ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Rocket racers on the rise

Posted: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:01 AM by Alan Boyle


Mike Massee / XCOR / Rocket Racing Inc.
Click for video: The XCOR Rocket Racer fires up for a test flight in November.

The Rocket Racing League says its rocket-powered race planes will take off for their first public exhibition races on Aug. 1 and 2 at the EAA AirVenture air show in Oshkosh, Wis. But that's just the start. The league's founders have also acquired an airframe-manufacturing company, taken on a new partner to build rocket engines and set up a string of subsidiaries.

All this is part of an effort to make high-performance aerial racing into a business on a par with high-performance auto racing.

"It's not just about racing rockets around a racetrack in the sky," said Granger Whitelaw, the league's co-founder and chief executive officer. In his view, it's also about building the future of aviation and aerospace.

For two and a half years, Whitelaw and his partners have been working to create a "NASCAR in the sky" - a series of aerial fly-offs that would draw in spectators and viewers the way auto races do today. Now Rocket Racing Inc. is aiming to take that auto-racing parallel several steps further.

Whitelaw outlined the plans during an interview late last week, in advance of today's formal announcement in New York:

  • Two breeds of "Rocket Racer" planes would fly in public for the first time on Aug. 1 and 2 at the Oshkosh show, one of the year's biggest air exhibitions. Current plans call for additional exhibitions at the Reno Air Races in September, at the X Prize Cup in New Mexico (traditionally held in October) and at in Aviation Nation in Las Vegas in November.

  • One kerosene-fueled Rocket Racer has been under development at California-based XCOR Aerospace for more than a year. But in a surprise move, the second Rocket Racer would use an alcohol-fueled engine built by Texas-based Armadillo Aerospace, under the leadership of millionaire video-game programmer John Carmack.

  • The company that built the airframes for both racing planes, Florida-based Velocity Aircraft, has been acquired by Rocket Racing and will operate under the aegis of a new subsidiary called Rocket Racing Composites Corp. Velocity will build a new line of private planes as well as the airframes for future Rocket Racers.

  • Other subsidiaries have been set up alongside the league to work on avionics and other electronics for the planes (Rocket Racing Technology Development) and to manage the venture's facilities in New Mexico (Rocket Racing Land).

Visions vs. realities
Whitelaw envisions a day when throngs will flock to watch rocket planes zoom through a "racetrack in the sky" at speeds in excess of 300 mph (480 kilometers per hour) and rising as high as a mile above the crowd. Video views of the race, including computer-generated 3-D graphics showing the course, would be flashed onto big screens and available via display devices, so that spectators could follow along even when the planes themselves are hard to spot.

This year's tamer exhibitions will incorporate big-screen views, but the more advanced features won't be ready right away, Whitelaw said.

The planes will be flown by the designated test pilots for the development effort: former astronaut Rick Searfoss for the XCOR Rocket Racer, and former Navy test pilot Len Fox for the Armadillo Rocket Racer. The planes are designed to zoom and glide for about 15 minutes, with the ability to be refueled rapidly between flights.

Six racing teams have signed up for the Rocket Racing League and intend to purchase rocket planes at an estimated cost of $1.2 million. Eventually, the teams plan to vie for millions of dollars in prizes. However, Whitelaw said those competitive races likely wouldn't begin until late 2009.

Between now and then, the league and the other Rocket Racing subsidiaries would have to firm up sponsorships and media deals, ramp up the production line for the planes and gain Federal Aviation Administration approval for the races. Whitelaw indicated that the FAA still had to give its final OK for this year's exhibition flights.

A tale of two engines
Armadillo's involvement could add an extra twist of competition to the preparations for those first flights. In the past, the league has worked exclusively with XCOR Aerospace on engine development and integration. Now XCOR, which recently advanced its plans for a much higher-flying suborbital rocket ship, will be vying with another fledgling rocket company for the league's business.

Last week, XCOR spokesman Doug Graham would say only that his company was continuing to work with the racing league. Over the past six months, the XCOR Rocket Racer has gone through a series of test flights at the Mojave Air and Space Port in California.

