ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Google co-founder aims for space

Posted: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:04 AM by Alan Boyle


Reuters file
Google co-founder Sergey
Brin has his eye on space.

Google co-founder Sergey Brin has put down $5 million toward a flight to the international space station with the company that has sent millionaires and even a billionaire into orbit.

Virginia-based Space Adventures announced the identity of the future space traveler as well as its vision for the next decade of space tourism at a New York news conference today.

As part of the deal, Brin paid a $5 million deposit to Space Adventures, which would secure him a spot on the future Russian Soyuz flight to the station. The price tag for such a trip has run from $20 million (or less) to $35 million (or more). Thus, if Brin goes through with the purchase, he'll be paying millions more in the years to come.

Space Adventures' co-founder and chief executive officer, Eric Anderson, said Brin could choose to fly as early as three years from now, or 2011.

He said Brin would be the first of six founding members of an "Orbital Mission Explorers Circle" who would be granted access to future flights in return for the $5 million deposit. In a follow-up phone call, Anderson told me that another would-be space traveler - whom he would not name - contacted him just minutes after today's news conference. "I spoke to the person, who just signed up for the No. 2 spot," he said.

The company reached an agreement last month with Russia's space agency to purchase a Soyuz flight exclusively for its own purposes in 2011, and that would be the first opportunity for members of the Explorers Circle to fly, Anderson said. Two spots on that flight would be available for paying passengers, with a professional Russian cosmonaut in the driver's seat.

Space Adventures' arrangement for the 2011 flight is different from how the company has handled its other multimillion-dollar trips - which involved tagging along on a regularly scheduled "taxi flight" to the station. "We will be the first company to undertake a private mission to the international space station," Anderson said.

The 34-year-old Brin, who founded Google along with Stanford schoolmate Larry Page a decade ago, was the moving force behind his company's sponsorship of the $30 million Google Lunar X Prize. That competition would reward the first teams to put a privately funded probe on the moon.

Brin and Page have long been fans of the space effort.

"I am a big believer in the exploration and commercial development of the space frontier, and am looking forward to the possibility of going into space," Space Adventures quoted Brin as saying. "Space Adventures helped open the space frontier to private citizens and thus pave the way for the personal spaceflight industry. The Orbital Mission Explorers Circle enables me to make an immediate investment while preserving the option to participate in a future spaceflight."

If he goes through with the flight, Brin could become the richest human to go into space. He ranks as the fifth-richest American on Forbes magazine's 2007 list, with an estimated net worth of $18.5 billion.

Looking back, looking ahead
Space Adventures used today's news briefing as an occasion to celebrate its 10th anniversary in the space tourism business - and look ahead to the next 10 years.

The company reached orbit in 2001 when it brokered the precedent-setting spaceflight of Dennis Tito, a California-based investment adviser whose trip to the international space station shook up NASA officials. After Tito's trip, the space agency was more accepting of Russia's millionaire spaceflight participants, all of whom were Space Adventures clients:

Its sixth orbital client, video-game guru Richard Garriott, is due to fly to the station in October. Garriott will become the first son of a NASA astronaut (Owen Garriott) to go into space himself.

Space Adventures also has a seat reserved on a Soyuz flight scheduled for next April, and Anderson said the customer for that seat would be named later this year. 

As Space Adventures' orbital successes have piled up, the company has raised its sights: In 2005, the company announced that it would offer trips around the moon, at a cost of $100 million a ticket, and in 2006 it listed a $15 million spacewalk option for its clients.

Garriott told reporters that he had been working on plans to do a spacewalk during his October trip, but "unfortunately, those have not manifested." As for the moon trips, the company hopes to fly at least one customer sometime in the next five years, said Peter Diamandis, who is a co-founder of Space Adventures as well as the founder of Zero Gravity Corp. and the chairman of the X Prize Foundation.

Although Space Adventures started out as a space tourism company, it's turned into something much more, Anderson said. "Space tourism isn't really the right word for what we do. ... This is private space exploration," he said.

The company has had its hands in suborbital and zero-gravity flight as well as orbital adventures: Just in the past couple of years, Space Adventures announced deals with the Russians to build a suborbital passenger spaceship, as well as deals with Singaporean investors and Arab sheiks to build future international spaceports.

Anderson declined to discuss how much progress has been made on the spaceship development effort, although the Russians have acknowledged that they're working on a 16-person suborbital craft. Diamandis said that Space Adventures' international expansion plans would begin with zero-gravity airplane flights in Europe, the Persian Gulf states and Asia, most likely in cooperation with partners. Actual spaceport development would come later, he said.

