ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



What's waiting on Mars?

Posted: Thursday, May 08, 2008 7:05 PM by Alan Boyle


Univ. of Mich.
Click for video: An
artist's conception shows
a dust devil on Mars. Click
on the image to watch
time-lapse imagery of
a dust devil from 2007.

Images from NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter are providing an advance peek at what the Phoenix Mars Lander will be running up against when it lands near the planet's north pole later this month: The spacecraft will be coming down in the middle of a spring thaw, and based on the pictures released this week, there just might be some Martian mini-tornadoes swirling through the scene.

Two of the twisters, known as dust devils, show up on an April 20 image of Phoenix's projected landing area, taken by MRO's Context Camera. The Martian whirlwinds are similar to the desert mini-twisters often seen on Earth - and have previously been caught on camera by the Mars Pathfinder lander as well as NASA's Spirit rover. You can watch a dust devil spin through Spirit's line of sight in this year-old video clip.

Phoenix will be landing just as the north polar region is warming up. This picture shows you what the terrain looked like a couple of months ago. The terrain was a honeycomb of dark soil, broken up by patterns of fractures still filled with frozen carbon dioxide.


NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSS
Arrows highlight two dust devils whirling
across the landing area for the Phoenix
Mars Lander, as seen from above by the
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Click on
the image for a larger version.

In contrast, this picture from MRO's Color Imager shows that the frost has largely retreated from Phoenix's projected landing area. A wider view of the dust-devil scene reveals that bright spots of frost still lie within some of the region's craters, but those may soon be gone as well.

A Martian CO2 thaw isn't like a spring thaw on Earth: When carbon dioxide frost fades away, it sublimates directly into a gas and goes into the atmosphere.

The warming atmosphere fuels the formation of dust devils. As explained in this advisory from Malin Space Science Systems, the frequency of dust devils is expected to increase as the thaw proceeds. The full Context Camera strip, which takes in an area 18.6 miles wide and 195 miles long (30 by 314 kilometers) reveals plenty of dark streaks left behind by previous wind action. (Can you spot the two dust devils on the full strip?)

Mars' atmosphere is only 1 percent as dense as Earth's, so it's a matter of some interest among planetary scientists to find out how the wind can play such an active role on the Red Planet. Check out this archived report (and this one) for more about the Red Planet's powerful sand and dust.

To keep up with the latest as the Phoenix Mars Lander zooms toward its May 25 touchdown, check in with our "Return to the Red Planet" section as well as the home page for NASA's Mars Exploration Program

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I am very excited to the new technologies and informatiom that is coming from the project mars. Im alwyas updating myself to whats going on with the project! Im very interested in science myself, and  it makes me want to persue my future in science because of mars.
"It was mars that collided with earth eons ago when mars and earth shared the same orbit around the sun...our moon was created and all of mars water was deposited on earth as a result and left mars barren and thrown out to it's present orbit."

No . . .   It was a *mars-sized proto-planet* that collided with Earth (apparently), and launched much of Earth's then-crust (along with alot of its' own material) into Earth orbit, where is coalesced into the Moon. This is why the Moon has an anomalously small iron core; it is made mostly of crustal (ie. 'rocky') materials from both the impactor and Earth.

As for Mars, it still has alot of water (this is precisely what things like the Rovers, MGS, Odyssey, and MRO have been showing us!!). But it lost a lot of its original water to UV photo-dissociation. A long word, but an easy concept: UV light from the sun passes straight thru Mars' atmosphere. When it hits water molecules in the air, it breaks them into H2 and O2. The H2 escapes Mars' gravity, to space, the O2 goes and oxidizes something. Thus Mars loses water over time, especially when that water is in the atmosphere.

And there is growing evidence that a lot of *Earth's* water came from impacts of millions of comets into the early Earth. The rest presumably accreted with the Earth and 'differentiated out' to the surface.
Why don't we send some small construction equipment to the asteroid belt where a computer program might allow them to divert some asteroids to the martian surface until the mass of the planet increased enough to maintain a denser atmosphere? Duh Or perhaps just build a big greenhouse
Well, I don`t believe this propaganda about Planet X? It`s a joke? I just think that we get most of our technology from Aliens? Let`s go back 600 years! We didn`t have what we have today, right? I would love to see humans live on Mars. I think we`re really close to accomplish this dream.
For everyone who thinks the Mars probes/missions are wastes of money, i want to remind you that the majority of your tax dollars (if you're american) are paying for The War instead. Why not start asking those organizations for money? I think any endeavour of science is a much more praiseworthy cause than death could ever be.
Yeah, i'm a soldier, yeah i've served my time in Theater. I'm not anti-war by any means, but people really need to learn to stop bashing on interplanetary expeditions when there are much more valid targets for criticism.
I can't wait to see what Phoenix will show us.
These 2012 Planet X doomsayers seem to be the same 2003 Planet X doomsayers. This mysterious brown dwarf (or a planet orbiting the dwarf) did not cross our path then, why should it do so in 2012. When 2012 comes and goes, a new date will be fabricated. All of the people with short attention spans (also a failure to research anything even though we live in the Information Age) will flock to the new date when it is fabricated sometime around 2016.
We must keep sending probes to Mars and beyond, or we might as well bury our heads in the sand and hope nothing bites us in the butt.  NASA needs to take vounteers and send a one way manned mission there to start a base operation for future missions (and YES, I would voulenteer for it!).  The future doesn't come without a price, and there are people willing to pay that price.  