"We're making progress, and we're going to get it done," Graham told me.

Armadillo's Carmack, meanwhile, said the league approached him confidentially several months ago to work on a parallel engine development project. "I actually said 'no' a couple of times, because we're not airplane guys," Carmack told me.

However, Carmack eventually decided that the racing league's needs meshed with his own rocket development effort, which is aimed at building a "Six-Pack" vertical-takeoff craft that can rise up to the frontier of outer space.

This month, the film-cooled engine that would be used in the Armadillo Rocket Racer was fired up to push a heavy crane truck down a pavement. The engine has not yet been tested in an airframe, but Carmack said the plane still could be ready in time for August's exhibition flights. "It's a simple system," he said.

Carmack recently said he would make rocket engines available to customers at a cost of $500,000 apiece. He declined to say exactly how much the racing league was paying Armadillo for the current project - but he said the project had a higher priority than Armadillo's renewed push to win the NASA-funded Lunar Lander Challenge.

"Our deal is to make a bunch of these," he said. "If we wind up making a bunch, it's going to be a pretty good business."

He acknowledged that the venture was "still fairly speculative" but noted that "there's real work being done, and people are going to be racing rockets."

Looking ahead
Actually getting the races off the ground may seem like an ambitious enough goal - but most of the parties involved are looking past the races to bigger ventures. For XCOR as well as for Armadillo, the Rocket Racers are just an intermediate step toward higher-powered suborbital spacecraft.

"Two tanks with a rocket engine is essentially one-sixth of our notional suborbital vehicle," Carmack noted.

Whitelaw, a veteran of the professional auto-racing circuit, expects that the technologies developed by Rocket Racing's subsidiaries will feed into the wider aviation market. He drew an analogy to the way Ferrari applies the lessons learned in its race operations to the consumer automobile market.

"It's using the racing series as a test bed for technology," Whitelaw said. "Just like Formula One, we're going to be doing that for aviation and aerospace."

To that end, he said Velocity Aircraft would bring out a new line of six-seat and four-seat luxury airplanes, incorporating technologies developed for the Rocket Racers. The price tag for the six-seater would be $1 million.

"I truly believe that with the excitement of rocket racing, there are always going to be Velocities there that people can buy," Whitelaw said.

Whitelaw even cast the XCOR-Armadillo engine competition in auto-racing terms. "It gives us more choices for teams," he explained, "just like Honda or Ford or Ferrari."

Whitelaw has repeatedly acknowledged that getting the Rocket Racing League started was taking longer than he originally thought, and he has declined to discuss in detail how much the venture has cost him and his partners so far. But he emphasized that the league's backers were in it for the long haul.

"It's millions of dollars of investment for us, and tens of millions of dollars we're allocating for growing the business over the next few years," he told me. "We are committed to do that."

Update for 11:30 a.m. ET: For additional information from today's news conference, check out Clark Lindsey's report at RLV and Space Transport News as well as this Marketwire news release. Lindsey also points to reports from The New York Times, New Scientist and Aero-News Network, as well as Rand Simberg's commentary at Transterrestrial Musings.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Awesome! Finally!!!
If we have rocket races, sub-orbital flights, all with a goal of going even farther out than that, when and where will college courses be taught to expand all of this technology to the next generation? Dare we call it "Star Fleet Acadamy", even if unofficially? Think of a space shuttle named "Enterprise" that actually flew. I'd much rather have a space race, than an arms race.
Starfleet Academy will come sooner or later and I would prefer sooner.  This is awesome news.  I wonder how much XCOR's stock is worth with all this new growth in Rocket Racing?
Is it me, or is this disaster waiting to happen? In all the articles I've read about this, no one has mentioned safety. NASCAR has at least three good crashes every race. I wonder how long this league will last once a fire ball of death takes out the grandstand. German Airshow, anyone?
In fairness, I should say that Whitelaw did bring up the safety issue during the interview: "A couple of the things that we're going to be doing are focused on safety." As examples, he talked about how to make the cockpit safer for pilots and passengers, just as in auto racing "there has been a tremendous amount of research done on how to build a cockpit around the driver." Another effort would seek "to make the workload decrease in the case of a problem or an emergency" by automatically putting the plane into the proper glide path for an emergency airport landing. "The point is to bring a process to aviation and aerospace different from what I think is currently being done today - much more like what we're doing with race cars."

