ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Readings in evolution

Posted: Friday, February 13, 2009 11:19 AM by Alan Boyle


Nicolle Rager Fuller / NSF
Scientific and religious leaders are sharing their thoughts on the influence of
Charles Darwin's ideas, 150 years after the publication of "The Origin of Species."

Charles Darwin's 200th birthday may now be history, but the story behind the origins of species continues to be told. In fact, you might be hearing more about "The Origin of Species" at church this weekend, right after the scriptural readings: More than 1,000 religious congregations around the world have signed up to give sermons on the theme of religion and science as part of the fourth annual Evolution Weekend.

The event, which has been attracting more interest from clerics every year, demonstrates the falsity of claims that religious belief and evolutionary theory are incompatible. One of the best things about the project's Web site is that you can peruse the sermons from past years - and easily make every weekend an Evolution Weekend if you wish.

To close off our coverage of Darwin Week, we provide a list of additional readings on the topic of evolution, including pointers to past recommendations from the Cosmic Log Used Book Club:

  • On the Web and in print: In honor of the Darwin birthday, as well as this year's 150th anniversary of the publication of "The Origin of Species," the National Science Foundation has put together an anthology on the current state of evolutionary theory titled "Evolution of Evolution." You can read it as a print publication on the Web, or take it in as a multimedia presentation. (And while we're on the topic of print on the Web, the "Darwin at 200" roundups from Seed magazine, Discover magazine, Science News and Scientific American are not to be missed.)

  • Fresh reads: Here are a few recently published works mentioned in Phillip Manning's weekly roundup of science books: "The Young Charles Darwin," by Keith Thomson; "Darwin's Sacred Cause: How a Hatred of Slavery Shaped Darwin's Views on Human Evolution," by Adrian Desmond and James Moore; "The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution," by Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending; "The Well Dressed Ape: A Natural History of Myself," by Hannah Holmes; "Why Evolution Is True," by Jerry A. Coyne; "Banquet at Delmonico's: Great Minds, the Gilded Age and the Triumph of Evolution in America," by Barry Werth.

  • Human evolution: These Cosmic Log Used Book Club recommendations have been around for a while, but they're still fresh enough to give you a sense of what science has learned about human origins: "Before the Dawn: Recovering the Lost History of Our Ancestors," by Nicholas Wade; "The First Human: The Race to Discover Our Earliest Ancestors," by Ann Gibbons; "Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind," by Donald Johanson. If you're looking for a brand-new look at human evolution, get ready for Johanson's latest, "Lucy's Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins."

  • More CLUB Club selections: The Cosmic Log Used Book Club highlights books with cosmic themes that have usually been around enough to become readily available at your local library or secondhand-book shop. Among past selections: "The Making of the Fittest," by Sean B. Carroll; "Evolution," Stephen Baxter's sweeping science-fiction epic; and our very first CLUB Club pick, "The Sparrow," a sci-fi novel by Mary Doria Russell that makes you think about how different intelligent species may or may not get along. (Are you listening, Mr. Neanderthal?) I'll add another CLUB Club selection to the list for this month: "Radical Evolution" by Joel Garreau, one of the books that inspired our own special report on "Fast Forward: The Future of Evolution."

  • Pharyngula's picks: Here are a few selections that P.Z. Myers, the biologist behind the Pharyngula blog, passed along last year: "Coming to Life" by Christiane Nusslein-Volhard; "Your Inner Fish" by Neil Shubin; "Bones, Rocks and Stars" by Chris Turney; and "Endless Forms Most Beautiful," another one by Sean B. Carroll. And then there's Carroll's latest, "Remarkable Creatures: Epic Adventures in the Search for the Origins of Species."

That should tide you over for the next week or so. I'll be spending some days out of the office, and the posting schedule will be significantly lighter than usual until I'm back at my desk on Feb. 23. So in the meantime, hit the books - and if you have other recommendations for evolutionary reading, post them as comments below. If I use your pick as a future CLUB Club selection, I'll send you a copy of "Remarkable Creatures."


