ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



One quantum leap

Posted: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:38 PM by Alan Boyle


Univ. of Maryland
  This graphic shows the apparatus set up for the
  quantum teleportation experiment.

Researchers have successfully teleported information from one trapped atom to another one sealed up in a container sitting 3.3 feet (1 meter) away. That's one small step for teleportation, and one quantum leap for code-makers and code-breakers.

But if you're waiting for the kind of teleporter that can beam Captain Kirk down from the Starship Enterprise ... well, don't hold your breath.

"The term 'teleportation' is a little weird," research team leader Christopher Monroe told me today. "When people see that word they think of Captain Kirk, and that's a big problem."

That's not to say that this kind of teleportation is ho-hum physics: Albert Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance" and thought it couldn't be done. But quantum teleportation, as in the transfer of information from one place to the other without passing through any physical medium, has been in the works for more than a decade.

Over the years, teleportation experiments have demonstrated that quantum states - for example, the spin of a particle or the polarization of a photon - can be teleported using a variety of methods. But the researchers behind the latest experiment, reported in Friday's issue of the journal Science, claim that this is the first time information has been teleported between two separate atoms in unconnected enclosures.

That's the kind of setup that makes the most sense for super-secure communication systems, as well as for super-smart computers that could break today's cryptographic codes or sort through huge databases.

"Our system has the potential to form the basis for a large-scale 'quantum repeater' that can network quantum memories over vast distances," Monroe, a physicist at the University of Maryland, said in a news release issued today. "Moreover, our methods can be used in conjunction with quantum bit operations to create a key component needed for quantum computation."

The experiment was run by Monroe and other researchers at the Joint Quantum Institute, a partnership between the University of Maryland and the University of Michigan. If you don't need to know the details about how the feat was done, and you don't want to risk getting your brain twisted in a knot (as mine was), skip the next section and resume reading about "the next giant leaps." 

How the job was done
The team started out by trapping ytterbium ions in electromagnetic fields, inside separate vacuum chambers. Let's call the two ions A and B. (This chart shows the setup.)

Each of the ions could be in either of two energy states that were designated as the "1" and the "0" of a binary quantum bit. Unlike classical bits of information, quantum bits (or qubits) can be put into a state of superposition - that is, they can be in a combined 1-and-0 state until a measurement is made.

Ion A was zapped with a specially tailored burst of microwaves to put it into a desired state of superposition - in effect, entering information into A's "memory." Then, both ions were excited with laser pulses lasting just a trillionth of a second. That excitation sparked each ion to give off just a single photon that corresponded to each ion's energy state. (This chart explains the process.)

The photons were directed to a beam splitter that would set off a pair of detectors only if the energy states of each ion are entangled in such a way that they're complementary: If one is in the "1" state, the other has to be in the "0" state. It might take thousands of tries to get the right combination, and scientists wouldn't know which ion is in which state. But once the two detectors were activated at the same time, scientists could be confident that the entanglement is in force. (This chart shows how it works.)

With the ions in an entangled state, the scientists measured ion A - collapsing the quantum state out of superposition and making the original information vanish. Now A's energy state is definitely either "1" or "0." That would tell the scientists what kind of microwave burst to apply to ion B in order to read out the information that was originally entered into ion A.

No information was sent directly from A to B. Instead, quantum entanglement was used to put the information into ion A and get it out again through ion B. (This chart shows the final steps of the experiment.) 

Future giant leaps
Monroe admitted that the experimental setup might seem rather clunky compared to today's classical computers. But physicists are still in the small-step phase of quantum computation.

"There's a lot of engineering that has to be done," he said, "but if you've ever seen the first solid-state transistor in 1957, it looked like this. It looked like it came out of a physics lab."

Monroe would like to boost the reliability of the system for entangling atoms, as well as the reliability of the system for reading out the results. In the experiment reported in Science, the information could be read out accurately about 90 percent of the time.

"For teleportation, that's very good," Monroe said. "We'd like to go up to 99 percent. But for quantum computing, you'd probably need three nines - 99.9 - so we have our work cut out for this in all dimensions."

Eventually, Monroe and other researchers in the field hope to establish networks of quantum communication devices that can send data across the globe. Quantum communication would be more secure than present-day communication, because if someone tried to eavesdrop on the signal, it would just collapse into random gobbledygook.

Theoretically, quantum computers would be much better than classical computers at sorting through huge databases to find the right information. One of the leading applications would be to find the prime factors of large numbers, which are the key to today's cryptographic systems.

