ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Was Mars too salty for life?

Posted: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:54 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / JPL-Caltech / Cornell
NASA's Spirit rover captured this view looking northward from the north edge of the
Home Plate plateau, where it will be spending the Martian winter as a stationary
"weather station." Click on the image for a larger version.

Life on ancient Mars just got tougher.

Not only was Martian water highly acidic in ancient times, but it was also extremely salty, researchers reported today in Boston at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

"In fact, it was salty enough that only a handful of known terrestrial organisms would have a ghost of a chance of surviving there when conditions were at their best," Harvard biologist Andrew Knoll, a member of the Mars rover science team, told reporters.

When you add in the earlier findings about how acidic Martian water was, back in the era when the rocks now being studied were formed, the picture of the Martian environment becomes so forbidding that Knoll couldn't think of any organism on Earth that could survive.


NASA / JPL-Caltech / Cornell
This view from NASA's Opportunity
rover shows bedrock in a layer
informally named "Gilbert," around
the inside of Victoria Crater. A thin
"fin" of rock rises from one of
Gilbert's edges. Click on the image
for a larger version.

"There aren't that many of those environments around," he observed. The organisms would have had to withstand the corrosiveness of water draining out from an acid mine as well as the salinity of water pooled on a salt flat.

Knoll's findings are based on an analysis of the minerals sampled by Opportunity as it explored the Martian plain known as Meridiani Planum, where it landed just over four years ago. The analysis looked at the present-day chemical content and worked backward in time, using a computer model as a "gauge of paleosalinity," Knoll said.

Other evidence comes from an analysis of one of the more recent pictures to come from Opportunity, a close-up of a rock known as Gilbert. The slab is covered with the blueberry-like stones that have been often been seen in Meridiani Planum. But it also sports what Knoll called "Cadillac-like fins" along an edge. He said those fins tell geologists that the rocks were formed by fluid flow but have been exposed to the elements for a long time.

For Knoll, the bottom line is that even the rocks of Meridiani Planum, where Opportunity found its best evidence for ancient water, would have been no place for life as we know it.

"By the time the Meridiani rocks formed, broadly speaking three and a half to four billion years ago, the planetary surface at Mars was ... my favorite three-word characterization is, 'arid, acidic and oxidizing,'" Knoll said. "That's not a very pleasant place to live, and it's a worse place to try to do the chemistry that is generally thought to have given rise to life on this planet."


NASA / JPL-Caltech / Cornell
This view from NASA's Opportunity
rover shows a stretch of layered
bedrock informally named "Lyell,"
part of a bright band around the
inside of Victoria Crater. Click on
the image for a larger version.

That means future probes would probably have to look elsewhere for evidence of life - either deep underground, or someplace where rock layers from the earliest epochs of Martian history were exposed, Knoll said.

"Probably the best place to look for evidence of Martian life ... is in Mars' earliest history, the first 500 or 600 million years, the interval that precedes the deposition of Meridiani Planum," Knoll said. "We know those places exist. They've been characterized from orbit."

The bad news is that Mars, like Earth, may have been hit by waves of extinction-level cosmic impacts during that time period - an epoch that geologists call the Late Heavy Bombardment.

But there's also good news, for Knoll as well as anyone else who wants more definitive answers to the questions about life on Mars:

  • For one thing, Opportunity and its twin rover, Spirit, are still going strong after four years of operations on Mars. In fact, Cornell University astronomer Steve Squyres, the principal investigator for the Mars rover mission, noted that Spirit made its "biggest discovery" only recently. That discovery came when the rover kicked up a deposit of almost pure silica - which indicates that hot springs or steam vents were active during ancient times.

  • For another thing, the Phoenix Mars Lander is due to land in Mars' north polar region in May. That probe is designed to dig into the cold ground and look for evidence of water and the other chemical building blocks for life.

  • Finally, the Mars Science Laboratory, a rover far more capable than Spirit and Opportunity, is being readied for its 2009 mission to look for even more signs of ancient life. Richard Cook, project manager for the mission, said the list of potential landing sites has been whittled down to six promising candidates. "The real question is ... to try to find the place that not only could have been a habitable place in the past, but probably more importantly, [the place that] was able to preserve the signs that it could have been inhabited," Cook said.

No matter how the current life-on-Mars debate ends up, the prospects are good for having a permanent presence at the Red Planet from here on out, in the form of rovers and orbiters, said Charles Elachi, director of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

"Think of them as robotic scientific stations which have been studying that planet for a decade, similar to the scientific stations we have in Antarctica. ... You're using them on a regular basis to understand what's happening, in this case, on another planet," Elachi said.