For additional food for thought, take a look at these other Cosmic Log postings:

And for much, much more, search for Darwin on msnbc.com.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

the pic gives me that Yoda feeling, eh?
It's amazing that it took to 150 years ago for people to notice that everything changes. Then they called the change "Evolution" which of course is still "change". and now there are people who,because they changed the name, don't beleive that there's change,[evolution] Is this a serious arguement?
Delighted to read that my novel The Sparrow has been picked for the CLUB club, although I'd be happier if you guys would buy it new so I get the royalties. As it happens, Neandertals were my speciality when I was still a working paleoanthropologist. Feel free to get in touch if you have questions about The Sparrow.
May I suggest anything published by Stephen Jay Gould?
The world worships the great lie. Evolution is impossible. If it were even a remote possibility; the world would be covered with viruses {they multiply faster then animals and therefore mutate faster thereby wiping out all competition}.
Stop teaching our children falsehoods !
Having read many of the articles on the anniversary of Charles Darwin, it seems to me that the media is making a 'god' and even a 'savior' out of a mere man. Is Darwinism now a 'religion,' a belief system, a scientism. As he has been worshipped in the halls of our universities, let us now worship him now in the media. Let us sing songs of praise to him. Seeing how Darwinism influenced Hitler, it is scary to think how the morality of the survival of the fittest will effect our world.
No one claims incompatability with religion, just the Bible. If churches believe Darwin they don't believe the Bible.
One thing that would be a great move forward would  be for the creationists to forget their superstitions.  We are on the verge of putting together the whole story of the Universe's creation from the big bang, which itself has been confirmed.

I'm sure that the open mind religions will find ways to combine Evolution with concepts about God, that is ok.  But you can be sure that the recalcitrant, backwards looking, never admitting an error groups for fear their whole house of cards based on faith (in what....) will collape, will continue on their own path to where they belong - ridicule and ruin.
Allan, nearly all religious people have no problem with science. Our problem comes when some scientists offer their opinion as fact on the explanation given for the evidence. There are reasonable alternative explanations. We usually don't use the 1 hour church service for a science lesson. There is plenty of time to do that on our own time. We are there to honor our Creator and also to minister to one another.

Either way, I have enjoyed reading your blog this week on evolution even though I do not believe the in Darwinian evolution model. Keep up the good work.
I cannot understand why churches cannot accept evolution. God is the beginning and the creation. From there it is evolution over millions of years. I dont think God punches a timeclock but might like to see things evolve.
Then God said: "Let us make man in our image,in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves on the ground"
So God created man in his own image,in the image of God he created him, male and female he created them. (Genesis 1,26-27)

It is my believe that God created the soul of male and female and put them in suitable bodies to live on earth. After all, our earthen bodies do not count, they go back to dust. The soul is the important part and should return to God.
Unfortunatly, while all the creation around us evolves and goes on, our souls do not seem to evolve or learn . We still cannot manage to accept our diversities or diverences and learn to get along.
But there is always hope.
Erika

You can believe in God but it has nothing whatsoever to do with Darwin's theory of evolution. That leads to an arbitrary and mechanistic worldview - one that I happily hold with no spiritual infirmities whatsoever, I'm pleased to report.
In fact I'm very much looking forward to reading Christian Moevs new book on Dante. That's where religion belongs: in books.
Oh great...theologians playing scientist now! The biblical God IS incompatible with Darwin's theory.
People can read Darwins Origin of Species here  http://www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-origin-of-species/

The type of english makes for a not so easy read so take all the time you need.
Alan, I just would like to say that I really enjoy and appreciate your column.  I really look forward to your perspective and as I click on my Cosmic Log icon on my desktop, I lean forward a little bit and prepare myself to be astonished.  Thank you.  You're fun!
 By the way, there is saying I really like that can be applied to all sorts of different topics, from the LHC  to  Darwin,  that I  would like  to  share  with you:  remember, SAID & DID aren't even brothers.
It is absolutely amazing to me in this age of vast information, that there are those that still advocate evolution.  It is a lie from Satan.  God created the heavens and the earth, and everything in it.  Look at His creation, He gave us plants, soil, water.  And look at all the amazing things people can do with these things to make housing, metals, gourmet foods, etc.   God loves us!  The Bible says that we all are born once, and die once, and then comes the judgement.  He also gave us Jesus Christ as a sacrifice for our sins so we can live eternally in heaven (John 3:16).  We cannot make it into heaven on our own because we have all sinned.  We need Jesus.

