ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The unsung rocketeers

Posted: Monday, January 28, 2008 6:50 PM by Alan Boyle


Thierry Boccon-Gibod / Virgin Galactic
With SpaceShipTwo in the background, aerospace pioneer Burt Rutan (second from
left) chats with design team leaders Luke Colby, Jim Tighe and Matt Stinemetze.

When it comes to visions of future spaceships, Virgin Galactic certainly knows how to pour on the glitz – as evidenced by last week’s gossip-worthy unveiling of the design for the SpaceShipTwo launch system. But there’s a lot of hard work to be done behind the scenes, and far more people are involved in the effort besides British billionaire Richard Branson and aerospace guru Burt Rutan, the stars of last week’s show. Some of the unsung rocketeers in the commercial space race are just now getting their shot at the spotlight - while others stay out of the spotlight entirely.

Rutan himself tried to shift the spotlight when he brought up five of SpaceShipTwo's top designers, who had flown in for the New York unveiling from Rutan's home base at Scaled Composites in Mojave, Calif.

"I am not a sole designer - in fact, I have not been well lately," Rutan told the audience. "These guys here are the ones who are running our design program, our development program."

The five next-generation engineers on the stage were:

  • Matt Stinemetze, project engineer at Scaled Composites.
  • Bob Morgan, design team leader developing the launch airplane.
  • Jim Tighe, project engineer for the spaceship, and chief aerodynamicist at Scaled.
  • Pete Siebold, specializing in avionics and development of the SpaceShipTwo simulator.
  • Luke Colby, designer for rocket propulsion.

"Burt has this unique knack to pull together the best designers on the planet, and drag them out to the middle of nowhere with nothing to do but design really cool spaceships," Stinemetze joked.

Stinemetze and Tighe were actually the first ones to lay out the main features of the SpaceShipTwo rocket plane and its WhiteKnightTwo mothership. "Expect in the future to see a fleet of these," Tighe told reporters. 

Afterward, I asked Rutan via e-mail about the reference to the team - as well as the reference to his health. Was there any reason to think he would have to step out of his starring role? Here's his reply:

"For a long time the press has always given me sole credit for design of the 39 aircraft developed by my two companies. While the creative aerodynamic content has been mine for most of them, the current crop of new stuff is done by a large team of engineers. I brought the top five of them for the SS2 program to the press conference, introduced them and their roles in the program and had them discuss the detailed design rationale for the two ships on the Virgin team.

"The goal was to give them the deserved credit for design of these aircraft/spaceships. However, in all the stories I have read about the unveil press event, every writer has ignored what he saw and gives me credit for the designs. I would have thought that at least a few of them were awake?

"I have not been mute about the health problems I have had since early September, but I would not be happy to see stories about it in the press. Since there are always flaws in the stuff published I would not welcome having to correct personal info that is not relevant to our space story. A better place for that would be in a biography book."

Just as Rutan isn't the sole designer on the SpaceShipTwo team, SpaceShipTwo is not the sole entrant in the private-sector space race - though I admit that might have been hard to figure out on the basis of last week's news reports, including mine.

Branson, who founded Virgin Galactic as the final-frontier wing of his Virgin empire back in 1999, has a unique knack for generating consumer buzz about his ventures, and that has brought in an estimated $30 million in deposits for future flights. The other players may be taking a lower profile - but they're just as serious about keeping up with Branson's pace in what most of them think will be a marathon with more than one winner. Here's a sampling that hits upon the variations in business strategies:

Inch by inch, step by step
XCOR Aerospace is Rutan's lesser-known aerospace neighbor in Mojave, although the company builds up a little more celebrity every time it wins a rocket contract or gets featured in a magazine. Company spokesman Doug Graham compares Rutan to a space-age Christopher Columbus, who is able to attract funding from some of the deepest pockets of the day. In a sense, Richard Branson and SpaceShipOne's backer, software billionaire Paul Allen, play the same roles that Ferdinand and Isabella filled back in 1492.