Space Adventures' most recent milestone came this year when it completed its acquisition of Diamandis' Zero Gravity Corp., which has emerged as the biggest commercial provider of weightlessness flights. Zero Gravity made a splash last year - and opened a new frontier for adventurers with disabilities - when it gave world-famous physicist Stephen Hawking a generous taste of zero-G.

Someday, Hawking hopes to take an even more ambitious ride on a suborbital spaceship - most likely Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo, backed by British billionaire Richard Branson. That hints at the challenges Space Adventures may encounter if the personal spaceflight revolution takes off the way the company's founders hope.

Questions for the future
Virgin Galactic has the edge in the race to offer suborbital space tourism, due to Branson's billions as well as the track record of SpaceShipTwo's design team. The list of competitors includes other companies headed by billionaires or millionaires, such as Blue Origin, Bigelow Aerospace, Armadillo Aerospace, SpaceX and PlanetSpace. Will those deep-pocketed companies give Space Adventures a run for its money - or will they end up being partners?

"We will choose to partner with one of them" sometime in the next couple of years, once suborbital spaceflights become a commercial reality, Diamandis said.

Anderson said the quoted price for a suborbital flight was about $100,000 - the same as it has been for nearly a decade. He wouldn't entirely rule out adjusting that price upward when suborbital service actually starts, but he said "we've not changed it because I do believe that's the right price point."

To date, Space Adventures' orbital business has been the most lucrative part of the operation. But that business has depended on the Russians' sale of surplus seats on their Soyuz craft heading to the international space station. If the space shuttle fleet is retired as scheduled in 2010, the requirements for transporting crew members to and from the station could wipe out that surplus.

The arrangement announced today indicates that Space Adventures might find itself bidding against NASA (or other space agencies) for future seats on the Russian Soyuz craft. What will that do to the company's business model - and its currently cordial relationship with NASA?

If the Russians can ramp up production to deliver five Soyuz craft a year, that would probably accommodate NASA's requirements as well as Space Adventures' needs, NBC News space analyst James Oberg told me. But the last two Soyuz descents from the space station have been rockier than expected, and space officials are looking into whether the increased production has led to lapses in quality control.

"My concern is that the Russians are right now struggling to double the production rate, from two to four Soyuzes a year," Oberg said. "If the indications hold that these problems are fabrication oversights, then the idea of producing even four Soyuzes a year is problematic. On the other hand, it's a problem that must be solved. A paying customer has the clout to demand a solution — and to get more insight into the problems."

In response, Anderson said the Soyuz and the Russians have had a good safety record going back many years. "When you add it all together, I don't think this is anything that's really going to put a strain on them," he told me.

There's yet another cloudy scenario for the decade ahead: Suppose the economy takes a downturn, or suppose the space effort suffers another setback. Will the multimillion-dollar demand for space adventures hold up? Or will the grand visions laid out today by Space Adventures turn out to be as insubstantial as the visions laid out by Rotary Rocket in 1998, and MirCorp in 2000?

Fasten your seatbelts: To paraphrase Bette Davis in the movie "All About Eve," it's going to be a bumpy night ... or a bumpy decade.

Update for 3:40 p.m. ET June 11: Much has been made elsewhere about Space Adventures' plan to purchase an entire Soyuz mission - that is, two seats for paying passengers with a professional cosmonaut in the driver's seat. This isn't the first time that the "private mission" concept has come up, however. The company floated the idea five years ago, as noted in this archived story from 2003.

Update for 3:30 p.m. ET June 12: Russia's Itar-Tass news service quotes Russian space chief Anatoly Perminov as saying he has "no information" about plans to send Brin to the space station. Perminov also told Itar-Tass that there were no plans to send space tourists to the station after the yet-to-be-scheduled trips of two Kazakh cosmonauts.

Representatives of the space agencies supporting the station are to meet next month and decide when the station's long-term crew will go from three to six, Perminov said. That will increase the demand for Soyuz seats. "There is simply no room for space tourists," he was quoted as saying. "Space tourism will be suspended."

When I asked Anderson about this, he noted that Brin hasn't yet made a commitment for a specific space trip, so his name has not been passed along formally to the Russians. As for the remark about "no room for space tourists," Anderson said that comment should be interpreted in the context of Russia's plan to provide four Soyuzes a year for transferring space station crews.

Space Adventures' purchase of a Soyuz mission would be in addition to the crew transfer missions, he noted.