Evolution on the other hand is a lie that really says that we are here by some random chance.  So a watermelon looks like a water balloon, so they must be related, blah blah blah  The chimp looks like a human so they must be related.  We came from the goo, through the zoo,  to me and you blah blah blah,  I have heard this all my life in public schools.  What complete trash evolution teaches.
Scientific and religious leaders are sharing information on Darwin.  Great.  But still only 4 in 10 people believe in evolution as a theory.  You know only 4 of 10 people will read the articles and that leaves the other 6 people in blissful ignorance.
Did you know Darwin invented gravity? He could walk on water?
His brother was Jesus Christ? That he discovered the big bang in his bathtub? And that when the cow jumped over the moon, Darwin had got there first? Please--all the media fools lying to us about their god.  What Darwin said is this: The fit survive, they are fit because they survive, and they survive because they are fit. That's not science. Its not even a theory. Its a tautology.
I'm a Catholic. We have no problems with evolution. Please don't think that everyone who is religious buys the literal interpretation of the Bible. If God wishes to tell a story in a literary way to make moral points, I don't think we should tell Him He can't. Besides, is the mustard seed really the smallest of all seeds?
The Old Testament says that Earth stands still.
Anyone with intelligence knows that that is a lie.
Obviously, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which are all based on the Old Testament simply CANNOT be true, as it makes patently false claims about the nature of the world we live in.
Clearly, there is no "falsity of claims that religious belief and evolutionary theory are incompatible;" such claims are UNDENIABLY quite true.  Or does the whole universe revolve around the Earth (and by extension, around the religious believer)?
It is amazing how the God gaps are shrinking and being filled in by verified science-verified information.  Eventually...     Who knows what could be discovered and scientifically verified?
How about "Evolution, a Theory in Crisis" by Michael Denton, or "Darwin's Black Box" and "The Edge of Evolution" by Michael Behe. Why do you recommend only one side of this controversial issue?
Organized religion has made a brand out of stifling ideas over the past two thousand years. Latest addition of Holocaust denier to the ranks of the Church is just another one of those moments.

Organized religion is about being part of a non-thinking and oh-so-spiritual mob. If that cranks your wheel, fine by me, but don;t go around spreading the gospel to the unwilling.
Mr. Boyle didn't ask for religious commentary; he asked for book suggestions. Among the very best books on evolution:
Darwin's Dangerous Idea by Daniel C. Dennett
and
What Evolution Is by Ernst Mayr
Too many fundamentalist bible thumpers.  Has anyone ever questioned, who wrote the bible?  I read many author's names in that book.  How much bias does that book have?  I guess it is more difficult to change old handed down beliefs with no proofs, than to question proven modern beliefs.
Right.  The earth is the center of the universe.  And its flat.  It is also the only planet.  Any of these sounding familiar?

Believe in god all you want, but please stop holding science and rational thought back with it.
Religion is delusion born of fear.
Seriously, let's just say that evolution is real (just go with me on this and keep reading) and that God is real. Do you really think that when God relayed what happened "in the beginning" that he could have told it with all the facts and dates? NO...he knew that instead of taking a bible to church we would have to haul an entire library with us. Now that we are able to understand things more (wait, is that evolution...)God is letting information out a little at a time. It is said that He only gives what we can handle.
There is something to be said for what Erika Wilson stated above about our souls. Very intriguing.
As for Dan Homer in Alaska stated above that viruses would have to mutate, etc...I hate to be the bearer of bad news but they do...what's that pesky flu that could cause "some" issues..the bird flu. Also, how do you think we have MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) which is a bacterium. Let's not forget that the mitochondria that is in each cell of every person comes from a form of bacteria that was around before man.
"If evolution existed the world would be covered in viruses?"....uh guess what man? The world IS covered with viruses, bacteria, fungi, etc.  Fortunately we have immune systems to fight most of them off.  Although they do EVOLVE resistance to antibiotics which is a huge problem not getting much attention in the media. BTW, I'm catholic and my catholic school in KANSAS taught evolution.
There is *no* such thing as "Darwinism". Evolutional Biology *is* hard-core science. How does it make more sense to have George Burns crack a joke or light a cigar, and then the whole Universe - man included, the very next day - just pops into existence? How about stone-cold evidence that the Universe is 14500 billion years old and that humans evolved from primates? Where did all that background radiation going right through you as you read this come from? Why is it such an incredibly accurate dating marker?