"Queen Isabella hasn't shown up for us, so we're doing it the hard way," Graham said. "We've had to get it one jewel at a time."

Those jewels have been earned for developing the flying machines for the Rocket Racing League as well as for doing rocket-engine work for NASA, DARPA and the U.S. Air Force. In addition to paying the rent, such projects advance XCOR's efforts to create a rocket-powered, two-seat suborbital space plane

XCOR has been mum about when it hopes to get that plane off the ground and into space, and it seems unlikely that the two-seater will be ready before SpaceShipTwo's eight-seater. But Graham said some things are more important than being first to market. "It would be great to be the first to enter, but you want to be the first to enter with the right vehicle," he said.

Giving NASA a lift
Several spaceship companies are banking on NASA to give them a boost, through a demonstration program known as the Commercial Orbital Transportation System, or COTS, as well as future payload deals for the international space station.

California-based SpaceX is already in the midst of a NASA-supported development program for its Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon cargo/crew capsule. Four other companies - Andrews Space, Orbital Sciences, PlanetSpace and Spacehab - are heading up teams looking for more NASA funding. What's more, PlanetSpace and t/Space, as well as Spacehab, Constellation Services International and SpaceDev, are already getting advice from NASA (but no money) on spaceship development.

The key milestones to come include NASA's Feb. 7 decision on the next round of funding, as well as SpaceX demonstration flights planned this year for the Falcon 9 as well as its smaller-scale Falcon 1 rocket. Just this month, SpaceX conducted its first multi-engine firing test for the Falcon 9.

If you build it, they will come
Nevada-based Bigelow Aerospace and Washington-based Blue Origin are both funded by billionaires (hotel magnate Robert Bigelow and Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, respectively), and they both tend to play their cards a bit closer to the vest.

Bigelow is riding on a wave of two high-profile successes for its inflatable orbital space modules, and is reportedly looking for an affordable launch vehicle as it prepares to put up the first private-sector space station capable of accommodating visitors.

Blue Origin, meanwhile, trumpeted a successful test flight a year ago but has since reverted to its secretive ways. By my tally, there were at least three opportunities for flight testing over the past year, based on Federal Aviation Administration records, and in November Bezos said a new test rocketship was being built. The reports emanating from Blue Origin's spaceport in Texas hint that the launch facilities there are also in the midst of an upgrade - and that a new round of tests is expected in the coming months.

Spaceflight sponsors
Oklahoma-based Rocketplane Global recently unveiled its own XP spaceship design, and chief executive officer George French noted Virgin Galactic's new look with special interest.

"If you look at their new design, you'll see three Rocketplanes," he told me today. Of course, Rocketplane's hybrid jet-rocketship doesn't sport SpaceShipTwo's movable fins - which Rutan considers the key to the plane's eventual success - but French voiced confidence that his six-seat plane will hold its own.

While Virgin Galactic has been courting customers well-heeled enough to pay $200,000 for a flight to the edge of space, Rocketplane has been focusing on corporate sponsors. One of the latest to sponsor a future free suborbital spaceflight is the Nestle candy company, which is promoting its KitKat bar in France. (Here's a report about the contest - in French, of course.)

"Virgin's a marketing machine, and we can't compete with them on public PR, but when the designs go head to head, and corporations do due diligence, they pick us," French said.

Rocketplane has been aiming to get its XP craft into operation by the end of 2010, although French told me that date is squishy. "Everybody who's out there has found out that it's taking longer than they thought," he said.

But wait ... there's more
So far, the two-year rule appears to be holding - that is, the first flights are two years away, no matter who you're talking about. Next year, they still may be two years away. But at least some players in the space game will continue moving ahead, often blending strategies in the process.

For example, Armadillo Aerospace's John Carmack is paying his own way as he and his team work on modular rocketships, but he also wants to get in on NASA prizes, suborbital joyrides, military contracts and corporate deals down the road.

