ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Rocket racer remade

Posted: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 1:42 PM by Alan Boyle


Mike D'Angelo / Rocket Racing League ®
Click for video: Watch the Armadillo-powered
rocket plane take off for a test flight in Oklahoma.

Less than a month after its public debut, the Rocket Racing League is putting a bigger, more powerful prototype plane through its first flight tests - and the results are so impressive that the craft's rocket engine will be adopted as the standard for another five racers, the league's chief executive officer says.

"Everything was exactly as we had drawn it out," CEO and league co-founder Granger Whitelaw reported from Burns Flat, Okla., where the second-generation plane had its first outing on Monday.

The first-generation plane, which was demonstrated at the EAA AirVenture experimental air show in Oshkosh, Wis., was equipped with a kerosene-fueled, pump-fed, 1,500-pound-thrust rocket engine provided by California-based XCOR Aerospace. In contrast, the plane being flown this week at the Oklahoma Spaceport has an alcohol-fueled, pressure-fed, 2,500-pound-thrust rocket engine from Texas-based Armadillo Aerospace.

The engine isn't the only thing that's bigger: The airframe is a modified version of the Velocity XL-5, which is wider, longer and heavier than the Velocity SE that was equipped with the XCOR engine. (One of the league's subsidiaries acquired Florida-based Velocity Aircraft earlier this year.)

If the demonstrations in Oshkosh and Burns Flat were meant as a fly-off, the Armadillo team - led by millionaire video-game programmer John Carmack - came away as the winner.

"The Armadillo engine is going to be the primary engine for the Rocket Racing League," Whitelaw told me. He said five more planes will be built using Armadillo's propulsion system, which is a spin-off from Carmack's years-long quest to win the $2 million, NASA-backed Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge.

Whitelaw said the planes will be offered to the league's six teams at a cost of $1.25 million each. The Armadillo-powered plane will be painted in the colors of the Bridenstine DKNY Rocket Racer, thus taking on the sponsorship that was announced last month.

"Now that we’ve successfully conducted a test flight with the Armadillo engine, we are looking forward to getting to racing and exhibiting a 21st-century sport for the 21st-century sports fan," Whitelaw said.

XCOR's engine, meanwhile, will be out of the running for the time being, although Whitelaw said he wouldn't rule out using that engine or others in the future if they meet the "specifications that we feel are required for safety, reliability and reusability in a racing format." He declined to discuss the details, citing requirements for confidentiality.

The Rocket Racing League had hoped to put the Armadillo-powered plane as well as the XCOR-powered plane into the air during the Oshkosh show, but the Federal Aviation Administration didn't approve the Armadillo version for exhibition. The bigger plane had to sit on the ground at the league's exhibit space, partially disassembled.

Whitelaw said the FAA's approval for research-and-development flights came just after the Oshkosh show was over, setting the stage for this week's first flights.

The tests involved roughly 10-minute flights to put the craft through its paces, at altitudes ranging up to 8,000 feet and speeds of up to 190 knots (219 mph), Whitelaw said. Test pilot Len Fox revved up the plane from zero to 92 knots (105 mph) in 8 seconds during Monday evening's first takeoff, and shaved that time down to 6.7 seconds on Tuesday, he said. Test flights continued today.

The Armadillo engine's rocket plume can be "seeded" with chemicals to add color to the nearly invisible alcohol flame. For this week's tests, saltwater was added, producing a "nice, bright, reddish-yellowish flame" that extended out more than 15 feet, Whitelaw said.

Fox was reportedly pleased with the performance. "Len never shows emotion, but we're all very happy," Whitelaw said.

Armadillo's Carmack was pleased as well.

"I am very happy with how the tests are going - the first three flights were done in the first 24 hours we had clearance and cooperating weather," he told me in an e-mail today. "We have been ready for a while, but the FAA held our R&D permit until after XCOR flew at Oshkosh, then two weeks ago we were up in Oklahoma and had rain or cloud cover all week."

Carmack noted that in addition to the test flights, the Armadillo engine has gone through about 75 test burns. Eventually he'd like to aim for an aviation record: the fastest climb to 3,000 meters (9,842 feet). The current record of 41.2 seconds was set in 1974 by former Russian cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya, and Carmack wrote that Armadillo would have to use "a slightly different engine (bigger throat, maybe more injector elements)."

Whitelaw said the current round of flight tests is aimed at providing the FAA with data that will eventually lead to the issuance of an experimental airworthiness certificate for exhibition flights. The league would need that certificate to demonstrate the Armadillo-powered plane at future air shows, such as next month's Reno Air Races. It's not yet clear whether the timing will work out for a demonstration in Reno.