My only caveat would be that not all the issues surrounding rocket planes are like cars, even high-performance Ferraris. Maybe the rocket scientists out there could go into more detail about the differences. ;-)
A flagrant waste of natural resources.
you gotta be kiddin'
rockets schmockets
do they supply binoculars?
how does one read the numbers to follow their fave?
grow up, rocketeers...yer never goin' anywhere but rapidly around in circles...around a track or around the globe...same ol' same ol', eh?
what about the red bull races how do they compare
Bill Fowler,

Hardly - anything that helps to push the development of space helps society. And this most certainly helps us do that.
big waste of resources which could used for the welfare of mankind in medicines and other life savings equipments.
"A flagrant waste of natural resources.
Bill Fowler (Sent Monday, April 14, 2008 3:16 AM)"

Totally agree. At a time like this. When my generation (1990s) just came into the age of driving. With gas prices these "ROCKET RACERS" are just going to suck up alternate resources. Personally. I love aviation. I hope to find a career and serve my country in that field, but right now is not the time to start a "Nascar in the Sky". NASCAR is the most pointless thing I've seen. I enjoy the wrecks (sounds evil but thats what people really want to see) but i don't like the idea of it all. Again my point, it just sucks up more resources, resources that could be used for alternative fuels.
Waste of natural resources - perhaps - but the energy crisis may have a solution in space.  Also, as Ferris Valyn said, anything that helps space exploration helps society.
“big waste of resources which could used for the welfare of mankind in medicines and other life savings equipments.”

This is not a government financed venture so your comment is worthless!  If this new sport flies… it flies... if it fails… it fails!  This is the American way of competition and free enterprise which by the way helped out just about every other nation in the world in their time of need, never asking a thing in return.

How about Nigeria?
Tired of the "Wasting Resources" comment from folks with private jets and suv's.
Science spin off feeds the hungry, allows them to live longer, over-populate so we can feed some more (no natural population controls). We live well because of science and bash it constantly.
We are talking about Rockets which use about as much fuel as fits in a SUV tank (plus a larger quantity of Liquid Oxygen, extracted from the air).  These efforts to advance technology will not put a crimp in supplies (compared to people driving to a football game).

The money invested would not be sufficient to PAY a high profile Football Player or singer.  If you want to talk about wasting money - target them first!

It these developments lead to even a small improvement in NASA launch efficiency or costs, both the fuel burned and cost will be recovered from those improvements in LARGE Rocket performance.
 
