ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Seeing through invisibility

Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 6:25 PM by Alan Boyle


Duke
This demonstration shows how a cylindrical "invisibility cloak" bends microwaves
moving from left to right around a interior space, concealing the space from view.

First, scientists developed a real-life invisibility cloak. Now Chinese researchers are working on an anti-invisibility device to see through the cloak.

This may sound like a development that would concern the Romulans in a "Star Trek" episode rather than real people. But the research, published online today on the Optics Express Web site, addresses real-world concerns about the cloaking devices that are being built in labs today.

Such devices can make whatever is inside invisible to particular wavelengths, by bending light around the sheath of the "cloak." They've been compared to the magical invisibility cloak in the Harry Potter novels as well as the Romulan cloaking device on the classic "Star Trek" TV series.

The real thing, however, is much more limited than the fictional items. The cloaking device developed a couple of years ago at Duke University, for example, looks more like a slide-projector carousel and can make something seem relatively "invisible" only to a narrow band of microwaves.

Nevertheless, the work that scientists are doing with plastic-and-metal metamaterials could eventually lead to radar-evading ships, planes or submarines.

"Cloaking is an important problem, since invisibility can help survival in a hostile environment," Huanyang Chen of Shanghai Jiao Tong University said in the American Institute of Physics' report on the research.

The theoretical anti-cloak that Chen and his colleagues describe would cancel out the effect of a cloaking device by coming into contact with the inner surface of the cloaking device's refractive material.

To some extent, it's a matter of scientific one-upsmanship. The researchers say they've shown that even the best cloaking device would not be a perfectly stealthy shield, "as there exist some objects that it cannot hide." But the anti-cloak would also address a problem even Harry Potter could understand.

Any device shielded in an invisibility cloak would not be able to sense the waves being bent around it. For example, suppose you had a remote-controlled sensor sitting at the bottom of the ocean, shielded from radar or sonar by a cloak of metamaterials. Occasionally you might want to pick up on the signals in the "invisible" wavelengths, just to see what's in the area, but the cloak would block your sensor from seeing (or hearing) those signals.

That's when you would press your anti-cloak against the cloak and take a peek - just as Harry Potter might lift a corner of his invisibility cloak to look out at Lord Voldemort's minions (and hope they don't look in while he's doing it).

"With the anti-cloak, Potter can see outside if he wants to," Chen said.

Chen's colleagues in the anti-cloaking research include Xudong Luo and Hongru Ma of Shanghai Jiao Tong Univeristy as well as C.T. Chan of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

does it work on Political Candidates...just make 'em go away?
wouldn't that be swell...
I actually posted an answer an hour ago - but someone cloaked it!!
They tried it on a candidate and they were so full of misdirection the light was confused! They ended up looking like a black hole.
"as there exist some objects that it cannot hide."

SEP

Hey I think this reporter is only half a nerd.  The KLINGONS had the cloaking device on the CLASSIC Star Trek!  You're fired!

[ALAN ADDS: Sorry, Juan, but I'm old enough to have watched Classic Trek when it actually aired on NBC. The cloaking device made its first appearance (heh, heh) with the Romulans. For what it's worth, here's the Wikipedia reference:]

"In Star Trek, cloaking devices were first introduced and used by the Romulans in the Original Series episode "Balance of Terror", though the device was only referred to as "a practical invisibility screen." The invisibility came as a surprise to the crew of the USS Enterprise, who considered it only a theoretical possibility. During a later episode, "The Enterprise Incident", the term "cloaking device" was first coined by writer D.C. Fontana."

http://www.giantginkgo.com/archives/thermoptic2.jpg

guess I have to do the reaserch for you guys. Its considred thermo-optic camouflage and made science and win. above is where you can see the actual cloak.

I wish I had an invisibility cloak when I was in college. Think of the fun I could have had!
Maybe they should read Harry Potter before they use him for an analogy.....cause he CAN see through his invisibility cloak! lol Cool science though
Actually, this sounds like more of an enhancement, since the device can only work with direct contact.  That means you'd have to find the invisible object first to then plant your anti-cloaking device.  So, this is really for those inside the cloak who want to peek out now and then.  What it doesn't mention is does that "window" work both ways?  Will we see floating heads?  And lastly, when can I get one for Halloween?
It is the equvilent (almost) to eletronic counter measures (ECM) and electronic counter counter measures (ECCM).  This cloaking technology would be great for those that are studing wildlife.  
Haha!  I agree with Steve!  
i think its kinda cool about seeing through invisability sometimes on tv u can tell who i invisable becauz its easy yall are dum!!!!!!!!!
How to cloak a spacecraft: Set up an opaque screen
in front of you and one behind and project the image
of what is in front or behind onto the screen.
you can use a gas or dust cloud as the screen.
You must remain motionless inside the screen and
solar wind will disipate it. You can project a
panaramic image using multiple cameras and projectors.
Can be an outer skin attached to the craft like an
egg shell or plastic bag which would inflate in a vaccum. These days, digital cameras are very small and cheap. Hi-Def tv.
thanks Larry...but it's not working...DRAT!!!
"The cloaking device made its first appearance (heh, heh) with the Romulans."

Andthat episode was based on assorted can-and-mouse submarine engagements. The sub boys were doing 'stealth' before there was a word for it. Even radar stealth began with them, as German sub designers sought ways to keep raised periscopes from showing up on British marine radar...

Something we dreamt of all the childhood, Guess if only it could be a real thing in life. What blessing it would have been!
Was the above graphic a computer simulation?  If so, what are the dark blue areas in what I am assuming are the troughs of the incident waves and why are they not there after the object?  If these are 'real' affects then detecting these affects would tell you that a cloaked object is nearby and where it is, what it wouldn't tell you is what that object is but 'blow it up anyway!' and you solve the problem of the hidden enemy.
2smart4u,
If you bothered to look you would have noticed that both the dark blue and dark yellow dissipate as they travel in the uneffected area.  To detect the object you'd have to have multiple detectors with incredible sensativity and a controlled source of radiation.  In most scenarios involving an enemy I'm not seeing those kinds of laboratory conditions in the real world.  You'd probably have better luck closing your eyes and stumbling around feeling for it.  There's just not a significant difference.  Not like searching for subs by looking for the quiet spot in the ocean.  That works because the subs block background noise.  This redirects and reemits it.  But hey, as long as you feel smart.
they already have a complete working unit that workers well google dr z  or saferplanes . u can buy one suit for around 1300 dollars or 18000$$ if you want to hide  your hummer from infrared or visual view ..it works if anyone knows a better detection way please let me know ks i've seen them they work but can be detectected with small toy lazer or motion detecter ,upon being hit with lazer lite it will go thru bu come out as a biggg nonlazer dot , seems they cant handle intense photon power in one spot without diversifying sort of like flash lite if anyone knows a better detection technique let me know
if you can bend radio waves  then you can build one for visable light waves  they have it,it works well and cost about 1300$  see drz   thats to much info for now  if anybody finds a simple way for detection of one of these units while stealt let me know  other than with a lazer or motion detector


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1334934

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google