ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



How stars are born

Posted: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 7:02 PM by Alan Boyle

NASA's "Great Observatories" have teamed up with other telescopes on Earth and in space to produce glorious pictures showing how stars are born.

Astronomers believe the first generations of stars were crushed into existence as cosmic gas congealed into galaxies, and that's the focus of a clever study that draws upon the Hubble Space Telescope's view of a bizarre "Cosmic Eye." More recently, blasts of radiation and supernova winds are hammering out stars from clouds of gas and dust, as seen in a pair of pictures that incorporate data from the Spitzer Space Telescope.

Here's a quick guide to the latest fireworks displays from NASA's three Great Observatories: Hubble, Spitzer and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory:

Stellar work of art
The picture below shows NGC 346, a star-forming cloud that is 210,000 light-years away in the Small Magellanic Cloud, a satellite dwarf galaxy orbiting our own Milky Way. The carnival colors reflect a spectrum of light that is far wider than the human eye can perceive - and that's the secret to interpreting what's happening.

"NGC 346 is an astronomical zoo," Dimitrios Gouliermis of Germany's Max Planck Institute for Astronomy explained in today's image advisory. "When we combined data from various wavelengths, we were able to tease apart what's going in in different parts of the cloud."


NASA / JPL-Caltech / XMM / NTT / MPIA
This painterly portrait of a star-forming cloud called
NGC 346 combines imagery from several telescopes.
Click on the picture to see a bigger version.

Clouds of cold dust show up best in the infrared wavelengths that are Spitzer's specialty. In this picture, they show up as red blotches. The green areas represent glowing gas, as seen in visible wavelengths by the European Southern Observatory's New Technology Telescope. Even hotter gas has been detected in X-ray wavelengths by the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton space telescope, and that gas is portrayed as a blue haze.

Ordinary stars appear as blue spots with white centers, while young, dust-enshrouded stars appear as pinkish-red spots with white centers.

The bright area at the center of the picture represents a region that is being blasted with radiation from massive stars. The resulting shock waves are squeezing new stars into existence.

Higher up in the cloud and toward the left, you can see a bright spot surrounded by a bluish glow. The glow is actually created by winds given off by a supernova explosion 50,000 years ago. The bright spot isn't the star that blew up - it's actually a triple-team of stars shining through the winds. The supernova winds push against the cloud of gas and dust seen to the right, spawning infant stars (which look pretty in pink).

The results show that two mechanisms for star formation can be at work simultaneously in the same region. The international team's findings are due to be published in an upcoming issue of the Astrophysical Journal. Check the Spitzer Web site and this Caltech news release as well as the ESA Web site and the ESO Web site for further explanation.

Hidden star clusters
Scientists combined infrared observations from Spitzer with X-ray observations from Chandra to figure out how stars were being born inside clouds of dust so thick that you can't see them in visible light.


NASA / JPL-Caltech / CXO / CfA
RCW 108 is a region where stars are forming within
the Milky Way, about 4,000 light-years from Earth. Click on the picture to see a larger version.

RCW 108 is a star-forming region in our own Milky Way galaxy, 4,000 light-years from Earth in the southern constellation Ara. This picture of the region is a composite, with Spitzer's infrared view highlighted in red and orange and Chandra's view shown in blue.

Chandra identified hundreds of hot, massive stars that are giving off violent bursts of radiation, including members a large star cluster known as NGC 6193 that is visible on the left side of the image. Astronomers believe that the radiation given off by these hot stars is carving away at the thick clouds of dust and gas that Spitzer mapped in detail.

The blast of radiation appears to have sparked the birth of a new star cluster inside the knot of clouds near the center of the image. The stars themselves are so thickly shrouded that their X-ray emissions can't be seen.

Click on over to the Spitzer Web site and the Chandra Web site for more about RCW 108.

