ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The world inside a bacterium

Posted: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:25 PM by Alan Boyle


Pantheon Books
"Microcosm" focuses on
E. coli and the new
science of life.

Can a whole book actually be written about one single-celled organism? "Microcosm" pulls off the feat by using the E. coli bacterium as a guidepost to life's secrets.

E. coli? Isn't that one of the biggest villains of the bacterial world? The one responsible for the spinach scare and last year's tainted-beef recall? Yes, those problems were caused by bad breeds of E. coli - but for every bad strain, there are hundreds of good strains you can't live without.

"You have several billion E. coli inside of you right now, and they're going to be with you until you die," science writer (and blogger) Carl Zimmer told an audience at Town Hall Seattle this week, capping a West Coast book tour for "Microcosm."

Over the years, Zimmer has written about subjects ranging from zombie cockroaches to species-hopping to the seat of the soul - and when he started formulating the plan for his latest book, he wanted to address one of the world's greatest mysteries: What is life, and how does it work?

That subject is just a teensy bit too broad for one book, however. So Zimmer looked for a way to scale his scope back, and address the what-is-life question in a microcosm - literally, a cosmos on a microscopic scale. And E. coli was the obvious choice. Zimmer took his lead from Nobel-winning biologist Jacques Monod, who once said, "What is true for E. coli is true for the elephant."

E. coli is the Joe Six-Pack of the microbial world: German-Austrian pediatrician Theodor Escherich found it in 1885 as he rooted through baby diapers, looking for the causes of infectious disease. (The "E" in E. coli stands for Escherichia, a genus name that honors the discoverer.)

Escherich and the researchers who followed in his footsteps found that E. coli could live on all sorts of things - milk, potatoes, blood - and could survive under a wider range of conditions than most microbes. Starting in the 1930s, it became the microbial model of choice for experiments aimed at figuring out how genes worked.

Genetic 'gold standard'
Today, E. coli is "the gold standard of genetic familiarity," Zimmer writes. Scientists know more about how E. coli works than about virtually any other living thing.


Ben Stechshulte
Carl Zimmer uses E. coli as a microcosm of all biology.

Even though it's just a one-celled organism, the darn thing has a molecular sense of smell that passes along a signal that food is nearby - and it has a system for getting to that food, by whipping its tails around in particular patterns that semi-randomly get it where it needs to go.

Those tails - also known as flagella - have even contributed to a cultural controversy over evolutionary theory vs. intelligent design. How could undirected evolution ever produce those tricky whips, which seem to work like tiny outboard motors? The flagellum became a hot topic during 2005's Dover evolution trial - and was cited in the judge's ruling against intelligent design.

Zimmer addresses the courtroom case in "Microcosm," as well as the way E. coli supports the case for evolution in the laboratory. The bacterium has proven so adaptable to changing conditions that scientists are able "to put natural selection under a microscope, teasing apart the individual mutations that benefit E. coli," Zimmer writes.

One of the longest-running experiments is being conducted by Richard Lenski and his colleagues at Michigan State University. For 20 years, Lenski has let E. coli run its course over 44,000 bacterial generations in the lab. He freezes samples every 500 generations, and keeps careful track of how the bacteria cope with a low-glucose diet.


CDC
E. coli bacteria quickly form
colonies when they are smeared
across the goo in a petri dish.

Just this week, Lenski published findings about a bizarre twist that is described in Zimmer's blog: Even under the carefully controlled lab conditions, one bacterial strain gained the ability to digest citrate - something that E. coli isn't supposed to be able to do.

The researchers were able to run the tape backwards, checking exactly when the citrate-munching bugs learned the trick. At the 31,500-generation mark, they found that about 0.5 percent of the bacteria could consume citrate. That population grew for a while, then was almost rendered extinct, and then came back with a vengeance to dominate the entire flask.

