ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Satellite debris lights up the sky

Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:46 PM by Alan Boyle


DOD
  CLICK FOR VIDEO
  Watch Pentagon video
  of the missile intercept.

About three dozen skywatchers in western Canada went out to see Wednesday night's total lunar eclipse and got a surprise bonus: the fireworks show created by the Pentagon’s shootdown of a falling spy satellite.

Other aftereffects, including what may have been the plume created by the satellite’s burning fuel, were seen back in Hawaii - near where the missile was launched for the orbital interception.

The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada's Prince George Center, located about 470 miles (750 kilometers) north of Vancouver, had long planned a public viewing event for the eclipse, said Brian Battersby, the group's Webmaster. A dozen members of the club and about twice that many non-members showed up, even though the viewing conditions were less than ideal.

"The clouds were unfortunately covering the eclipse for most of it," he told me.

Then there was a break in the clouds to the west. "My girlfriend turned around to look at the Andromeda Galaxy, which is named after our daughter," Battersby joked. "As she was looking for that, she noticed something and said, 'What's that!?'"

She and the other skywatchers spotted what appeared to be a persistent meteor trail, zooming from the southwest in their direction.

"I started noticing more of them, quite a few trails that we saw," Battersby said. "Six or so bright ones, and there must have been a dozen dimmer ones. They came in waves. It was quite a long stream of debris, not just a couple of isolated meteors."

It didn't take long to figure out that the "meteors" were almost certainly bits of debris from the impact between the spy satellite and a missile launched from a U.S. Navy cruiser thousands of miles away, near Hawaii. Satellite trackers knew that the spacecraft's projected path would take it over Canada, and the debris fell along the same path.

Unfortunately, the cameras had already been put away when the fireworks began, due to the disappointment over the eclipse, Battersby said. And the Prince George observers appeared to be in just the right place at the right time. Skywatchers in British Columbia's Okanagan region as well as Edmonton in the neighboring province of Alberta reported seeing no debris, Battersby said. It's not yet clear whether there were sightings farther north, either in Alaska or Canada.

There were some sightings back in Hawaii, however - and we're not just talking about the high-resolution missile video made by military spotters. On the SpaceWeather.com Web site, Maui photographer Rob Ratkowski reported a different kind of close encounter:

"I had my doubts about getting any images. I went to our site on Haleakala w/ Dr. JD Armstrong and pointed my 770mm refractor towards the direction believed to be the correct area. I spotted a fast moving point of light and began shooting frames. I knew that I had something and it was at the time the Navy stated. Also the AMOS 3.67 meter scope was also pointed in the same direction as mine and it tracked to the north and down what I believe was the path of the destroyed satellite. We then set up to shoot the eclipse as seen from Maui. Towards the end of the eclipse we noticed a long faint trail over the area of the satellite intercept that we believe to be the hydrazine vapor, it persisted into darkness. A very interesting evening on Maui."


Adrian Wyld / CP / AP
A sequence of images taken every 20 minutes shows
the progress of Wednesday's total lunar eclipse.

Was it merely a lucky accident that the satellite intercept happened to occur during the total phase of Wednesday's lunar eclipse?

I'm sure the skywatching conditions weren't the top thing on President Bush's mind when he gave the go-ahead for the satellite intercept. There's no doubt, however, that the eclipse brought out more observers than might otherwise be watching for debris. And as any meteor-watcher knows, it's much easier to see what's going on in a dark sky when the moon's glare is gone.

Did you see the eclipse? Were you a Far North observer who spotted "meteors" during the same time frame, around 10:30 to 10:50 p.m. ET Wednesday? Feel free to add your reports as comments below.

If you completely missed the big show, you can get a vicarious thrill by checking out SpaceWeather.com's eclipse gallery and interactive photo map. You'll find a goodly number of videos of the eclipse over on YouTube. I particularly like this time-lapse video that shows you the progression from full moon to fully eclipsed moon. And if you want to learn more about the science behind lunar eclipses, check out our "Inconstant Moon" interactive.

Although we won't see another total lunar eclipse until 2010, there's a total solar eclipse coming up Aug. 1, and you can bet we'll have lots of coverage of that event. In the meantime, be prepared by clicking through our "Moonshadow" interactive.