To you, my devout friends, I'd like to sell a slightly used bridge, in whatever city you choose. I even have pri-mo real "Mare-side" estate on the moon
Whatever the answer is makes no real difference in the long run. It is mankind's apparant desperate need to find all the 'answers' that has led to the creation of religion which has, over the millenia given people the perfect excuse to go to war in defense of one religious belief or another.
It really is all nonsense. Who really cares whether Darwin's theory is right or wrong?
Why not consider the possibility that all religion is barking up the wrong tree, including Darwinism?
Now THAT is something worth pondering.
It is sad that people just swallow dogma, depending on what church they happen to be raised in.  When faced with facts, like fossils and scientific discovery, they show their foolisness. And the worst thing is, it doesn't make them bettter peopole, just more narrow, while giving their pastor a job. Sad.
Origin of the Species looks almost NOTHING like modern evolution theory, which is continually updated when new theories are shot down as impossible, like spontaneous generation. Just about everything Darwin wrote has been disproven, including the fact that he considered blacks to be an inferior species (which Hitler latched onto, and promoted).  His "celebration" is next to Lincoln's birthday, and those two men couldn't be farther apart.  One believed in racial superiority and spontaneous generation, the other in racial equality and divine intervention. Darwin was an elitist promoting the theory of universal elitism.
The Catholic church last week made a statement that it accepts Darwin's teachings and evolution.  Their position  is now that God created the initial conditions of the Universe, but that from then on everything evolved and continues to evolve.

Next month the Vatican is holding a conference on evolution.  They invited creationists and intelligent designers as an afterthought only to provide a counterpoint to the discussions.
dan homer alaska  Your attempt to use evolution to disprove the theory is funny!

A virus is not alive.  Yes it evolves very fast but if it kills a host organism the virus dies too.  Therefore virus evolution would favor the virus that keeps the host alive as long as possible...

A bacteria is alive, but if it infects organisms, the same basic principle would apply.  Killing your host is suicide. (worthy of a Darwin Award ;)
Bruce,

Because it's not a controversial issue.  It's as controversial as the Theory of Gravity.  And while we are still learning new things about evolution, even when faced with something we didn't expect, it still supports the theory.

There is a misunderstanding with the uninformed masses that disbelieve evolution: that somehow the scientific community is unwilling to budge.  This is furthest from the truth.  The truth is, scientists the world over would throw away evolution if it could be proven false.  But it hasn't.  Science is the search for truth.

I'd go so far as to say religion is the one who is not willing to give in to evolution.  I've yet to see any evidence from any so-called ID scientist.  Each argument gets more and more far fetched.

Finally, just because people oppose an idea doesn't make it controversial.  It makes one side ignorant.

That being said, I'm sure you'd be willing to support me in my cause to fight the Theory of Gravity.  Intelligent Attraction for the win!
This Darwin blogging community is worth checking out.
http://bloggingdarwin.com/
It never fails to amaze me that the Theory of evolution is still hailed as fact...still haven't found the missing link, and never will...why are we called superstitious to believe in a creator?

It's ok, when we are all faced with what comes after...no one will be able to say that they weren't shown the way...perhaps you chose to believe whatever the scientific community comes up with every few decades or so, and it seems to change all the time, but as for me...i believe in the way, the truth, and the life...Jesus Christ.

And please don't categorize me as just another one of those 'ignorant' christians, please. Many of us are well read, talk about what we read, analyze it, and then chose to accept or refute it based on our beliefs, and oftentimes, common sense.

My biggest problem with the theory of evolution, is that is is just that...still a theory! or it would be taught and called the FACT of Evolution.

Until it is proven, I will hold on to my beliefs...
> Why do you recommend only one side of this controversial issue?