The Cosmic Eye
The last region in our star-forming trio is a galaxy far, far, far away - about 11 billion light-years away, in fact, close to the edge of the observable universe. In this week's issue of the journal Nature, astronomers from the U.S. and Britain describe how they got a closer view of the galaxy by using the Hubble Space Telescope plus a galactic gravitational lens.

"Gravity has effectively provided us with an additional zoom lens, enabling us to study this distant galaxy on scales approaching only a few hundred light years," Caltech's Dan Stark, the research team's leader, said in a statement from Durham University. "This is ten times finer sampling than previously."


NASA / ESA / STScI via Durham U.
A Hubble Space Telescope image shows the "Cosmic
Eye." The yellow source in the middle is the
foreground lensing galaxy, while the blue ring is the
lensed image of the background star-forming galaxy.

The "zoom lens" is a galaxy that is sitting smack-dab between us and the distant galaxy, 2.2 billion light-years away. Because of the alignment, and because of general relativity, the nearer galaxy's gravitational field bends and focuses light beams from the faraway source. That produces what's known as a partial Einstein ring, nicknamed "the Cosmic Eye."

Stark and his colleagues analyzed the spectral signature from that focused light, and found that there was a subtle redshift effect: One edge of the faraway galaxy is moving away from us, and the other is moving toward us. That led the researchers to conclude that the galaxy is in a whirl.

"For the first time we can see that a typical-sized young galaxy is spinning and slowly evolving into a spiral galaxy much like our own Milky Way," Stark said.

The researchers also factored in data from the Keck Observatory in Hawaii and the Plateau de Bure Interferometer in the French Alps. The interferometer's millimeter-wave instrument is sensitive to the distribution of cold gas that collapses to form stars.

"Remarkably, the cold gas traced by our millimeter observations shares the rotation shown by the young stars in the Keck observations," said study co-author Mark Swinbank of Durham University's Institute for Computational Cosmology. "The distribution of gas seen with our amazing resolution indicates we are witnessing the gradual buildup of a spiral disk with a central nuclear component."

The bottom line is that the far, faraway galaxy is apparently being formed from scratch, rather than through the collision of pre-existing galaxies. As all that cold primordial gas swirls together, it collapses gravitationally into a first generation of stars - a process that has not been seen in such detail before.

"Effectively, we are looking back in time to when the universe was in its very early stages," Swinbank said. "This technique of using gravitational lensing provides us with a glimpse of what we will commonly achieve when the next generation of telescopes, which are still a decade away, come online."

To get a preview of the Atacama Large Millimeter Array and other monster observatories, check out our interactive gallery of next-generation telescopes, as well as the Web sites for ALMA, the E-ELT and the TMT.


The NGC 346 study's authors include Gouliermis as well as Thomas Henning,  Wolfgang Brandner, Eva Hennekemper and Felix Hormuth of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, and You-Hua Chu and Robert Gruendl of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

The authors of the study on RCW 108, appearing in the February 2008 issue of The Astronomical Journal, include Scott Wolk, Bradley Spitzbart, Tyler Bourke and Robert Gutermuth of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Miquela Vigil of MIT's Lincoln Laboratory and Fernando Comeron of the European Southern Observatory.

The "Cosmic Eye" study's authors include Stark and Swinbank as well as Richard Ellis and Johan Richard of Caltech, Simon Dye of Cardiff University and Ian Smail of Durham University.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

