ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



'Life on Mars' explained

Posted: Thursday, January 24, 2008 11:50 AM by Alan Boyle


NASA via MSNBC  
 CLICK FOR VIDEO
 MSNBC's Willie Geist
 reports on the latest
 enigma from Mars.

Now there's a "Mermaid on Mars" to go along with the time-honored Face on Mars: Some Red Planet fans see the sculpture of a seated woman in one of the panoramas sent back to Earth by NASA's Spirit rover.

Is this suppressed evidence of alien artistry? Does the picture actually show a creature of some sort? Based on analysis of the stereo imagery, the best explanation is that the feature was indeed sculpted - not by a Martian hand, but by the Martian wind.

Some folks make a habit of looking for strange features in the pictures that have come from the Mars rovers over the past four years - features like "bunny ears" (bits of fabric left behind by the rovers), or the "Martian footprint" (the imprint of a wheel tread), or "rover rotini" (a mysterious curlicue that might be a mark left behind by a drill).

The Martian Mermaid has taken its place as one of those enigmas, elevated to prominence by a Daily Mail article headlined "Life on Mars?" The Telegraph wondered whether the sculpture was the Martian equivalent of Denmark's Little Mermaid. Even the TODAY show's blog joined in the fun.


NASA / JPL / Cornell
The "Mermaid" is hard to see in the original pictures from NASA,
so this picture helps you get oriented. The enigmatic feature is within the
red circle in this picture. Click on the image to see a larger version.

Some people take this seriously, however - hinting darkly that NASA is covering up evidence of alien life. So it's a good idea to try to figure out just what the feature is. As usual, Emily Lakdawalla does a great job of collecting the evidence on the Planetary Society blog.

The key step is to go back to the original images that were collected by Spirit last November. If you take out your red-blue 3-D glasses (you do keep a pair with you at all times, right?), a look at the high-resolution stereo imagery will be instructive: The "sculpture" appears to have some depth to it, and the more you look, the more it appears to be a spiky spire of rock stretching out from wind-eroded formations.

Cornell astronomer Jim Bell, who heads the scientific team behind the Mars rovers' panoramic cameras, confirmed my impression when I contacted him today. By now he's quite familiar with the image and the controversy, in large part because he's been getting dozens of phone calls from reporters asking about the Mermaid (or is that Bigfoot?).

"It's a funky little bizarre wind-carved rock formation," Bell told me. "It's not unusual at all."


NASA / JPL / Cornell
Get out your 3-D glasses: The "Mermaid" is a dark point toward the upper left of
this stereo image. You can see how erosion has sculpted nearby rocks as well.

Bell figures that the feature is about 2 inches (5 centimeters) high. He said his team has come across a variety of curious-looking shapes like this one as they've sorted through the more than 200,000 images returned by the Mars rovers over the past four years. To date, none has provided clues worth following in the search for traces of ancient life on Mars, he said.

"Believe me, I would be leading the parade if there were really pictures of little men or fossils," Bell told me.

Although he's a little nonplussed about the conspiracy angle, Bell said he welcomes any opportunity to draw attention to the fantastic pictures sent back by Spirit and Opportunity - pictures that can be seen at NASA's Web site at Cornell's Pancam Web site. Bell also highlights the best images in his recently published coffee-table book, "Postcards From Mars." We also have a nice selection of images in our space gallery, including this rover retrospective.

"I think it's great that people are interested in the rovers and that they're still generating news - even if it's bizarre," Bell said.

Case closed? You decide - then add your comments below.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Lets bring him to earth so he can suffer like the rest of us!
I personally dont think that wind could have sculpted a rock to that shape i dont know what it is but its not a sculpted rock made by wind
Truth is, we don't know what is really out there.  Who can say the actual size for sure?
Our sun is a very remote outpost in the milky way as compared to other suns that are on average much closer to other suns. Most likely, intelligent life has already visited intelligent life in their regions.
"The little Mermaid on Mars'--I am so happy this mystery have finally been solved---for years we citizen of Copenhagen thought it was student's from university of Copenhagen that stole the little mermaid---and all along it was actually the Martians---shame -shame on you little trols!
Wouldn't it be fantastic if one day during our lifetime we are visited..............
If you look closely you'll distinctly see a bearded figure - yes! - we finally found osama bin laden!
I think the FED's are trying to distract the attention of the public from foreclosures and the economy.... they want to distract people's attention with all this crap.. So whats next... new case against some celebrity or smoething like that... what bull shit...
With so much science to be gleaned from the work of these wonderful little rovers, why is it that only controversy like this can gain such impassioned attention?  Still, any attention is better than none.  I do wish that specifically we could go out of our way to visit the "face on mars" or to go back to this little example of alien wind art in order to get us all on the same page.  While we're at it, lets hold an open house at Area 51.  The lack of full transparency on some of these issues irritates me as much as the ridiculous conspiricy theories.  Part of what fuels these theories is simply poor communication between the people who ask the questions and the people who know the answers.



I see something else! Click on the stero picture link, then enlarge it. What are the lines on the RIGHT of the picture? They look like a road, or something man made.They are symetrical and don't tell me the Rover did that or that the wind blows out even straight lines either. The Rover has tracks! Any thoughts out there?
The burden of proof is on the conspiracy theorists. It just doesn't work to say that it is an alien sculpture and then assume everyone should buy into that. The explanations that NASA puts forth make sense and similar phenomena can be observed all over Earth. Until a more plausible theory comes along that's it.

