars, by precisely measuring the gravitational wobble those planets induce in the stars themselves. (Our interactive tutorial explains how it's done.) As the years have gone by, planet-hunters have gotten smarter about using that "Doppler wobble" technique, and they've also trained sensitive telescopes on faraway stars to measure the slight dimming in their light as alien planets make their transits over the stars' disks.

This transit method takes center stage in the next phase of the planet-hunting space race: The European Space Agency's Corot satellite, which was launched a little more than two years ago, has a head start. Just this month, members of the Corot science team announced the discovery of a "hot super-Earth" that is less than twice Earth's size.

Next month, NASA picks up the pace with the launch of its Kepler satellite, equipped with a planet-seeking telescope that has some advantages over Corot. Astronomers expect Kepler to turn up some true Earthlike planets, in Earthlike orbits, around sunlike stars.


NASA
Astronomer Alan Boss is author of "The Crowded
Universe: The Search for Living Planets."

"If Kepler comes up empty-handed - boy, it'll turn out to be virtual harakiri," Boss, a member of the Kepler science team, told me earlier this month. "But there's little chance of that."

The first fruits of the $550 million Kepler mission won't be the coolest alien Earths, Boss cautioned. "Often the oddballs are the earliest ones to find, for some reason," he said. Boss expects the Kepler team to announce the mission's first discoveries of hot Jupiters and hot super-Earths within a month after science operations begin.

The biggest factor behind that schedule has to do with the time scale of a planet's orbit. It takes at least three orbits for astronomers to confirm that the dimming of the star is really caused by a planet rather than, say, the brightness cycles of a variable star or a binary-star system. If the planet is extremely close to its star - which would be an oddball orbit by solar system standards - that won't take long. For example, the hot super-Earth identified by Corot completes an orbit in just 20 hours.

Farther-out planets will require more time to orbit, and therefore more time to detect.

"The earth, by definition, will take at least three years to get," Boss said. "Roughly four years from now, we will be beginning to make our claims for Earthlike planets around solar-type stars."

Boss' book traces the buildup to the Kepler mission through a series of time-stamped entries, reading almost like a diary. It's often been said that politics can get as messy as sausage-making - and based on Boss' accounts of Kepler's budgetary travails, the same can be said for pre-launch mission planning.

Along the way, Boss also delves into the deep scientific issues of the planet search:

  • Are new planets built from the core up, like dirty snowballs, or do they whirl into shape like stars are thought to do? (Boss says both processes come into play.)

  • How do you define stars, brown dwarfs, sub-brown dwarfs, planets and dwarf planets? (Boss was involved in many of those discussions, including the IAU's efforts to define planethood.)

  • What will it mean if (or when) Kepler finds those alien Earths? (Boss says finding out how many such planets exist among the more than 100,000 star systems that Kepler is expected to survey will reveal "the most basic parameter in any estimate of the prevalence of life in the universe.")

Kepler's primary mission is due to last three and a half years, but Boss hopes that the spacecraft will be up for some extra laps around the racetrack. Which mission will be the first to reveal just how common alien Earths are? Corot or Kepler? Considering that Boss is on Kepler's team, he's not the best person to handicap this race objectively. But in the end, it doesn't really matter who reaches the finish line first.

"Either way," he writes, "after centuries - if not millennia - of speculation and wondering, we will finally know just how crowded the universe really is."


For another perspective on "The Crowded Universe," check out Jeff Foust's book review in The Space Review.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

@ James Hilman: Not so! The technology as we have it now and have had before just has not been refined. Interferometry in space is our best hope. By placing multiple sensors in a grid and rotating the whole assembly , the structure can be an array of satellites connected by cable and be hundreds of killometers wide. A huge undertaking , but the scale of project required to do it now , with technology that exists now. Such an arry has the ability to detect planetary bodies as small as 1/3 the size of Earth.

