ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Close scrape at Saturn's moon

Posted: Friday, March 07, 2008 4:21 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / SSI
 Click for slide show:
 See Cassini's images
 of Enceladus.

The Cassini orbiter is due to make its closest-ever approach to a celestial body next Wednesday, when it comes within 30 miles of the surface of Enceladus, one of Saturn’s myriad moons. Enceladus isn’t just any moon: It just happens to shoot up geysers of ice crystals, which may hint at the presence of liquid water (and perhaps even life) beneath the moon's frozen surface. Cassini will be “scraping” right through the heart of the plume, at an altitude high enough to escape damage - but low enough to take samples and find out whether life’s building blocks lurk in that alien sleet.

"We should come away from this flyby with a better idea of the composition of the plume, in particular, a better measure than we've had up until now of the abundances of ammonia and some simple organic compounds, both of which are important to ascertaining the astrobiological potential of the source environment of the jets," the Space Science Institute's Carolyn Porco, leader of Cassini's imaging team, said in an e-mail.

Cassini has had close brushes with Enceladus before, but those flybys were nowhere near this close. In fact, at the precise moment when Cassini is closest to Enceladus, the bus-sized spacecraft will be zooming so fast that it can't really take any useful pictures.

The good news is that Cassini will be taking in data like crazy when it goes through Enceladus' south polar plume just a half-minute later, at an altitude of 120 miles (200 kilometers). John Spencer, a Southwest Research Institute planetary scientist on the Cassini team, said the previous flybys had at best a glancing encounter with the ice plume. "This time, we're really plunging into the plume," he said in a NASA video explaining the flyby.

That's why this year's series of Enceladus encounters are called "scraping flybys." It may sound scary to subject a $3.4 billion space probe to a sleet storm, but Cassini's mission managers say this sleet shouldn't pose a threat: At a height of 120 miles, the particles of ice are expected to be no more than a micron wide (that's 0.00004 inch).

The entire time line for Wednesday's flyby is outlined on the Cassini imaging team's Web site, and to celebrate Cassini's first scrape, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has put together a goodie bag of Enceladus-flavored treats:

While you're at it, check out everything we have to offer on Enceladus, including this slide show highlighting the moon's plume and "tiger stripes." And stay tuned for updates: After Wednesday's scrape with Enceladus, Cassini is due to dig in again in August, and then at least twice more during the probe's extended mission.

If the results are interesting, that would bolster the case for making an even more ambitious trip to Enceladus. Later this month, European scientists are due to discuss a future space mission called TANDEM, which could send probes to the surface of Enceladus as well as Titan, another one of Saturn's most mysterious moons. NASA has a similar concept for a follow-up mission to Saturn's moons, called the Titan Explorer, which would be launched sometime after 2020.

There are lots of places to look for traces of life in our solar system - ranging from Enceladus to Mars to Jupiter's ice-covered moons. What do you think we'll find? Feel free to leave your comments below.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I think these scientist are absolutely brilliant. The way that they manage to extend missions and get more data out of a probe and the creative methods that they use is just awesome. I totally support my tax dollars being used ofr space exploration and believe that it is just a matter of time before someone discovers life on another world be it thru robotic probes to the moons of our systems gas giants, on Mars or even thru SETI detecting an alien signal.

Whether it is microscopic life in an underground ice deposit on Mars, life around a heat vent on Europa or Enceladus (or whatever is there) or even a stray broadcast of intelligent life, I think that just knowing that we are not alone might bring us closer together as a world when we realise how special we are and how much we have in common with our fellow humans.
The interactive look at the moon seemed great but as is most always the case, I could not hear the narrator because the background music is too loud. This happens to me all the time. Please tell makers of films like this we don't need loud music in the background!! I want to actually hear the information. If I want music, I'll turn on my stereo!
I did a paper on the Cassini / Huygens mission.
I've always been fascinated with Saturn. And when I found out what they were doing, that they were releasing a probe to Titan, I thought how cool is this. I hit the website every day, watching the countdown clock, waiting for seperation (Christmas Eve 2004). Then days later, I found myself doing the same for Huygens entry to Titan (Jan 14, 2005). If you haven't seen the pics you need to check them out.

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/images.cfm?subCategoryID=10

I didn't even know about the launch in 97. I found out weeks before the separation of Cassini and Huygens. The web site is excellent for navigating between pics, missions, and next encounters...

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.cfm

Of all the missions, this has got to be my favorite.

I don't know how the guys that put this together do it. I mean, they launch in 97, then have to wait till 2005 for separation and touchdown of Huygens. But then you have to think, Cassini traveled over 2 billion miles just to get to Saturn (guess that takes a bit).