Update for 2:20 p.m. ET: Space.com has its own take on the shootdown sightings, with quotes from Ratkowski as well as a link to the See-Sat-L online forum, the place to be if you're a satellite fan. Smaller pieces of satellite debris may be coming down over the next day or two. It might be hard to distinguish them from run-of-the-mill meteors, but if anyone can figure it out, See-Sat-L's legions will.

This page on the Zarya Web site contains some great information about the spy satellite's ground track - illustrating why Prince George was in such a prime position for seeing the debris and showing the track(s) along which people could expect to see debris. People in Michigan, for example, were most likely to see debris during the third orbit after interception, which was significantly later than 10:30 p.m.

Update for 4:40 p.m. ET: We've just put up a First Person gallery of lunar eclipse photos that highlights images from msnbc.com users - and that means you! Take a look, vote for your favorite picture, and feel free to submit your own.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It was absolute ideal conditions to view the entire eclipse from here...
I live in San Antonio, Texas, and last night around 10:40 I thought I was seeing Jupiter?, I'm not sure, my husband said we could see a planet last night during the eclipse.  But the red star-like thing I saw was kind of twinkling, then turned orange and disappeared.  I kept watching trying to prove to my husband that I had seen something (still thinking it was a planet) and I saw a real quick one, more orange than anything, then poof, gone.  When we went inside I saw on CNN that the satellite had been destroyed just a few minutes ago.  I think I was seeing the wreckage coming down.  
I don't know what I saw, but I know I saw something.  Did anyone else see something last night?  And from where?
My 10 year old daughter looked out her bedroom window last night after she went to bed around 9:20 CST and this morning told me she saw a rocket in the sky and that it was really scary.  She had no prior knowledge of the satellite issue.  I immediately thought of the satellite, flicked on the tv and checked the internet and indeed it was blown up right around that same time.  Is it possible that she would have seen debris here in St. Paul Minnesota?  She said it looked like a rocket because it had flames trailing it. She even said that the noise is what made her get up and look.  She isn't one to make things up.  

Thanks,
Marilyn
Nicole, unfortunately Corpus Christi (TX) was total cloud cover last night...
Great night to see both the lunar eclipse and objects streaking across the sky.  I was on the phone and said to the person on there that I was seeing quite a few streaks across the sky and I am in Northern Michigan!  I was in -10 degree weather in a sleeping bag and enjoyed every minute of it.
I saw the eclipse from central florida. It was a wondrous site!
I went outside to watch the eclipse at 10:00 ET in Portage Mi. and then went back out about quarter to 11:00 ET and was watching the eclipse when I thought I saw a meteorite falling. At the time I didnt know that they were shooting down the satellite. Now I realize that I saw part of the satellite falling.  
I saw the eclipse (first one I've ever seen), it started around 6pm PST or so and it was really interesting, there were rumors of clouds and rain but I had a completely clear view through the whole thing.  Unfortunately didn't see any debris from the satellite but wasn't looking either. Anyone in Oregon see any debris?
My wife and I were watching the lunar eclipse in Sacramento at 7:25 pm PST and then turned to the east and began walking along a dark pathway. At 7:30 pm (10:30 EST) we both saw what looked like a large fireball beginning at about 30 degrees above the eastern horizon, and ending at about 10 degrees. Neither of us had seen a fireball that large before. And the other interesting thing was that it appeared green. We both immediately assumed it was debris from the satellite falling through the earths atmosphere. We were surprised this morning to find very little mention of sightings by others in this area.
I told my daughter to walk outside and take a look at the lunar eclipse. She came bak in telling me that she saw a bright shooting star. I am now wandering if she saw part of the satellite that was shot down. I wish I would have stayed outside a little longer now!
As I was taking a quick glance at the moon near the beginning of the eclipse (which was pretty impressive and the skies were mostly clear here), I spotted what I initially thought was a "shooting star", but didn't quite look the same as your run of the mill meteor. I saw other smaller streaks of light falling away from the main fireball and that's when I realized that I might have been seeing the debris from the satellite re-entering the atmosphere. What a fluke that I looked right at that exact time!
what kind of satelite was it that our Navy shot down?  My son asked me, but I didn't know the answer.  Thanks!
I was able to watch the Lunar Eclipse from The Twin Cities metro region in Minnesota.

It was very cold here, making for a crystal clear sky - watching the moon slowly become covered up, then watching it change to a reddish orange as the diffracted light from our atmosphere hit the lunar surface was incredible.