"We're going to be there," Whitelaw said. "Whether we fly there depends on how we fly the test profile, and how fast the FAA moves."

Whitelaw insisted that the league was on track for a series of demo flights leading up to televised prize competitions in late 2009 or 2010. After the Oshkosh flights, four "very qualified" teams expressed interest in joining the six racing teams who have already signed up for the league, Whitelaw said. Interviews are under way.

Update for 3:45 p.m. ET: Here's a recent profile of John Carmack from Forbes (via CBC) that traces his ascent "from doom-dealer to space racer."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Kewl.  I want to put that on my Corvette!
I hope that these rocket races lead to better engine designs for low orbit space planes and other craft that could be used to go between the surface and space without the need for large rockets.
I WOULD LOVE NOTHING MORE THAN TO HEAR THAT WONDERFUL SOUND OF THE ROCKETS AND WATCH THE KIDS COVERING THEIR EARS IN EXCITMENT OVER ROCKET RACERS .COME ON ! WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR ? LET'S GO !
Why would you want to slow down your corvette with that engine? Can't you already get to a 100mph in less than seven seconds? Kawasaki sells a stock motorcyle that can do better than than, for crying out loud.
Or...instead of getting excited over a six plane field of rocket-powered homebuilts that will be flying so high up you can't see them, you could instead go to the Reno National Championship Air Races and watch over 100 planes compete in 5 different classes (homebuilts, to modified WWII fighters, to jets) on low-level pylon courses that all play out right in front of the crowd.

There will be a couple hundred thousand people at Reno to watch.  I can promise over my dead ex father in law that you'll NEVER see that kind of crowd at a Rocket Racing League event.

Just my .02
guy s newell,

The plane being pushed by the rocket is significantly heavier than TallDave's Corvette. My guess is that the rocket would push him so fast that he would quickly lose consciousness as his wheels left the ground, and he plastered himself to a tree somewhere.

This would help alleviate some traffic congestion
So true guy, but a Corvette or rice grinder can't go straight up! [...]
There are aircraft at Reno that fly faster than that with mostly stock four-cylinder Lycomings and Continentals.

Wow.  Cutting edge stuff this Rocket Racing League.
This may be moderately interesting as a step towards space. But has little to know attraction as RACING.

219 mph is slower than nearly class at the National Championship Air Races (airrace.org) and the IF1 class races on 100 hp, the Sport Biplane on 180-200hp both having speeds over 240 mph.

This entire league is a GIANT YAWN!

Wake me when they do something of interest.

Go Strega!
"I hope that these rocket races lead to better engine designs for low orbit space planes and other craft that could be used to go between the surface and space without the need for large rockets."

It's also my hope that this will encourage more rocket and spaceplane development, but what the RRL wants to do is massively less demanding than what it takes to reach orbital velocity (if that's what you mean by 'space'). Doing that, with any kind of chemical propulsion, means a large rocket. No two ways about it.

But then, wide-bodied airliners are 'large' airplanes that operate commercially every day. Don't let size alone intimidate you...

Hey, gota question.  If it is karosene or alcohol fuled how is the oxygen introduced for combustion ?  Doesn't really sound like a true rocket.

[ALAN ADDS: OK, I left out references to the oxidizer. Liquid oxygen is the oxidizer for the XCOR as well as the Armadillo engine.]

Neither your corvette or your kawasaki can leave the ground... it depends on the kind of rush you want to experience
"Kawasaki sells a stock motorcyle that can do better than than, for crying out loud".

And even my BMW does 0 - 60 in 4 seconds and 0 - 100 in 10.

But a rocket will give you the same acceleration (in a vacuum) on the 2nd 100 mph -- or the 3rd, 4th etc.  There's no changing up into a higher gear that gives less acceleration.  It's the same all the way until you run out of fuel -- in fact they get stronger as the fuel load burns down.
Yeah, doing some "back of the envelope" calculations, the 0-100 mph acceleration in 6.2 seconds is only 0.7 G's.  In other words, if it were to try and launch vertically it wouldn't even make it off the ground.  Sort of ironic.

On the other hand, and in direct contrast to vehicles with an internal combustion engine, the rocket will actually accelerate even more in the next 6-10 seconds.  The only reason for a "top speed" has to do with air resistance and drag... or running out of fuel.

This still is a kick that will throw you into the back of your seat and will have these vehicles have performance envelopes similar to fighter jets rather than conventional aircraft.  It still should give one heck of a good show for those who might want to see this league race... especially if six to ten teams are all competing at the same time.