Cudos Guys,
I want to build me a rocket.
i found this article interesting did you know that i like exploring and exploring yesterday i read my book of solar system then i found saturn's moon then i research the moon of saturn i did'nt find it instead i click the close scrape at Saturn's moon thanks for this article
This is not real. It is a movie script, a fantasy, a report of whats happening on a movie set like the apollo moon landings. A bus sized craft plows through a plume on the moon of another planet in our galaxy...yeah right.
Good point on the music. They do that a lot in documentary video. Also support 100% spending much more money on NASA. It gives us jobs on earth. The spin offs will help our standing as a technology leader and the information will help everyone on earth. I am just sick that the US is going to allow our ability to get a man from earth to orbit to just expire like an unwanted gift card.
Space exploration fascinates the heck out of me.
I can't read enough about the missions currently underway.
Is there life on these remote places? It remains to be seen.
I expect, if life is found, it will be microscopic in nature, but
will still give hope that there are other worlds in other
galaxies that have life similar to what we know here on earth.

Unless we develop some type of Star Wars transportation method,
we'll never visit these places, because they are light years
away from us. Explorers would die of old age before they got
there. Let's face it, who could go that long without cable TV?

All-and-all, the missions in our solar system today are changing the
way we look at our neighboring planets. The recent Mercury flyby is another
wonderful example of man's abilities.
I hope I'm alive to see what we discover when we fly past Pluto.
Mike
Otto, remember that this is a moon, not a planet. Yes, it is in our galaxy, but is not as far away as that implies, as it is also in our solar system - orbiting the same star that our earth does. Enceladus, Saturn's moon, is realtively close compared with other, more distant objects we have seen with telescopes and detected by gravitational wobbles of distant stars. Let's be real. We have military jets that fly many times the speed of sound. Do you really think that we can't propel a bus-sized object out of earth orbit? We certainly have the technology, and probably technology more sophisticated than that. I imagine you also don't believe there is water any place besides earth, and that you don't believe we have rovers on Mars. What rationale do you really have for your disbelief? This stuff is real.
The ignorance of some people just blows me away, how they could possibly believe that these interplanetary missions are fiction!  Voyager missions were sending back incredible photos of the solar system LONG before the technology existed to fake such things.  Wake up and get a clue people!
As much as I admire the accomplishments of those who pursue knowledge of other worlds, I wonder if we aren't losing focus on what makes us special; the fact that millions of people are starving to death on our planet as we spend billions to search for life elsewhere; when we now know that if we don't change our priorities here we will never achieve our dreams of going elsewhere. When mere mosquito nets will save thousands of lives a year in Africa, and we spend billions to search for microbes on Mars... how can we truly enjoy the search?
Otto Matick wrote.."This is not real. It is a movie script, a fantasy, a report of whats happening on a movie set like the apollo moon landings."

You're joking...right? not a very good joke.
Like that sad old man in the trailer in Nevada with all the cats ... pitiful!  I'm waiting for the missions to the Moon with the high resolution cameras so I (and everyone else) can see the Apollo landing sites.  The one at next to Hadley Rill ought to be a good one.  And ... just for the record ... don't you think the Russians, French, and the Japanese would sit quietly by while all the "faked" Apollo stuff continues to be aired?  There's a huge number of people on the planet that would truly LOVE to fry our beans over that!
Actually, there are alot of people like "Otto" who are conspiracy theorists who believe in nothing.

They believe the moon landings were staged, in aliens at Area 51, and that George Bush personally blew up the twin towers, and that drugs should be legalized. (that might explain their thought processes)

Sadly, they actually take themselves seriously.
Please don't feed the trolls (trolls meaning the attention hounds and flat-earthers, consipiracy theorists and the like).  They thrive on attention, by responding to them you are feeding their addiction.  I grew up in Huntsville, AL during the 1960's, it was a great place and time.  I miss it.
I look forward to seeing the sdata from the scrapes. I try to follow tthe space events and hope someday to participate in them. In the meantime, keep up the research and exploration, I'll be watching.
I am totally in favor of the money used to explore
other planets in our solar system.  It is amazing that people can sit at a computer in the U.S., or another country, and plot the course, and time it will take from launch to rendevouz with a distant moon.
De Wayne.  I agree we probably could do more to help the helpless on planet earth, but I didn't see anything in you message that had anything to say about the $15 Billion a month it coss this country to fight that Mickey Mouse War.  Get your priorities lined up and start writing your representatives in congress to get us out of this mess, so there is more money to do the things you would like to see done.
"fact that millions of people are starving to death on our planet as we spend billions to search for life elsewhere" ... the budget for NASA pales compared to the expense for the war in Iraq and defense waste.  The space program benefits all of mankind.  

