ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Hollywood remakes an alien

Posted: Thursday, December 11, 2008 6:20 PM by Alan Boyle


20th Century Fox
A crowd gathers around the "Central Park Sphere" in a scene from "The Day the
Earth Stood Still," a remake of the classic 1951 movie about alien visitation.

Although the modern-day reincarnation of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" may not rise to the classic status of the 57-year-old original, it fortifies the science-fiction story with some fresh science facts.

The original 1951 movie was a black-and-white, Space Age parable about a planet in peril ... from the potential threat of nuclear war. Calling the movie a "parable" is particularly apt, because veiled allusions to the Christ story are shot through the tale about an alien visitor (Klaatu, played by Michael Rennie) who brings a message of peace and unity to a world riven by the Cold War.

The new "Day," opening Friday with Keanu Reeves as Klaatu, preserves the basic story of an alien with a mission who comes down to Earth. This time, however, the mission is not to keep earthlings from trashing the celestial neighborhood, but to keep humans from trashing Earth.

"We can't risk the survival of the planet for one species," Klaatu explains in the film.

Will the remake's environmental message resonate the way the original film resonated for an earlier generation? "I can't think about this movie having long-term impact in the way that the original did," Scott Derrickson, the director of the new "Day," told me this week. "If it did, I'd be shocked."

Like the first "King Kong," the first "Day" was such a classic that it couldn't possibly be matched, "even if you make a perfect film," he said. That's the big reason why he was reluctant at first to take on the project.

He changed his mind, however, after reading the script, which recast the 57-year-old story from a 21st-century perspective.

"What I tried to do was take a picture of this moment in time. ... What that moment seemed to be is that we're living in an age where we've made quite a mess of things: the war, the economy, the planet, this thing that keeps us living," he said.

And yet, Derricksen said, humanity seems to do its very best when things are at their very worst. That's when people somehow find a path to change they can believe in. "I wanted to make a film about that reality, that the precipice of disaster is sometimes the very place where transformation takes place," he said.

That doesn't mean the new "Day" is purely a message movie. "My first job is to entertain," Derrickson said. To do that job, he built in plenty of breakneck chase sequences, big explosions and woo-woo special effects. No one will mistake the movie for a philosophical treatise - or a science documentary, for that matter. But when possible, Derrickson tried to have the movie reflect what scientists have learned about the cosmic frontier over the past half-century.

"We went through a tremendous amount of effort to root the science of the movie in real science, and also to pay particular respect to the profession of science," he said.

Derrickson's main ally in that effort was Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at the California-based SETI Institute. Shostak was brought in as an adviser because the film's leading actress, Jennifer Connelly, plays the role of an astrobiologist - and wanted to learn more about what such scientists really did.

Shostak said he was impressed by Connelly's interest, and by the fact that an Oscar-winning actress was cast as an expert in a scientific discipline that is still building up its credibility. "How many movie characters can you name who were astrobiologists?" Shostak asked during an interview this week. "I think Jennifer Connelly might be the first."

Eventually, Derrickson asked Shostak to look through the script and mark anything that didn't ring true to a scientist's ear. He got back a sheaf of papers that were covered with red marks. "So I told him, 'Can you fix it, please ... and stop being so condescending,'" Derrickson joked.

Not all of the suggestions were taken, a fact of life that Shostak accepts. "It's Hollywood," he told me. "Their job is not to teach you science." However, there are a few scientific riffs worth paying attention to: 

  • Real astrobiology: The dialogue for Connelly's first scene, which is set in a Princeton classroom, was rewritten to reflect questions that astrobiologists might actually consider: For example, which microbe would be more likely to live on Callisto, one of Jupiter's ice-covered moons: radiation-hardened Deinococcus radiodurans, or a type of thiobacteria that can survive in sulfuric acid? (I'd go with the first choice on Mars, and the second choice on Europa or Venus. But Callisto? Feel free to weigh in with your space-geek selection below.)

  • Real nanotechnology: One of the threats that comes up in the movie is a variation of a standard nano-doomsday plot device known as "gray goo": the ability of fictional nano-bugs to swarm over their target and turn it into ... another swarm of nano-bugs. The late author Michael Crichton used this in one of his sci-fi novels, "Prey" - and although that book was never made into a movie, "Day" provides the next best thing in nano-meltdowns. Could it really happen? Almost certainly not the way Crichton imagined it. Nevertheless, experts have voiced concern about nano-safety as recently as this week.

