ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Private space age turns 4

Posted: Friday, June 20, 2008 4:42 PM by Alan Boyle


NBC News
Pilot Mike Melvill flashes thumbs-up after flying SpaceShipOne
above the 62-mile boundary of outer space on June 21, 2004.

This weekend marks four years since Burt Rutan and his team at Scaled Composites ushered in the age of privately developed spaceflight with the SpaceShipOne rocket plane. But don't expect a big celebration: Rutan told me he's been so busy ushering in the next stage of the spaceflight age that he forgot about the anniversary . . . until I reminded him.

"We are so focused on SpaceShipTwo development here, with a lot of new engineers and technicians, that we tend to forget our accomplishments of 2004," the aerospace designer wrote in an e-mail from his headquarters in Mojave, Calif. "I can say that the SpaceShipOne program for [software billionaire] Paul Allen was the most challenging and most rewarding program I have done.

"It is likely that we may never accomplish that great a challenge with so few people again," he said. "Looking back, it makes us all very proud."

The four years since June 21, 2004, underline just how unpredictable frontiers can be. Many of the things that were predicted have not come to pass: Back then, it seemed as if the first suborbital space tourists might be climbing aboard Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo within two years after SpaceShipOne's historic test flight. Today, that milestone still looks as if it's two years away.

The unpredictability doesn't apply merely to the people at Virgin Galactic and Scaled Composites - who will be running into the much more tragic first anniversary of a fatal accident next month. As I pointed out a year ago, the two-year rule applies to virtually every player in the private space race. (A quick look back at my stories about Rocketplane Global and PlanetSpace confirms how tricky the prediction business can get.)

Eric Anderson, the chief executive officer of Space Adventures, referred to the fudginess of forecasts last week. He recalled that his company was founded 10 years ago with the expectation that suborbital space tours would be routine by now.

"The funny thing about predictions is that sometimes it ends up being a lot better than you thought, but not in the way you might have thought," he said.

If you're looking for the "better" half of the spaceflight revolution, four years after its start, you'd be best advised to look at the low end and the high end of the scale, rather than the middle-range suborbital challenge. Arguably, things have turned out better than expected for semi-space experiences and the full orbital treatment:

Semi-space: In the past four years, the availability of commercial zero-gravity airplane flights in the United States has gone from "can't be done" to coast-to-coast. (Sure, NASA was doing it for years before that, but not on a commercial basis.) The zero-G clientele includes high-profile fliers ranging from physicist Stephen Hawking to domestic diva Martha Stewart. Now tourists are paying $4,000 each for a taste of weightlessness, and even NASA is a client.

The Rocket Racing League is making progress toward its first demonstration race in August - and if that venture's business plan pans out, legions of spectators will be exposed to the roar of a "NASCAR in the sky." XCOR Aerospace plans to parlay its work with the Rocket Racing League into its years-long effort to build a rocket plane capable of taking paying passengers to the 37-mile mark - and eventually beyond the 62-mile internationally recognized boundary of outer space.

The full orbital: The Russian space program has been very, very good to Space Adventures. Moscow has sent three of the company's millionaire clients to the space station in the past four years. The next millionaire, video-game guru Richard Garriott, is due to go to the station in October for an estimated fare of $35 million. This part of the business is a big factor behind Space Adventures' reported profitablility - and the company is working with the Russians to get more high-rolling clients (such as Google co-founder Sergey Brin) into orbit in 2011 and beyond.

NASA is trying to help jump-start commercial orbital spaceflight through its $500 million Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program. Although Rocketplane's deal with NASA fizzled out, SpaceX and Orbital Sciences are still working to develop private-sector rocketships capable of servicing the international space station. SpaceX is gearing up for a key launch of its Falcon 1 rocket that could come as early as this month.

Meanwhile, Bigelow Aerospace has two functioning modules in orbit and is working on what could be considered the first private-sector space station - assuming that the company finds an affordable method for transporting crew and cargo.

The dates most often mentioned as key for Bigelow, SpaceX and Orbital Sciences are 2010 and 2011 - which proves that the two-year rule is in force for orbital as well as suborbital spaceflight.

Will Rutan and his team be flying SpaceShipTwo by that time? Will they even be turning their eyes toward orbital flight by then? Although Rutan will be rolling out SpaceShipTwo's mothership for display on July 28, he won't play the prediction game - and you won't hear him invoke the two-year rule. We'll just have to stay tuned.

"We cannot comment on what is ahead, beyond what you can find with a Google search," he told me. "In general, we are mute on new programs until they are ready for flight testing."

