ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The subatomic dragstrip

Posted: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 5:40 PM by Alan Boyle


SLAC
A technician works inside SLAC's 2-mile-long linear accelerator tunnel.

Most atom smashers are built like racetracks, with powerful magnets bending subatomic particles into circular routes. The SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, built in the heart of California's Silicon Valley, is something completely different: It's basically a 2-mile-long dragstrip that whips up electrons to shed light on the structure of matter.

SLAC's straight-shot structure hints at the shape of atom smashers to come - such as the future International Linear Collider. And it makes for one heck of a jogging trail.

"There's actually a race where they go down to the accelerator and back - it's four miles," said SLAC graduate student Chris McGuinness, who is an avid mountain climber as well as a researcher working on the next generation of laser-powered particle accelerators.

Next month's 37th annual SLAC Run and Walk will take place outside the accelerator's housing. But at the same time, 25 feet beneath the surface, electrons and positrons will be running their own races down SLAC's straight track.

At the end of the track, those pumped-up particles can be curled around and smashed together, or they can be captured in a magnetic ring to generate brilliant flashes of X-ray light. The smashing part has supported Nobel-winning discoveries, including this year's physics prize, but the flashing part is pointing the way to SLAC's next frontier. 


SLAC
The housing for the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory's 2-mile-long tunnel
shows up as a straight line in this aerial photo of the Silicon Valley site.

Transition time
SLAC is definitely in a time of transition, in part evidenced by this month's official name change: For the past 46 years, it's been known as the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Today, Stanford University still manages the lab on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy, but the acronym has been incorporated into a bigger mouthful of a name to recognize SLAC's growing role in photon science and astrophysics.

In particle physics, SLAC's signal accomplishments have focused on figuring out why matter is structured the way it is. "We did the first experiments that showed quarks existed," said Stanford graduate researcher Daniel Ratner.

More recently, the lab's BaBar collaboration has shed light on why matter won out over antimatter, and found the lowest-energy example of weird subatomic stuff known as "bottomonium."

But BaBar's days are numbered: As the Large Hadron Collider takes center stage in particle physics, the detector system at SLAC that yielded such fundamental research (known as the B Factory) is being closed down. That's been one of the reasons why SLAC has laid off 225 of its 1,600 employees over the past year. Budget cuts forced by Congress were another factor.

The good news is that new projects are gaining steam: Scientists at SLAC play a key role in managing the recently launched $690 million Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, and the $400 million Linac Coherent Light Source is due to come online next year.


SLAC
Researcher Dennis Nordlund peers at equipment used for soft X-ray imaging
on a beamline at SLAC's Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource.

Inside the accelerator
SLAC's researchers provided a preview of what's ahead on Monday during a tour organized for this week's New Horizons in Science conference, which is presented annually by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

The linear accelerator itself is just the start of the journey, at least as far as electrons are concerned. Although we couldn't walk through the underground accelerator hall itself, McGuinness ushered us through the above-ground Klystron Gallery.

Klystrons are essential elements that generate electromagnetic waves, like glorified microwave ovens. The energy from the barrel-sized klystrons at SLAC is funneled down waveguides to the accelerator, where they push the electrons faster down the track like ocean waves pushing a surfer toward shore.

At the end of the run, magnets divert the drag-racing electrons into the places where they're put to use - for example, the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, or SSRL. The heart of the facility is a warehouse-sized synchrotron ring, somewhat similar to the 17-mile-round ring used for pulsing protons at the Large Hadron Collider.

At SLAC, however, the electrons' energy isn't released by collisions. Instead, they are kept in magnetic captivity and shed their excess energy in the form of X-rays. "The only thing we're using is the energy they shed," researcher John Pople explained.

Flashes of X-rays are focused onto a wide variety of materials, and the patterns made by diffracted X-ray light can show the molecular or even the atomic structure of the material being studied: "Soft" X-rays can probe electronic properties on a scale of less than a micron (a millionth of a meter), while shorter-wavelength, "hard" X-rays can illuminate structures on a scale of less than a nanometer (a billionth of a meter).

"Philosophically speaking, it's a form of microscope," Pople said.

In one of the SSRL's closetlike hutches, Pople and his assistants are using hard X-rays to map the atomic structure of materials that could someday show up in a better breed of artificial corneas. At another beamline, graduate student Eric Verploegen is using soft X-rays to look at the properties of substances being considered for spray-on circuitry. The idea is to come up with flexible, organic-based electronics that could be worked into, say, combat uniforms.

"It's a way to understand how to design the organic transistor material you want to use," Verploegen told us.

Farther down a hallway, at yet another beamline, Swedish-born researcher Dennis Nordlund is working on a tangle of gleaming pipes and metal foil that could do service as an electron spectrometer. The complex plumbing is supposed to create a nearly perfect vacuum inside the instrument.

"It's the same pressure here as it is in space," he said.

