ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



How stars get stolen

Posted: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 5:28 PM by Alan Boyle


E. Peng / Peking U. / NASA / ESA
These are just eight of the 100 galaxies observed in detail by the Hubble Space
Telescope as part of a survey to determine where globular star clusters are
concentrated. Click on the image to see all 100 galaxies.

Gobs of observations from the Hubble Space Telescope suggest that big galaxies steal globular star clusters from little ones, using gravity to pull off the heist.

The findings come from Hubble's survey of more than 11,000 globular clusters in 100 galaxies of various sizes and shapes. All those galaxies are contained in the Virgo Cluster, an assemblage of about 2,000 galaxies that is a mere 54 million light-years from our own Milky Way. From that distance, Hubble was able to pick out the star clusters even in dim dwarf galaxies.

The point behind the statistical survey was to figure out what factors influenced the creation of globular clusters, which contain some of the universe's oldest stars. In the July 1 issue of The Astrophysical Journal, researchers report that the clusters were concentrated toward the galaxy cluster's center.

"Our study shows that the efficiency of star cluster formation depends on the environment," Patrick Cote of Canada's Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics said in today's Hubble image advisory. "Dwarf galaxies closest to Virgo's crowded center contained more globular clusters than those farther away."

That fits with previous findings that M87, a giant elliptical galaxy at the center of the cluster, contains much more globulars than astronomers would have predicted. Starbirth is more active toward the center of the galaxy cluster, most likely because of gravity.

"Star formation near the core of Virgo is very intense and occurs in a small volume over a short amount of time," said Eric Peng of Beijing's Peking University, the Hubble study's lead author. "It may be more rapid and more efficient than star formation in the outskirts. The high star-formation rate may be driven by the gravitational collapse of dark matter, an invisible form of matter, which is denser and collapses sooner near the cluster's center."

M87 sits at the center of a large concentration of dark matter, Peng noted, and that may have given rise to bigger globular star clusters during the early universe. In contrast, outlying galaxies didn't face as much gravitational pressure - and as a result gave rise to smaller star clusters that dissipated over time, he said.


NASA / ESA / CXC / CFA / NRAO / STScI
This composite image shows the galaxy M87 in
visible light as well as X-rays (blue) and radio emissions (red). The emissions are thought to emanate from a black hole at the galaxy's center.

After the galaxies were created, gravity apparently played another role in boosting M87's stellar riches. There's evidence that the big galaxy snatched star clusters from smaller galaxies that ventured too close, Peng said.

"We found few or no globular clusters in galaxies within 130,000 light-years from M87, suggesting the giant galaxy stripped the smaller ones of their star clusters," Peng said. "These smaller galaxies are contributing to the buildup of M87."

Peng said a sizable proportion of M87's globular star clusters may be stolen goods.

"In M87 there are three times as many globulars deficient in heavy elements, such as iron, than globulars rich in those elements," he said. "This suggests that many of these 'metal-poor' star clusters may have been stolen from nearby dwarf galaxies, which also contain globulars deficient in heavy elements."

You can steal a peek at the galaxies that Hubble surveyed at the Space Telescope Science Institute's HubbleSite as well as the European Space Agency's Hubble home page. There's even a zoomable image showing all 100 galaxies. Meanwhile, the Chandra X-Ray Observatory's Web site has a spooky composite image of the galaxy M87. 

For still more views of galaxies and other cosmic glories, check out the latest installment of our Month in Space gallery. Every time we put up a new installment, people ask where they can find larger versions suitable for printing out or putting on a computer desktop. Click on the titles to find more pictures:

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Wow, Impressive
A wonderful collection of photos!  Thank you.
I would like to be able to see this a whole lot closer.  That wouldn't happen unless I was in a starship.  Oh, to have science fiction be real!
It's wild that they mention distances like 130k light years being able to strip away a star cluster from smaller galaxies. Being a novice to all of the mechanics of space this sounds like it would fall under the conditions of a Hill Sphere as far as who wins ownership of these objects. Is that correct or is there a better explination for this?
How does M87 steal the clusters without disrupting the smaller galaxies themselves?
Message to the astrophysicists and space journalists out there:

Can you guys PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE take a closer look at what's being said by the Thunderbolts group?  They've presented a compelling case for a *completely* different paradigm which does not require the invocation of particles (like dark matter) that have never before been directly observed.  I've followed them for the past several years and they've responded to every single criticism thrown at them.  Their theory is based significantly upon the work of Kristian Birkeland, who is renowned as the world's first laboratory space scientist.  We can understand what we're seeing in space in plasma laboratories -- and that's exactly what Birkeland did.

Every day that goes by where we as a society are not taking a closer look at the less popular interpretations for astrophysical observations will be another day of assumption-laden speculation, confusing observations and a theory of everything that does not meet up the big and the small.  Plasma-based cosmologies are the way of the future.  Space is, after all, completely filled with charged particles.  Charged particles respond far more to electromagnetism than gravity.  The idea that gravity is the main character in this thing is an act of blind faith.  Who amongst the astrophysical community has taken the time to actually listen to the alternative plasma-based paradigm?  It's clear to me that we define our preferences largely on the basis of how we define our reading selection.  If the best that the astrophysicists can do is to invoke never-before-witnessed particles, then surely the plasma-based theories deserve far more attention than they are getting ...

http://www.thunderbolts.info
new discoveries are being made all the time
 What is the question here? There doesn't seem to be
anything to write about. How about this...?
The fact that we can still see M87 tells us that its central black hole is still small and likely growing.
Should M87 wink out in the near future might we assume
that its central black hole had achieved a mass equal
to that of the whole galaxy, and swallowed it.
Replies are invited!
I am always facinated by composite photos like M87 depicting X-Ray emission. The implication of the energies and power source that it represents are hard to fathom. I presume that charged particles are streaming out at near light speed and colliding with gas that follows some polarity axis from the central region thereby emitting x-rays and radio frequencies because xrays and radio emissions are just a form of EM radiation like visible light.  That photograph indicates some axis.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1248082

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google