The assumption is that one genetic mutation provided a relatively poor method for digesting citrate, and that a later mutation provided the full recipe for success. Zimmer said E. coli's chances of evolving into a citrate-eater were on the order of 1 in a trillion - and yet, it happened.

"It may not be the origin of new species, but it's a major transition," Zimmer said.

Pushing forward
E. coli could serve not only as a tool for looking backward at evolution's course, but also as a tool for pushing forward on medical and technological challenges.

Genetically modified E. coli is already being used to manufacture human insulin, and Zimmer describes efforts to turn the bacteria into photographic film, anti-cancer "torpedoes" and biofuel factories. They can also be transformed into microscopic computers for solving sticky math problems.

Scientists have even tweaked E. coli in the lab to use amino acids that are not used by any other type of living organism. "In a sense, we've actually created alien life on Earth," Zimmer said.

E. coli and its ilk could eventually help scientists answer more of those cosmic questions:

Zimmer doesn't downplay the possibilities.

"Jacques Monod said, 'What is true for E. coli is true for elephants.' I wonder if it's true for aliens," he said.

"E. coli is already up in space, it's in the space station. So if you look up and look at the space station at night, you'll be looking at E. coli. I don't think that when and if we get to Mars, we will discover E. coli on the Red Planet. But I do wonder if there will be some striking similarities between the Martians and this really remarkable microbe."

For more about "Microcosm," check in with Carl Zimmer's Web site and the ScienceBlogs Book Club. Real Science has the complete podcast of Zimmer's talk in Seattle.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Re ecoli in the space station...
was that before or after the flusher got fixed?
Hello !
Stop putting germs on to petri dishes smeared whith things enavble them to grow and watching them grow.
How about putting the germs onto petri dishes spread with things which will help them to die - and giving everyone an injuction about that doomed germ ?
D.A. Green
nichevoo@hotmail.com
"The assumption is that one genetic mutation provided a relatively poor method for digesting citrate, and that a later mutation provided the full recipe for success. Zimmer said E. coli's chances of evolving into a citrate-eater were on the order of 1 in a trillion - and yet, it happened."

Just as predicted based on probability analysis given the extremely large populations and short generation times for bacterium. But this 2-mutation change is the upper limit, since a 3-mutation change would then be a million times more improbable and be beyond the reach of chance. This fits exactly with what Dr. Behe pointed out in The Edge of Evolution. By contrast larger creatures with longer generation times could never achieve even 2 particular coordinated mutations. This is why bacterium such as E. Coli are so genetically static despite their massive mutational resources, and larger critters even more so.

It's time to stop claiming the earth is flat because  your lawn is flat, which is the methodological equivalent of these claims that because simple mutations happen, all the complexity of life must be due to mutation. Living cells are hypertechnological structures of incredible complexity, and ascribing it all to chance+mutation just makes "scientists" the ignorant religious nuts of the 21st century.
This article is a bit misleading as it makes it seem like E. coli is a very versatile bacteria such that is would ever be found on another planet.  In fact, E. coli has evolved in the human gut for so long that it is relatively wimpy compared to other bacteria (i.e. Pseudomonas or Bacillus species) that can live in a great array of environments.  While we do know the most about this particular species, it probably won't be allow us to answer many of the questions above.