A real leap needs to be made in antimatter technology and production. Current spacecraft using exauhst principals are limited in speed ~2x the speed of the thrust exiting the vehicle. Antimatter rockets are our fastsest conveyance yet, and give us the hope of reaching the closest stars in under 100 years, once we find somewhere to go.
Seems to me that there are a lot of intelligent people on this site.  However, nobody has covered my thoughts in this matter.  Is it possible when they find these planets they will find White people on one, Black people on another, and Asians on another?  Now, I feel we were brought here as a test to see if we could learn to live together.  Or maybe we were just brought here to be punished.  Hope I didn’t offend anyone, that’s not what I am trying to do.  But think about it!  Give me your take.
Several posters here seem to think that we need habitable, Earth-like planets in order to extend civilization beyond the Earth.  That's not true; we are a technological species, and can (or will soon) live anywhere there is energy and the right mix of materials.  Sticking ourselves at the bottom of a deep gravity well is probably the LAST thing we'll want to do.  The Moon, the asteroid belt, and the two moons of Mars will be our first steps into the galaxy, and are capable of supporting trillions of people comfortably.  Beyond that there are the gas giant moons, the Kuiper belt, and ultimately the Oort cloud -- our own solar system is a vast, resource-rich place.

So finding Earth-like planets will be interesting scientifically, but have no material impact on the spread of humanity.
It's truly unfortunate with how important such a discovery is, that such a poor mission was funded.  About ten years ago, NASA was talking about a space based inter-ferometer that could potentially SEE the cloud tops and land masses of other earth like worlds.  Do do this, you needed six hubble sized tellescopes flying in-sink each about several hundred miles apart that beamed their light back to a central satalite that combined the light from all the others.  This would result in the equivalent resolution/combined signal strength of a tellescope that was hundreds of miles in diameter!  That to me is a science project on the grandest scale and far more worth it than just about ANY OTHER!
If we find a planet that would likely support life say within 10 light years, would we fund a probe with powerful enough engines to get there before we all die of old age?
Don't get too excited folks. 1000 to 1 life is discovered in our own solar system before it is confirmed 1,000s of light years away.  For one, finding a planet with what we deem the right conditions for life is not proof of life. And even direct observation (if it were possible) is not proof of life, only proof life once existed.  Our own solar system should be explored first to answer the questions of weather life is possible on other worlds.  If you can find it on another planet or moon in our own solar system you can infer a much, much, much greater chance of it arising in another solar system.  
I believe there are very intelligent beings out there. I also believe they know where Earth is and have visited us many times.
All Earth like planets is similar except the amount of surface water.  They have large mountain trees River and smale stream. The people seem similar to us in every way and form.  
Very advanced alien civilizations, I suspect, must have mastered space-time warps, and must be harnessing the energy of rotating black holes (think of the classification of alien civilizations given by Freemon Dyson - Civilization II, may be). In that case, their time passes much slower than that on earth - they must age at a much slower rate and may tend to live far longer in earth years. In that case, 10 earth years or whatever time it takes for the Jupiter's/earth's wobble to occur and seen by them would be nothing for them and they should be able to detect us! (Of course, they may obviously have far far superior detection techniques.) But this also makes me wonder why would such super-civilizations go away from the gravitational field of their black-hole(s) and visit us if they will age much faster and die earlier, that is, if they live and die at all! Hence, I don't think extremely advanced alien civilizations would visit us at all. In-between civilizations, may be!
I had rather spend the trillions of dollars trying to save our planet. If we find other intelligence out there, they'll be so far away that it won't matter that much, but I guess knowing will be worth wasting all our tax payers dollars?
Religious and other history plainly states we have been visited many times and still are, just much more discreetly.
It will be interesting to see the reactions from our radical religious fringes when a planet, let's say with observable methane in its atmosphere...is found.  I can only hope we point our radio-telescopes towards it after that...and literally hear the communications from another world.  

Let's hope they're friendly!