"This is nothing new," Anderson told me. "It's a discussion of the additional difficulty of providing spaceflight participant seats if the crew goes to six with only four Soyuzes."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

C'mon Al, nobody will ever again approach the bogosity of Rotary Rocket...that said, I offer you, once again, the solution to this entire mess...space travel* without rockets or burn in...alternative fuel solutions galore...and a perspective that will brighten your outlook towards everything, because you won't be relying on others to form your opinions for you...
sound good?
click the name below...continue to click through for the full experience...
space travel...not a ride in some tin can ( aramid fibre can if you will ) presented by Tin Men, to apogee and back...while peering through some tiny porthole...
ready when you are, Folks!
Now that Hollywood trailer trash serves as behavior model for our "culture"...we may now enjoy the ongoing pollution of space by the uber-rich playboys. Does anyone remember Icarus?
Don`t come back!!!
Nice to see Sergei blowing millions of dollars for a personal joyride rather than investing into worthy charities right here on earth. He sets a great example by choosing "look at me" over philanthropy.
Those people who point to the cost and exclusive nature of "space tourism" should be reminded that ordinary tourism started in much the same way.

A couple of centuries ago, you had to be someone along the lines of Lord Byron to go on "The Grand Tour", spending months moving slowly across Europe, visiting historical sites and cities, such as Venice, Rome, Pompeii, Athens, etc, perhaps buying the odd group of statuary to enhance your country estate.

It was only such things as the invention of railways and the telegraph; the cutting of the Suez and Panama Canals, and so on, making travel easier, together with an increase in literacy, making people more aware of the wider world, that made tourism as popular as it is today.

We can hope to see the same cycle repeating itself, with an even wider scope in which to do so.

I understand that the first European explorers to visit the Grand Canyon stated, on their return, that their's would probably the only expedition to visit such a desolate, out of the way location.

The Valles Marineris canyon complex on Mars is not only longer than the Grand Canyon in absolute terms, but in comparative terms as well, Mars being smaller than Earth.

I wonder how long that will remain "out of the way?"
All expansions in to the future have started as adventures for the rich and famous. The poor stay at home to continue the work needed to make the rich and famous more rich and famous.
Brin's money will NOT buy him a flight. He was born in Russia and he speaks Russian. I bet he will not be approved for the flight for religious and political reasons. He is rich but naive.
You can take the boy out of Russia, but will not take "Russia" out of the boy.
It would only be worth all that money if he took Hillary Clinton with him and dropped her in perpetual earth orbit.  Me?  I would just spend the money on booze and Elliot Spitzer type enertainment.
Oh please people, the comments on here are by a bunch of jealous and small people who just can't stand the thought of somebody who has millions to blow it on the chance of a lifetime.

No person of his means gives all of his money to charity, so get off yourselves and grow up!  This is no different than if he chose to spend HIS money on a massive estate and a bunch of other toys.  Suggesting that he not be entitled to spend his money how he chooses is communist style thinking if I ever heard it!
It's a shame our money is going to the russian government to support these flights. When will NASA wake up and realize not just government engineers want, and deserve, to go into space? I understand the cost and the risks, which is why at the moment it is reserved only for those who can afford it. Some day it'll be more inclusive, but for now, NASA could use the extra dough.
By that time, Spacex may actually be sending 7 ppl into space for the same price that these guys send 1.
Sounds amazing and it seems like the new agreement would allow for passengers, a strange line of business but why not actually
This is the adventure of a lifetime. For those people who can afford it, you would be crazy not to go. In relative terms it actually is not that expensive, I mean they could charge 10 times the amount and there would still be people willing to go! Someone might pay $10000 to take a drive in a Formula 1 car, then people will also say 'your crazy', so it's all relative.
The biggest problem with open forums like these are you get more comments from people who like to hear themselves talk than you get comments from people who want to discuss the topic. Oh well.

I am one person who is hoping SpaceX will be in the ballgame at around the same time this Soyuz flight with 2 paid passengers takes off. Then a true cost alaysis of both options can be tabulated.
Alan I am curious why you still insist in granting instant credibility to PlanetSpace by grouping them with other legitimate companies, I too once held out a lot of (misplaced) faith in the capability of this group.

You are much to generous to included them in the group of "Virgin Galactic competitors"

Blue Origin, Bigelow Aerospace, Armadillo Aerospace, SpaceX all of which have actually delivered on promises

and milestones.

Months have gone by without a word about them. And then presto their name appears again in the media without any reference to anything new.

Now I realize they are a private company and they are not obligated to inform the public of anything. But I do have to questions why they get this level of endorsement when you have organizations like ARCA who barely have 2 cents to rub together and yet they seem to deliver what they promise. They get vitualy no coverage in the media.

Then there is Planetspace headed by Kathuria and his assistant Sheerin, these two have made countless public proclamations

of grand plans and unsubstantiated claims of achievement.  The rest of the "Virgin Galactic competitors" have actually gotten real hardware off the ground.