Besides we cannot fed the world by ourselves.  Many people are starving because their governments are corrupt.
Dewayne you're ABSOLUTELY right! By the way, how many mosquito nets have you personally bought and sent to Africa to save lives instead of spending several times that amount on a pizza?

Put things in perspective. NASA's total budget is less than 1% of the US budget. A good portion of that budget goes into research carried out here on Earth in aeronautics (you know... making air planes safer for you to fly in) and propulsion.

What we stand to learn from these missions has the potential to change how our entire species looks at itself and its place in the universe. Of course, that potential combined with the derivative technology we use here on Earth and the navigation, communication, and weather satelites in orbit, certainly can't be worth the price of making twenty or so movies.
Otto, what education do you currently have? It is great to question the media, but reverse the questions. What makes you not believe? Proof? Do you believe in the holocaust? You don't believe in the landing on the moon. So what makes you such a pessimist? When you make a statement, you have a questionable intelligence. You need to back it up with data. When you are unable you back it up with data it makes you sound like two things - one a fool or two an idiot.

This was an interesting story, did not know they had launched. NASA has patience. I don’t know if I could have waited since 97. I do agree before we can explore the outer reaches of the universe we need to spend some money on the human race before we spend money on microbes. Are we that unconcerned what happens to individuals less fortunate than us? Save this planet before we search for other planet or moons to investigate. We have the intelligence to reach into the stars but not enough to fix our planet ecosystem?
The quest of the scientists, the physicists, the astronomers, and the astronauts (pioneers all) - it could not possibly be fiction because the story is founded on everything we know about reality, and the collected data presents us with many more new, fascinating,  and downright enigmatic questions than what we started with.  What sounds like fiction to me is, “It's the 21st century and there's an entire country somewhere that lacks the capability to make mosquito nets.”  Surely the reason for it is not because that country's government has squandered its resources on scientific research...
"...we spend billions to search for life elsewhere; when we now know that if we don't change our priorities here we will never achieve our dreams of going elsewhere."

  You speak as if yet other billions aren't already being spent on those and other 'Earthly' priorities. Have you (or others with similar opinions) found out just how much is being done? That kind of work, necessary though it is, is rarely as glamourous, nor is it easy to find the price tag as a given space project.

  And many of those 'more important things' involve politics, human behavior and other things that don't respond as well to having money thrown at them as technological (usually) issues do...

Jesus doesn't want us to go into space. The bible tells us about the tower of Babel and that it made God mad. We should not explore space.
When I was a kid (70's), following the Voyagers and Pioneers, I *couldn't WAIT* for the next big event, even though they were often years apart. These days it is getting harder and harder to 'stun' people (though Deep Impact seemed to do a good job of that), but I think *that* is a credit to just how successful the planetary exploration program has been; and by this I mean not just the spacecraft, but the people who then spend years figuring out what all the data means. Remember, the images are only the tip of the iceberg as far as data-ruturn goes!

As for conspiracy theorism and "spend NASA's budget on Earth" business, those have been addressed well by others above (and will have to be re-addressed ad infinitum...) so I won't waste electrons on them.
In regards to the mosquito net comment, you should thank BOINC (a SETI project), who is providing the technology to enable malariacontrol.net to do a project that might help find a cure for malaria.  How about that for a priority?
Accomplishments like this are all steps to the ultimate goal necessary to assure the continuation of the human race. Without taking these first rudimentary pioneering feats of exploration we will never get off of the planet on a permanent basis. Without exploration and the establishment of colonies on other planets here and eventually among the stars the human race will not survive. We will be snuffed out like the dinosaurs, be it from nature or our own hands.

Humans have always needed to see what is over the next horizon. What would have happened if Columbus or Amerigo Vespucci stayed home? We may never see this in our lifetime, but then again Columbus never saw what became of the New World.

Without funding the next step and taking the chances necessary to reach the next rung on the ladder of our evolution as a society, we will not survive.

We must walk before we can run
Can one really be surprised by the occasional doubter, however unaware of the world around them, when astronomical studies have become increasingly distracted by the apparant need to directly compete with science fiction? Case in point: The ever growing pursuit of xenobiology despite it's perfect failure rate. Even though the bar has been repeatedly lowered every several years (the search for intelligent life became the search for bacterial life became the search for organic molecules and water) making it ever easier to assert that "life may be out there", the results don't justify the hype. It seems one can't find any reference to a mission of space exploration in the media anymore without being confronted with the perfunctory "search for extraterrestrial life"--a search that would appear to be fueled on the one side by people trying to drum up funding and support for future missions from a public that learns much of their science from science fiction movies, and on the other side by people in the astronomy community that either failed organic chemistry or never took it in the first place.
The movie is recorded in 5.1, if you are playing back in 2.0 the center channels will be too quiet to hear.  Purchase a center channel speaker and it sounds fine.