-osgo
When looking for life they should look for a star in the boondocks.  No star within ten thousand light years of a magnetar is likely to harbor life.  The candidate star should be larger than 95% of all stars in order that it be long lasting enough to for life to evolve.   It will be a star rich in metals.  The earthlike planet must be within the habitable zone of the star and must have a moon large enough to almost qualify the planet-moon system as a double planet, with attendant plate techtonics, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc, and resulting magnetosphere to prevent the solar wind from blowing away the water and oxygen, had they ever been present. Also necessary will be a gaseous giant like Jupiter properly spaced to divert stray comets from bombarding the earthlike planet. The moon must have been the result of a collision of the earthlike planet with a Mars size planet in the early years of planet formation, pulling the crust of the earthlike planet into the formation of the moon.  The removal of crust will allow for the formation of dry land on the planet, which would otherwise be totally covered with water, and likely baren of life which seems to evolved into higher forms where water meets the land.    
This is great my son wants to be an astonomer, I bought him an 8" Celestron for christmas. I believe it is the best investment for his future I could make. I hope someday he finds a planet. The universe is a wonderful place, it is our playground. We need to find a way to play in it.
There is NO alien civilization out there. I do believe there is other planets out there in space undiscovered. Let's stick to investigation than assuming. My question is, if we find what we looking for in the next years or hundreds of years, what do we do next? Do we even have the technology and material to transport hundreds or thousands of people into space, traveling the distance to get to its destination and colonize a new territory? If not, we would be wasting money that could be used to better the way we live on earth.
What use will it be to find another Earth a billion light years away? We will never be able to visit or communicate with it. Might be nice knowing, but it's going to do no good whatsoever.
Has anyone else taken a step back and assessed the last 100 years of life on our OWN earth? We have evolved in everyway possible, as a species, more in the last 100 years than we ever have since the beginning of our existence. We live in the most astounding time of life, right now. But why NOW? Why is it US that gets to be a part of the highly possible discovery of alien life? Is there a bigger picture that we don't see? I find that living right now is completely awesome. Period. To find life outside our own planet will change everything. Religion and Science will either continue to coexist or the beliefs that we have held dear for so many generations will be immediately disregarded. I'm kind of speaking out of my ass, but what do YOU think?
What do I know?

But I think it's kinda crazy with things like the Large Hadron Collider.

I won't try to break it down, since I fully don't understand it either. But if they create a big bang and can capture the beginnings of a universe and are able to one day sustain it in the vacuum.

Maybe it would almost be a way to study the universe in a controlled environment.

Maybe shed some real light on the structure of the universe.  

Also makes me wonder if they'll prove Creationism, with a flip of a switch.

Then it makes me wonder if we're just hanging out in someone else's Collider.

Who really knows?

Even if we were to find another civilization we would not be able to converse let alone visit.  The distances are just too vast.  Unless we find something close to receiver-less teleportation there is just no way to get anywhere.  To get anywhere in a reasonable time via some sort of "star drive" we would have to be able to travel at hundreds or thousands of multiples of light speed.

We will get in to space but it will be a local phenomenon.  Orbital factory/refineries etc. there is too much raw materials and fuel for the taking not to.  The need to clean up the space junk in earth orbit may be our first real commercial space endeavor (I don't count satellites as they are launched from the ground and orbit passively as a whole).
As much as I would love to see us go into space we need to get our own house in order first.  I would far rather see the money and more importantly the brain-power focused on making our civilization stable and all people on earth fed, safe and happy.  We have the resources and technology to do this NOW we just lack the will.
There are a lot of people that agree that mankind is destroying our planet and that we should be looking for another suitable planet to destroy in the future.
It is unfortunate that we do not have the means to visit any of the potential replacements.

We have yet to solve the problems of time and distance to travel to stars in our own galaxy and may not do so in anyones lifetime.  It is unlikely that even your grandchildren will have that luxury.