A quantum computing system would be a godsend to spies - and that may be why the research reported in Science was supported by the federal government's Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, or IARPA, as well as by the National Science Foundation.

Beam me up? Not so fast
But if information can be teleported without sending something between A and B, doesn't that mean something could be transmitted faster than the speed of light? And wouldn't that break the laws of physics? Well, not really. Even though the quantum entanglement operates at a distance, the information required to interpret the results has to be transmitted classically.

"Something happens faster than the speed of light," Monroe said. "It's just not information. ... But there is something weird nevertheless."

Monroe and other researchers hope to delve into some of that weirdness, including a phenomenon called nonlocal communication, in future experiments. Over at the University of Washington, physicist John Cramer is taking a different approach to the same kind of weirdness through an experiment that could investigate backward causality. (The last time I checked, Cramer was still working the bugs out of the lab apparatus.)

As for Captain Kirk ... physicists emphasize that the brand of quantum teleportation they work with isn't like the instant matter teleportation that's been so much a part of science fiction, from "Star Trek" to the 2008 movie "Jumper."

Theoretically, I suppose it's possible to entangle every single atom in Kirk's body with atoms down on the surface of the planet Vulcan. But in order to reconstruct the information at his destination, Kirk would have to be destroyed atom by atom on the Enterprise. And right now, even William Shatner wouldn't want to put that much faith in physics.

"There's always one kicker," Monroe said, speaking about the science in general rather than Kirk's fate in particular. "No matter what you do in quantum mechanics, there's always going to be a kicker somewhere."


Click through our interactive presentation, titled "Cats and Qubits," to learn more about how you get from quantum mechanics to next-generation computers.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It is a matter of fact and common knowledge that 3 feet is 1 yard and not 1 meter.  The standard is quite different.  For one thing, meters are based on the "metric" system and 1 meter would be 100 CM or 1000 MM, whereas a yard or 3 feet would be 36 inches.
This means I can sleep in
As i know it, things that travel have a "wave" in front of them..thus if something is traveling at light speed, it a has a wave in front of it..or at least things affect by its "getting there". The experiment of the mirrors having waves out before the wave comes in are this I believe.

A meter is not equal to 3 feet, as is stated in this article. A yard = 3 feet, but a meter, although about the same, is not the same.

[ALAN ADDS: Just for you, I'll change the reference to 3.3 feet (OK, I admit it's closer to 3.28 feet, but that's just too geeky for me in this context. 3.3 feet is a bit too geeky as well, in this context, but just for you ...)]

Really great article, Alan. Halfway through, I drafted a mental comment that began with "But if you have to send the microwave selection, where's the teleportation?" Of course, further thought collapsed into quantum weirdness of the nonlocal variety. Two questions: if a quantum-encrypted communication degenerates into (tech jargon warning here) quantum gobbledygook, then can't a channel be closed by any sort of non-intelligent monitor? and of course the old standby: if things seem to be happening simultaneously at some arbitrary distance, how sure can we be of our understanding of the meaning of the "distance" between the events?  
Alan, you were right the first time. If you only have one digit of precision, 1 meter = 3 feet. On the other hand, 1.0 meter = 3.3 feet, 1.00 meter = 3.28 feet, and so on.
welcome to fantasy island !!
Just so everyone out there who wanted to nitpick the article.  3.3 feet = 1.00584 meters
The charts are practically useless.
i dont understand. so when can i buy stuff on ebay without waiting on delivery?
So lets say that we get to the day where we can teleport someone from A to B. If their body gets destroyed, then wouldn't you in effect be killing the person or what ever the living thing is? Even if the person is still alive down on the planet or where ever they teleported to, it would just be a clone. Even if the clone has every single memory and features of the person, it's still not *that* person. Yeah, a little freaky lol
3.281 feet = 1.00004 meter/s

As close as one can get, for this website. :)
Perhaps there is a sort of negative refraction going on where there is a wavefront of sorts that is faster than the speed of light that traverses back to ion B; given that ion A has been in a pre-determined state.

This can happen due to the fact that the 50/50 beamsplitter is in the optical path of the emitted single photon from each ion source. There is an optical path 'backwards' to ion B and thus far the experiment focuses on the photon 'states' as detected simultaneously by two detectors.

For all one knows, ion A may appear back at a low state of energy after being 'read' by the laser pulse because due to the same 'negative refraction' method at the 50/50 beamsplitter; ion B has 'written' its state onto ion A.

My suggestion is to delay the writing and reading from ions A and B as if transportation did occur; ion B should remain in a state of what ion A was.