I completely agree with the postings that we should be spending more on helping to feed and house the poor, just look elsewhere for the funds. How about the overly bloated military budget. Now over 600 Billion dollars a year, where 8 years ago it was 400 Billion! Whenever a new plane rolls off the line or some new unmanned predator kills some terrorist no one ever heard of, does anyone say we should be spending that money on the poor? Probably not. Before anyone comments on the cash strapped NASA maybe they should look at the overly bloated white elephant in the room.
to all fromnothians get to the mothership!!! this is your wake-up call. the end near. soon we will be home..
" When mere mosquito nets will save thousands of lives a year in Africa, and we spend billions to search for microbes on Mars... how can we truly enjoy the search?
Dewayne Blanco, Carencro, La."

I would think it far more efficient to spend a few minutes worth of what it costs for the military which we have used to invade two nations without reason. (Afghanistan offered to give the U.S. Bin Laden & associates if we would provide them with sufficient evidence to support the extradition. The lies behind our invasion of Iraq are well known. And both were our good buddies until it became politically expedient to name them enemies.)

Or we could take a few days worth of what is spent on agri-business subsidies.

Either would provide the monetary means of eliminating malaria in Africa without any impact on this country's minimal funding for science or space exploration.
Unfortunately, our population on Earth is growing such that killing a few million people by malaria is still not going to help the over crowding and ultimately the lack of food, water, shelter and space we will be desperately craving for survival.  
Already we are reading that we need to stop using carbon based fuels today to prevent the disaster of global warming on this Earth in 50 years.  (Like that is going to happen any time soon.)  
The western states want the waters of the Great Lakes piped out there.  They feel that we have too much.  Their ecosystem (a desert where no one should be living anyway) is more important than ours.  They have silicon valley that make our computer chips and they grow all our avacados and tomatos or is it tomatoes?  More important than some wildlife and shipping routes and a place to swim free.

Looking to outer space and innerspace is what we are suppose to do.  It is our manifested destiny.  If not, why are we intelligent enough to do it?  Why do we have the desire and will to do it?
Our studies in space will not give us a "place to go" as some hope for, but it may give us an answer to what we can do to survive the massive dieoff of humans in the next 150 years.  There has to be a reckoning somewhere along the line.  It happens to every over populated species I've ever seen.  
If we don't kill ourselves off, a super volcano, a large comet or a unseen star exploding 8,000 light years away will probably do it.  It happened before, why wouldn't it happen again?  We need to look for the answers so the human species can survive and thrive in balance.  Otherwise some intelligent insect will dig us up in a million years and put our bones in a museum, wondering how this simple primate could have gotten so intelligent and why they could have gotten wiped out?  Must not have learned anything.  Probably spent all their money on mosquito netting.
Jon C. from NJ, do you give your money to the poor? I think that if more people were interested in the sciences in general, this whole planet would be in a much better place.  [...]
Since early Terran life developed in the oceans, it would seem logical that the most logical priority to look for extra-terrestial life would be the large Jovian moons that apparently have vast oceans beneath an icy surface. All we need is a robot that can drill down a mile or so.
The matter-of-fact phrase "Since early Terran life developed in the oceans..." illustrates the problem of misinformation quite well. Despite the no doubt good intentions of the writer, it remains that this is a scientific myth. It is a regurgitated idea perpetuated by those in the scientific community who choose to remain blissfully unaware of the chemistry involved. But why is it not a fact? Because, briefly, the fact of the matter is that if large organic molecules such as proteins and nucleic acids were to occur at all, they would need to have been generated through a combination process known as a condensation reaction. Since a biproduct of such a condesation reaction of two amino acids is in fact a water molecule, such a reaction is prevented from occuring within a watery environment. Thus, as any organic chemist worth their salt can tell you, life could not have developed in the oceans. Yet the general public, including those interested in astronomy, still believes this fallacy because it has been repeated often enough and loudly enough by certain groups within the scientific community with an agenda that demands it.

Isn't it ironic that the very thing many, if not most, xenobiology enthusiasts are convinced will point them to alien life, water, is the very thing that will prevent life's constituents from forming in the first place?

Ignorance is not a crime, but ignorance deliberately perpetuated by the scientific community should be.
i love what NASA is doing, i really do, and you of you people are right in some shape or form.... but really think about this- if we dont find someway to expand in a number of years- what do you think is going to happen to this planet and everything on it??

