ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Bye-bye, Baby Red Spot

Posted: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:36 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / NMSU / JPL
These pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope show the passage of Red Spot Jr.
and Baby Red Spot in a band of clouds below the Great Red Spot. Junior (the two-
toned spot at the very bottom) survived unscathed, but Baby (indicated by the
arrow at far right) wasn't so lucky. Click on the image for a larger version.

Back in May, the scientists behind the Hubble Space Telescope announced the birth of a bouncing Baby Red Spot in Jupiter’s turbulent clouds. Unfortunately, some creatures eat their young: The latest Hubble imagery reveals that the Baby Red Spot is being gobbled up by the planet’s larger and older Great Red Spot.

Baby Red's sad fate is the consequence of the complex storm patterns in Jupiter's atmosphere. The spots are actually cyclones swirling within a band of clouds. Over the past couple of months, Baby Red and a slightly older storm nicknamed Red Spot Jr. have been catching up to and passing around the Great Red Spot.

Imagery from Hubble and from ground-based telescopes revealed how the baby was caught up in the big spot's spin. "It was torn in two," Amy Simon-Miller, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, told me today.

A pale remnant of Baby Red may survive the encounter, but it's at least as likely that the shrunken spot will be pulled into the Great Red Spot's powerful blender and merely add more energy to the longer-lived storm. That's probably how the Great Red Spot has been able to hang around for hundreds of years: by gobbling up smaller storms in its path.

Junior lives on
For Simon-Miller and her Hubble team colleagues, including New Mexico State University's Nancy Chanover and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Glenn Orton, the short-lived baby was a bonus. When they requested their telescope time, their primary objective was to track Red Spot Jr.

"The little guy popping up was not known when we started doing the observations," Simon-Miller said.

Unlike Baby, Red Spot Jr. appears to be a survivor: It was formed several years ago by the merger of three smaller, white-colored storms, and earned its nickname in 2006 by turning from white to red. So far, Junior has steered clear its bigger rival, and Simon-Miller thinks it will hold its own in Jupiter's atmospheric clash.

"The Great Red Spot's never going to eat it," she said.

Why a Red Spot?
One big question remains: Exactly what makes the Red Spots red? The prevailing view is that some sort of reddish material containing sulfur, phosphorus or hydrocarbons is churned up by a change in atmospheric dynamics. Scientists even know there are differences between the Great Red Spot and Junior - but they haven't yet identified the mechanism or the material.

Simon-Miller said Hubble could check the chemical signature of the cloud tops in Jupiter's chilly, hydrogen-rich atmosphere. However, there's nothing on Earth to compare it to. "We have to have a lab space on Earth that can measure things at the same temperature and pressure," she said.

As a result, the life and death of a storm on Jupiter is still a mysterious thing. Baby Red, we hardly knew ye.

Update for 4:40 p.m. ET July 18: It looks like a bit of Baby Red may live on, Daniel Fischer notes in the latest edition of The Cosmic Mirror. Amateur observations, made after the Hubble images were captured, appear to show a remnant of the little spot on the other side of the Great Red Spot. In a comment below, Fischer maintains that the reports of the Baby Red Spot's death are premature.

For different perspectives on Jupiter and the Great Red Spot, check out our "Jewels of Jupiter" slide show as well as recent views from NASA's New Horizons probe.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

All kidding aside, the severe weather on Jupiter probably is due to global warming.  Not our globe, of course.  Jupiter puts out a lot more heat than it receives.  By all rights it should be almost completely frozen.  This implies a large metalic core.  Or maybe the threshold for fusion is lower than you'd think.  Any way it happens, the excess heat is what fuels the turbidity.  Perhaps it's just a look ahead for us, albeit on a larger scale.
Although the article seems to add human feelings to the topic of the matter, it is fine with me. The main point of what is happening is getting across. And, also, we must remember that not everyone who reads these articles are scientists. So I'm sure people who would find it complicated or "boring" to read on would most likely appreciate the article, my opinion. Regardless, I can see who others who prefer it bein formal and factual may get annoyed by the deliverance, so all I can say to that is... THAT SUX FOR YOU. There are several other sites you can get more factual details about this same topic. As for me, I will keep reading these articles because I just like to update myself with news.. simply :)
A little off topic, but I'm just curious. I read some time ago that Jupiter is theorized to have a core made of metalic hydrogen. Any new information on that?
Just wanna say that all there is to offer here about astronomy is what I'm looking for when I look up astronomy. The hubble will soon be out and the new advanced telescope sure will bring us more pics that are unseen by hubble.Very interesting stuff here.
Cool.
@ liz ur: You sound like the borg. "irrelevant." Its a storm, storms have no feelings. STUDY AND MOVE ON. However i agree its a science fact it has no feelings. Trust me before this earth perishes there will be way more interesting things to discover.
Bill Evans:
I was born in 1956, and by that time, WWII was over already for 10 years. I believe you've meant to say "cold war" or something else when referencing the development of a spy plane with cameras capable of reading what is in a dime.
But yeah, fantastic technology, so imagine what an instrument designed 50 years later can do on space, where we don't have the blur of the atmosphere.
It's too bad there are talks about retiring the Hubblebecause of maintenace costs, even before something better is put in place.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1204456

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google