The other suggestion is to attach directional optical filters to the photon output ports where outgoing photons from each chamber have near 100% forward transmitivity, but reverse direction energy, light, etc. has a significant attenuation factor.

Overall, this is very interesting !

Thank you.

Oh yes, 1 meter = 39.37 inches. (3 feet and 3.37 inches OR 3.28083333  feet)
given that gravitational waves are not at this point understood,,how can these honest folks be blamed for misunderstanding the interaction and the resonance,,the Q.T.R.F.of E.and A.R. mathematics I have worked out show exactly what I speak of however that explanation will only happen via nondisclosure...
"No information was sent directly from A to B."  But there was "entanglement" between the two ions.  Being in the arts with just a passing fancy in quantum physics, this sounds like a simple passing of gossip from one biddy-hen to another with the retrieval of said gossip being hearsay.  Oversimplification of such a complex process, I know, but keeping it simple, stupid, usually works best.  Fascinating.
First point contact transistor----1947.
One thing people have to realize is that this is not really a true form of matter teleportation, its only the quantum state(s) of the particle that is teleported. Its like telling someone over the phone line what a particular person looks like down to the smallest detail, and the person receiving the information recreates that person down to the smallest detail. The only difference here is that the fact of sending the info actually causes the original person to change its appearance (has something to do with fact that you can't know everything about the first person as the mire action of looking at him causes some quantum changes in him). For all Q-teleportation to work, the first person (or particle in this case) has to be completely isolated from all external energy fields, even a stray photon can disrupt the whole process as that photon will carry away some information about the particle thus changing it. As in the telephone example, no mass (matter) was actually transmitted. However physicists like to call this teleportation because they use the phrase if particle “B” now equals particle “A” in all respects than “B” is now “A”. But this is not true, as Alan mentioned the particle “A” still exists (it was not destroyed) it only lost its entanglement (or attachment via spooky action at a distance) to “B” at which point particle “A” took on a random quantum state and “B” continued with the original state of “A”. It would be more correct to call this quantum copying than teleportation with the added feature where the original gets automatically changed by the coping process.
Great point Harlen, this really causes a redefinition of distance in this respect. Does the simultaneous action really mean superluminal communication, or is there a possibility of the distance between the two particles being reduced to zero? Call it what you will, a wormhole, say. But whatever the "vehicle", I believe that this opens the possibility to drop the feedback loop (the part that restricts the speed of communication to less than lightspeed), resulting in a chance of faster than light communication.

When I wrote my paper about precisely this in 2001, every publication I could find on non-locality dismissed superluminal communication as a violation of Einstein's 'laws', but Einstein didn't subscribe to quantum mechanics at all, correct? Isn't that where his famous quote "I do not believe that God plays dice" came from? I figured that at a minimum a cyclotron would be necessary at either end so the application would be highly improbable but this article makes me optimistic in its success.
What I can't believe... is everyone missing this great discovery. If I remember correctly, admittedly that is a big IF, these atoms can be separated by immense distances and this will still work. If this is so, then we have a quantum network going or at the very least, a Quantum Radio! I do not know how fast they can change the atoms state, but I imagine it is well above the gigahertz range. Imagine if you will, landing a large rover on Titan. Then, using these two atoms to pass data between there and here, we have a communications link. One that in our world appears to break the laws of light, but in the quantum world is a ho hum fact of life. What I could do with that!
The article states 3.3 feet; for the sake of simplicity that's 1 meter :)
The old faster than light or seamless whole conundrum.  Interesting article Alan!  Some really brain addling stuff to consider, like if someone who is trying to monitor the "signal" can collapse it wouldn't the intended listener also collapse the wave function and destroy the message?

It will be interesting when scientists are able to figure out how this faster than light information dissemination works.  I'm still baffled how changing one ion can somehow change another somewhere else which isn't in contact with the first one.  If we see one ion changing are we missing seeing other ions changing too?
I'm unclear.  Can information be be sent at faster than light speed using "spooky action at a distance?"
who knows maybe Jesus was not crucified ,but was......"teleported"!!
From my humble interpretation I'm thinking that instantaneous communication may not be possible with Bell's Theorum/Quantum Tunneling/Spooky-Action-at-a-Distance. And I was hoping we might have "sub-space" transmissions for Mars or interstellar Satellite Missions.
Sufies and Yogies has been using this form of communication for centuries now. It's about time.  
What are the prospects of a 2 way communication system from this? Would this allow for the remote operation of probes on Mars in real-time?
Would this also make computers (if quantum based) really small?  I believe that there was an article on the in an issue of Scientific American from June of 2007 talking about black holes (page 82).