  • No flying saucers: The original "Day" indelibly imprinted the flying-saucer image on a generation of UFO fans. The metallic, engine-driven spaceship became a cliche of outer-space operas, ranging from "Star Trek" to "Star Wars" to "Close Encounters of the Third Kind." For his new "Day," Derrickson wanted to create a totally different kind of UFO: Klaatu and his pals come to Earth in shining lights that look like globes of swirling clouds when they come to rest. "I love the idea of trying to create an alien spaceflight technology that came from an entirely different place," Derrickson said.

  • Real equations: Shostak said one of the most important things he did was to check the equations that Klaatu writes on a blackboard for a Nobel-winning professor (played in a cameo by "Monty Python" veteran John Cleese). "The equations there are in fact some of the fundamental equations of general relativity, but what happens is that Klaatu adds another term which might account for dark energy," Shostak explained. "We don't know what that term is, but he does. ... Klaatu establishes his creds by showing that he knows more about general relativity than we do."

In his Space.com tale about being on the set, Shostak recounts how he told Derrickson that Keanu Reeves seemed to be writing the equations too slowly on the board. The way Shostak told the story, Derrickson answered that Reeves was doing it just right for the role. "Hey, Seth, he's an alien," Shostak quoted him as saying.

For the record, Derrickson told me he doesn't remember making that crack but was happy with the way the scene turned out. He was also happy with the contribution that Shostak made to the movie.

"It was a big lesson to me on the science front," he said.

For his part, Shostak hopes "The Day the Earth Stood Still" will leave young viewers yearning to learn more about life on Earth and beyond. Some of them may end up starring as astrobiologists in a real-life sequel.

"The thing I would tell schoolkids is, 'You know, there are actually people who make a modest living studying the possibility of life beyond Earth," he said.

Update for 9:35 p.m. ET: To mark the opening of the new "Day," Twentieth Century Fox has arranged to have the whole movie transmitted via a 5-meter dish antenna (the kind used for TV uplinks) in the direction of the nearest star system, Alpha Centauri.

The transmission will be made by Florida-based Deep Space Communications Network, a commercial venture that has been sending signals spaceward for more than three years. (One of their previous clients was Craigslist.)

"We are thrilled about beaming this film into space," Jim Lewis, the venture's managing director, said in a news release. "This will be our first full-length movie transmission. And what could be more relevant to send into deep space than a movie about the earth's acceptance of visitors from outer space?"

Deep Space says the transmission is due to begin at noon ET Friday, but don't expect a film review from the Centaurians anytime soon. The triple-star system is four light-years away, which means it would be four years before anything could possibly reach Alpha Centauri.

In fact, SETI experts say it's unlikely that a decipherable signal will ever get that far. Shostak has looked into how far radio signals of various strengths could carry into deep space, and his conclusion is that TV transmissions would be drowned out by static long before they get to Alpha Centauri. Tightly focused military radar signals might carry farther, but the Pentagon has no plans to air the matinee.

This has led NBC News space analyst James Oberg to call Twentieth Century Fox's transmission "a publicity stunt" based on "claims about interstellar communication that are really technologically strained, if not entirely bogus."

A publicity stunt? Hatched in Hollywood? Who knew!

Update for 8 p.m. ET Dec. 12: Our review of the new "Day" is out, and if Gort the robot enforcer really existed, he'd be seeing red right about now. Great headline, though: "Klaatu Barada Stinko."


To keep up with Shostak's quest on the scientific frontier, tune your Web browser to his weekly radio show, "Are We Alone?"  Shostak stars in a Cosmic Log pilot podcast we put together last year. You can also click through our list of six signs that aliens might exist, and watch interviews with Keanu Reeves from NBC's TODAY Show and from "Access Hollywood."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

