ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



America's space age turns 50

Posted: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:08 AM by Alan Boyle


NASA
The Jet Propulsion Laboratory's William Pickering, University of Iowa physicist
James Van Allen and rocket scientist Wernher von Braun hold up a model of
Explorer 1 at a news conference after hearing the satellite had reached orbit on
Jan. 31, 1958. Click on the image to watch a newsreel report on the launch.

Carl Raggio still remembers how tense he felt exactly 50 years ago, on the night America entered the Space Age.

He and his fellow engineers were playing gin rummy at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. - but their minds weren't fully on the game. They were waiting for the beep-beep-beep that would tell them the satellite they had slaved over for months had actually reached orbit. "That's an anxious time," he told me this week. "That's the gut time."

Then the definitive signal came. It came later than expected, but nevertheless it came, at 9:45 p.m. PT on Jan. 31, 1958. Explorer 1 was circling Earth for the first time - and proving that America could match the Soviets on the Cold War's orbital frontier.

At a Washington news conference, the rocket pioneer who came to America from Nazi Germany rejoiced. "We have firmly established our foothold in space," Wernher von Braun declared. "We will never give it up again."

Meanwhile, back in Pasadena, Raggio could finally tell his wife about the project he had to keep secret. "I called her up at about 11 o'clock at night and asked her, 'Guess what we're doing?'" he recalled.

What Raggio and his co-workers were doing was getting America into the space game.

The achievement is being celebrated this week with special vigor at JPL at Pasadena - as well as at Cape Canaveral, Fla., where the rocket was launched, and in Huntsville, Ala., where von Braun and his cadre of German engineers were based.

Military origins
Fifty years ago, the operations in Pasadena, Huntsville and Cape Canaveral were mostly military in nature. Long before 1958, several U.S. teams were working to develop missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons to another continent - just as the Soviets were.

In fact, the traditional wisdom is that von Braun's Army-led effort could have put a satellite in space in 1956, but higher-ups worried that an Army launch might send too warlike a signal to Moscow. Instead, President Eisenhower favored the Navy's Project Vanguard, which had more civilian participation.

Then came Sputnik's history-making launch in October 1957, followed less than a month later by Sputnik 2 and the first dog in orbit. Eisenhower pressed his rocketeers to come up with an answering volley within 90 days.

The Vanguard rocket failed spectacularly in December, earning the nickname "Flopnik." Then it was the Army's turn. Von Braun's team readied the Army's Juno 1 rocket, a modified Redstone ballistic missile. JPL built the satellite, which would carry scientific experiments designed under the direction of the University of Iowa's James Van Allen.

Raggio, now 79, said there were long days at the lab, working on the spacecraft's design. There were also long stretches of tedium as the designers waited for the launch. "We played cards, and that was mostly gin," he said. "Gin was a short game."

Cards loomed large in the Explorer 1 team's mind-set. JPL's project manager for the satellite, Jack Froehlich, saw the effort as an opportunity for America to deal itself into the space game after Sputnik's winning hand. He was quoted as saying: "When a big pot is won, the winner sits around and cracks bad jokes, and the loser cries, 'Deal!'"

Froehlich even had decks of cards printed up and passed them out to team members, Raggio recalled. "I happened to have the joker," he said.

Up until the night of the launch, JPL's engineers called the satellite "Project Deal" - but in the end, Eisenhower decided on a different name. "We didn't know until we heard it come over the radio that it was named 'Explorer,'" Raggio said.

Scientific payoff
Explorer 1 gave America a chance to recover some of its confidence and prestige after the Sputnik shock, but there was a scientific payoff as well: The data returned by the satellite showed that Earth was not surrounded by a swarm of killer pebbles, as some scientists had feared. However, the cosmic-ray readings hinted at the existence of bands of radiation surrounding the planet - an unexpected result that led to the discovery of the Van Allen Belts.

"It established the first scientific discovery of the Space Age," JPL historian Erik Conway said.

The rise of space science in 1958 also established a new Space Age role for JPL: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration was founded that October, and just a couple of months afterward, JPL was taken from the Army and put under NASA's wing.

Soon von Braun and the other top rocketeers from Huntsville and Cape Canaveral joined JPL's engineers on the civilian space effort. And the rest is history.