This is a world scale project that would require a huge investments of men and materials.  It will be the most expensive project that the human race ever invested in and it is going to be very difficult to pull this off while people are still strapping on explosives to prove a point.  
I'm a Christian who believes in both evolution and the bible. Where do you think God came from? Of course He evolved perhaps billions of years before us and he arranged this earth to fulfill a need to love a creature that would in turn love him. If humans would love their brother as themselves we would have no more wars or disease here. We have God's blessings in our space travels and I can't wait to see how this progresses. If any one is interested I can furnish proof of His divine nature and existence right in the Bible.
Frank Williams is right. if we were to detect an inhabited planet millions or billions of lightyears away,communication and/or travel would be futile. remember, what you're looking at that far out is how it looked millions or billions of years ago. we would have no way to determine how that world looks today, if it even exists anymore. i believe the universe is teeming with life, but it's so immense in size and scope. ftl travel would still not be fast enough. probably the best way to travel such incredible distances is so far beyond our capability-a stable wormhole. even that may not be enough. we should continue observances though, just to know, not worry about contact until our species advances to that point. our system is what we should concentrate on for discovery,resources and possible colonization. one step at a time. that would be a good staging point as we continue to advance. these things of course will take trillions of dollars and several decades to undertake but our futures may someday depend upon it. even if we discover habitable worlds within our own galaxy, not another galaxy(WAY too far away), communication/travel to & from would take decades if not centuries, even if ftl travel has been achieved. i know a lot of you,as i, would love to see that someday, like in Star Trek, but i'm afraid it won't be in our lifetimes, unless we soon figure out how to defeat aging and death. anything's possible though...
I love it when people assert with such certainty and finality that there are NO alien civilizations.  How could YOU possibly know?
The aliens will eradicate the non-believers first.
I have recently been wondering about possible alien civilizations and I keep thinking that maybe the reason we haven't found others is simply because we are the first... or maybe second... I mean, what if we here on Earth developed just a little faster than any other lasting civilization in our Galaxy? Maybe there are dozens of intelligent species out there... a few thousand years behind us? Even a species a few thousand years ahead of us, but on the other side of the galaxy, won't be seen by SETI until thousands of years from now.
I thought it's already been discovered just how rare a planet like ours is in the universe with all the prerequisite conditions nessesary for a planet to support life.  The chances of another planet like ours in our universe is too miniscule for any projects like this to be anything but a waste of time and taxpayers money.
----------------------
What a terrible, conceited, uninformed opinion.  The population of earthlike planets near enough to locate is proportional - just like the planets we are now discovering.  If 5% of all planets are of correct size, in the 'habitable zone' of an appropriate star, and are in the habitable zone of the Milky Way, then 5% of the planets are earthlike.  Nature doesn't slant things like the above writer did.
There are no aliens in space, just imagination. Go invest in some telescopes and watch the stars all night, let me know how that works out for you. I am an firm believer, support, and respect scientists who make progress and found new discoveries.  I hope to live long enough to "physically" see actual facts than hear of these fiction stories. How much money does it takes to get these space programs moving in "God speed"... literally?
 The closest Earth like planets is not that far from here it is our technology that is the problem. We need to utilize spacecraft or black hole which bird use to travel around the Earth with very little effort.  You see around each planets there is a passage that can be used to stick a space ship ten of thousand miles per hour without any fuel at all.
"There is NO alien civilization out there. I do believe there is other planets out there in space undiscovered. Let's stick to investigation than assuming. My question is, if we find what we looking for in the next years or hundreds of years, what do we do next? Do we even have the technology and material to transport hundreds or thousands of people into space, traveling the distance to get to its destination and colonize a new territory? If not, we would be wasting money that could be used to better the way we live on earth."