G'day, Adam: Nothing's wrong with Callisto, I kinda like it. I just don't know whether the radiation or the possibility of sulfuric acid is the bigger threat. I'm kinda thinking the thiobacteria would do better, since my guess is that Callisto's ice has a composition that's similar to Europa's. But that's just a guess. How's the summer Down Under, by the way?
C'mon! It's science FICTION! Go watch the special effects and pretend Keanu Reeves can act
The MSNBC review mirrors Kurt Loder's, the major criticism being Reeve's lack of visible emotion. Anyone can overact. Some people can act, and we call them actors. A very few of them can perform in a role and force their behavioral reactions to the situations serve to show their reactions. An example is Kurt Russell's "Soldier". He rarely changes his expression to any significant degree, or speaks more than 3 words in a row, yet he manages to project a wide range of reactions. It takes superior talent to project emotion without overt emoting. Russell does that. I think the same will be said of Reeve's performance as Klaatu. I think its audience acceptance will be, as so often happens, quite at odds with critics' statements. Such a shame that critics don't lose their jobs when they do their jobs badly, like mediocre actors do, and like exceptional actors don't.
I have enjoyed the original for many years and continue to view it because there is a certain edge to the movie. I enjoy sci-fi movies of all types and believe that each movie, new or remake, should be judged on it own merits. I have not seen the new version but look forward to taking my son to it quite soon.
I gotta say, I just came from seeing this movie, and I don't think it's as bad as has been portrayed. I'm not 63 years old, and I wasn't around when the first version was introduced, so I'm in the target audience for the 2008 release.

First off, the movie was pretty much as I envisioned it: a decent sci-fi movie about the impending destruction of the human race by intergalactic beings who view us as a threat. I mean, if you were looking for more than that, some sort of message, then I guess you came away disappointed, but I for one was not looking to be preached at about how we're slowly poisoning the Earth through global warming, on the brink of worldwide nuclear war, or consuming the resources of the planet faster than we should be. I get enough of that stuff on the evening news. It was intended as entertainment, not as a 1950's parable, and it succeeded in entertaining me for 110 minutes.

Regarding the acting, well, it's Keanu Reeves.... If you were expecting brilliant oratory, maybe you should have gone and seen "Frost/Nixon" or some sort of Shakespearian drama. What I didn't find was overly cheesy acting, which was what I expected. It was dry in some parts, sure, but not laughable like has been suggested. I liked the interplay between the kid, Helen and Klaatu; it made the movie's premise about Klaatu changing his mind about the human condition much more believable. One of the previous commenters suggested that all Helen did was plead that "We can change...!" the whole time, but I say that the actions of the characters in the movie speak louder than their words.

Finally, regarding the science: I liked how they protrayed the "nanotechnology" as little bugs that pretty much ate everything in their paths; kind of a cool twist on an old theme. I first read about nanites in Crichton's novels, and I've been interested in the subject ever since. Making the nanites akin to bugs reinforced the "cleansing the Earth of all but the basest lifeforms" theme. One problem I had, though, was this: how did the nanites distinguish between human flesh and animal/plant cells? Can they actually be programmed to recognize and consume artificial materials and the specific human DNA pattern while leaving everything else?

All-in-all, it was a movie I would watch again for the sheer entertainment value. Happy moviegoing to the rest of you!
doesnt jupiter generate a huge amount of radiation and calisto has a negligible atmosphere to wind up in a non exsistent magnetic field?  

if stuff evolves in space itll maintain a defense or use of direct radiation, or deal with it somehow
"Too Soon from the Cave, Too Far from the Stars" - Ray Bradbury

If this movie was going to be remade the theme had to be changed.  Even if the Russians (or the rest of the nuclear community) decided to attack us we would most likely survive the attack (the damage would be devastating, no doubt, but woe to our attackers as our targeting and delivery will be far more accurate) given the advances we have made in anti missile technology.

The fact is that our planet is in peril because of our industrial activity in just the last 150 years.  All of the ecological damage that has been done can be reversed (excluding the permanent extinction of species) by our own demise as a species.  However we can reverse the damage *and* recover many extinct species with our technology and ingenuity.  We should be responsible citizens of this planet instead of reckless overlords.  Once we've learned how to take care of our own planet, we might be able to take our place in the galactic community.
Recall the little song from Mystery Science Theater 3000.  If you wonder how he eats and breathes, and other science fact, repeat to yourself it's just a show; you should really try and relax.