As for the reader from Texas who wondered if she saw the explosion of the spy satellite - very unlikely. Even though the impact took place ~120 miles up, there's little if any chance that it would have been above your horizon.

I was checking from my more Northern location, and didn't see anything. No surprise about that though - if the people in Edmonton, Canada couldn't see it, then even Minnesota was likely out of the viewing range - Texas would probably be completely eliminated.
If the satellite was carrying hydrazine, which is hypergolic (it can't burn without the presence of oxygen), and the satellite was in space, then what was the oxidizer that caused the fireball?
The sky was much too cloudy in Northern Utah to see anything.
Hydrazine, besides being hypergolic, can also be used as a mono-propellant--it can burn WITHOUT an oxidizer, although this is less efficient than using nitrogen tetra-oxide as an oxidizer, as larger spacecraft do (such as Soyuz, the Shuttle, and Apollo). However, it eliminates the need for separate oxidizer tanks and pumps, so it can be worthwhile for smaller spacecraft.
Yeah the day before the satelite was shot down the space station and Atlantis were due for a pass over Texas, and i saw them. They were two distinct dots of orange light very close together. Then , suddenly, they just dissappeared. I guess this was when they passed into the shadow of the Earth. The staellite's destruction, however, was only visible from the northeastern parts of the US, ( Oregon, Washington, etc) ,  and Canada, so i highly doubt anyone in Texas saw the explosion, unless a wormhole appeared and the other end was near the satellite.... I was sad that the eclipse was blocked from my view by overcast clouds in my area.

Hypergolic means that the burning starts without any external ignition source.
A full moon makes one feel cold.  Being in below zero weather drives that feeling home.  Then, the turning of the full moon orange gave an additional feeling of dread and consternation.  
A very creepy site of which we had a perfectly crystal clear view.  
Just makes you feel so small and insecure.  It is no wonder people in the past would weep and cry out in alarm and dismay when the heavens changed before their eyes.
By the way, my 11 year old son thought it was "cool".
I live up in Kodiak, Alaska, and unfortunatly I couldn't witness the spectacular display of the lunar eclipse. I was bummed, but I am thankful that some people posted a myriad of photos of the eclipse.
Saw the eclipse under nice clear skies up here in Fort McMurray, 5 hours drive north of Edmonton. Didn't see any satellite debris though.
re: "If the satellite was carrying hydrazine, which is hypergolic (it can't burn without the presence of oxygen), and the satellite was in space, then what was the oxidizer that caused the fireball?"