I agree with taking a few KBO's and sending them to the surface to help "seed" the planet with more resources, but unfortunately, it would take more technology than we currently have to get objects large enough there without missing and sending them on to us here.
Paula:  
Arnold already Terraformed Mars for us.  I had bought his documentary not too long ago called "Total Recall".  I have booked passage on the next flight out.  Why live on earth when it will be destroyed in a few years?  We need to get there before all the trash people show up.  Perhaps get the best intersections for a nice business.  Perhaps a Restaurant or gas station.  Dollar General?

One thing about any of Alan's blogs: He prints everything that people send in.  Even it you can't read it or doesn't make any sense or is a lampoon.
"I  am 78 years old and will never understand spending all that money on space.  What for? Maybe it is why I was so bad in science in school right through collage. Why don't we spend in on something that will help us here on earth?  Oh it is interesting, I will admit that, but such a waste of time, money, and brains.  Please! Can someone give me an answer that I have been asking for about 60 years? Someone must know.     Science has done so much good.  Just wondering"

 Loraine, The money spent on space programs have benefitted all of us a great deal, much of the technology developed for the space programs have found mainstream uses, these experiments and advancements continue as we try new things.  One of the greatests things to come from this type of research and development is coming to new understandings about our own planet and its origins.  While I agree that it would be better to spend more money on things like education, healthcare, and infrastructure in our country, The money spent on the space programs pales in comparison to what we spend on things like the military, or foreign subsidies.  The continuing struggle to learn more about our world, our universe, and our eventual place in it is as important in the long run as any of the short run things that we do..again, wars, and the political agendas of some of our erstwhile politicians.
 A quick comparison would be..space budget over the next 10 years is roughly 50 billion dollars..we spend that in less than 3 months in Iraq.  Which one do you think will actually bring us more useful things for the money spent?  
I find it strange that Paula puts forth such a silly postulation.  But, it definately shows just how large the gap in education and logic is between people in the same culture.  Even here in The United States we see it.  A good example, would be the elections in 2000, and 2004.  People saw what was going on, but some had "faith" rather than actually do some research, and believed even when confronted by the facts.  I'm not an atheist, however, I do feel like all written works of man, when it comes to religion and theology are works of legend or fiction. Its hard to be the smartest man in the room on too many occasions this is the case, as I'm sure many of you who read and post here are aware.  Adam and Eve?  Legend.  Moses? Legend.  The Ark..again, Legend.  No proof other than ONE book's (in its many forms, and interpretations) says it happened.  Whats amazing, is for people to believe whole heartedly in something like that, but not believe in things like global warming, evolution, or carbon dating..things of which have more than met the burden of proof over the years..I ask you...who's hiding from what here?
To those who are so ignorant that they automatically associate groundless predictions with the Bible/God(Yahweh); I'd like to let you know that when anyone  puts a defined date (like 2012) on such things as prophecies, predictions, doomsday, etc., it's the first sign of a false prediction. The Bible does not put exact dates on its prophecies...

...But what you should be concerned about is that of the approximately 500 prophecies in the Bible, over 500 have been fulfilled (no, not only in the Bible but in written secular history).  Only very few remain to be fulfilled, all in regards to the end world (which the Bible does not claim will take place in 2012, or any other specific year for that matter).  I don't ask you to believe me, but read for yourself.  Pick up a Bible (you know that book which so many of you pass off as a fairy tale/outdated piece of literature/myth, but, very few have actually taken the time to read even one page of).  What you read may surprise you!


IF you are all such LOGICAL thinkers...what do I have to lose if I'm wrong about everything I believe in with respect to Jesus/God and Scripture??! A few years of instant gratification on this earth?!?!  What do you have to lose if you are wrong about everything you believe in?!?!  Are you willing to be your eternity?  Which is the more logical path to follow?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=998587

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google