I have no doubt there is other life out there.  The probability almost guarantees it.  The math also pretty much guarantees that we will never come face to face with them.  Such is the nature of the universe (at least all of it that we know about it so far).
I hope the people of ALPHA CENTURI won't invade Earth for sending a STINKO MOVIE their way.
The review here by Alonso Duralde questions the mentioned "biological altruism". As Kurt Loder notes in his MTV review, it's a real field of study. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruism#Altruism_in_ethology_and_evolutionary_biology

Both Duralde and Loder (and many others, raising the question 'did they all come to this conclusion or did some of them copy others?' note negatively that Reeve's Klaatu shows almost no emotion. Apparently they came in late. Early on it's established that Klaatu's normal form is not human, and that he was born into human shape upon landing in order to be able to survive here. He even states himself "This body will take some getting used to." Furthermore, it's established that his newly born body is human, but his brain is not. At the risk of enforcing more science upon an adequately consulted film, humans show emotion due to the interaction of their thinking, feeling and behaving. With a different brain in place, the new body would not react with normal emotional response. A normal human brain with damage or disorder frequently has disruption of emotional display. Depressed persons often have "flat effect", lack of emotional display very much like Klaatu. Damage to the right side of the brain parallel to the speech centers on the left can result in loss of "prosidy", the emotional content of speech (in both production and understanding). An alien brain may be working far better than a human one in some respects, but since Klaatu is not here to interact with people other than to bid them farewell, emotional display for the sake of interaction would not be a priority in matching foreign brains and bodies.
OK..I saw this with my daughter and her friend. I ate their pop corn with them and we liked the movie.  We are killing the earth...make no mistake about that.
If aliens were close enough to Earth to tell what we were doing, what makes you think they would care?
We sure wouldn't care if we found aliens killing themselves.
Guys, I really need to borrow one of your interociters, mine broke down. (I love Mystery Science Theatre 3000)  "These pages are made of metal!" "no, I'm pretty sure they're paper"

This Island Earth was one of my favorites
You don't have to be an anti-environmentalist to think that this movie looks preachy and not very entertaining.  Even the special effects look underwhelming from the commercials.  I'll pass until it shows up on HBO.
I have the orginial TDTESS in my DVD collection.  I saw it when it first came out in the early 50's.  I was so impressed.  That said, as I was so disappointed in 'The War of The Worlds' 2.0, I think I'll wait for the new one to show up in the $5.00 at Wallyworld.
Lets hope the people of Alpha Centuri won't invade Earth for the stinker that was transmitted to them!
For the then-munificent sum of $.10, I first saw the original when it came out in 1951. It's still, after 57 years, just as impressive and memorable as when I watched it for the first time at age 9. The local PBS outlet in Philadelphia (Pa., not Miss.)ran it uncut and without commercial breaks about 15 years ago; I still have my precious VHS tape of it which I've since played and replayed at least five or six times. I don't plan on seeing the remake; the politically-correct liberal Hollywood hothouse that alleges itself to be the American motion picture industry, hermetically sealed off from the rest of the U.S. (with the exceptions of Washington DC, Seattle, Manhattan and San Francisco),seems determined to disallow anyone from taking a divergent interpretation of their current products. Where's Gort where we really need him? Maybe the remake should have been shot in Chicago (LOL)!!!
I saw the movie in IMAX on Saturday and I though it decent.  Not great, but not horrible, either.  Some of the criticisms of the movie here and elsewhere on the web and just laughable, though.

1. Klaatu shows no emotion - what, you think aliens should act human?

2. Aliens wouldn't care that we are killing the planet - the movie perfectly explains why they care: There are very few life supporting planets in the cosmos and they cannot allow one to die.

3. Unrealistic/Improbable/Bad Science/Etc. - Sigh.  It is just a movie.  The primary goal of the movie is to make money.  Entertaining anyone is secondary.  Getting people to think the movie was good is further down the line.  If studio execs think that changing plot lines or introducing stupid pseudo science will help the movie make more money, they will usually do so in a heartbeat.
Clint of Chicago wrote:
"The very fact that we are not the slaves of evil galactic overlords proves that faster than light travel is not possible. Every intelligent species in the universe is just like us, doomed to gaze forever at the stars and wonder."

So, because we (as humans) have a history of enslaving those who are different means every other race that may exist must be the same?  I believe that humans have evolved past that stage now and any other intelligent life could have as well.  Admittedly, humans still have some way to go yet with that situation, but saying that FTL travel cannot exist based on the fact that we are not slaves is not exactly the most scientific.
*correction* Im pretty sure there are other beings elsewhere trying to find beings like themselves
thank you master I will continuously keep track
You don't have to be an anti-environmentalist to think that this movie looks preachy and not very entertaining.  Even the special effects look underwhelming from the commercials.  I'll pass until it shows up on HBO.
thank you master I will continuously keep track


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1710980

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google