Space Adventures is sending high-rolling travelers on orbital trips, and the company is even selling a backup seat for $3 million. (As expected, Australian entrepreneur Nik Halik was named today as backup for space-bound game guru Richard Garriott.) At the same time, Space Adventures is making deals for lower-rolling suborbital giveaways.

Zero Gravity Corp. is flying private passengers on weightless airplane flights, but is also doing corporate sponsorships and giving NASA a zero-G lift. Then there's the Google Lunar X Prize, which is attracting a new set of players hoping to send a robot to the moon and win $20 million or more. (Word is that more X Prize competitors may surface next month.)

I'm sure I've left off some worthy players, and I apologize in advance for that. For a good overview of the entire field, check out our private-sector space archive as well as our clickable survey of the "New Space Landscape."

Elsewhere on the Web, you can visit Clark Lindsey's RLV and Space Transport News, Jeff Foust's Personal Spaceflight, Michael Belfiore's Dispatches from the Final Frontier and Rob Coppinger's Hyperbola.  And as always, feel free to add your reflections on the rocketeers - sung or unsung - as comments below.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Re Virgin Galactic's $30mil in deposits...in 1984/5, Society Expeditons Project Space Voyage offered future rides for $52,000...with a $5000 deposit...they collected $25mil...that's 5000 deposits...from word of mouth, a small pic in Esquire, and one of those ads that looks like a news story in the NYC rags.
The $25mil evaporated, along with Project Space Voyage...except for Colette Bevis, Project Director...she's one of original X-Prize guy, Peter Diamanides' gals Friday...ironic, eh?
But, the point is...where's today's interest?
Never fear...Galactic Girl ( Barbie Bubblehead )and Paris Hilton will save the day...
What a sorry situation...can you say backpedalling?
Two years away...two years away...etc...etc...ad infinitum, it seems...
When there's a reason to be shot into the cold void of space ...there will be money to be made. Or if terraforming and ultra speed travel to the moon or mars can be accomplished then maybe. BUt lets put the cart BEHIND the horse.  But just in case i'm wrong, i own 2000 shares of Spacecraft Development (SPDV)
Steve , you have to be kidding. After 3 successful flights of Spaceship one you are calling Spaceship 2 a pipedream... please. Testing will begin this summer of the vehicle with passenger service to start in 2009 or 2010. That's it no more no less. Branson does not put his money on losers and scaled composites who designs Spaceship 2 is no loser.
I admire Burt Rhutan immensely. My husband was one of the first of his "builders" to buy plans and build his early design of a "Long EZ" pusher prop aircraft.  We went to many seminars in Moajave' at his workshop.  My husband won a ride with Burt in his plane through a raffle.  The crew was always eager to help when you called with a question.  Mike Melville is a one a million guy.  He test flew our Long EZ when it was ready and we're proud to say that we've been associated with them.  KUDOS to ANY endeavor that they put together.  
Best wishes on your recovery, Burt.

We are in the business we are in today because of that little Long EZ.
re backpedaling?
Today Bigelow, Xcor, Armadillo, Blue Origin all have flying test hardware.  Spacex and Virgin should both fly this year.  We may still be two years away from paying passengers on suborbital flights but there is no comparison between the dreams of the 80s and 90s and the actual engineering and business progress that these real companies have made.  Steve, you are welcome to your cynicism.  I am optimistic that these companies are leading us into a new era of human access to space.
A Plan to save the Space Shuttle and thousands of NASA Jobs using near light speed propulion of 67,000,000 miles an hour is unveiled.

http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/29008/

Looks like there are some serious players, but the public yearns to see more than computer graphics. I still have faith that some of these companies will come through. My bets are on Scaled Composites and SPaceX and their projects.
Hey Steve...Can you fill in the blanks of your jargon so we can understand what your point is?