Dominic, The odds of finding life is actually pretty good I'd think.  Not only are the basic building blocks for life out there in abundance and so many potential worlds availaible (like even the moons of free-floating planets), there is also the idea of transpermia...  Bacteria have an amazing ability to turn themselves into a spor... a seed that can survive hundreds a milions of years in a dormant state.  It is speculated (and even partially proved when living experiments on the Shuttle Columbia actually survived re-entry) that if an asteroid hit earth or another world with bacteria, those pieces of debris, blasted out into space, could land--after millions of years--carrying microbes that can then start to live again.  The theory even goes on to say that such debris could travel between the solar systems from other stars.  Self generating life is obviously far rarer than life that can re-seed other worlds once it gets started.  Will this lead to intelegence?  I think that's the big question!  

If we do find another world, we could send hundreds of thousands of genetic samples of people there to be mixed after the jouney.  that way the ship can be much smaller than some colonization ship which would take centuries to get there.  Personally, I don't see us colonizing other worlds in other solar systems for thousands of years yet, so the best thing to do is to build space cities of our own and live there instead of trying to find some other earth like planet.  Science is discovering some very strange things about instantanious travel--at least photons I think--so it is to me... rather likely that some form of extra fast space travel will be possible at some point.  the mere idea of instantanious travel points to a doorway in our reality... not a worm hole but a hint of something far grander about our reality than we currently understand.  It doesn't take a brain surgon to understand that science has yet to uncover all the laws of physics and there are indeed hints and theories that all matter comes from the same underlying fabric that interconnects us all.  If true, what explosion of energy, and tech can come from such a study?  We do need to get things right on earth but we don't seem to want to.  it's rather easy to build ultra-efficient, disaster ready homes that can house people much more effectively, but all "people" seem to want is to outclass the jone's next door.  We should try the best we can to colonize this world as we would on any other.  If we were to make the journey to another world, um... do you think we'd put our cities and nuclear power plants right on the nearest fault lines?  It's to me a disgrace to think how poorly we've planned our own colonization in compared to how deliberate such a new venture would be.

Um... sorry for the rant... Guess i'm just in the mood to write today :)!

Chris
God told them there are no other life forms...  Is religon man made?
It is very exciting to think that we will increase our ability to view some earth like planets but lack the know how on getting there.I too agree that the intelligent life in space has  seen the blue beacon of earth but decided to stay away due to our primitive population.We have too many religions that all say human life is so precious that we cannot institute birth control, too many wars in the name of god and as people we think what is good for us is good for the planet, its the opposite. Whatever we do to make our lives simpler in some way we strip another resource from the planet. We have killed off, strip mined or bulldozed over so much life from this planet. Any "ET" would know that as soon as people  leave this place it will once again be a nice place to visit.

Finding the planets with space based telescopes will be the start of the new exploration era. I dont think we will be getting any help from the outside unless its by pure accident, or some very precarious circumstances. So mans enginuity will have to carry us through once again, we did create a whole new country just a few hundred years ago so I think there is still hope for us.
Tom Venne, while life may be fairly common in the universe, intelligent life somewhat less so, in spite of much of the science fiction you've seen, it's MASSIVELY improbable that you'll find life that could be fairly described as 'humanoid' of any color.

The particular chain of evolutionary events that led to us isn't likely to be reproduced exactly, anywhere else. Again, you may find intelligence, and they may even be upright bipeds of a sort, maybe even have the physical characteristics we would call 'mammalian,' but anything like a human, or any other sort primate? Virtually certainly not....

For more information on Kepler you can check out the following websites:

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. (Designed and Built the Kepler Spacecraft) http://www.ballaerospace.com

Kepler Site at NASA: http://kepler.nasa.gov/


Maybe God is an alien and we are his ant farm.
"Sticking ourselves at the bottom of a deep gravity well is probably the LAST thing we'll want to do."


That may be an issue, when all you have are chemical rockets, but excessive concerns about gravity wells are for wimpy civilizations that haven't learned to do better. Some of us *like* the relative stability that comes with a reasonable planetary surface, compared to, say, large rotating O'Neil-type habitats in space.

But, having said that...

I completely agree that a place doesn't *have* to already have life or be as readily habitable as Earth, to be interesting, useful and even habitable, with one degree or another of technological support (he said, typing away in a building with central heating, the sub-freezing winds of Upstate NY whistling outside).