This is just so amazing- that people from earth can understand and explain these tremendous happenings trilions of light years away, is just so indicative of what man can accomplish if he sets his mind to it. Thsee scientists should be as well known as sports or music stars. Too bad they are not, and it's an indictment of our society because they are not.
Wow!
Just what is the gas and dust they keep talking about>
I thought stars were fusion reacting hydrogen,
Mind boggling!!!!  Just what a wonderful creator we have to have produced such magnificence both here on our planet as well as the rest of the universe!  I am not an academic and don't really understand it all except that I know there is a force - call it God,Budda, whatever, who is responsible for all this - including the wonderful scientists who are clever enough to figure it out to this stage - WELL DONE.
Our solar system is located in an arm of a spiral galaxy from which we can observe events of what we call the big bang. Is it possible that the big bang is, in itself, located in an arm of a yet unknown galixy
Awesome, absolutely awesome! I wonder what Galileo would think if  he saw todays incredible advances in Science!  How tragic his ending--and how narrow the minds of the Church to  stifle the advances of genius!
Sad at best--when I think of how religion has done so much harm to the advancement of real scientific knowledge:when they could embrace the wonderful gifts of our Creator. Sometimes small minds do much to destroy great ones!  Jealousy perhaps, ignorance or just plain stupidity! ?
Correct me if I'm wrong. The gas clears away as it forms a new star. How do we know that the dust forms the star. Could it be that the star is already formed, but not visible due to it being behind the cloud. As the cloud clears, the star becomes visible. Science and creation do not have to be separate. Common sense tells anyone that either could be the case. Only the evolutionist would surmise that it must be a new star forming. Just a thought.
wow! i saw a shooting star and i wished on it and the next day it came true and so i really think that this is cool even though i am not a science freak this is cool and i really want ot go to space but i am not going to never do it i know for sure that i wont because i dont want to spend all my life till im 50 and then find out that i cant so i wont but that would be cool if i went without studying!!!!!!!!!=]=]
please respond to my message if you want that would be awesome and great and cooL!!!!!!!
You are absolutely right!!!!   Our world is dying and finding a new place to live is our only option
And the point is? Can we put NASA down for a rest for a few years and spend the money on something in America. The U.S.A. is operating at a big deficit and NASA people create work projects to justify their jobs. Can we spend the billions at better places, maybe for humans?  Robots and camera's have shown all we may see for quite sometime. How about using their budget on alternative fuels and maybe for a national sset up of alternative gas fueling stations. Carbon atom type not ethanol.  
These scientists will never be famous because what they do requires a quashing of the ego and lots of brain power.  Anyway, its all about marvelling at the Creator.    
Can the human really understand how amazing,... is the universe ???
"Except", as a lot of things perceived to be correct "now" may in the future be said, "well that's not really what's happening at all, here is what we "think" is really happening. ..................................
God's wands at work!  He is truly awesome!
Amazing how the more we learn, the more I look up at the stars with wonderment and total awe.
You ain't seen nothin' yet.
And there is still so much that we don't know.
In my very humble opinion, what is most fascinating about the Hubble image is that we're looking at something that happened 11 billion years ago.
To: Jack Nashville Tn,
You suffer from a common misconception.
NASA brings in more money than it spends, but the gain does not show up on NASA's books. Cutting NASA's funding costs us more than the amount gained by the cut.
No the human can never really understand how amazing the universe really is because the human mind can't really comprehend infinity. And what problems we will solve as soon as we quit looking for a big bang. Budha is everthing and everything is Budha. It truely is marveling at the creator not the created.  
Can we please dispense with "The Creator" bit. Here's a question for those with religious backgrounds. How created the creator? If he/she is an eternal being then why did he/she wait so long to create the universe? It's the old question, "Which came first? The chicken or the egg?" Oh wait I forgot you guys already have that covered. The Creator simply snapped his/her whatever and poof, both came into existence at once. All that physical evidence supporting evolution was intentionally left behind by The Creator to winnow out all of those pesky infidels. My bad.
It is amazing what GOD can create!  Wow!  
Unbelievable. Thank you so much for this gripping account of our Universe!
"The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork." -Psalm 19:1
Ok...you are getting a bit carried away.  This is actually nothing but what we can see.  
I would rather see pictures finally identifying anti-matter, 6th-12th dimensions, or my great grandma.  Now that would be news worthly of a sport's star or movie actor.
To Phil in Muncie - Your opinion. Same old argument as our local city government. The tax money generated will pay for the convention center and not cost property owners anything, but maybe 20%. Oh, we were wrong, we need an increase. Space shuttles end in 2010 and we are back to rockets and capsules. And pictures from, what do you guys say, ah. oh, 11 billion years ago. Cool, pass the pipe.  I say lets build some new natural gas pumps at the local market so we can keep $700 billion from going to the middle east and to other places we have gone. Let the engineers work on that problem for a few years and then go back to taking pictures of nebula's.    
If you look closely at the third pic ("cosmic eye")on the upper arc, I swear you can see the letters, "brought to you by GE"!!!  Amazing their reach extends into the cosmos!!
The deep "lookback" time and dynamic nature of the universe indicated in these observations is mind-boggling and exciting.  The effect of massive bodies on Einstein's spacetime is also extremely cool, as is the observation on red-shift and rotation of the young galaxy!