I also think that Lenski's work is groundbreaking and has great implications for how we understand evolution and evolutionary processes.  
What if E. coli was sent to Earth as a catalist to jump start life on the planet. Some kind of alien created bacteria that is programmed to evolve, making the best choices to adapt to its environment.  Kind of like artificial inteligence in Nano technology. What if!!!!
This makes me think of the engineered moss among other things that were talked about in Red Mars.  Is it possible to have these engineered bacterium to change some of the material of Mars to be less salty?  Could these small things be made to dig holes in the ground and speed decomposition to reduce the size of landfills?  
Eric, you are sadly misinformed and very poor at extrapolation. If a 3 gene mutation is a million times less likely, and a 2 gene mutation occured in less than 20 years, in a tiny population (compared to what exists in the world), I should think that 100 million years ought to suffice. Yes, modern cells are hypertechnological. They are far, far beyond anything our current technology can accomplish. They are incredibly complex. If you haven't noticed, increasing complexity is one of the general themes of the Universe. Give up your sad lonely fears for your own pathetic blip of a life and marvel in the majesty of the Universe that gave rise to you. Believe me, the Universe will accomplish more than you could ever imagine, much less achieve. I'd also like to point out that you demonstrate a bigoted, narrow, and generalized viewpoint, ignorantly lumping all scientists together. You seem altogether unaware of the developments in evolutionary theory after Charles Darwin. Scientists build knowledge upon other secure knowledge, and continually challenge the knowledge already accepted. Ignorant religious nuts fear changing their views to the point of violence. They do not build knowledge, they spew forth the same ideas again and again and insist that you accept them without evidence. Scientists provide evidence and their analysis, and the works that they base their work upon, never asking you to accept in blind faith but to test it yourself. The ignorant religious nuts will always be just that, ignorant, religious, and nuts. Guilt and fear are the main mechanisms that most major religions use to motivate. Has a scientist ever tried to guilt-trip you into accepting their hypothesis? Have they ever threatened you with the destruction of your soul should you refuse to obey the Law of Conservation of Momentum?

Debbie, I'm a bit conflicted with your post as well. E.Coli lives in a very broad environment, not just in human guts. They live in the guts of many, many animals, and are very stable in the environment. It has to be, otherwise it can't get into your guts. we don't get E. Coli from our mothers, our digestive tracts are never attached. But I'm definitely not an expert on microbiology, I'd be insterested in reading about Pseudomonas and the various Bacilli. Can you suggest somewhere to read about them? As far as the questions, E. Coli is already helping us learn if new life can be created from scratch, in a sense - they are building up genetic material from custom-built genes and inserting those genes into E. Coli. I think it could also answer the question about whether life can survive space or not, though some of the really tiny bacteria are probably better candidates. The rest of the questions I can't really see E. Coli providing us the answers to.
So Eric is claiming God made everything because his brain cannot fathom the triviality of probabilities when measured across enormous stretches of time?

Eric, the mutations enabling citrate metabolism didn't occur simultaneously.  There is nothing terribly improbable about successive beneficial mutations accumulating.
Oh those silly creationists always thinking that evolution=chance.  Evolution is a trial and error process whereby living things constantly alter their strategies for growing and surviving.
Chance may be a trigger but the outcome is very in tune with reality.
The citrate metabolism 'discovery' by Lenski's group was actually an accident.  In studying how the populations of bacteria evolve (optimize) to growing on different 'food' sources (such as glucose vs maltose), they use a 'no growth' media totally lacking any of the various 'foods' as a control.  The no-growth media does contain citrate, but since everyone knows that E. coli can't grow on citrate, that was no problem...  until a year or two ago when some of the populations started to grow on it ;)

That caused some difficulty for the studies people were doing, since their controls were screwed up.  Annoying uppity bacteria.
Eric.  Hail to the Creationist Museum.   We are the only country in the world with such an idiotic institution.  I have always argued that 10% of the US population keeps us on the cutting edge and maintains our place as the technology leaders in the world.  The other 90% are idiots.  
Let's hear a loud cheer for E-coli without which, we would all be Jelly Fish (maybe).
as usual things of this nature take a religious tone.
Where did all this STUFF come from to make all this STUFF from???? POOF it happened????? Either way GOD (existent or not) or happen chance, I am sure this GOD (existent or not) would be more interested in how you lived your life and treated others then the MULTITUDE of mutations we can find in a particular species. ME personally find this all facinating. Nay sayers, Believers, agnostics and Creationists HARK THEE.......it is most likely we weil NEVER really know. So at least praise those who PURSUE some sort of answer to the big question. It is so easy to sit back and condemn those who TRY...........


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1117048

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google