ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



One quantum leap

Posted: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:38 PM by Alan Boyle


Univ. of Maryland
  This graphic shows the apparatus set up for the
  quantum teleportation experiment.

Researchers have successfully teleported information from one trapped atom to another one sealed up in a container sitting 3.3 feet (1 meter) away. That's one small step for teleportation, and one quantum leap for code-makers and code-breakers.

But if you're waiting for the kind of teleporter that can beam Captain Kirk down from the Starship Enterprise ... well, don't hold your breath.

"The term 'teleportation' is a little weird," research team leader Christopher Monroe told me today. "When people see that word they think of Captain Kirk, and that's a big problem."

That's not to say that this kind of teleportation is ho-hum physics: Albert Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance" and thought it couldn't be done. But quantum teleportation, as in the transfer of information from one place to the other without passing through any physical medium, has been in the works for more than a decade.

Over the years, teleportation experiments have demonstrated that quantum states - for example, the spin of a particle or the polarization of a photon - can be teleported using a variety of methods. But the researchers behind the latest experiment, reported in Friday's issue of the journal Science, claim that this is the first time information has been teleported between two separate atoms in unconnected enclosures.

That's the kind of setup that makes the most sense for super-secure communication systems, as well as for super-smart computers that could break today's cryptographic codes or sort through huge databases.

"Our system has the potential to form the basis for a large-scale 'quantum repeater' that can network quantum memories over vast distances," Monroe, a physicist at the University of Maryland, said in a news release issued today. "Moreover, our methods can be used in conjunction with quantum bit operations to create a key component needed for quantum computation."

The experiment was run by Monroe and other researchers at the Joint Quantum Institute, a partnership between the University of Maryland and the University of Michigan. If you don't need to know the details about how the feat was done, and you don't want to risk getting your brain twisted in a knot (as mine was), skip the next section and resume reading about "the next giant leaps." 

How the job was done
The team started out by trapping ytterbium ions in electromagnetic fields, inside separate vacuum chambers. Let's call the two ions A and B. (This chart shows the setup.)

Each of the ions could be in either of two energy states that were designated as the "1" and the "0" of a binary quantum bit. Unlike classical bits of information, quantum bits (or qubits) can be put into a state of superposition - that is, they can be in a combined 1-and-0 state until a measurement is made.

Ion A was zapped with a specially tailored burst of microwaves to put it into a desired state of superposition - in effect, entering information into A's "memory." Then, both ions were excited with laser pulses lasting just a trillionth of a second. That excitation sparked each ion to give off just a single photon that corresponded to each ion's energy state. (This chart explains the process.)

The photons were directed to a beam splitter that would set off a pair of detectors only if the energy states of each ion are entangled in such a way that they're complementary: If one is in the "1" state, the other has to be in the "0" state. It might take thousands of tries to get the right combination, and scientists wouldn't know which ion is in which state. But once the two detectors were activated at the same time, scientists could be confident that the entanglement is in force. (This chart shows how it works.)

With the ions in an entangled state, the scientists measured ion A - collapsing the quantum state out of superposition and making the original information vanish. Now A's energy state is definitely either "1" or "0." That would tell the scientists what kind of microwave burst to apply to ion B in order to read out the information that was originally entered into ion A.

No information was sent directly from A to B. Instead, quantum entanglement was used to put the information into ion A and get it out again through ion B. (This chart shows the final steps of the experiment.) 

Future giant leaps
Monroe admitted that the experimental setup might seem rather clunky compared to today's classical computers. But physicists are still in the small-step phase of quantum computation.

"There's a lot of engineering that has to be done," he said, "but if you've ever seen the first solid-state transistor in 1957, it looked like this. It looked like it came out of a physics lab."

Monroe would like to boost the reliability of the system for entangling atoms, as well as the reliability of the system for reading out the results. In the experiment reported in Science, the information could be read out accurately about 90 percent of the time.

"For teleportation, that's very good," Monroe said. "We'd like to go up to 99 percent. But for quantum computing, you'd probably need three nines - 99.9 - so we have our work cut out for this in all dimensions."

Eventually, Monroe and other researchers in the field hope to establish networks of quantum communication devices that can send data across the globe. Quantum communication would be more secure than present-day communication, because if someone tried to eavesdrop on the signal, it would just collapse into random gobbledygook.

Theoretically, quantum computers would be much better than classical computers at sorting through huge databases to find the right information. One of the leading applications would be to find the prime factors of large numbers, which are the key to today's cryptographic systems.