But It has been how many years since Canadian Arrow was absorbed into Planetspace, and what have these guys done. Sure I read a lot about what they are going to do.

Why have you not taken Planetspace to task and force them to substantiate their claims. They certainly won't show anything to anyone else, has anyone actually ever seen any real Planetspace hardware, a factory, an employee, anything other than these two. I mean they could be the only two individuals working there surrounded by cardboard cutouts of other workers.

Use your journalistic skills and do some real digging instead of taking them a face value.

Ask them just what happened to all the various launch dates, the big "partnerships" and "deals", the so called Silver Dart, Canadian  Arrow Rocket, the Launch Pad in  Nova Scotia, the Unfunded COTS milestones, and the "partnership" with Lockheed ATK to launch an Athena 3 rocket, Just to name a few.

Oh and one other thing Alan as you are the only one who can seem to track these guys down, if you get a chance ask them to update their founding stake holders (the little guys) with an always promised-never- delivered share holder meeting. That is if they are not too busy making the Big Pitch to new naive investors.


It is a shame what happend to this group, or should I say what has NOT happend
Dear Disgruntled: I included PlanetSpace because it's a venture that is headed by a billionaire or a millionaire (Chirinjeev Kathuria). The list would definitely be different if I were to focus on companies that have actually flown hardware (for example, it would include XCOR Aerospace but not PlanetSpace, which has done some development work and testing but hasn't launched anything).
Alan...disgruntled...et al,
I'm walking a tightrope here, because Alan and I have agreed that if I behave somewhat within the confines of civility, he will allow my comments on any topic.
As some of you may know, the above named Billionaire Rocketeers are actually all in a race to catch me.
If not for their work in the bureaucratic trenches, while building the foundation with their billions...( for which I do not have the means )...nobody'd go anywhere...
All the testing is necessary for existing criteria to be met.
I ignore existing criteria, letting the
"Billionaire Adventurers Club" members scramble amongst theirselfs.
The point of this missive is to inform you Folks of something that Alan told me before Cosmic Log came online.
He is a reporter...objective to the core.
You report clearly and accurately on something which doesn't really even exist.
Try being one of the most knowledgeable individuals RE The New Space Race, yet never favoring your fave via CosmicLog.
Kathuria has been a player since shortly after day one...I think he's totally bogus, but Alan tells 'em as he gets 'em.
Be thanful for the chance to read such unbiased news.
There's no place else with less agenda.
Kinda like a Scientist/Journalist...rather than just a Science Journalist...Journalism with the pragmatism of pure 'prove it' Science.
While this reads like buttering up, it's the 100% real skinny from here...of course being extra nice so that the above Gaia Two hype is out there may play into it just a wee bit.
Thanks, Al...


Alan thanks for responding to my comment.
I would like to clarify a few things though.
First while Chirinjeev may in fact be a millionaire it would seem to be evident that no large sums of money have been invested into this venture to further the development of its technology, contrary to what mr.Sheerin indicated in a public press event in London Ontario in May 2005 the grand opening of the now closed Canadian Arrow Space Centre. Mr.Sheerin announced "we have found our Paul Allen" A reference to indicate to the press, local government and investors that Canadian Arrow had finally received its much needed financing.

Second, Planetspace has not done any development of any sort other than PowerPoint graphics and paper tigers since the dissolving of Canadian Arrow.
All the propulsion development and alike was done prior to the formation of Planetspace in May 2005.
Now as I am just an investor in this venture, and I of course do not receive any communication with them (silly me)
For all I know They could in fact be putting the finishing touches on a flying Dart ready to roll down the runway.
So this is just my personal opinion.
And you do not have to believe me. But all this information can in fact be found on the internet…Easy research.
I challenge any journalist to see what these guys claim to have. My guess, nothing more than mock-ups and lots of talk.
I just hope the rest of the space industry is not like this.
"Nice to see Sergei blowing millions of dollars for a personal joyride rather than investing into worthy charities right here on earth. He sets a great example by choosing "look at me" over philanthropy."

So at what point, and in what way *does* a man get to spend his money on a legal activity for his own pleasure?

Remember, the reason we make money at all, is to increase the range of needs and wants we can we can meet. And as there will always be someone who makes more than someone else, there will be products and services that someone can afford that someone else can't.

*After* paying taxes to a government that allegedly is seeing to the needs of its citizens, how little does one have to make, before someone else no longer says how charitable they should be? My income? Yours? The guy living on the street corner?

And always remember, high-end products and services *employ* people with less than high-end incomes...




SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1130193

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google