Putting one of these into a 'vette would IMHO give it a bit bigger of a kick than even this, although you would have to figure out where to put the fuel tanks to power this sort of rocket engine.  It might also make you a candidate for a Darwin Award if you went airborne as well.
The image looks like some creature trying to get away...wings flared, legs tucked back, neck extended...arching forward in a great leap...escaping.
That pink thing is going to really hurt if it catches up.
Smiling....Gentlemen,the last flight today was 0-100 in about 4.5 seconds and it does not slow down from there. The engine could easily do 1,200 MPH, it just would not be doing it with wings any longer :)

The point of racing is NOT always top speed, it is entertainment and competetion between athletes and their machines they craft and run.

I ASSURE you..you will see these AT Reno, Mike Houghton ( CEO of Reno )is on the Board of Advisor at Rocket Racing and he loves it, as do most Air Race fans. And mark my words, the crowds will be secnd to none in size when they race live around the World.

It is the most dynamic, interactive sport the World has ever seen. The integration of technologies, live flight and synchronization will satnd alone.

Relax, there is room for MUCH more air racing and aviation needs it,so besupportive and welcoming, it will benefit everyone across the Board.

And yes, on the Corvette it would be a kick in the pants...Ifyou have the guts to hold on.
From Len Fox, the navy test pilot for the program:  On takeoff "Its faster than an F-18 on afterburner.  But it is not as fast as a catapult launch.".
Read the story again, folks....that's a TEST speed of 219.  Nowhere does it say anything about racing speed or top speed.  Back in the 70's at the California races at Mojave, they started racing old f-86s, Shooting Stars and f-89s around a 5 mile triangle pylon course.  They were doing well into the 300's and some 400's, about 200 feet off the ground.  It was impressive the one time I saw it.
I was at osh kosh ithis year and saw the xcor rocketplane several times and saw the other planes race there too.  That plane was not so high you couldn't see it and the rockets will be turned on and off as they go.  So definitely real skill involved in the race.  If you had seen this plane you would not be talking like this.  And it made a vertical climb that was just awesome and the noise was great too.  See it, you will change your tune.
To bad we couldn't put some of this technology into a car engine that gets better milage! We are losing site of our priorities.
Speaking with a friend who was born in the 1930's he says "that when they first saw aircraft without propellers they were worried" ... now we're talking about rockets.

Maybe someone should buy a British Electric Lightening and try racing that for a laugh - 0 to mach 2+ in less than 90 seconds (wheels-up nose-up bang bang !!) - certainly beats an F-18 (Sorry guys & gals)

We've come a long way since John Stringfellow first flew his steam powered aircraft in 1848
"The plane being pushed by the rocket is significantly heavier than TallDave's Corvette."

Actually, no, it's not. The suggested max gross weight of an unmodified Velocity XL is ~2900lbs (empty weight is ~1800lbs), while the curb weight of a typical Corvette is ~3000lbs. The rocket-propelled Velocity with full propellant load is actually in the ballpark weight-wise with a Corvette.

Come on people, think before you write.

1. This was the FIRST flight of this plane/rocket combination - its a prototype. You don't give it full heater on a TEST flight.

2. Armadillo aerospace made the engine - they are a rocket company planning sub-orbital then orbital launches - check out their website. RRL stuff is a sideline to get some cash in (and have fun!)

3. There are manu sorts of racing - just because its not the fastest, it shouldnt be discounted. LMP cars are faster than Nascar which are faster than Clubmans etc, but all have audiences, all are good to watch.


I, too, was impressed by the rocket racer at Oshkosh, and I was more impressed by the F-22, the F-18 and the V-22, which cost a whole lot more.  I, too, am worried about hearing loss for the millions of spectators, and I think the F-22 is louder than any near term rocket plane in most of the audible range.  The Rocket Racing League is putting on a show for very little money, and that could lead to something GREAT!!.  As for vertical climb rates, try the cable launch Sling Shot, which takes ordinary people from 0 to 100 mph,  200 ft straight up in less than one sec for only $50.  The initial acceleration may be close to 6 g's but that drops off rapidly after the first 100 milliseconds.  Carrier aircraft get off horizontal below 3 g's, which is still a kick in the pants.
Wow -- I'm really surprised that Armadillo has surpassed XCOR in this instance.  XCOR has been building liquid-fueled rocket engines for years; that's all they do, and they do it extremely well.  They haven't had a hard start or other failure in years.  Armadillo, much as I love 'em, are comparative amateurs.

But I guess that's what the market system is about -- if the amateurs have a better product, then that product wins.  Still, it makes me a little nervous... it could be a big setback for the industry if somebody buys the farm.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1295499

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google