The light frontier
If you think that's impressive, you ain't seen nothing yet. The Linac Coherent Light Source, now in the final stages of construction, will pump up electrons to such high energies that the resulting flashes of X-ray light will pack 10 gigawatts of power.

"When it's focused, we have no known material that will stop it from burning through," Ratner said.

New caverns have been burrowed into the sandstone on SLAC's 430-acre campus to accommodate millions of dollars' worth of beamlines and observing istruments. Right now the caverns are empty, but starting next year, the Linac Coherent Light Source will set a new standard for imaging resolution, down to 1 angstrom, or one ten-billionth of a meter. It will also provide the shortest stop-action flash ever known, lasting as little as a femtosecond - that is, one-quadrillionth of a second.

You can think of it as an atomic-scale microscope for materials, or a flash camera capable of seeing atoms. Either way, it's a new frontier for science and technology, as important as the frontier that will be explored at the Large Hadron Collider.

"Instead of being at the energy frontier, we can look at the light frontier," Ratner said.

More Big Science:

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

A minor quibble: The Indianapolis Racetrack is closer to oval-shaped than round.  It has two "straightaways" although only one of those is truly straight.  A typical particle accelerator, as I understand it, is truly round.

[ALAN ADDS: Oops No. 1 ... Yes, I knew when I wrote that sentence that an "Indy racetrack" is oval instead of round, but I was thinking I would try a bit of literary license (the tunnels at the LHC, for example, do not form a perfect circle, but run in segments with curves and straight stretches). Frank's message tipped me off that I should be more careful about using my license. As a result, I've corrected the item to remove the reference to Indy racing.]



maybe Usain Bolt can race the particles along the jogging trail...great promo!
maybe his brother Lightnin', eh?
new link from my name...check it out...gotta find a way through until these great gadgets come online!

Wow, you have a klystron in your microwave oven? Everyone else has a magnetron in theirs.

[ALAN ADDS: Oops No. 2 ... Our Advantium oven is pretty cool, but it's not that cool. I've corrected the item to avoid saying that we have a klystron in our kitchen.]

Alan,
Is that pixel resolution of 1 A or the ability to see features that size?  Asked another way, will you be able to see that their is something 1 A across as a grainy image or will it be clear?  (except for the fact that that's an optical question)

[ALAN ADDS: Tim, I think that based on your analogy, a feature spanning 1 angstrom would appear as a single "pixel," though I'm glad to be corrected on this point (as I have been on other points, see above). The wavelength range for the LCLS will be 1.5 to 15 angstroms, but SLAC generally says the observations can go down to the range of 1 angstrom. Maybe there is something analogous to interferometry or multiple imaging that can improve resolution ... I didn't ask about the details. This page provides a glossary listing for angstroms as well as femtoseconds:]

http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/lcls/glossary.html

A ten gigawatt laser? Chris Knight...Mitch Taylor...Eat your heart out.
Okay Boys, These Colliders are the mind-[game] of a bunch of pseudo-science idiots. Have they produced anything, except a debt load, the answer is no, and they won't, and sometimes when something lights up for them, it is a hyperdimensional matter, with HD protocolers laughing their asses off that the pocket protector idiots can be hustled so easy.

This Old Papa here has a Doctorate in Hyperdimensional Physics and just groans and groans at the Twilight Zone paradigm that has been installed here. Tsk,Tsk,Tsk, and no one ever asks for a repair, as the loop has been looped for a long, long time.
How much longer can the copper sections in the Linac last @ SLAC?
It's too bad that the SLAC is being closed down after such a great run giving us great science.  I sure am looking forward to seeing the LHC get up and running properly next spring.  Too bad we had our own large ITER project cancelled because of some congressional cheapskates.

As for what we get out of this kind of research let's never forget that the team at the LHC came up with the "www" internet scheme and then gave it away.  Now that's something useful that so many can take advantage of!

We need some real science coming back to the White House and only Obama will do that.  So sad that our country is falling behind the rest of the world in scientific research.  We're way behind on mag-lev trains and fusion power generators and we should be way ahead.
EarthScientist, what the heck are you getting on about? Yeah, they have produced useful results. You do like using your computer, don't you? You wouldn't have one nearly so nice without their research, as the scientists and engineers push the physical limits in their quest to make good on Moore's Law. I presume you like cell phones and television too. Now think about how pervasive electronics in general are in your life. Your car, microwave, cell phone, elevators, mp3 players, airplanes, the control systems for the power plants that provide your electricity, hospital records, financial records, the Internet, traffic lights, communications infrastructure, control systems for the very water you drink! Without the use of electronics, agriculture in the US would be far less efficient, therefore food prices would be much higher.
Please dismiss anything written by someone who tells you they have a "doctorate" in anything. People who justify their position in such a manner, in my experience working at a university, rarely know much if anything beyond their particular field of research. Oh yes, and by the way, how many useful results have come from hyperdimensional physics? While I believe many of the THEORIES are on track, the common concensus is that we will never be able to prove them in experiments (i.e. pseudo science) because there is no way to build instruments to measure them (excluding math equations which produce results that work in other math equations). Please produce 1 gram of hyperdimensional matter now to show how cost effective your funding is. I believe we have some generational jealousy occuring between fields of study.
Frank in Dallas wrote: "A typical particle accelerator, as I understand it, is truly round."