And, the most impressive thing about this research is that it helps us come closer to a true understanding of how things work - the goal of science.  And, by the way, truth is truth, regardless of its source... revelation or scientific discovery...and all things that really are true will fit together once we truly understand how everything works, so there's no sense butting heads on that acocunt.  Science and faith can and should co-exist.
To: Jack in Nashville
Phil in Muncie is right.  NASA receives less that one percent of the US budget.  Many of the technological advances we have today come from NASA.  We need to continue investing in space science and exploration.
To: Jack Nashville Tn,
The money DOES show up on government books, just not on NASA's books. I'll see if I can find you a reference.
I spend all of my relaxing moments following the advancement of all fields of cosmology, ie., theoretical physics, partical physics, etc. I cannot begin to express in words my gratitude to the scientist specialists for their efforts and astounding results. I am overwhelmed to be a part of this, however small.
Can you imagine if we are just parasites on a much larger being, like a community living on an amoeba or something like that?  How ridiculous would our presidential election be in regard to everything else?  How ridiculous would life be?
To quote a great comedian:
"Far out, man..."
It's funny how you all read the same article, as did I, because it peaked my interest. To the universe and its creations, by whichever creator - anyone believes in, an to the scientists who worked so hard on their passions for the art and the workings of the outter world, I gracefully thank you! It was great to get my mind off Wall Street and what we've done to harm our own existence - hopefully we're not too late... Can we all just not vote and see what happens? I'm not comfortable with either candidates. I feel like i'm watching a Pre-K fight out on the playground, no he said she said BS.
Nicely put Alan!!! I couldn't have said it better myself.
Actually, the gas is derived from the methane emissions of any tetonic life form.  Therefore any such gases QED prove a life form on any such planet.  Likewise, any color in the universe that is blue, which is an impossible color to produce in nature, proves QED that any blue spot on all of those pictures proves other life forms in our galaxies and beyond, QED.

If you look closely, you will see 2 other universes right between the 3 and 4th galaxies on the third picture in pixels 34 x 460 and 34 x 461.