Rehashing what could have been done with late 1950s rocket technology in airframes that are only designed to fly at half the speed of sound is certainly not progress.  A good jet trainer (and some piston powered planes) could outfly every rocket plane that is currently proposed for racing.  Now if all those folks that have millions to throw away were to fund a private race to the moon... That might push the technology a tad.
I don't get it. They will never fly faster than a modern air fighter and they will never go higher than a sub-orbital plane so what is the point? A better competition would be to try to launch an orbital flight. They stop trying to go farther after the sub-orbital flight during the X price. Sooner or later private flight would have to reach orbit
Even though the Rocket Racing League is talking about using some of the NASCAR safety technology in their planes, I don't think much of it is applicable to a small, light aircraft that is traveling much faster than a race car. A crash at 300+ mph (projected flying speeds for the rocket planes) has a lot more energy to dissipate than a race car crash at 200 mph. If there is a major problem (loss of control authority, structural failure, massive engine failure, etc.) in one of these rocket planes, there aren't many options for survival. Also, because of the very short duration of the flights (rocket engines aren't exactly fuel efficient), I don't think rocket powered aircraft will be anything more than a niche market providing short, but spectacular flight displays at air shows. I just don't see the racing aspect catching on.
Do you people really think that the U.S. had all its problems resolved when we landed on the MOON? Do you think that there was no strife in the world? That ther weren't whole nations living at the poverty level? I am personally tired of people who constantly bring out that old saw about "wasted resources" or "the money could be better spent". Do you people believe that Spain had all its problems solved when Columbus discoverd America? Grow up people.
what are they thinking a rocket that races thats just ignorant but i have heard some pretty stupid things this past year.
This is an excellent idea.  Because of racing, automobile developement surged ahead.  I can't think of a better way to spend a day than to watch some rocket developers "push the envelope".  There may be some accidents, I hope not but you never know.  Did everyone think we were going to grow up into a space faring people without some risk?  Just as our pioneer fathers did, I am willing to bet my life that this will work.
I'm finding it really hard to get excited about this. Everyone says that it's going to advance space travel, but I don't really see how since our space craft are already more advanced than these little planes. Maybe if someone could explain more of the scientific benefits and not just the "cool factor" I'd be more stoked.  
"Now if all those folks that have millions to throw away were to fund a private race to the moon... That might push the technology a tad."

  You are familair with the Google X-Prize, are you not?

  Yes, it's unmanned, but the point is, lots of private space activity on a broad front, will get a real spacefaring civilization going, faster than two or three countries doing it the hard way...

As I was reading this, I was thinking back at all the Airplanes that we would see flying over our farm in Peshtigo, WI on their way to Oshkosh during the Fly-in.  They came from all over.  Vintage Army planes, modern jets, Russian cargo planes, etc. and since I've been on this side of the state, the Concord.  We had mini fly-ins where outside towns would get visitors flying around and showing off their stuff.  It was great. It gets one excited and makes a person proud to be an American.

I had the thought that perhaps I would just accidently look up and see a blur of a plane about 500 feet above the ground going over at 1,500 MPH, speeding south being chased by another.  What a sight that would be. Alas it is only 300 MPH and up so high they need telescopes to view it.  I think sometimes my grandkids drive their souped up lawnmowers faster than that as they race around the driveway loop!!

The trick to this whole idea is to start a little smaller than I would have envisioned and work it up over time.  These fella having "backyard" ideas, are the people that will figure out something that we have never thought about before.  They are the pioneers we need today so we can catch up to the future tomorrow.  Good luck to them and to us.
For people wondering about what spin-offs can come from this, consider the following points and technologies its already developed
1. Races such as this will have a need for rapid refueling capabilities - Historically this has been a long process (think hours).  The X-racer uses liquid Oxygen (like most other rockets), but already XCOR has developed a rapid refueling process such that it can transfer into the LOX tank the entire contents in under a minute.  Given that you usually have to vent the Oxygen (since it boils and turns to gas below 0 degrees Celesius), this has made fueling a very difficult process.  But this rapid refueling can be used by a lot of things, potential, making fuel and go spaceships that much closer.
2.  High use rocket engines - historically, most rocket engines get inspected and analysis after every use.  This is hardly practical for large scale usage - much like car and plane engines, you need to be able to use these engines multiple times without worry.  Racing engines have to have that capablity, when racing.

Its worth noting that engine developed by XCOR for this is also the engine that will be used on its Lynx vehicle
A waste? sure is, at least for the spectators and owners who will spend a small fortune creating the sport. The aircraft designers on the other hand, get critical design experience, that to date has been held only by big business. Marketing it as a sport seems to me to be a great way for small aerospace and aeronautical companies to offset the cost of research that they otherwise might not be able to afford, I wish them well in this endeavor.
Thanks, Ferris, for explaining the spin-offs.

I'm really curious to see whether XCOR or Virgin will be open for business first. My gut tell me it'll be Virgin since they have more financial backing but they've also set their goal pretty high. XCOR is more modest but their goal is more attainable. I'm also dying to see Armadillo's racer.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=879343

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google