Anyway, in a recent article about SpaceShipTwo, we had to read about people being upset about us going into space while people are starving, getting sick, fighting, etc. There is 0 (ZERO) correlation between the two.

We must continue to improve and invent these technologies and that is the way it is and should be. We've had people working to help others for centuries and here we are with the same problems...especially in Africa. You can pour billions of dollars into these countries to try to help the sick or the victims of war, but it will not stop. Now, I'm not saying give up on them, but if I had a choice where to spend my money, it would be on technology and creating jobs and industry for Americans.

The cry babies that come on here and shoot down these technologies and ideas would serve a better purpose by signing up with the Peace Corps than to try to get us to second guess our morality because we are supportive of space travel and research. I guarantee that most if not all of us would love to see world peace with no illness or famine, but unfortunately many countries don't agree and we can't control them.

Eventually, everyone can benefit from the research and technolgy and this may help millions of people avoid those atrocities. SpaceShipTwo it breaking a barrier and sending us into a whole new era of space technology...what can't be good about that. New jobs, new markets, new technology and new industry...it's all good!

Oh...and just for the record. Commercial fishing and truck driving are more dangerous than space flight and the support work that gets us there. So maybe the cry babies would like the fisherman to stop fishing and truck drivers to stop driving because the technologies that are used are a big waste of money...while people are still starving dying.

There really is no correlation between space flight and problem with humanity and therefore, no reason to make a point for argument. So let's stick to the wonders of private enterprize going where only government supported space technologies have gone. Hey, it might even free up some government money which may find it's way into the hands or stomachs of the war criminals in the countries we are attempting to help.

Also, if someone wants to pay $200,000 to go on the first trip, go for it! It is the same way with a new model of car or buying new computer technology. You always pay a premium and the prices come down over time.
I believe the early airplane creators sold rides on their second or third generation vehicles.   After WWI the barn stormers sold rides at county and state fairs.   Does anyone know if the Wright brothers did and what was the price of a ride for any of them?
Scott
pipedream? don't get it...
backpedalling...
the...is for you to fill in...you've missed a lot.
maybe backpedalling is wrong...how about incessant BS?
RE exciting new era in manned space...as soon as The New Space Race develops a newer, less expensive telecomsat lifter, Paris Hilton won't be able to buy a ticket...pay attention to who's who in this game...all telecom guys...in one way or other...who will benefit greatly by developing cheap lifting capacity...in the meantime...
that particular ... means 'fill in the blanks'...
"A Plan to save the Space Shuttle and thousands of NASA Jobs using near light speed propulion of 67,000,000 miles an hour is unveiled.

http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/29008/ "

  First, it requires a very respectable nuclear power source, which is all right with ME, but I know that too many people respond to 'nuclear' like that other n-word: Once it's uttered, all rational thinking stops.

  But I think the part that amazes me most...is that this proposal for spacecraft propulsion with outstanding performance is billed *first* as a plan to: "...Save the Space Shuttle and Thousands of NASA Jobs"

  Instead of the applications it could have to space projects that would be otherwise impractical (or impossible). Isn't expanding our space capabilites part of what NASA's for? Or is it a jobs program for engineers, with results taking second place...?

  And now you know why I cheer the private guys.


Steve likes to be cryptic. He likes to stir the pot. If he were to compose an actual sentence he might end up fainting. Don't even ask what would happen if he strung a few sentences together into a paragraph. I kid. :)

In any event, there is some truth to what Steve writes. We do need cheaper access to space. I differ from Steve though in this respect, I believe this commercial space race can do nothing but help lower the cost, even if it starts out a little pricey.
Privatized spaceflight might be a good thing, if only they weren't in this race only in order to hook up with moon cheese babies!
I think we will see the first rocket powered test flights in about two years. The critical long lead time system is the engine. XCOR already has excellent ones. Armadillo's busy developing their own as are Scaled,TGV and Blue Origin. Rocketplane has contracted their engine work out.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=616215

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google