Indeed, we already live with technological support we take for granted, even here. Space will just be a natural extension of that...

"I had rather spend the trillions of dollars trying to save our planet."

Cool. No one's spending literally 'trillions' of dollars on planet detection (or any other space projects), anyway...

i am excited for this search as a hope to be astronomer. But, I don't like the idea of waiting 3 years.
"The candidate star should be larger than 95% of all stars in order that it be long lasting enough to for life to evolve."

Brush up on your stellar physics. The more massive a star is, the *faster* it uses up its hydrogen.

Granted, it's not intuitive (no one promised that the Universe would be), but it's true.

You want stars not much more massive than the Sun, for that reason. And not too much less massive either, because the 'Goldilocks' zone where planets are likely to have liquid water is narrower and closer to its star, reducing the chance a planet will be there, and in the extreme case around a red dwarf star, a close planet will, early in its hhistory, get into a locked rotation situation where one side will always face the star, much as the Moon does with Earth.

Add to all this the fact that stars are *more* common with lower mass.

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/11/red-dwarfs-have-teeny-tiny-habitable-zones/

http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/stars/red-dwarf-stars/

Frank, It's been a while since I've looked at photos of the O'Neil Space cities...  Much like looking through a telescope for the first time at night, I think it awoke something in me.  That being said, I really don't like them very much...  It seems a lot to me like trying to bring the ideals of a suburban family home into space.  Vast open areas... even the greenhouses were not very space efficient.  Granted it was a dream of what was and certainly is possible... for that we can thank him!  However, realistically I think they'd be a lot more compact and yet--to me--even have a better feel.  I love nature... I love small towns, but I also love big cities like NYC!  There is a positive energy there that is hard to describe.  If space is limited in such colonies, that doesn't mean it can be very nice.  For example, Look at how customized, stylish, and yet functional the cabins are on small yachts!  It's amazing!  Sailing in a Crystal clear sky... perhaps with the planet Saturn making a breathtaking rise each day, I think it would offer its own amazing feel and warmth.  Much like an ocean liner has mega theators and activities, I think such a city would be a very nice place to live, yet, if you do get an occasional need to live on earth, I'm sure there would be shuttles back and forth all the time.  Most people don't live in the same place very long so I'm sure a space city doesn't have to be an un-ending permanent stay which does have an air of feeling restrictive and un-natural... even if living in the same location on earth.  As we grow, I'm sure it will be a draw to many, even if not all.  Somehow there has to be a way of doing this centuries before it would seem likely.  ...and the best way to realize that is to have realistic city plans and realistic colonization plans that people can get a feel for.  Once on the table... Seriously, I think it would be a timeless draw that would bring nations together and our focus around a goal and purpose that we were somehow meant for.  We may not yet spend the trillions of dollars on science like we do on global warfare, but hopefully the one will replace the other and to be honest, all it takes is a change of perspective!  NOTHING MORE!  Hey... perhaps those telescopes will help :)! Anyway :)!
Chris
Yes of course ... wonderful news about this planet finding! What happens if we find it?? Well here is what I think may happen...