I think most big scale accelerators are typically round but if you consider the use of linear accelerators used in hospitals to treat certain types of cancer, they outnumber the circular accelerators by far.
Earth Scientist casually opines "Okay Boys, These Colliders are the mind-[game] of a bunch of pseudo-science idiots. Have they produced anything, except a debt load, the answer is no...."

I'd argue that the individuals living longer due to Stage 1 drug research (such as the protease inhibitors) would argue differently. Environmental remediation strategies for identified Super Fund sites, research into safe disposal of nuclear wastes, protein folding studies related to genomics, nano-particle research related to fuel cell for future clean vehicles are ALL areas of research DIRECTLY benefitting from the science place at laboratories such as SLAC.

It's an injustice to suggest that facilities of this type are only for and specifically related to areas of study that do not translate into real world benefits.
This coherent x-ray light source is amazing. A number of possible applications for this techology are imaginable.

First; the ability to, in some way, image the electronic shell structure of atoms might be possible with wavelenghts of one Angstrom. This level of resolution can shed light on or perhaps image in some manner, the bonds between atoms in materials ranging from biological samples to short and intense bonds between tightly bound atoms such as can exist with the element of carbon. Good examples of such bonds are triple bonds which involve high degrees of chemical bonding energy.

A study of the way atoms bond from an observational perspective might somehow lead to materials with tighter or stronger bonds than those that exist within pure diamond, the hardest known ordinary substance.

Second; the technology might have defensive application in terms of space-based missile defense. A beam of x-rays that can burn through any known materials would have potential applications when deployed in space to zap incomming missles, regardless of how well they are shielded. The cost of such space based hardware would be very high, but cheaper access to Earth orbit will eventually permit such battle-stations to be built. With the pleriferation of nuclear armed states and nuclear capable missles, such a technology could be very important.

Third; the production of gamma rays by the same mechanisms that x-rays are produced could conceivably provide 0.01 to 0.001 femtosecond snap shots of atomic electron shell structure and perhaps even snap-shots of the structure of the atomic nucleous as well.

The production of concentrated ionizing electromagnetic radiation, such as the 1 Angstrom X-rays, can offer a fundamental new window into the field of high energy physics research including high energy particle physics. This opportuinity will only improve as EM energy beam pulse power as well as the photon energy level increases. A 10 GigaWatt to 100 Gigawatt plus highly focused gamma ray beam or hard gamma ray beam would be awesome. Perhaps the International Linear Collider that will accelerate electrons to about 1 TeV could produce such a beam of gamma rays.
James M. Essig,
I've been pondering the question of electron shell imaging all day.  I suspect they'll be able to show some electron sharing in molecules.  Unless shells are far more distinct than I think they are I doubt they'll be able to get anything.  I wonder if they'll even be able to document atomic size.  Even with 100 times better resolution the electron cloud is (probably) so indistinct that it can't be measured.  The idea of a unit based on gamma rays is intriguing.
Hi Tim;

Thanks for the above comments.

I have been interested in the artificial production of gamma rays for quite some time. It will be interesting if at some future time, artificial sources of hard gamma rays with energies of one TeV or greater can be produced in tightly focused beams. The idea of using such high energy gamma rays to interact directly with baryons or other fermions is also of interest to me.
James,
That sounds like a weapon ("communications device" in CIA speak).  We can't develop it for that.  We have to develop it so we can get a snapshot deep inside the atom.  Then we weaponise it.  Er, communicate with it.
Hi Tim;

I am curious as to what new physics we can discover in the event that we are at some point, able to build 1+ TeV photon sources wherein these photons would be used to collide with the various simple, or supposedly simple, and composite fermions we have discovered. A new window might be offered to experimentalists for doing ulta high energy physics at the 10 TeV range plus. Such photon experiments in both the center of mass frames and laboratory frams could well uncover some new physics.

Part of my interest in nuclear physics and particle physics no doubt had at least some of its origins from the fact that my departed father was a U.S. Navy officer within the Naval Reactors Division of the Naval Sea Systems Command, and who later worked as a Civil Service employee upon retiring from the Navy, also for Naval Reactors/DOE. My father during his academic life had accumulated numerous physics, engineering, and mathematics text and reference books. I remember as a 10 year old boy looking through these books and being drawn to the complicated equations, tables, and charts contained within even though I could only under stand a few symbols such as C for the speed of light, and nothing else. I guess this love for the complexity of symbolic mathematics and mathematical physics represents more of the artist in me rather than a strictly analytical side.

Regards;

Jim


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1602034

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google