Because it's not controversial and the only ones battling the windmills of reality are religious zealots undeserving of our attention?
It is absolutely imperative to close one's mind off to rational thought to reject evolution.  Reading these comments it is sad to see so many people in total denial.  This is a free country where we are free to believe whatever we wish, even what we know not to be true.  That is religious freedom and it's okay to believe the earth is 6,000 years old.  What is not okay and a violation of our constitutional rights is to teach religion in public schools.  Every single credible scientist in the world accepts evolution as the leading scientific theory or fact, depending on what has been proven and what we are still working on.  People who want creationism taught in our schools are hurting this country and attacking science.  Leave science to the scientists and separate religion and believe what you wish, but leave the absurd satan comments and the like to your closed minded cult.
THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RELIGION AND SCIENCE IS NOT EVOLUTION. IT IS THAT RELIGION TEACHES THAT MAN'S BASIC NATURE IS SELF-INDULGENT, AND WEAK. HE IS INCAPABLE OF PERFORMING GOOD ACTS ON HIS OWN. HE NEEDS THE HELP OF A GRACE FROM GOD TO PERFORM GOODNESS.
THE VERY FACT THAT MAN HAS AN INTELLECT, AND IS CAPABLE OF LEARNING, UNDERSTANSDING, AND COMMUNICATING MEANS THAT MAN IS CAPABLE OF EMPATHY, COMPASSION, AND ALTRUISM. THE SELF-INDULGENCE, AGGRESSION, AND WEAKNESS OF MAN ARE TRAITS THAT HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED THROUGH THE PROCESS OF EVOLUTION.
THE MORE WE LEARN TO USE OUR MINDS, AND THE LESS WE DEPEND ON THE PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF EVOLUTION, THE MORE WE BECOME ALTRUISTIC AND GODLIKE.
WE HAVE LEARNED MORE IN THE LAST 100 YEARS THAN WE HAVE IN THE LAST 10,000 YEARS; AND THE FUTURE IS UNLIMITED.
While visiting Asia, I can tell you that their heart is warmed over by the comments of the "anti-evolutionists" here. While they are determined to beat the pants off us in science and math - keeping religion far away from schools and scientific thought - we are determined to put our fate and our kids future in the hands of "God" and scream "controversial" whenever evolution is mentioned as a scientific fact. [...]
So many ignorant Americans...so much stupidity in so many of the above comments. I have studied evolution all of my academic life, and do speak from a position of scientific knowledge. Denying scientific facts because of religious beliefs is totally misguided. It is a huge, wonderful, 13.7 billion year old universe that we live in. The facts are so much more amazing than the myths imagined by the writers of ancient religious texts such as the Torah, the Bible and the Koran, on which most modern creationist bigots of various stripes rely.
Lots of remarks against Darwin and Science here.  The common trned is that those posters clearly show that they dont even know what evolution is.  Pathetic
I have studied molecular evolution as a biologist and have discussed evolution with my brother a UCC pastor.  I suggested that the simple solution is God created evolution.  The problem the UCC church has with evolution is their belief that God is perfect.  If he is perfect then his creation must not evolve.  Evolution requires that God's creation was flawed.  This is not acceptable.  My brother is an intelligent thinking person and is troubled by this paradox.  Evolution is obvious to anyone who observes the world around them.  We used to think that it took many generations for the mutations to produce viable organisms.  We have recently found out that some mutations can produce viability in very few generations.  Darwin's interpretation of evolution was not perfect.  There is more to discover.  That is the beauty of our world.  Keep up the good work and keep looking for the answers.
There is no controversy concerning the scientific theory of evolution. There are those who are educated enough to recognize sound science when they see it, and those whose superstitious willful ignorance has interfered with that education. The latter group act like spoiled children holding their breath in order to get their way. It is a shame such people can't/won't grow up.

Not only has it stood the test of time, but the theory itself has "evolved," as we have continued to add more pieces to the puzzle.
The creation story from the bible is false, and is not an alternative to evolution as an explanation for the complexity of life on this planet.
Creationism, or intelligent design, as it is currently called, can not answer any questions or even decide which creationist myth is the One True Myth.
To all Judeo-Christian/Muslim believers:  Consider carefully and thoroughly these ideas (I'll be polite, although I'm not sure you deserve that).

1. Your unshakable faith is nothing more than the result of what was authoritatively driven into your mind when you were a child.

2. Suppose NASA announced today that an asteroid, large enough to wipe our humanity, is on an unavoidable collision course with Earth (Certainly you accept that possibility).  The collision will occur long before we have time to develop technology to prevent it.  What would you have to say about your "God" at that point?

3. Consider the case of Lakshmi Tatma, the little, Hindu, Indian girl who recently survived an operation to remove the body of her headless twin, attached at the pelvis.  What would your "God" have to say about previous cases like Lakshmi's where the affected child had no access to modern medical technology for such an operation?  Why would the "God" you worship as beneficent and loving deny all those innocent, beleaguered individuals a chance at surgical help, but single out Lakshmi for "His" blessing?  Keep in mind, while you're coming up with an answer, that Lakshmi's parents have surely never considered prayer, or any type of donation, to your "God".

Please try to open your minds to the realities of the world, including the obvious facts of the evolutionary process and the foolishness of religious fairytales.
To Pluto Animus: I am a Christian. I hold no anger or ill will toward those who choose not to believe what I believe. I do, however, have one question for you, Pluto. You said that the Old Testament says earth stands still. I have checked 4 versions of the Bible and cannot find that statement. Could you help me with the book and verse?
America should lead the world the world in science, but instead most Americans cling to primitive superstitions, believing that a sky fairy created the world, and mutilating their children by hacking at boys' genitals. Even Obama, a supposedly educated man says that he is the 'instrument of god'. Not the instrument of Odin or Zeus, no that would be mental.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1793634

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google