Could someone intercept the information and decode it with another quantum computer?  
This article definitely proves that mathematical physicists need to be on lithium.
By resending the same message three or four times, a 90% success rate could be immediately useful for a deep space ansible on unmanned spacecraft or rovers.
"Beer."

Homer Simpson
It seems that the promise of quantum computing dramatically extends the current limits of traditional transistor-size by eliminating space-consuming buses between registers and memory addresses. This could mean palm sized computers emitting little or no heat with the computing power of modern super computers.
No, 1 meter is not 100 CM or 1000 MM. A meter is the same as 100 cm or 1000 mm. 'M' is mega- (1,000,000). You wanted m, which means milli- (1 millionth). You also wanted c for centi- (1 hundreth). Not even sure what C would be. I guess maybe 100, but we use hecto- for that.
Oh, and meters aren't "based on" the metric system. Meters are the standard base unit of length on which the metric system is based.
Which means, other than the "3 feet is 1 yard" part, everything you said was exactly (wrong) backwards.
It sounds to me that they are looking for a way to extinguish a nuclear explosion before it is complete.
Can this process be happening anywhere out in the real world?  And what would it look like on a large scale?  Would it look anything like the effects of dark energy?
Oh, science... boring... interest... fading...

Wake me up when they actually teleport something....
And the point is...? Nobody's getting anywhere anytime soon with a "teleportation" device. Unless another Einstein comes up...
But all this is rather pointless.
"If one is in the "1" state, the other has to be in the "0" state. It might take thousands of tries to get the right combination". Do the 'hits' on the thousands of tries occur at pure random or is there some, perhaps complex, relationship? If there is no space between the particles, then neither is in 'motion' of any kind?
Professor Michio Kaku: "Teleportation and forcefields possible within decades... What is unthinkable today might not be forbidden in a few decades or centuries... We will have the power of the gods."
Teleportation and forcefields could become scientific realities within decades, and time travel will also be possible in the future, according to one of the world's leading physicists:
http://cristiannegureanu.blogspot.com/2008/12/teleportation-and-forcefields-possible.html
It seems the real confusion is caused by people using words implying motion or movement from one point to another to explain what is happening, when in fact there is no such movement. Entanglement does not involve "moving" or "transferring" anything. There is no "portation" of any kind. Stop using this misleading terminology and you might get fewer idiotic responses.
very interesting article. everything has to begin somewhere and this might be the beginning of teleportation.
All the sqwabble about how long a meter is and it's meant absolutely nothing.  Did they use a micrometer to get it exact?  Was it exactly 1 m outside edge to outside edge?  Center to center?  Was the "container" one meter away or the trapped atom?  If we're going to obsess let's at least do it right.

I think you should change it to "a yard (1 meter)" to give a sense of scale and leave it at that.
Is this supposed to work for long distance communication?  Light pulse through fiberoptic timed to coincide with a light pulse on the receiving side?  A long chain of atoms that all have to be entangled?  Is this supposed to get us away from a medium or just secure communication over a medium?
how do use talking monkies use this to stop us from making the planet uninhabitable?
If this were practical for interstellar communications for far flung advanced civilizations, then SETI would most certainly be using the wrong equipment to find a "Signal" wouldn't they?
WTF?!  Researchers teleport info from one atom to another, over a distance, pretty cool stuff, and all many of you simpletons can do is argue over what the hell a meter is?  Really?  None of you have any input on the consequences or significance of this breakthrough?
I’ll throw my hat in the ring, forget what a meter is to a yard, how do we know they were only 1 meter apart?  Did they measure the distance, and how did they measure it, did they use a calibrated device, do several measurements, confirm with other devices to ensure the distance was 1 meter?  Did they do a MSA study to confirm that indeed it was 1 meter?
Morons and a computer...
Hey kevin common knowlege says however that 3.3feet equals 1 meter.
Einstein did not believe this could be done so he's out. Every atom in the universe is in a constant state of motion and the thousands of times will be resolved be patient.
Hey, Noah (from Oklahoma)  I case you haven't known this before, none of us are the same person that we were only a moment ago.  Oops, got to go - I'm morphing again...
Mr. Schroedinger has found his box empty, and would like for his cat to be returned.  Msrs. Michelson and Morley are of differing opinions on whether any entanglement actually occurred.  Really, folks, lighten up.  Scientific progress is accellerating at an exponential rate, so get used to it.  By the way, who gives a rats ass about Alan's definition of a meter?  If you want to be that serious, refer to the appropriate "white paper", not a friggin' msnbc.com science article.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1757398

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google