To review the past four years of Red Planet odysseys, check out our "Return to the Red Planet" archive and our slide show of "Mars' Greatest Hits," as well as NASA's Mars exploration Web site.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It is interesting but totally useless information and a waste of billions of dollars that could be used to help us survive on earth.
If you want to know how life began invest a couple of dollars and buy a Bible.
Jerry in Alaska, wonderful, someone with common sense!  The "Scientific Community" at NASA or ESA can postulate ideas all the time, but what about common sense--guess that course isn't a requirement for a Ph. D in Astrobiology.  
There isn't any consensus agreement as to what volumn of water composed the ancient oceans on Mars, nor an agreement on the present volumn of water ice under the surface, in caverns, or even in an extinct magma chamber under any one of the volcano's.  Therefore, based upon assumption, acidic water could exist underground and carving out extensive underground aquaifers.  Alternatively, an extinct magma chamber could have become an underground oasis for life that is based upon chemosynthesis of compounds within thermal vents.  As a thought experiment in creativity and critical thinking, to the NASA Ph. D's, try to imagine removing all the magnma from the "Yellowstone" supervolcano and completely fill the cavity with water--either acid or fresh and try to visualise life existing in this oasis for millions of years.  It would have some energy, heat from the internal core of the planet, water would exist in liquid form, the above landscape would act as a "plug" or a "cork" on a bottle of vinegar?  Did you Ph. D's over there at NASA and ESA forget about vinegar worms?  Or do you guys and gals just look at the pretty pictures and try to explain it with what you know.  Everyone of you need to go back to school and learn common sense and some creativity workshops as it wouldn't hurt any one of you!
Life is abundant every where.  I can believe that mars is to salty for earth life, but what about martian life.  The life, if there is any, can adapt to the climate and surroundings.  Look at the evoultion of man for example.  We have made big strides in our evolution, so why cant life on another planet make those changes?
Wow too salty eh?? I'm in 7th grade and this stuff intrigues me when I get bored.
I really enjoy reading about the whole space thing and I Thank God for the people whom are so advance in their field of knowledge. This does make one think about the Creator of all things!!!
The big question that Knoll has not addressed, but that other scientists are working on is this:  Is there life on Earth in very salty and very acidic waters?  The answer is yes.  There are acid saline lakes in Western Australia with pH 1.5, TDS (total dissolved solids) 300 parts per thousand. As a comparison, seawater has a pH 8.1 and TDS 35 parts per thousand.  So, these Western Australian waters are extreme for earth, but likely similar to past shallow surface waters and groundwaters on Mars.  These Western Australian acid saline waters contain microorganisms. Therefore, the suggestion that martian waters were too salty and too acidic for life made by Knoll is not well-founded.  Check the literature.
Why cant it be that Mars might have salt water creatures
The point (and I think its a good one) that martian life could, in fact probably would, be something completely different than what we know is repeatedly made here. And I am surprised by some of the statements coming from scientists, who should know better, about how 'bad for life' their findings may be when they don't know what kind of life they are talking about. In point of fact scientists, including me, are *very well aware* of this Mr. Smyth, the question of what constitutes life is one constantly discussed in such circles. The fact that a handful seem to forgotten that does not change this.

Allen: Yes Mars's surface pressure is only about 6 mBar which is roughly equivalent to 30 km up on Earth (our surface pressure is about 1000mBar). It is therefore *currently* impossible for liquid water to exist for long (it would simultaneously boil and freeze). But there is lots of evidence that Mars once had a much denser atmosphere, and that it had massive amounts of liquid water. But this may have been billions of years ago....   a scientist recently embarrassed himself deeply by making the claim that he saw a pond of water in a rover image, which turned out to be a picture of a cliff face....

The stuff in the crater bottom is dark sand, and NOT water....

As for the 'crinoid cover up', c'mon; conspiracy theories are a dime a dozen, and that sure don't look like no crinoid t'me....just a rock.

There almost surely *was* another planetary object where the asteroid belt is now; the existence of solid iron meteorites tells us this. But the asteroid belt has never contained more than a few percent of an earth-mass of rock and iron . . . how it was broken up is unknown, and that's as far as the story goes.

The subject was Mars, DC. Again, that's *Mars*.

Why couldn't there be life?  Examples of extremeophiles exist in nearly every corner of our globe.  There are micro-organisms that live in the highly acidic very hot geysers in Yellowstone NP.  The black smokers at the sea floor are teamining with life.  So to simply state that life could not exist becuase of acidity... is absurd to the maximum extent possible.  LIFE CAN AND WILL.
WHY is it that when people are searching for life outside our own planet they don't like it when us god freaks as so put it. makes a comment. but when there lying in bed dying the first thing they cry out for is god .can you answer that one boys or maybe dr.zaius can fill us in with his great wisdom...
hmm. How profound of me i am very sorry. i am baptist a a strong believer at that too. i attend church about 2 times a week. Please remember that this is a scientific website; keep an open mind and please just don't bring personal religion into the matter. i believe there are alot of possibilities for mars and yes our poor soul when earth is gone. yet you have to wonder how far will we have spread through out the galaxy? And how much will we really need earth for by that time?

humans are advancing far faster than they use to. we will eventually crack a few more scientific break throughs and a human may be able to live forever who is to dictate the possibilities? lets leave it to the scientist.
how come we think that it is salty but we havent been up there?
There is a constant thread from NASA that "everything on Mars was formed billions of years ago and nothing has changed" yet when they claim that the bedrock of Meridiani formed billions of years ago, they are missing a major, obvious flaw in their thinking- look at the sedimentary layers *inside the craters* which are NOT billions of years old (by their own dating system).  Those layers are shaped like the crater floor, vary in thickness with the crater cross section, and therefore *must have formed after the crater!*  How hard is that to see, even for a rock collector?  It is very disappointing that so many inconsistencies appear in the statements from the "authorities" (like the peroxide claims).  It is chemically and physically impossible for hydrogen peroxide to exist in Martian soil because of the presence of iron sulfate salt- duh!  Th two chemicals explode on contact, and NASA has clearly stated that iron sulfate is about 20% of the soil.  So who do you trust when they screw up both geology AND chemistry?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=668749

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google