A quantum computing system would be a godsend to spies - and that may be why the research reported in Science was supported by the federal government's Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, or IARPA, as well as by the National Science Foundation.

Beam me up? Not so fast
But if information can be teleported without sending something between A and B, doesn't that mean something could be transmitted faster than the speed of light? And wouldn't that break the laws of physics? Well, not really. Even though the quantum entanglement operates at a distance, the information required to interpret the results has to be transmitted classically.

"Something happens faster than the speed of light," Monroe said. "It's just not information. ... But there is something weird nevertheless."

Monroe and other researchers hope to delve into some of that weirdness, including a phenomenon called nonlocal communication, in future experiments. Over at the University of Washington, physicist John Cramer is taking a different approach to the same kind of weirdness through an experiment that could investigate backward causality. (The last time I checked, Cramer was still working the bugs out of the lab apparatus.)

As for Captain Kirk ... physicists emphasize that the brand of quantum teleportation they work with isn't like the instant matter teleportation that's been so much a part of science fiction, from "Star Trek" to the 2008 movie "Jumper."

Theoretically, I suppose it's possible to entangle every single atom in Kirk's body with atoms down on the surface of the planet Vulcan. But in order to reconstruct the information at his destination, Kirk would have to be destroyed atom by atom on the Enterprise. And right now, even William Shatner wouldn't want to put that much faith in physics.

"There's always one kicker," Monroe said, speaking about the science in general rather than Kirk's fate in particular. "No matter what you do in quantum mechanics, there's always going to be a kicker somewhere."


Click through our interactive presentation, titled "Cats and Qubits," to learn more about how you get from quantum mechanics to next-generation computers.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

SETI?  Finally, THE way an extraterrestrial would contact us.  No 80 delay of broadcast, just
instant messaging".
From what i understand, i detect this problem. The 2 ions have to be near in order to be entangled. So you COULD "teleport" the qubit to the other end of the galaxy instantly but FIRST you would have to somehow transfer the second ion there! Also, you have to transmit the results of the measurement of the first ion to the person who has the second.

That effectively cancels the "instant" thing.

Is it good for encryption? Yes

Is it faster than light? No, because a photon and some information must be transmitted through conventional means.
It may not be a matter transporter but it might be a way for a FTL com.
As for the belief that information cannot be transmitted faster then light we need to stomp this stomp this out as it's likely completely wrong.
I also feel the belief is holding us back like some some beliefs that were held in the 1600s held back science.
The classic view of causality is a hold over from the 1950s before modern quantum physics and long before newer theories such as string theory and M theory.
"Spooky" for Einstein and Us   BUT    not for Photons

As far as photons are concerned, they are eveywhere in our universe at once. We, for example, say it takes photons 8 minutes for them to get to us from the Sun. The photons DISAGREE; they say the time is zero. We say about 2.5 million years for photons to get from, say, Andromeda (our twin galaxy) to us; the photos say it takes no time at all. Because photons are "carrying the load" in many of these experiments, there's no problem, as far as they are concerned with being in more than one of our places (different places do not exist for photons; hence, for them place and time are meaningless concepts from the start) at the same time. Photons, therefore, are really not "spooky"; however, experiments that don't use photons, say, electrons present another "spooky" situation, unless there is some photon like exchange involved.
     "Spooky" P.S.
  Perhaps Bohr might also have told Einstein to stop telling photons what they can do, like telling Einstein to stop telling God what He can do (like, playing dice if He wants). Maybe photons are God??? At least they have, by our physics, omnipresence. This could then mean that scriptures, in reporting that God first said "Let there be light." (photons) Let there be Me? I AM? Photons exist?
 Einstein's no-dice-playing God may have trouled Bohr in view of quantum revelations, but they would agree with forbidding God to be inconsistent or demanding He be consistent, if He is to be worthy of being called a god. {-)
I understand this up until what happens after the beam splitter. If ion A is measured and that result is applied to ion B there is still a transfer of information through a mediator isn't there?

[ALAN ADDS: The beam splitter is kind of an entanglement filter that registers the right result only if the ions A and B are entangled. That's part of the preparation for the teleportation. So yes, there is some information that has to be transferred at no faster than the speed of light, if only to check initially that the ions are really entangled. If you're confused, join the club. What was it that Feynman said? Something like "If you think you understand quantum theory, you don't understand quantum theory." 
"But in order to reconstruct the information at his destination, Kirk would have to be destroyed atom by atom on the Enterprise."

In "Think Like a Dinosaur" by James Patrick Kelly, later interpreted by "The Outer Limits", the original individual remains, and to "maintain balance" with the transport the original must be eliminated.

