ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The sights and sounds of space

Posted: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:54 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / JPL-Caltech / UA / IA-Cambridge / SINGS team
The Fireworks Galaxy, also known as NGC 6946, blazes in an infrared image
captured by NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope. This image has been reoriented to
maximize the view. Click on it to see even larger versions from the Spitzer team.

Have you ever heard an aurora? Or a black hole? Have you ever filled your screen with the fireworks of the final frontier? Help yourself to the biggest pictures and the coolest sounds from space.

Where to begin? This week, the scientists behind NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope put out a new view of the Fireworks Galaxy, a dazzling spiral about 17 million light-years away in the constellation Cepheus.

The Fireworks Galaxy isn't being featured just because it's getting close to the Fourth of July: Astronomers took a close look at the scene to figure out whether a supernova first spotted earlier this year was really a supernova after all. Their conclusion, slated for publication in the July 1 issue of the Astrophysical Journal Letters, was that the outburst may have been a new type of explosion for dusty, massive stars.

For a different kind of celestial crack-up, check out the Gemini Observatory's picture of a collision between two nearly identical spiral galaxies in the constellation Virgo, 90 million light-years from Earth. Astronomers have charted the gravitational interaction between NGC 5426 and NGC 5427, and say the galactic dance may serve as a preview of our own Milky Way galaxy's encounter with the neighboring Andromeda Galaxy billions of years from now.

Such collisions are thought to end up creating fuzzy elliptical galaxies - and that fuzzy prediction goes for the NGC 5426-27 pairing as well as the future "Milkomeda" crash.

In space, no one can hear a galaxy crash. But here on Earth, astronomers can turn cosmic emanations into alien-sounding audio. The latest example is the European Space Agency's rendition of Earth's chirping aurora. The ESA's Cluster satellite constellation recorded radio emissions from the aurora, and astronomers translated those readings into an audio track that sounds like birds twittering.

Astronomers have used similar wavelength-translation tricks to produce spooky audio from electric field noise around Saturn, radio waves detected near Jupiter, radar pings from meteor showers and even X-ray emissions from a black hole.

For more elegant sights and sounds, you should check out the GLAST Prelude for Brass Quintet, Op. 12. The piece was composed by Nolan Gasser to mark this month's launch of NASA's Gamma-Ray Large Area Space Telescope (a.k.a. GLAST) - and will serve as the prelude for a large-scale multimedia symphony titled "Cosmic Reflections."

"Cosmic Reflections" will use music, narration and film to trace the entire 13.7 billion-year history of the universe, and celebrate GLAST's role in unraveling that history. The tone poem is due for its premiere at Washington's Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in the fall of 2009, according to the composer's Web site.

Some of the world's best cosmic compositions can be found in our own Space Gallery, which currently features the latest installment of our "Month in Space" slide show. Every time we put out a fresh batch of pictures, some folks want to know where they can get bigger versions of the images for their photo-quality printouts and computer desktops. With that in mind, we offer these links to more information and bigger digital files:

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Last month, The Boston Globe began a feature called "The Big Picture" - and some of its subjects have featured the glories of space. Here are some of the Big Pictures:

"Cassini Nears Four-Year Mark" (congrats to the Cassini team on the end of their primary mission and the beginning of the extended mission, by the way)

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/
2008/05/cassini_nears_fouryear_mark.html


"The Sky, From Above"
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/
2008/06/the_sky_from_above.html


"Martian Skies"
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2008/06/martian_skies.html

And if we're talking about big pictures on Earth, you shouldn't miss out on msnbc.com's popular offerings:

PhotoBlog
http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/

The Week in Pictures
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3842331/
So what do we wind up with?  A pulsar keeping time - must be the drummer, a black hole laying down a killer bass line, the aurora as brass, Jupiter and Saturn on strings?  Kind of a jazzy little ensemble.  I'll bet they over use syncopation.
Sights and sounds of space? I was taught in 6th grade elementary school in the USA, 56 years ago, that sound waves don't travel through the vacuum of space. Has something changed?
That galaxy appeares to be in our line of sight and tilted at 90 degrees. I wonder why we see no gravitational lensing. It seems to me there should be
with such a large gravitational structure.
Phil,

Did they teach you how a film projector worked?  In the earliest days of movies, silent pictures, there was no sound track, music was played in the theater that matched and interpereted the action on screen.  That left a lot of control out of the hands of Hollywood.  Several attempts were made to add a soundtrack to the film.  The one that finally struck used a strip on the side of the film, next to the picture part.  By varying the amount of light going through this strip they were able to use a detector hooked up to an amplifier hooked up to speakers and soon the "talkies" were born.  If you can follow that I assume you can see how we can take any varying signal and convert it to a sound signal.  Visual light, x-rays, radio frequency emissions,gamma radiation, gravity pulses, subspace interference, ...
Thanks for that explanation, Tim. I was wondering along the same lines as Phil.
Any idea why the arms have those big holes in them?  Is that from huge super novae?  I haven't seen this look before.  Do all galaxies look like this with the right color enchancements?
Thomas Ashby,

Lensing like that requires pretty exacting alignment and objects that are bright enough.  There might be a ring there that's just so dim we can't see it, it might be coming through in the arms.  I'm not sure of the relative distances involved and the system may work like a more conventional lens, we may not be at the focal point.  That being the case then for any large mass out there we get a ring that shows us what is at a specific distance behind the mass.  In most cases we'd be focused on nothing, and we might not even notice that ring.
Ok Tim..that makes sense. Of course, not even at a focal point. So it's just luck that we get to see any lensing systems at all as from the Virgo cluster for instance.
After a little more thought ...  If the gravitaional pull of a galaxy is able to bend the path of light, let's say 2 degrees from it's original path, and at it's distance the light from another galaxy is diverging at 3 degrees, 1.5 + 1.5, to pass the lensing galaxy on either side, or rather all around then:
All of the light that would have passed the galaxy at this given distance, per the 4 degree spread, would be bent 2 degrees such that the light would be converging again at a 1/2 degree angle.  It would come to a focus at 3 times the distance between the two galaxies.  I think that's where we'd see the best Einstein ring.  If it were farther out, such that it's dispersion angle were 2 degrees, 1 + 1 off straight line, then the point at which it came back to focus would be equal to the distance between the galaxies.  So every light source probably casts an Einstein ring around every gravity concentration which is visible as long as you are in the right line.  The quality of the ring probaly depends on what angle of dispersion focuses where you are.  In the first example, if we were closer than 3 times the distance, say 2 times the distance, then light from a tighter cone should focus where we are.  This would work until the cone were so small it no longer opened wider than the structure producing the gravity. Conversely, a light source too close to the gravity would have to cast a more obtuse cone to get around and a two degree change from an 80 degree angle would not converge.  My "2 degree" angle of change would vary with the point of closest approach to the lens.  That would give a sweet spot for Einstein rings.  The Goldilocks distance.  I've heard that term before about planetary distance from a star for life, I don't know if I've heard it about this.

But still, with all the stuff out beyond what we can see you'd expect more rings.  It's like looking at the beach and wondering how many grains of sand line up perfectly with your eye.  Maybe they're just too faint.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1172849

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google