Enjoy!
And here is a question for those with an "Evolution" background. Who introduced the concept that time is a human phenomena? Yes, Einstien. The fact that the impossibility of a black whole is no longer impossible or that we now know that light particles are gravitationally influenced or that perception of time and space is relative to a magnetic-field's  level of influence is evidence of how little we really know about our universe. We can agree to disagree that thanks to Einstein's theory of relativity, among his other works, most of what was held to be absolute during Darwin's time (modern age) is now quietly dismissed. Relativity undermines the true age of the universe, relativity, undermines the newtonian principles of gravity, space, and time. For all its worth, Evolution-based science has now become what the "Middle age science" was to the Renaissance. A famous scientist stated that "we are no closer to answering the basic questions of life than the authors of the Genesis account." One thing we have in common, whether creationist or evolutionist, is faith. By the way, regarding the chicken vs. the egg question, I honestly don't have an answer. I only know that if I asked Darwin a similar question regarding what he believed existed first, the Big Bang or matter, he would be forced to answer as I have. How can matter come from nothing? I've seen many explosion but have never seen it form new matter, it only scatters what is already there. To say that something pre-existed the Big Bang leaves plenty of profound questions. So let us respect each other in this regard and realize that we are both hernest seekers of the same thing, truth, the goal of faith and reason.          
John Doe:
That is a very narrow minded view. How do you know the Creator waited so long to make His creation? I don't buy the earth being billions of years old myself, I tend to stick with the 6,000 year old earth idea. However, what if the billions of years old thing is correct? What if we were not the first? How are you so sure that there was not a creation before ours? What if we are creation 2.0 if you will and the previous creations inhabitants are going down the same wretched path this world is going down? These pictures are amazing and I agree that we are watching God's work in progress. Your religion of evolution is ridiculous at best and can't explain why we are here or even what these pictures are. Evolution is at the very root of this world's demise.
Wow, when Father comes we'll be able to visit these places, since thiers no limit to speed in the spiritual state!!!
These revelations are just fabulous and fantastic to the readers naked eye. What a way to unlock the secrets of the universe!
MY FIRST QUISTION IS IT POSSIBLE THAT HUMAN WOULD LIVE IN ANOTHER PLANET SOME DAY , SECOND IS THERE A LIFE ON OTHER PLANETS OR GALEGXY , WHAT ABOUT UFO IS IT REAL OR JUST A WASTE OF TIME PLEASE HELP  
The DAWN of the ALPHA-LIGHT shines through the BLACKness of the OMEGA-UNIVERSE...and then there was: A NEWBORN CREATION out of the HEART and SOUL of PRISTEEN PURE OMNIVERSAL LOVE at the CRADLE of GALACTIC STARS...THE CREATOR'S CREATION REVEALED!!!
No money spent by our government is as well spent as the funds spent for space and science exploration. Sadly, there are so few career opportunities for scientists.
It's great that we have such wonderful tools to see and understand how nature works in all it's glory.  So interesting that scientists have discovered how to use lensing galaxies to improve the view.  This is all about how nature works, no silly imaginary gods needed.
"Infinity" is the term we need to remember.  Also, "relativity".  Your only smaall next to something huge.  These concepts are hard to grasp as humans but the universe has always been.  Our section of the universe is so large in our view yet so small in terms of all the other universes that have exploded into existance that we cannot see from our view point in space.  It trully never ends.
Maybe Man would take better care of his environment if there weren't so many who never fail to give credit to a non-existent deity who "watches over" our faithless exploitation of the natural world and universe.

Regardless of the factors that control our physical universe, it is beautiful.
Isn't it great what random chance has created!?  The vastness is incomprehensible.
to John Doe in San Diego,
perhaps you should re-examine what you think you know...as there is NO physical evidence to support evolution as the method of creation. all that is known is change within a species, which is actually variation, not evolution.
ever wonder why new "evolutionary discoveries" are not in textbooks? because they have been refuted. science and God are not mutually exclusive, they are connected far deeper than you imagine.
Science is nothing more than man's attempt at explaining the universe via math and physics from what they observe. It may or may not be true. It is just our best attempt at explaining what we observe and predicting what may follow. Someday another scientist will rewrite, redefine, or otherwise change what we think is true today and approximate the universe a little bit closer.

Then again, perhaps God just snapped her/his fingers. Scientists haven't proven God false, they are just approximating her/his results.
Sorry John Doe from San Diego,CA unfortunately some of us cant do away with GOD not even for a trillion fraction of a second as you have suggested.Just know tha GOD created the whole wide universe out of nothing(creatio ex nihilio).Can you please tell me John Doe which one was created first man or the sperm in man? Your answer wil resolve the hen and the egg issue.Its good that atleast most of the respondent believe that there is a Supreme Being behind all these awesome things out there.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1517008

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google