At least this new theory removes this unpleasant ethical dilemma from consideration.
Interesting explanation in the second to last paragraph, in which Captain Kirk would have to be destroyed atom by atom as his information was being beamed down to Vulcan.

In the novel "Spock Must Die!" by James Blish, in which there were two Spocks, Scotty explained the operation of the transporter in very much the way that this article was described.  This novel was written about forty years ago. Star Trek may have been on the right track about future technology - again.
this is whats wrong with all of you today, you would rather sit around and copy paste your conversions of meters to yards and cry and whine about how do we know how far apart it was...WHO CARES, the fact that technology advanced 1000% in the past century based on all the other centuries combined and predictions say it will advance at a rate exceeding 100x what it did last century we are in for a very awesome next hundred years or so. Get with the future or get left behind, my only word of advice.
"I'm unclear.  Can information be be sent at faster than light speed using "spooky action at a distance?""

Generally, we think not...and yet, go back and see the stories here (and elsewhere) on John Cramer and 'retrocausalty.'

The last word may not have been said on this.



"If this were practical for interstellar communications for far flung advanced civilizations, then SETI would most certainly be using the wrong equipment to find a "Signal" wouldn't they?"

Once you get around that big *IF*, I would have to agree with you. Concievably, civilizations typically learn to use this physics this way (if indeed it can be), not that long after they discover radio, so perhps no civilizations are sending out intentional interstellar RF signals, because anyone capable of detecting them, will soon learn to use 'this' (whatever we might call it) anyway, so why bother?

Highly speculative of course, but reasonable to me.

Thomas,
As near as I can figure, and may be wrong, it's like rolling two dice, one here and one there.  A process can tell when the spots equal 7 (interference pattern?), so that they are in opposite states.  Then the there die can be tested, if it's a 3 then the here die is a 4.
So some information, in this cas a photon, has to be sent over a medium.  And then several times until you get entanglement.  Then, I assume, a confirmation message back to the source to advance to the next bit.  Supposed to be secure but it seems like tapping the line with a beam splitter gets you a testable signal that doesn't collapse the process.  Although I'm not sure the split beam would work, maybe something that selectively routes the signal.
FTL Info:  I am pleased to see discussion got off of metric meter conversion onto something positive.  I don't think any of us needed that.
RE:  distance limited to 1 meter.  Is there not discussion on cosmic level that FTL occurs?  Forgot exact discussion but open to reply.

We are at the very beginning of this major find. I believe that in the near future, that we will find out how to keep atoms in the "entangled" state and not require the beam splitter to see if they are. Once we have this, then the "Cosmic Radio", "Sub-Space Ethernet" or what ever you want to call it...will be built. Then we'll have our -*apparent*- Faster than Light communications.
Really? No one has any feedback about what I said of superluminal communication (above)? How about this: What if the two particles are the same? I'm just offering another explanation for why this occurs "instantaneously". Sure, we are pretty confident that two particles can not occupy the same point in space and time, but what about one particle occupying TWO points in space? Maybe the two particles aren't 'communicating' or sending information to each other, because they are actually one!

Unlikely, but worth consideration.
Stephen Hatfield,
Interesting to consider, but then they'd only sometimes be one, then other times be two.  Maybe when they're two they are each one with their respective selves somewhere else.  Meanwhile as all these particles appear in this space, each in sequence, the same space is always occuppied.  Probablility theory might support parts of the theory if you twisted it, but the odds against finding the two spots the particle was representing itself, out of all the universe where it could happen, are big.  Of course those odds improve if the same particle could be in billions of places at the same time.  I don't know how you could even try to test that.

Another possible avenue for FTL communication would be through another dimension.  Fold space over so that the XYZ distance is 100 light years but through W it's only 2 ly and communication appears to go at 50C (assuming same travel time across that W distance, or by defining a ly in W by W's standards).  Of course, how do you bend space, how do you open a portal through W, how do you enter and exit the portal, does matter that goes in come out as matter or anti-matter, do the properties of light change, ...?
>> Is this supposed to work for long distance
>> communication?  Light pulse through fiberoptic timed
>> to coincide with a light pulse on the receiving side?  
>> A long chain of atoms that all have to be entangled?  
>> Is this supposed to get us away from a medium or just
>> secure communication over a medium?

This is simply a way to secure information.  A classical signal still needs to be passed from one to the other.  For example, in the setup carried out by Monroe's group the result of the measurement on A has to be communicated classically to whomever is controlling B so they know what type of microwave burst to apply to B.
this is soooo cool


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1757398

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google