Robots vs. humans
Even then, there was a split between robotic and human space exploration. "Eisenhower was not keen on spending a lot of money on 'Man in Space,' precisely because he viewed it as nothing more than a stunt," Conway said. "Kennedy reversed all that."

A lot of that was also von Braun's doing, he said.

"Von Braun was never interested in the possibilities sparked by robots," Conway told me. "That colored everything he did. He didn't foresee what you could do with robotics. The only people who really did were the space scientists of the '50s who were advising Eisenhower."

JPL helped set the stage for lunar exploration with the robotic Ranger and Surveyor missions, but the astronauts were the stars of the show. Explorer 1, meanwhile, fell out of orbit and burned up over the Pacific Ocean in 1970 amid little fanfare.

Maybe that's as it should be. After all, no one ever threw a ticker-tape parade for a robot. But when it comes to exploration beyond the moon, the robotic probes - Mariner, Pioneer, Mars Viking, Voyager, Galileo, Hubble, Mars Pathfinder, Cassini, the Mars rovers and more - have been and still are the only deal in town, in the solar system and beyond. And there's something to be said for that as well.

Raggio, who retired in 1990, stays active and serves on a variety of community boards, but he still looks upon his 39 years at JPL as the best years of his life.

"What could be better?" he asked. "You get to take a picture of the Maker, and you realize how profound this universe is. Well, you can tell that I'm still turned on. Just going through the gates every day was a turn-on for me."

Conway said that all started with Explorer 1, exactly 50 years ago.

"The big scientific legacy of Explorer 1 was the discovery of the unexpected," he told me. "We did not expect to find belts of radiation surrounding the earth. A lot of scientists always have some idea of what they're looking for, and instead they're often very wrong. We've found some strange things as we've gone out into the solar system. And I expect that will continue."

Check out these retrospectives from JPL, the Los Angeles Times and The New York Times. You can find a list of resources about Wernher von Braun online, courtesy of Marshall Space Flight Center's History Office. This online book is a biography of William Pickering, the JPL director behind Explorer 1.  Here's an online autobiography of space scientist James Van Allen. CollectSpace's Robert Pearlman has an interesting tale about Explorer 1 souvenirs. Finally, feel free to add your comments reflecting on the 50th anniversary of America's space age.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I've been an enthusiastic follower of the space program since childhood. I appreciate the reminder of the 50th anniversary of Explorer I. I'd lost track of that. It strikes me as a little odd that the United States Postal Service could find enough significance in Yoda (of Star Wars fame) to honor him with two separate stamps last year, but has decided to pass over this anniversary.
man in space. what a colossal waste of time and money. and space.
Wish I could modify Philip's comment to the ISS. What the space community is someone like Von Braun.  I still remember his partnership with Disney to help spread the word of why space should be explored.  Yes, I wish the USPS would honor the original explorers of space sans Yoda.
the moon in ten years...extrapolate that and we should be sitting here in front of our screens, awaiting the first pics of a Mining Colony on Io...DRAT!
someone ask the old timers to talk about their visions...vs...the reigning idea that all they could accomplish was what Congress would bear, and 'not in our lifetimes' was a sad given...it's carried over...double DRAT!
Hooray for those guys...knew they'd never get to see their visions realized, but gave it everything they had anyway...
You know what I think about the argument of Man vs Machine...imagine the original Star Trek as an Earth Based science team viewing data from an advanced deep space robot probe...and imagine how boring that would have been...especially the probe getting it on with all the hot women.
Man is space? Why not? There was a good reason why we went to the Moon later. A robot would have stopped.

Now we have two exploring their parts of Mars, and they are out doing the Everyready Bunny with their ability to keep going, and going.
Philip is correct. Man is space has been a colossal waste of time and money. How refreshing to hear somebody else say it.
For those of you who think Man in Space is a collosal waste of time. Where do you think many of the technological advances that drive our world and economy have come from? When we mind our world raw, where do you think we will turn to next? The moon, asteroids perhaps? When this world can no longer sustain our ever growing population, where do you think mankind will be? In space possibly?

You be-little the great achievemants our drive to explore space have gifted us with. You would dismiss the sacrifice of those men and women who have lost their lives for this cause to better humanity.