Do you believe well have housing of the future?? air cars? spaceships to live in? where will we get the source of food needed to sustain us?

if anything trying to find new places in space or seeing what star or moon or planet can sustain our type of life would be the best thing for now. Sure there are people that are starving or people that are needing attention from another country or anoher, but if we dont prosper oneway or another, with the tools we have to make tat possible- were going to be like other past civilizations.

they say that were the only ones out here and that we were the first -maybe- but what if there were more of us put in the universe, what if we have next door nieghbors that have been watching us from day one but wont bother to help whats already selfish?

i for one do not want to be part of a dying race, do you? And even if what any of you think in what im sayng to be perposterous; thik again- the time will come in our lives when we will meet people that have been watching, waiting, thinking of plans to makeus pay for our cruelity towards what we have been givin....

it only a matter of time- and as for the people thinking that we cant go up to space; totally of balance people, we are to far into technology "NOT" to be able to. i love the fact that you can sit on the internet and see what places weve been and where were going-

but we really need to speed things up more, i think NASA knows whats going on in space, but wont tell us-why- nationwide panic and they might not think that it would happen n the next few years- hopefully.
Now that all is said and done I wonder how much the cosmic dust analyser glitch will impact the close approach analysis. The very name seems to suggest that it is unrelated to the moon simply because cosmic dust implies dust of cosmic origin.
$3.4 billion for this piece of space junk?
I wonder how many people $3.4 billion would feed????
Rather than discuss all the stupid things that governments do, I'd rather say how happy I am to be living in an age of discovery like we are! Adding to mankind's knowledge will help people in ways not imagined now. I'm all for space exploration and am pleased the rest of the 'first world' countries are doing the same. Perhaps the US, China, Russia, and the EU will combine efforts at some point: not a very realistic hope, but a lot could be achieved to the benefit of all.

The US might pay for NASA by a 'waste of time and intelligence' tax that works thusly:

Every time the media wants spend money sending over paid talking heads, journalists and  paparazzi to follow the latest starlet bimbo around to constantly report the status of their undergarments (if any), they instead must give that money to NASA and run an intelligent in-depth news segment on what's going on in space today. They could use the information already provided by NASA for free.
 It does take a while for us to get info back from a flyby of any kind and the results are worth the wait!!  In reguards to the poor of the world...unfortunately the U.S. can only do so much...even if we weren't at war in Iraq etc, people would still say we need to do more to help the poor.  Now not all of the poor in the U.S. are able to work but the ones who can just don't because they think they are below what jobs are available.  That's part of the problem with having illegals in this country, they will take those jobs because our poor won't.  Many other countries have poor also but the little help they recieve from us don't always go to the them because their governments/rich/terrorists people won't let them have it.  The people that go over to these countries to try and help the poor put their lives in danger every day whether they are soldier/civilian/cleric!
  The space program is very important because it isn't just about finding life out there.  Scientists are hoping to finding a planet/moon that will suppodrt life, HUMAN LIFE not just other life forms so that we may be able to releave the over crowding on Earth.
"Isn't it ironic that the very thing many, if not most, xenobiology enthusiasts are convinced will point them to alien life, water, is the very thing that will prevent life's constituents from forming in the first place?" -David Blaha, Wisconsin

I don't pretend by any means to be familiar with organic chemistry, but perhaps you misunderstand these "xenobiology enthusiasts'" interpretation of water's importance.  Since, as you say, the amalgamation of two amino acids forms water, would it not be reasonable to suggest that in a place with life this reaction would take place, and one would find water?  Or contrapositively, if there is no water, this reaction has not taken place and so there is no life?  As well, I think it would be reasonable to search specifically with simpler instrumentation for water, rather than using time and effort to become able to recognize the 20 or so amino acids or all of their limitless combinations.  If we never find water, we will never need such complex equipment and not use funds for it, and if we do find water, then we will have good reason to develop those same instruments.

I apologize if any of this ignorantly belies my level of experience as a senior in high school.

As for the subject at hand, I agree with the general consensus that these scraping missions will prove useful, if not for discovering life, at least for finding more about processes in the solar system.  I can sympathize with arguments of NASA as a gross misappropriation of funds, but I see, as others previously stated, this mere fraction of spenditure to be much more important to humanity than other areas that could be reapplied to foreign aid.
WE'VE GOT TO GET THERE!!!  Our sun is ~5B years away from a supernova that will zorch all life off this planet instantaneously.  We need to be a long ways away beyond Enceladus when it happens!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=743704

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google