Larry,
The hydrazine would have used the same oxidizer that it used in the thruster engines. Because the thrusters operate in space, an oxidizer has to be included as part of the fuel system. Hydrazine (or unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine) is only hypergolic (ignites on contact with an oxidizer) if used in concert with a separate oxidizer. If the thrusters on the satellite indeed used hydrazine as the fuel in a hypergolic system, then the oxidizer (nitrogen tetroxide, liquid oxygen?) would have been on board too. Since a separate oxidizer has not been mentioned in any of the reports, then the hydrazine may have been used as a monopropellant in a decomposing exothermic reaction...which brings us back to your question. I'm inclined to think it was the kinetic energy released in the high-speed collision vaporizing the hydrazine (and lots of other stuff) that caused the fireball in addition to (perhaps) the hydrazine actually reacting with some oxidizer. Follow the links in wikipedia on hydrazine and monopropellants for more. Fascinating stuff. Here's a link to a company that makes monopropellant thrusters... http://cs.space.eads.net/sp/SpacecraftPropulsion/MonopropellantThrusters.html
Larry, hydrazine is usually "oxidized" by nitric acid; simply mix the two, and they ignite.  No atmospheric oxygen necessary.  There were most likely two tanks, once for the hydrazine, one for the nitric acid.
I missed the eclipse, but went out to watch the crossing of the soon to be doomed spy sat at 6:36pm. Just as it was about to come into view I saw a shooting star that came just prior to the sat at the same point in the sky. As it disipated the sat instantly came into view and crossed with incredible brightness. I have seen the Space station cross many times and this was as bright if not brighter.  Just thought it was ood that something streaked by the sat from what seemed to be the same angle from my point of view.
I witnessed both the satellite debris falling through the atmosphere and the lunar eclipse. It was between 7-8 pm in Bellevue Washington, a suburb of Seattle. The debris was more compelling I felt. By the way, I assume this was an opportunity to showcase our superior anti satellite missile capabilities. Hydrazine isn't that dangerous. The Chinese tested an anti satellite weapon less than a year ago. This was a arms race.
Hydrazine reacts in the presence of only hydrazine to nitrogen and hydrogen. It has been used as a single fuel rocket propellent for 60+ years.
It 'burns' quite well in the absence of oxygen.
I am in Australia and it is Friday night here. I went outside at about 7.30ish to put some rubbish in the bin. I saw a starlike object crossing the sky ... very quickly. At first I thought it was a plane but it was moving too quickly it then broke up into two pieces which followed the same path for about 15 or 20 seconds and then burned up...
In Virginia Beach, it was way too cloudy to see anything... :(
I would like to thank all professors & scientists who volunteer their time.
My wife, son & I had a wonderfull time watching the eclipse at the Elachee Nature Science Center 55 mi NE of Atlanta Wednesday night.
With their time and telescopes they showed us not just the eclipse but, Saturn, Rofolus, Serrius, Mars and the constellations. We had a joyous and memorable experience.
My family and I were watching the eclipse in Samoa, California at around 7:45.  After my family went home, I went back out to watch more.  It started clouding up so I started back in the house when a clearing occurred.  I saw what I thought was a shooting star.  I realize now it must have been the satilite.
The satellite debris was visible in Tillamook, Oregon. Fortunately I work nights, and was outside to see it. I was a little confused, at first, until I remembered reading about the planned missile launch last week. I do believe the debris was almost as pretty as the eclipse.
Larry: Oxidizer was probably nitrogen tetroxide - also on the satellite.
I was watching the eclipse from my front porch, and early into it I saw a rather large "shooting star". I figure it was more likely to be a stray piece of the debris. The night was clear and lovely for viewing the sky in Northwest Florida.
My wife and I went out to see the eclipse, Wed. night. Just as we arrived at the overlook, she was looking directly south, she saw what she thought was a shooting star. Later when we arrived back home, we aw on the news that the satellite had been shot down. On reflectin, we believe that the shooting star she witnessed was mostly likely a bit of the debris from the shootdown.
Regarding hydrazine:
Hypergolic means it will spontaneously ignite without a spark -- doesn't have anything to do with oxygen presence.  Two hydrazine derivatives called DMH and UDMH are hypergolic when mixed with nitrogen tetroxide.  Regular hydrazine "burns" without oxygen or any other oxidizer to form ammonia gas and nitrogen gas.  It isn't hypergolic; it needs a catalyst to "burn" controllably.  Regular hydrazine -- not DMH or UDMH -- is what's commonly used in satellite thrusters.  Any "fireball" was likely the warhead from the SM-3 missile or debris burning as it fell through the atmosphere.

BTW, full overcast in Lexington, KY -- no satellite debris or lunar eclipse visible here.
The eclipse was very clear and magnificent.WOW
I watched the eclipse from Fort Worth .We were fortunate that the moon was at about 50 to 60 degrees and light contamination did not interfere.I was disapointed that our school age kids were not aware of what brings about the eclipse.Too busy with TAKS studies I guess.
Larry, hydrazine is chemically unstable and can decompose upon shock or contact with certain metals.  A lot of heat is released when this happens.  Actually, I believe that no oxidizer is typically used with hydrazine as a propellent on these satellites.

"Fireball" may not be the right term, but I think the missille impact could clearly cause a hydrazine explosion.
The point to the Chinese is that we just shot down a satellite with a mass-produced missle that was deployed twenty years ago. Launched from a ship at sea using standard tracking hardware also deployed twenty years ago. Message: you're still more than twenty years behind.
Message: If we can hit a bullit with a bullit.....What else Ya Got? It was a kinetic hit....no war head....Ohhh yea....a big explosion...if there was "ANY" fuel on board it went on empact.....Bear in mind we landed a satalite probe on a astoroid in the Kiber Belt, a billion miles beyond Neptune...using Ion drive to get there....what else ya got?
All I can say is way the go USA....great shot
In London Ontario, I saw about 15 parallel contrails from satellite debrise, moving from north west to south east in approx. the same time that the satellite was supposed to appear over London Ontario.  Probably in a 10 degree spread, but all parallel.  The skies were crystal clear, but presently nobody in Ontario has reported it.

