ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Rocket racers target space

Posted: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:00 AM by Alan Boyle

Rocket Racing Inc. and Armadillo Aerospace are taking their rocket-powered partnership to the next level, in a suborbital space tourism venture to be headquartered at New Mexico's Spaceport America.

Flight testing is due to begin next year, with passenger service scheduled to start in 2010. The promised cost of a ticket: $100,000 or less.

"The price of space is coming down to earth," Rocket Racing's co-founder and chief executive officer, Granger Whitelaw, declared.

Today's announcement came on the same day that Texas-based Armadillo won $350,000 of NASA's money in the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge, taking place at Las Cruces International Airport in New Mexico. Led by millionaire John Carmack, the Armadillo Aerospace team flew its rocket-powered lander prototype through a course that simulates a space mission.

Carmack started up Armadillo Aerospace eight years ago, using part of the fortune he earned as a virtuoso programmer for "Doom" and other video games.at id Software. For years, he and his mostly-volunteer rocketeers have been working to perfect a vertical-launch rocket system - first for the Ansari X Prize, and then for the Lunar Lander Challenge.

Armadillo has also done contract work for the Air Force, and will finish up a methane rocket project for NASA. But going forward, Carmack and his team plan to turn the focus exclusively to their ventures with Rocket Racing. "We're basically not doing any more business development," Carmack said.

For the past eight months, Armadillo has been building and testing the engine for the racing planes to be used by the Rocket Racing League. The Armadillo-powered racer got the Federal Aviation Administration's go-ahead for exhibition flights just this month - and Carmack expects to provide a fleet of rocket planes for the league over the next year.

The suborbital space venture ties Armadillo and Rocket Racing even more closely together.

Rocket Racing's Whitelaw emphasized that the consortium is a work in progress. "We're not 'done,'" he told me. "There are a lot of possibilities that we're looking at."


Rocket Racing League
This illustration shows the current concept
for Armadillo's suborbital spaceship. Click
on the image for a larger version.

The main pieces are in place, however: Armadillo is to develop a reusable, vertical-takeoff rocket ship capable of rising beyond an altitude of 62 miles (100 kilometers) - the internationally accepted boundary of outer space. The two-person-capacity vehicle would be powered by Armadillo's modular rocket engines. Carmack said an eight-engine configuration should provide ample redundancy for safe manned flight.

Whitelaw said the ship would have a see-through passenger capsule, allowing for a "360-degree view of space." At the peak of the ascent, passengers would see the black sky of space above a curving Earth, and experience a thrilling taste of weightlessness.

Carmack said that the first unmanned flight tests would be flown next year from the Oklahoma Spaceport, with the prototype craft descending beneath parachutes. By the time passenger flights begin, sometime in 2010, he expected Armadillo to switch to a controlled, rocket-powered descent with a parachute backup system. By that time, the locale would switch as well, to New Mexico's Spaceport America, about 40 miles (64 kilometers) north of Las Cruces.

Rocket Racing Technology Development, a subsidiary of Rocket Racing Inc., would be responsible for financing and business management. The state of New Mexico would provide the launch facility infrastructure. Whitelaw said New Mexico would provide Rocket Racing with $3 million for infrastructure development.

"I am honored that Rocket Racing Inc. and Armadillo Aerospace have chosen New Mexico to set up shop," New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said in a statement released by Rocket Racing. "Spaceport America and the state of New Mexico are proud partners, and together we are writing the next chapter of space transportation."

A fourth partner in the venture will be responsible for marketing the space rides, taking reservations, training passengers and managing the customer experience, Whitelaw said. He said the partner is an "industry leader" in tourism, but added that he would not identify the company until the marketing plan was ready to be revealed.

"We already have passengers," Whitelaw told me, "but I'm not going to tell you anything more."

The target price of $100,000 is about half of what Virgin Galactic is charging for future suborbital space excursions beyond the 62-mile mark. It's comparable to the suggested price for a 38-mile-high ride in XCOR Aerospace's yet-to-be-built Lynx Mark 1 rocket plane. Those ventures are expected to start taking passengers no earlier than 2010, and more likely later.

"I've been saying for some time that we'll end up doing this before Virgin does," Carmack said. "We'll certainly be able to undercut their price."

In today's announcement, Rocket Racing said the suborbital spaceships could be used for more than space tourism. "Target missions include microgravity experiments, astrophysics observations, reconnaissance and high-altitude scientific and meteorological measurements," the company said.

Carmack said he thought the venture should be able to get the required permits and licenses from the Federal Aviation Administration in time to meet the 2009-2010 development schedule. "We've been through this process," he said. But his years of chasing after the X Prize and the Lunar Lander Challenge have also taught him not to take anything for granted - especially when it comes to rockets.

"The best-laid plans and intentions don't always end up coming out like that," he said.

This item was last updated at 1 a.m. ET Oct. 25. To keep track of developments at the Lunar Lander Challenge, check out these blogs:

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I'll take the lawn chair with weather balloons first!
Beat Virgin Galactic? Yeah right!

Rutan is on his second generation. NO ONE else has come close to even a first generation.