Man in space.....I hope we never lose that dream and one day realize it is a dream no longer. We are there and we will never let it go. Just as when humanity switched from being hunter-gatherers to farmers and agriculturalists. There is no turning back.
The meek can have the Earth when the strong move on to the stars.  

Keep flyin', guys & gals.
Yes, John and Philip, Man in space is a huge waste of time.  So was Columbus and the Vikings for that matter, and don't forget about Lewis and Clark and that idiot Captain Cook and his silly exploration of the Pacific.  Yes boys, man should just stay home, pray to God and never, ever ask questions about anything.  Good thing you two [...] aren't in charge of space science, we'd still be in the dark ages with your mentality.  
The general public can't even begin to understand the depth and breadth of the benefits that have come out of the space program.  The drive to solve the various scientific problems has stimulated countless inventions and medical solutions.  Ever used an infrared ear thermometer on your sleeping child?  Ever had a pair of Nike Air shoes?  These technologies and so many others came directly from the space program.  To say that humanity hasn’t benefited greatly on many fronts due to the United States’ space program is extremely naive.
Leave Yoda alone!!!
When 900 years you reach, look as good you will not...
We need to get Obi One Kanobi on a stamp!!!
$.42 a stamp... What a deal...
I wonder how much it will cost to mail you
guys something from Tatooine, when I go back...
I want to go home, I miss Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru...
They will be upset if I don't get back with their
droids...
Having grown up during the early years of the space program, I was energized with the promise of humanity's expansion into space.  That promise is dead. Now we have a self-perpetuating clique for only the chosen, lucky few. The possibility of venturing into space, via NASA, is impossible for the average American. Am I bitter? Yes. I admit complete jealousy.  But after 50 years, I finally hope to see the demise of NASA's gatekeeping with the rise of comericial space flight.  After 50 years of selfish and elitist stewardship, it is time for NASA to step aside and let the corporate sector take command.
Directly above the head of Dr. von Braun is the reason why America won the race to the moon. The instrument package was a bit of brand new technology, a solid state system sensor and transmitter and powered by another brand new system, photovoltaic cells. Because our launcher was so much smaller then the Russians, America had to depend upon new technology to get the job done. The Russians used lead acid batteries and vacuum tubes for their early space craft. President Kennedy's call for a  manned landing on the moon  drove the need to reduce the size of modern computers from, at that time, the size of a closet, to one the size of a briefcase. This computer, the first true solid state, integrated circuit computer, was used on the Lunar Lander as it made all six of its landings from 1969 through 1973. That technology leap was driven by the manned space program, and although it would have been achieved, eventually, it would not have been achieved so quickly. The space program drove integrated circuit development from its begininng in 1957 to where it is today, a "taken for granted technology."

How can you call that a giant waste?
Of course , propelling away more compressed oxigen to larger ozonehole, global warming, etc.
These gents dont know yet, them are the hardest criminals against organic - not just human- life.
Those who think the space program is a colossal waste of time obviously don't appreciate micro computers, micro medicine and a number of other everyday things the we wouldn't have or wouldn't have in the convenient size that we enjoy. Imagine the world with no laptop computers or cell phones..... actually, that part doesn't sound too bad.
this topic really stirs me...my Father worked for AVCO RAD in those years...doing nose cone ablation research...I had pieces of the stuff before there was Vanguard, et al...pretty heady...
then I got to see the testing methods...blowtorches firing into mica-windowed metal boxes, with little rounded cones being disintegrated by the flame...
I immediately began researching alternative methods of re-entry...the reigning wisdom saw no middle ground between skip-off and burn-in...nothing has changed, because all the stuff being done today was put on the drawing boards by the guys you see standing there holding up ExplorerI, and many others like them...crew cuts, Camels, and pocket protectors...administering space since day one...since they realized their dreams wouldn't come to fruition in their lifetimes, they gave themselves legacy, and perpetual influence...triple DRAT!  
For those of a spiritual bent, I recommend you check out what Dr. Henry Richter, Jr., program manager for Explorer 1, had to say this week to JPL employees. (Let's just say that Hitchens and Dawkins will hate it.)
People with sentiments like Phillip and John are just as right about space as the people who decried Alaska as a waste (before the gold and oil rushes, as well as the fishing industry came along) were right.