The lunar eclipse was a bummer here in FBX,AK; virtually within seconds of moonrise clouds slammed shut over the moon and it stayed that way until long after totality was over.

There's alot of smoke and mirrors surrounding this so-called "shootdown" , folks. First, one of Newton's Laws guarantees that nothing was in fact 'shot down' at all. It was simply broken up. Second, this act was 50% political statement, 50% message to the Chinese, and 0% safety related. It had *very little* to do with hydrazine, whatever-golic it is.....  and it only replaced one miniscule threat (hydrazine) with another (debris which will now fall all over the place; and no NOT all of it can be guaranteed to 'burn up' in the atmosphere. Third, to me this was a blatant waste of $50-60 million that could have been spent much more productively. Yeah, the missile was already bought and paid for, but now we have to go buy another one and reset everything. What a deal for a country so deep in hock to these very chinese the that if they decided to pull the economic plug on us we'd be in real trouble.. no missiles involved.   Finally, while it was the chinese who set the precedent, this act simply continues a damaging and potentially dangerous pattern of behavior. This IS the way arms races start. Its also a way to end up with earth-orbital space so full of junk we can't even go there (e.g. even now, the shuttles and the space station have been hit by small debris several times. The chinese added tens of thousands more pieces with their similarly foolish act last year.)

By putting forth such a silly cover story, the people involved in this merely look stupid, to me....  
All these people that thought they saw shooting stars nowhere near the debris field probably really did see shooting stars and not satelitte debris - they are quite easy and not uncommon to see during an eclipse or new moon.

I'm more curious as to why everyone heaped scorn on the Chinese for shooting down one of their satelittes but people don't mind when we shoot down one of ours...

Why are some some nitwits so defensive out there?

There was no point to the Chinese. We have been destroying satellites since the '80's (ASAT tests and treaties), most of the space debris in space was caused by us and most everybody knows this; certainly the Chinese and definetily not the defensive lamebrains.

What they should see, and learn, is how we test a new weapons system, fill the space with debris and all the lamebrains are thankfull and cheering. Whereas when the Chinese finally catch up with us, they get villified and our generals are talking about developing bombers than can strike deep within China!
I watched periodically through the intermittent cloud cover from west central Florida just NW of Tampa. I was able to glimpse the eclipse during the occasional passing of the clouds, and also saw what must have been an actual shooting star and not debris. It appeared whitish in color, but streaked from south to north between the earth and the moon, dissapearing into the could cover before I could determine its eventual trajectory. I am not sure of the exact time, but it was between 9:30 and 10 PM ET
Chinese finally catch up with us, they get villified and our generals are talking about developing bombers than can strike deep within China!

Talk about being a moron....We have had bombers that could reach china for 30+ years now. The Chinese shot a sat down that was in a 500mile high orbit...the debris from that will stay up there for 20 years even creating a hazard for the ISS in the years too come. We shot down a sat in Low Earth Orbit that was going to reenter the atmosphere and burn up within a month. No matter what you say 1000lbs of hydrazine on a 4000lb sat would leave most likely on the order of 250lbs falling to the earth and most likely being dispersed in the area the size of a small city/town. Quit bashing on anything and everything our government does anyway personally I feel safe knowing that we have it in our power to intercept an object in space traveling 22,000mph. I bet all you naysayers would not be so critical if that was an incoming North Korean ICBM...
Boy, mention the Chinese and suddenly words like nitwit and moron get lobbed about... something about "them" brings out the irrationals.

Is it a fact that the debris cloud from our shootdown will be harmless to anything else that is also in a low orbit?  I don't think that's been definitively answered by anyone in authority.
I'm with you Frank of Dallas. Kind of wish they'd get 'weeded out' sometimes, but one of the things I appreciate about this 'forum' is that I get to read what other people think (even if I *do* think it's irrational).   The name-calling I could do without though....  

Now, G'me your lunch-money JS.

Around 10 something last night on February 13, 2009, there was a loud boom heard throughout our county. I live in Kentucky. The police did not know whether it was a plane or train crash or something else. But then they found that it was some of the debris that had fallen from the collision that happened in space on Tuesady. This was very scary.  Where ever the impact of the debris happened the sound was heard in a 500 mile radius. I live in the southeastern portion of Ky and the sound was heard from Tennessee, North Carolina and a few other states.
http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/39601352.html


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=688746

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google