If why by that time managed to solve the mystery of travelling faster than light ... All the well off people will be able to leave this planet, as we all know the fees for such a trip will be near astronomical, so now they have mined an plundered this planet into doomsday. They leave it and all the people that cannot afford said "one way trip" to survive by their lonesome.
I think if we are ever actualy visited by others or if we discver them. on another planet. we might be a little disappointed, when they look just like us. and going through life learning and growing every day. We might be surprised when they do not look like frail creatures,., but are humanoid and are in the4 image of our creator.
Its not a race because there is no finish line, just a gradual increase in information about other planets as the years go by. The report is overly grand in this respect, we don't need overblown claims for us to be excited by the work.
I must say, I find it all very interesting, seeing what is out there, though there is no doubt that there are millions of planets and earth-like moons.
An infinite  Omniverse will contain infinite Earthlike
planets. That is the wonder of it all. The fact that there is Every Thing rather than No Thing that is the Great Mystery. Life is wonderful, treasure it.
I'm not sure why most of the comments are centered around finding life on other planets because it sounds to me that the mission is about first finding the planets.  I think there will be many amazing discoveries just being able to identify several "earthlike" planets.  I'm sure any they discover will be so far away that determining if there is life on those planets would take many more decades, if not centuries, of research.  Besides, just like it takes the light from stars thousands of years to reach us, reflections of other planets would have the same problem.  We could be seeing a planet that may have evolved life, like on our planet, but looking at it millions of years ago.  If there are intelligent aliens out there looking at the Earth, they may still "see" dinosaurs.
"I'm sure any they discover will be so far away that determining if there is life on those planets would take many more decades, if not centuries, of research."

Karen, although it may indeed be several decades to find live on other worlds, this particular "transit method of finding planets does offer a faily unique ability to look for some of the key signitures of life... like oxygen and water.  I'm not sure this satilite can do it, but ground-based observatories using this method have been able to actually tell what the atmosphere of other "far larger" planets was made of.  I know it's probably surprizing to hear as it was for me, but as the planet passes in front of the star, the starlight passes through that planets atmosphere and it's chemical signiture can be read even though we can't see the planet itself.  Much like there is a dimming of the sunlight as the planet passes in front, we can also see certain spikes in the spectral signiture that have in the past been used to detect certain elements of the planet itself... We can normally do this just on reflected sunlight for say Venus, but in this instance we are looking for the spectral signiture from direct sunlight that just happens to pass through the atmosphere of the planet infront of it.  Oxygen isn't a rare element but it so readily combines with other elements that to see it in the atmosphere of an earthlike world "may" be a sign of life.  

It never ceases to amaze me how astronomers use what tools they have to derive Soooo much from it.  Even the velocity way to detect planets is truly amazing and yet so simple at the same time.  

One can certainly infer (in reverse) that anyone looking at our sun, probably knows we are here from even just similar tech, not to mention a "real" effort.  ...and probably has known about life on earth for a very long time.  "If" they were close enough, I'm sure the temptation to visit such an amazing world was too tempting to pass up!  Although I DO NOT believe in UFO's, it's at least my guess/hope that any inteligence out there is certainly aware of us and I'd almost be certain keeping some kind of eye on earth.  The message that we show in our warships and contempt for the planet is probably a bit baffling, but I'm sure it's been repeated many many times of countless other worlds. We are in an interum period where we ahve all the high tech we need yet with little direction on how best to use it other than against one another.  I'd love to know what they know... but since we disregard the information we already have to make the world a better place, it's unlikely they are in any hurry to share it :(...  Only when we've secured our own existance without any potential of dying off, do we by default become those who speak for earth.  Until then, we are just nature playing itself out not to be interfeared with.  WE ARE SO CLOSE!  Let's take that next step!  
You can travel faster than speed of light in cylender in total darkness you dont see of feel anything in other word the only thing you know that you alive. At that speed a person can travel all across or Galaxy within half hour real time but only a few second in space time.  
NASA's budget is less than what they are dumping into a failed auto company! Expand knowledge or support failure? Which do you choose?
there is no other intelligent life in the universe. if there was,we would know already.since warp speed is dependent on technology which enable time-travel and probably means  if we ever encounter alien beings our past,present and future would be changed in ways unimaginable.on the other hand,theres those pesky black holes.

I hope to hear good news soon. We are not alone, it's pretty dumb to assume our planet was made just for us. WE evolved around IT, and if you think some god made it, shouldn't you be persecuting the people of other religions? There are many other planets like ours and plenty of different species of intelligent life through the Universe which contains trillions upon trillions of galaxies.
thank you xprize and space nasa for science technology thi is verypowerful technology science


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1799004

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google