ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Hubble weathers ups and downs

Posted: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:25 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA
Engineers man their stations at the Space Telescope Operations Control Center as commands are transmitted to Hubble's command and data-handling system.

The revival of the Hubble Space Telescope started out going "exactly as we hoped," a NASA spokesman said, but engineers had to put a hold on the operation after they saw two anomalies in electronic systems onboard the telescope.

Hubble's science operations went on the blink last month when the main system for handling commands and data going back and forth between the telescope's instruments and the ground failed. Controllers could still send commands up to Hubble and receive diagnostic readings, but the flow of imagery that made the telescope famous was cut off.

The sudden, unexpected snag forced the postponement of the space shuttle Atlantis' final service call, which was due for launch this week.

To revive Hubble, engineers at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center devised a plan to switch the flow of data from the main system that the 18-year-old telescope had always used, known as Side A, to a never-before-used backup system known as Side B. The space agency's top management gave the go-ahead for the remote-controlled switchover on Tuesday, and engineers went to work on Wednesday.

Engineers checked out Side B for the first time on Wednesday night, NASA spokesman Ed Campion told me Thursday. "All that went exactly as we hoped, so after that, the Advanced Camera for Surveys and the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 were retrieved out of safe mode to establish that each of them has a good working interface to Side B," he said.

Hubble's reconfigured electronics passed that test as well. "Everything worked the way we hoped it would," Campion said. "Now we're going to send commands to begin internal exposures and calibrations of the science instruments."

The calibration data would have been used to check that Side B was functioning just as well as Side A was before the breakdown. But that part of the operation mustn't have went as well, according to a NASA update issued Friday:

"Activitation of the Hubble Space Telescope science instruments and resumption of science observations have been suspended following two anomalies seen in systems onboard the telescope on Thursday. All of the telescope's payloads are back in safe mode condition while engineers perform troubleshooting."

NASA is due to provide further details later today.

Every hiccup in Hubble's status is felt deeply by the team working to get the telescope back in business. Before the latest glitch, Susan Hendrix, a NASA spokeswoman who specializes in following Hubble operations, told me that she felt a personal stake in the telescope's ups and downs.

"Hubble's been very near and dear to me," she told me Thursday. "It's kind of like an adopted child."

Even if Hubble resumes science operations, the child will still have to undergo some follow-up surgery: A spare unit is currently being tested at Goddard, and if that checks out, it will likely be brought up on Atlantis for installation (along with lots of other Hubble goodies) next year. Even when the new unit is in place, Hubble data will continue to flow through the Side B electronics, and Side A would become the backup. That's in line with a common-sense rule for engineers: "If it's no longer broke, don't try fixing it again." 

Keep up with the latest news about Hubble's revival by checking the status reports on NASA's Hubble mission page. There's even an RSS feed that you can add to your feed subscription list (along with the feed for Cosmic Log, of course). And if you need to be reminded why Hubble is worth saving, check out our space gallery and especially our audio slide show retelling "The Hubble Story."

This is an updated version of an item that was first published at 12:36 p.m. ET Oct. 16.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Whoooo Hoooo!! You go Hubble!
Alright!
Alan, I wonder if there has been any cost analsys
of bringing Hubble back to Earth rebuilding it,
and returning it to space. I feel sure that many
improvements could be made on the ground that
could not be made in space, and probally cheaper.
Thank you for fixing Hubble.
Gordon,

The problem is that returning Hubble to Earth requires two launches as opposed to just one.  Even when Hubble had massive problems when it was first launched they decided it wasn't cost effective to bring it back to earth for repairs, and now we have a very limited number of shuttle launches left to do the things we want to get done.  

I can only hope that some private company will take donations to bring Hubble back down to Earth for retirement in 10 years, as opposed to having it burn up in the atmosphere.  If there was every a piece of 'space junk' that deserved a spot in the Smithsonian...
Just like any other computer these days, it's cheaper, faster and better to buy new. Why relaunch an old piece of technology with limited resolution, questionable optics when you could field a new piece of technology with 20x better resolution and spot-on optics for half price? Let's just make sure the eye glass people grind to the right specs this time.

John Caveman Green
lancelotlinc AT yahoo DOT com
cavemanscrib DOT com
Fingers crossed from one who worked on Hubble.
I am so happy
Great news! Hubble is probably one of the best investments taxpayers have ever made in the space program.
Can the shuttle bring such a big payload back to earth? To my recollection hasn't allways come back close to empty?
Huge sigh of relief in Greenbelt...yeah for you guys, thank you & congratulations!

But when does Hubble expire?  Is there a known date, or approximate date, after which Hubble fails?

I thought we were running out of time as it was...I certainly hope not, but I am curious.
Toby,

It would be a heck of a lot cheaper to display a life-sized replica of the Hubble, sans interior elements, at the Smithsonian.  Plus, after the shuttle is retired in 2010, someone would have to build a 2nd generation RLV with the cargo capacity of the shuttle in order to have the capability to bring Hubble back home.
I am so happy we are keeping Hubble up and going.  It is a marvelous machine...and if we want to retire it (I like the Smithsonian idea), we need a Hubble 2 with all the capabilities our computing power now could bring to such an endeavor!  Wonder how we get funding for that in times like these...
Could the shuttle safely land with the weight of Hubble in it's cargo bay? It doesn't seem likely. But I am curious to know the answer.
I do love a slow tedious voyage even if experienced only through the sense of sight and imagination. Long live the big eye in the sky!
Is this Side A side B like a Right Brain, Left Brain type of thing. Will we start getting impressionist images from the Hubble instead of Analytical images now?
It's time to get all the science from Hubble that is possible to receive!  The cost of keeping it in operation is not the question.  Penny counting for a trip to the moon is the question.  Why go back to the moon in this economy, is the valid question.  Fixing the Hubble is very concervative and rewarding, beyond dreams!
Once NASA is finished with Hubble, would it be possible to boost it into a higher orbit so that it could be retrieved at a much later date?

