ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Family portrait of the stars

Posted: Friday, August 22, 2008 6:22 PM by Alan Boyle

The team behind NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope is celebrating the orbiting observatory's fifth birthday with a glittering, multigenerational picture of a star-forming region.


CfA / NASA / JPL-Caltech
Stars young and old glitter in the Spitzer Space Telescope's latest infrared view of the W5 star-forming region. Click on the image for a larger version.

The new infrared view of the W5 region in the constellation Cassiopeia was unveiled today at Los Angeles' Griffith Observatory as part of a celebration marking five years since Spitzer's launch in 2003. The view takes in an area of the sky equivalent to four full moons, 6,500 light-years from Earth, in one of our Milky Way's most picturesque stellar nurseries.

Three years ago, an earlier Spitzer picture of WB was hailed as showing the "Mountains of Creation," a vista of dust, gas and stars on a par with Hubble's "Pillars of Creation." The latest picture offers a wider view - and shows how one generation of massive stars gives rise to the next. That's something astronomers have been trying to pin down for years.

"Triggered star formation continues to be very hard to prove. But our preliminary analysis shows that the phenomenon can explain the multiple generations of stars seen in the W5 region," Xavier Koenig of the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics said in a news release issued jointly by the center, NASA and the Spitzer Science Center at Caltech.

Koenig is the lead author of a paper about the findings that has been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal. The idea is that when a star-forming region of gas and dust kicks into high gear, the most massive stars are formed first in the region's core. Such stars range from 15 to 60 times the mass of our sun, scientists say.

Some of that stellar material flies off in radiation-driven gusts of cosmic wind, carving out cavities around the stars and compressing the gas and dust along the rims of those cavities. That squeezes out the next generation of stars - and the process continues, moving out from the star-forming core.

The result should be a radial "family tree," with the oldest stars in the center, and progressively younger stars farther out, astronomers say.

Two hollow cavities are on display in today's wide-angle photo. The blue dots are older, more massive stars, and the pink and white dots represent younger stars shrouded in the "Mountains of Creation."

Spitzer takes its pictures in infrared wavelengths, which makes the space telescope a better choice than Hubble for peering through the dust surrounding the stars. Koenig and his colleagues made age estimates for the stars in the cavities as well as the stars on the edges - and found that the pattern matched what would be expected for a radial family tree.

"Our first look at this region suggests we are looking at one or two generations of stars that were triggered by the massive stars," Lori Allen of the Center for Astrophysics said in the news release. "We plan to follow up with even more detailed measurements of the stars' ages to see if there is a distinct time gap between the stars just inside and outside the rim."

The march of the stellar generations is expected to continue for millions of years. But when the central massive stars blow apart, they're likely to kill some of their children as well - a violent turn in a family drama that's more star-studded than "The Sopranos."

For more stunners from Spitzer, feast your eyes on the space telescope's first science images, as well as this colorful view of our galaxy's dusty core and a look at the faraway Fireworks Galaxy.

In addition to Koenig and Allen, authors of the upcoming Astrophysical Journal paper include Smith College's Robert Gutermuth, the University of Exeter's Chris Brunt, the University of Arizona's James Muzerolle and the Center for Astrophysics' Joseph Hora.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Just a question,
Are you saying the picture we’re looking at is basically eight thousand miles across and 6.5 light years away?

[ALAN ADDS: No, it's 6,500 light-years away, and the apparent area of the sky taken in by W5 is roughly equivalent to four full moons, or about a degree wide. W5 is an estimated 50 to 75 light-years across. The reference to the full moon's area relates to angular diameter rather than the actual diameter if you were to take a ruler. Sorry about any confusion over that.]

A truly breathtaking picture. I find it hard to wrap my mind around the shear size of these gas clouds. We have so much left to discover out there. What are we waiting for. Fund your local researcher.
What a majestic view!  Thanks for showing us an excellent example of taxpayer money well spent!  We are truly fortunate to be living in the Golden Age of Astronomy and to witness these marvelous discoveries which expand our knowledge of the universe and how it works.
  Why can't sun light be DARK MATTER ? Part of sun light is photon,it can pass through a solid and still shine such as glass,but it still passes throught a piece black glass and not shine,but it still there. You can not see it or feel it but it there.This has been going on since the begining,and still go on today.their must be a massive build up and I belive this is dark matter.I would like some feed back on this.  Thank you  Nealon
T
My mistake. I caught the 6.5 error about three seconds too late. Not sure why the four moon thing didn’t click in until I read your comments. It seems pretty clear after I re-read it.
Thanks
Clearly awesome and clearly indicating there is no hand of God making those stars.
The picture shows the process that ENERGY BE CONVERTED
INTO MASS? (E=mC2)
Are prints/posters of these images for sale?
Nealon,
Dark matter is way mysterious.  Many doubt there is such a thing.  It's definition can range quite a bit,too.  Regular matter that we can't see is pretty well accepted by all as dark matter, solar wind from billions and billions of stars, etc.  I'm not sure about light.  Photons are effected by gravity but I don't know that they exert a gravitational effect.  Who really knows what all comes out of a star.  There could be all kinds of stuff that we just don't know how to detect yet.  If the Higgs boson is the part of matter that contributes to mass then dark matter may just be an accumulation of Higgs bosons that didn't have enough other elemental particles to form matter.  The sugar that's left over after you've made all the cake batter you can make.  I'm pretty sure that the stuff that streams from all stars, including ours, contributes to dark matter.  Whether or not that stuff includes light I can't say.  It's a gravity thing and let me be the first to say, I don't understand gravity.
Why can't sun light be DARK MATTER

Nealon,
Sunlight can't be dark matter because photons do not have mass.  They certainly do exhibit some of the characteristics of dark matter and after over 13 billion years there sure should be a lot of them.  They travel at the speed of light because they have no mass.  I think the photons would be more likely to be the dark energy the scientists talk about but once again they have no mass so when they bump into things they really don't affect those solid objects.  A really interesting question as to what exactly is dark matter and dark energy since those two things compromise the vast majority of the universe and we can see their effects even though we can't see them directly.  Hopefully soon the scientists will be able to discover exactly what dark matter and dark energy consist of.  Meanwhile it sure is fun trying to figure it out.
it is a wonder..all things in basic like molecules and atomes..seems simple..but what GOD create is marvelous..coz putting all effects and nature makes what we saw on this..well give us always ur news about this invisibles & keep up the very good work..thanks
If Dark energy turns out to be related to light energy, or some undetected radiant frequency of a star, then gravity could also be formulated into the equation since light and gravity often show up at the same place and same time. Perhaps similar to the poles on a magnet.  
Hot damn! That picture just fries my taters! I was kinda hopin for a picture of Angelina Jolie, though, when I read, "Family Portrait of the Stars." Ah, heck. Them scientists make some pretty nice pictures with their space telescopes, too. I guess, in a sense, it is kinda like our own family portraits, though, ain't it? We is all just stardust, anyhow, ain't we?
Dude, far out! That like totally takes me back to the 60's. I am like totally having a major LSD flashback right now. Whoa, dude! I am in like totally harmonious synchronicity with the music of the spheres now. Groovy! Oneness with the cosmos! Whooeee! Here I go!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1284684

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google