Crewed spaceflight, in its current form, has returned little of substance, but there's no denying that resources are in space that can and will enable us to move forward.  If we can get it right, it will pay more concrete dividends.
Christopher!  You want to do what?  Send three ships westward? For how much!  Are you crazy? You'll just fall off the end of the Earth.  Why would we spend all that money on such a foolish endeavor when we have all these problems right here in Europe?
Happy Anniverary,
  This man vs machine debate is silly,we need both.
Thank God we have corporations starting to send up
pay loads.We have much to be proud of and an exiting future to look foward to.
            Rich Goffstown NH
Colossal waste of time?  Gee, we have microwave ovens, those $250 Nike sneakers you're wearing, kevlar, Tang, our hand-held computers, tiny cell phones, gps, advances in medical science, etc etc. If we hadn't gone out in space, we'd probably still have the UNIVAC computer(which could do 2000 computations a minute! in 1957), the rotary telephone, cars that resemble the cars from the 1940's, and we'd probably be still using typewriters.  

Oh yeah, space exploration has been a monumental waste of our time and money. Without people willing to advance us, we could still be using oxe drawn wagons, dying from all sorts of diseases that are currently irradicated, dying before you're even 30, and using bows and arrows to kill our food.
Before we write off 'man in space' in favor of robots, we really need to tally up the costs of unsuccessful unmanned missions.  There are quite a few instances where unmanned missions have gone sour and time/money have been wasted.  But, being unmanned, they rarely make headlines.

Some of these unmanned missions could have been successful IF the hardware had been assembled, tested and launched in a manned space station in Low Earth Orbit.  For that matter, a LEO launched satellite could have more capabilities than an Earth launched satellite because you aren't limited to the physical envelope of rocket AND because the satellite as a whole doesn't have to deal with high G launch forces, you can avoid launch related failures.

While there will be other issues with LEO based launches, the flexibility the human element would provide with a 'space garage' would make a big difference.  We just need a good, low cost Earth to LEO launch service.
  Bravo to all those who helped make my childhood so wonder-filled and fun by going into "outer space". Glad I was around.
When we understand that the true impetus of the space race was not science, but the battle of political domination and nationalism, then things start to look different.
My own support for space travel is based, in part, on two quotations.
The first is from the Russian scientist, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky:  "The Earth is the cradle of Mankind, but no-one stays in the cradle forever."
The second is from the award-winning writer, the late Robert A Heinlein: "The Earth is simply too small and fragile a basket for the human race to continue to keep all of its eggs in."  - to which his colleague, Larry Niven, has added an additional comment: "The dinosaurs had no space programme."
To quote from the ending of the film version of H G Wells "The Shape of Things To Come":  "The Universe or nothing.  Which will it be?"

I know which way I would vote.
"Yes, John and Philip, Man in space is a huge waste of time.  So was Columbus and the Vikings for that matter, and don't forget about Lewis and Clark and that idiot Captain Cook and his silly exploration of the Pacific.  Yes boys, man should just stay home, pray to God and never, ever ask questions about anything.  Good thing you two [...] aren't in charge of space science, we'd still be in the dark ages with your mentality."

What does God/religion have to do with this at all?  I love how people take any chance they can to bash religions.
For those of you who hate the idea of man in space and are very centered in spiritual beliefs...well, please don't think me as trying to stir you up.  I too have strong spiritual beliefs and I believe that we were created...but I also believe that what is out in space is kind of like sprinkles on a birthday cake.  God made the cake for us and designed it for us...in case you don't know yet, the cake is the earth...and all the other planets and nebula's and stars out there in space are just sprinkles for us to enjoy and watch and learn about...I know its not the best analogy but I like it.  so...yeah thats my two cents.  Have a good day.
It always make me laugh when simple folk say things like: " We should sort out the problems on our own planet and forget about space". I simply turn around to these people and say " Do you take foreign holidays? If so why? What a complete waste of money! You should give your holiday money to the poor and homeless before embarking on frivolous long distance travel that utilises complex flying machines! You should defer all mind expanding voyages and stay at safe in your armchair - send a robot to Goa or the Maldives - you can watch the pretty pictures at  home, risk free!"  Space travel is about free movement. The preposterous idea that we should be immobile because of "Earth's problems" is simply ridiculous...


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=624367

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google