Hubble has contributed so much to our learnings about outerspace.  It's marvelous!  With all of the turmoil in the financial markets and the wars going on, Hubble is a shining star enlightening our knowledge and helping our future!
It seems amazing that it's taken 18 years til it was necessary to test the bac-up sysyem..."Better than your average IT engineer, boo-boo!"
Hip Hip Hooray for Hubble!  I'm sure glad that all the fine folks at NASA that worked to revive Hubble came through like champs.  Now we can enjoy more of those wonderful pictures that Hubble has brought us for so many years.  Now let's get that repair mission going.
Side B has issues - Thursday evening the problems problems problems.  
Quality of the equipment that Hubble is made of speaks volumes.
this is an attempt by nasa to influence the election. all the sudden the side a system decides to go down a few weeks before the launch which was a few weeks before the election? please! just kidding. i'm not that cynical. go hubble!
Retrieval of the Hubble would depend on whether the Shuttle could land with that much weight on board.  I seem to remember that it doesn't have that  capacity.
Is anyone unhappy with what we have been able to achieve with the Hubble telescope?  Any further investment, in it, would take away from newer and larger systems.

The Smithsonian would be better served with a model and all of those glorious photos.
It seems to be in the same shape as my car...
Congratulations to the designers and engineers that built Hubble and her backup systems. To the NASA community who have taken such good care of the scientific community's gift to the world over the years and to the engineers that diagnosed the problem and successfuly made the switch over so her good work can continue.

Now lets get that dern servicing mission back into the queue ASAP!
The Hubble was a great telescope but its time has come. By continuing to fund Hubble NASA demonstrates that it's more interested in keeping engineers jobs than doing anything new. We are paying BILLIONS of dollars to fix a telescope when those same billions could be used to create new telescopes that were 10x to 100x stronger. Just look at projects like the Large Binocular Telescope in Arizona. At the cost of even one Hubble repair mission we could have 10 new ground based telescopes that utilize the newest advances in interferometry and other techniques.

WAKE UP NASA, and please use my tax dollars better.
Thanks Alan for keeping us up to date with the Hubble trouble.  Hopefully NASA will be able to get these new snafus fixed so that they can get Atlantis ready for the upcoming repair mission.  Let's all hope that Hubble can be fixed so that we can enjoy those wonderful pictures it has provided us over the years.
I am certain that the risk to life posed by the current space shuttle is not worth retrieving a museum piece.

However, if one of our software billionaires wants a great conversation piece for their coffee table and is willing to finance an automated recovery launch, go for it!
Another potential problem with de-orbiting Hubble for repairs is it's age.  Any complex machine wears with age.  A machine that has experienced the extreme temperature and radiation conditions of earth orbit for the better part of 20 years is going to become fragile in ways that we cannot predict.  Subjecting it to de-orbit and relaunch represents risk akin to replacing an unbroken part in a 20 year-old car with a new one.  Best to leave well-enough alone.

That being said, perhaps a case could be made for returning it to Earth, intact, at the end of it's operational life.  We would have an opportunity to study the long-term effects of orbital flight on the numerous materials used in it's construction.  Afterward, it would of course be enshrined at the Smithsonian.
If Hubble cannot be repaired, they should accelerate the schedule for getting the James Webb telescope up there.  JW will go into a solar orbit, as opposed to Hubble which is in a high Earth orbit.  This will allow it to "stare" at a single point in space for longer periods of time and gather much more information than the already-impressive Hubble could.

At the very least, whatever parts the Atlantis crew pulls off Hubble to be replaced during the upcoming repair mission should be kept.  It will be a shame if the whole thing cannot be salvaged but since Hubble is in such a high orbit it will probably require a dedicated mission which means even more money.  Maybe that could be a "Plan B" for the Atlantis mission - try to get it working while you're in orbit with it, but if not, just bring it on home.  Then again, it weights 24000 pounds... it would seem that would make the landing dicey.  However, considering that the shuttle was cleared to take off with that kind of load in the first place, and that resulting from certain kinds of emegencies during launch they'd have to attempt a landing with that load anyway, you'd think it would be feasible.  If its good enough to fly its good enough to land.

"I can only hope that some private company will take donations to bring Hubble back down to Earth for retirement in 10 years, as opposed to having it burn up in the atmosphere.  If there was every a piece of 'space junk' that deserved a spot in the Smithsonian..."

Unfortunately, none of the private companies that are working on orbital (as opposed to suborbital) systems seem to have anything planned in the next 10 years or so, that would be able to return anything like the size and mass of the HST to Earth.

In this particular application, Dragon (or Shenzhou) would be no more useful than Orion. Many people don't yet realize how much they're going to miss the shuttle's downmass capability. Even returning spacesuits from ISS for refurbishment will become an issue...

I would hope that before we think of bringing back the Hubble to sit in a museum,when we have no other way of learning where the black holes go.That we could send this incredible machine on this journey,one step forward for man kind.That there is no end.Just new beginnings.Send her. Jolene, Arizona
I would love to see the Hubble come back.  Sure we could put a model in a museum.  We can put a lot of fake stuff in a lot of places to represent things we really cared about.  But it just isn't the same.  While they are up there, they might want to pick up Vanguard, also.  It's the oldest surviving satellite.  Launched 50 years ago, and still up there.  But then they have another 300 years or so to make a decision on that one.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1556574

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google