Great competition, but please face reality.
not to beat a dead horse, but what is a "sub-orbital spaceship"?
no such thing, Alan...
or are you of the mind that says outer space starts at the ground?
I've seen the videos of Armadillo's Lunar Lander flights. I think they've got a shot at this, but it'll probably take two years more than they say it will. I wish them luck.
Rob in Utah,

Don't dismiss Armadillo so quickly. From a technical standpoint, Rutan could have lofted a paying passenger into space years ago, when the Ansari X-Prize was won. Space Ship Two is a brand new vehicle, and Rutan will not fly paying passengers on it until he has taken his family up on it. You better believe the testing program will be extensive. In addition, the Virgin craft is much more complex technically than the Armadillo craft promises to be. There will be far more possible failure modes to check out. If Armadillo beats Virgin Galactic to space with paying passengers, it will not be because of superior technical prowess. It will be because they have chosen to solve an easier problem.
Wow...looks like you've got all your ducks in a row!I will be keeping an eye on the the Rocket racers target space-Cosmic LOG.
Steve, in my book a suborbital spaceship is anything that's designed to fly above 100 kilometers (boundary of outer space) but not go orbital. That would take in SpaceShipOne and SpaceShipTwo as well as this proposed rocket ship. And Gaia Two, right?  ;-)  But not XCOR's Lynx Mark 1, since that isn't designed to crack the 100-kilometer mark.

By the way, it seems to me that this project would compete directly with what Blue Origin has been working on. Blue Origin, backed by Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, has been under deep cover lately. Might the financial reversals of the past few weeks may have an effect on Blue Origin's funding? If anyone has any updates on what they're up to, I'm sure we'd all dearly love to hear them.
I was just funnin' witcha, Alan...the term seemed kinda Gonzo Oxymoron gone awry...
I believe in 'outer space starts at the ground' myself.
That makes falling leaves spaceships too, eh?
Right now there little red, orange, and yellow spaceships strewn all over the neighborhood...love it!
Don't forget...from the last milennium...
"Here is part of the Universe too...."
Nice to hear from you...Forge Ahead...
I'm very disappointed with this country now. We should be on Mars by now. So much of our country's wealth has been spent on buying votes, that our country is going to be a third rate space power in 20 years if we don't get back our old attitude. Watch the JFK speech in May 1961 and you will see how much we have wimped out since then. We have a country full of losers and whiners. Imagine someone on a wagon train in the 1800s wanting to sue the government for not protecting them from the risks of nature. Then think about New Orleans now.  Imagine Lewis and Clark saying they won't go west because they might get hurt or that the government won't guarantee their safety. You see the problem. How much our spirit has changed.
"not to beat a dead horse, but what is a "sub-orbital spaceship"?"

Uh, one that goes above the altitude you consider 'space' to begin (generally taken to be 100km/62.5mi, but roll your own, if you like), but not making at least one complete pass around the Earth (and Vostok-1 did kind of split a hair on that one).

So, SpaceShipOne was sub-orbital. So was Freedom-7 and Liberty Bell-7, so are the paths ICBMs take. (The Soviet FOBS was technically sub-orbital, as they would have taken the long way around Earth to attack North American targets from the south, but did not constitute a 'space based weapon' that violates the Outer Space Treaty, by not making a full orbit.)

What you see as 'no such thing' has *plenty* of room for plenty of devices, and legal concerns...

Alan there is such a thing called a suborbital space craft. The first being the Mercury program. The last one was called Venture Star program that was scrapped because of price over rides. I worked on that program it was first called the X33 program because it was a prototype. Thank you Robert Barnes
Blue Origin has been very, very quiet lately, haven't they? No flights for 18 months and not a peep. If you can shake loose any news from there, Alan, my hat is off to you! I found out yesterday an old friend of mine went to work for them (from Amazon.com). I'm gonna have to call, but I doubt he'll spill the beans... :-)
Thanks for keeping it interesting
This photo is just amazing and by the way what is the name of this rocket hi i am ABHISHEK
That concept of spacecraft has potential issues relating to vertigo. A 360 deg view at such altitudes could make it only available to certain types of people. Like moutain climber types for instance who are well accustomed to fear of height. Someone could easily panic in such a case and make things quite unpleasant if not downright dangerous.

Gus Grissom was accused of panic when he allegedly "blew the hatch" on his Mercury craft that ended up sinking and he was highly trained !
Hire is something more about transparent habituated space modules:
http://www.sae.org/technical/papers/2008-01-2025
The transparent bubble for space flight is feasible but Armadillo visualization looks rather naïve.
They are too far from human rated vertical flight I thing.
I am actually worried that Armadillo will beat Virgin Galactic. Not because I care who does it first,but because I'm worried that Armadillo will have to cut corners to do it. Thats a very real risk. Fortunately,at this point I don't think it would derail the whole endeavor like it might have for the X-Prize flights.
If you think about it though, Scaled has a huge head start,and honestly a better more competent team. This is not to say that their competitors are not competent,but Scaled is just a whole different level of resources and talent,even if you don't count the fact that they are owned by Northrop,which potentially gives them access to expertise and technology to crack the occasional tough problem they might encounter. Unless their competition however has a brilliant idea no one has ever thought of before there is just no way for them to get something flying first. So far it does not seem to be the case.
All the basics are pretty well understood,its not a matter of coming up with something completely new,that turns out to be very simple to implement,but instead taking something that is relatively complex,and implementing hardware and making it fly. There are several techniques to get to these altitudes. Scaled has chose the X-15 route,with some interesting twists of their own.(shuttlecock re-entry,hybrid engine,etc) It worked well and many of the problems were discovered years ago. The other ways such as vertical launch from a booster rocket,which were tried have their own set of problems and solutions. Both are not trivial to implement. On the other hand,if you come up with something new,then its even worse,you have to figure out all the problems on your own.

On thing Armadillo seems to do unfortunately is underestimate the difficulty of their task. They did it during the X-Prize and seem to be doing it again. They were constantly talking about winning the X-Prize yet scaled was actually flying hardware while Armadillo didn't even have a working engine. To their credit however,they have tenacity. They are still out there,still building hardware and still trying. Thats not to be overlooked. Going from programmer to rocket science is a pretty big leap. Dont get me wrong,I'm actually impressed with what they have done. They have come farther than I would have thought. Their only real problem is making statements that are unrealistic. No matter how well you do,if you cant meet your own predictions,people get a bad image of you.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1588168

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google