Check out this posting for more SpaceShipOne tales.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Except for the pic of Melville, and SS1 related info, you could have dragged out some Popular Science/Mechanics piece from 1957, changed a few of the company names, and gone with it.
Let me know when the Rocketeers have had their fill.
Then we can make predictions which will actually come true "in our lifetimes".
I guess falling into space, propelled by compressed air is still too far out for today's envisioneers.
DRAT!!!
We may have been spoiled by the IT revolution into believing in impractical timetables for development.  A computer program can crash and be terminated any number of times without much harm - all it has to do is work enough not to drive the user insane.  A spaceship, however, is most assuredly *not* allowed to crash.  So imagine how long it would take to develop a  highly complex computer program if fatal errors were not an option at any point from beta-testing onward.  I can easily see that taking 5 or 6 years.  

Of course, things would move a lot faster if we were less scrupulous about human life, but unfortunately we always seem to care the most about that when it's most important to care less (in conquering space), and care the least when it's most important that we care more (in relating to other countries on Earth).  A business has little choice in the matter, since it depeneds on consumer confidence, but if our government were willing to throw away lives opening space to mankind the way they throw away lives to conquer and oppress defenseless countries, we would already be out there in style.
Americans in Orbit-50 Years Inc., a non-profit organization, plans to orbit two astrounauts in Feb. 2012.
"...you could have dragged out some Popular Science/Mechanics piece from 1957, changed a few of the company names, and gone with it."

  Except that today's companies have actually cut metal and *flown* stuff, with more stuff (Falcon, SS2, Lynx, Genesis) actually under construction. Tey have, if nothing else, passed the 'Missouri' test.

  Where are those 1957 guys?

Frank...they are holding onto the last vestiges of NASA...don'tcha think?
"plans to orbit"
"making progress toward"
"NASA is trying to"
"busy ushering in the next stage"
"working on what could be considered"
"space tourists might be"

read that for decades

maybe someone might start trying to working on what could be considered some progress on ushering the next stage of trying to eventually waking me up
when there is

real news
There are four highly credible firms with significant hardware, three of which have already reached space - Virgin Galactic (via Scaled Composites), SpaceX, Bigelow, and XCOR.  

Virgin Galactic has a direct path because their vehicles are essentially complete - White Knight 2 unveils this summer, and SpaceShipTwo later in the year.  This means flight testing on the WK2/SS2 vehicles begins a few months afterward, probably in early 2009, and it will likely be heavily publicized with videos and images.  Barring a loss of vehicle during flight testing, or a problem fundamental to the design that needs to be reworked, commercial flight operations are virtually certain before 2011.

SpaceX has an upcoming launch of Falcon 1 in the next few weeks, and is scheduled to do a full 9-engine test fire for Falcon 9 this summer.  Falcon 9 itself meanwhile is scheduled to be delivered to Cape Canaveral before the end of 2008, and launched in 2009, so unless something significantly untoward happens in the interim there will be a Falcon 9 launch in 2009.  We'll have to see whether it succeeds or not, but there will be a launch.  

Bigelow of course depends on further developments in crew transport capability, but of course SpaceX is approaching that through its COTS vehicle Dragon, and will handle it even faster if NASA exercises the COTS D option (ISS crew transport) and provides even more money.  The beautiful part about this is that SpaceX is committed to Dragon whether or not NASA wants their services, and is fully capable of pursuing it without additional outside funding, so COTS funding can only accelerate the schedule of both Dragon and Bigelow.  With COTS D, Musk says Dragon will be available to NASA in 2010, and without it by 2012/13, so (while this is a raw guess) I have to put the FAR outside timeline for manned Bigelow modules at 2015, which should more than account for any delay in Falcon 9.  

XCOR, a company with a history of understating its capabilities, has stated that Lynx will be available on a (depressingly standard) 2-year timeframe.  We can assume they're sincere but misguided about the difficulties, since their experience is in engines and not really so much in actual vehicle design and construction.  However, they are extraordinarily  efficient, so if we credit them with the raw talent of Scaled Composites, they should complete their vehicle on a significantly shorter timeline since Lynx is much simpler, smaller, and less powerful than WK2/SS2.  The big unknown in their case is funding, which won't necessarily be easy to obtain just because they're good at what they do and are profitable.  Call it 2012.

In the message somebody mentioned "black holes."  I can promise you they are not "holes."  They are made of stones with "seven sides." A term used in the Bible.  They are the hardest objects in the universe and cannot be "seen" because they are of spirit just as God said He created us in His "own" image and likeness in Genesis 1: 27. He is a Spirit!  They cannot be seen and they have a name in the Bible.  Each one is Leviathan.  When they grow big enough they contain an entire galaxy that will be "reborn."  The universe is the ultimate recycler of all things.  Believe me or not.
wow.... you might want to remember that not everybody shares your religion.  

....aaaaand back on topic...
And....no one mentioned Black Holes in any of the foregoing. As Matt stated, not everybody shares your religion.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1158681

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google