As for the argument that there are billions and billions (indeed countless) stars and solar systems out there and SURELY there is life other than ours in the universe; maybe so, but isn't it a tad improbable that among all those possibilities, it would be found right next to our planet? And that this alien life might look like us, somehow? That would be like finding two identical grains of sand lying next to each other at the beach.

We may find something someday, but folks, EVERY odd looking thing we find doesn't point right at aliens.

Why would only the part of the rock that forms the hand and arm be skin colored? And only the hair be hair colored? No other rock in the entire picture changes color abruptly horizontally. And it, by no length of the imagination, appears to be sitting on the larger rock or be a part of it. There is a drop-off at the large rock and the  figure rises from the slope beyond it. You can clearly see that this is a gradient forming a bowl. The entire line of rocks forms a drop-off point that steepens as it extends toward the left. Notice how the light is hitting all of the other rocks, look at where the shadows lie. Look at the shadows on the figure. Notice how the wind shear has leveled all the other rocks flat. Notice the figure is rounded toward the center, as you can see by where the light hits it. Both of the other things circled in this pic

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a197/dotcosm/PIA10214circles.jpg

appear to me to be rocks. The picture appears to be a panoramic shot that captures the view for several miles. If this picture is from the base of the rover and is only of the ground a few feet ahead of it, then we are wasting a colossal amount of money being there at all.
The image should be perfectly obvious to any american man over the age of 40: Some little boy martian set up his martian army men in the sand to shoot them with his Red Planet Rider BB gun, duh.
This is just an image of Britney Spears trying to hide from the Paparazzi - though I hear they have offices on Mars now so she better watch it.  On a more serious note, this can only be a natural formation.  It would be very easy to verify this by checking the image from day to day - if it doesn't move or change at all - what else can it be, really?  A Martian trying to set a world record for sitting in one place the longest time?  And the virgin Mary? Please - it's absolutely laughable how some people can't talk about ANYTHING without attributing some nonsense to religion or God.  Get real.
when I first saw this picture the first thing i thought of was a tusken raider from StarWars episode 4 when luke gets attacked. a still taken and blured to hide identity
Is Spirit still in the area? Would a return visit be possible? Regardless of what it is...it would be nice to get more evidence, and maybe *know* what they've seen.
When I first saw this picture, I thought to myself "wow. This looks like a rock carved into this shape by wind." and then I read this. Guess I'm good at guessing? Also, there's no life on Mars. If there was, there'd be some sort of credible proof instead of a 2-inch rock. Not mocking anybody's beliefs, but there'd be ruins or something more left over.    
I dont think it matters whether its a real picture of real human life on Mars, because we dont have pictures of God to know he/she exists right. Seeing istn beleiving, and its about time NASA and governments tell people the truth about alien life on other planets with all the sightings going on and stuff.
YAWN!
There is hopefully intelligent life somewhere in the universe. There isn't any sign of "intelligence" on the third planet from Sol. That is, if the condition of the human life is any indicator...wars, social injustice, intolerance....nope, no intelligence there.
Even though I would love to believe that it is an alien life form, in my opinion I think that it is just a rock. If this was an alien taking an afternoon stroll through the country side, then all they had to do was take another shot of the same spot. If it was an alien then it should have been gone on the next shot, or at least in a different pose. If NASA truly had any interest in this subject (with it being the possibility of a large alien life form) I think they would have investigated the matter further to go after more compelling evidence. As it is right now, I think it's just a cool photo that happens to catch a trick of light that they know will get them some attention. Which is not a bad thing, I think more people should support NASA or their own space program.

Remember here on Earth a long time a go when a volcano erupted. Hundreds of people we caught in a sudden lava flow. The lava hardened around their bodies, eventually they decayed. However the shape of their body was permanently cast inside that lava. When found, all researches had to do was pour plaster into that cast and when it hardened, they seen the exact pose that that person had died in. Some were mother holding their babies. I think kind of situation could also be possible. This really does need more in depth investigation.

But most likely, it's just some cool looking wind shaped rocks :(
Oh, yeah, and where is all this wind coming from? I thought there was no atmosphere to speak of on Mars? I was told by the "establishment" it's too thin of an atmosphere. Now all of a sudden there is so much of it it can carve rocks? Please, we'll never get a straight answer from liars. Space should be explored by the Private Sector also, and then we may get some straight answers when someone else can stride up to the podium and set the record straight for once.
Yes this is environmentally created...
As for Gov. info:
No, they would not tell us if there was any proven information in reguards to life elsewhere. How could they tell us the truth, the majority couldn't handle the truth.
But, those that preferred science over recess know that there is other life out there. More than likely too far to communicate, but it's out there.
We are still gathering information about our own solar system. We haven't even touched the surface of our own galaxy (and the billions of stars in it with planets orbiting them). Now add the unknown amount of other galaxies, with stars, with planets. It's crazy to think we are alone.
If you take a back, and think about it, we are still in an adolesants. The majority would rather believe something learned growing up, than something scientificaly proven.
Pluto is not a planet, the Giants will beat the Patriots, and we are not alone!!!
Looking up and out,
Rodney...
:-)
People see what they want to see.
I don't think the wind could erode something that detailed. I mean, I know the climate and weather conditions are different on Mars, but seriously? I'm not really a skeptic, but this makes me think.
Um, aren't we the aliens on Mars?
It's just a sharp pointed rock. The 'alien' simply looks like the shadowed side of the rock.  The sunlit side on the left is a bit fuzzy but it's there.  The 'extended arm' is just another rock shadow from the background coincidentaly aligned.
I'll only believe if the Mars rovers shows up something like USA's Mount Rushmore.
Or if the Martians start selling souveniers to Texans.
Why didn't Spirit Rover take a closer look?
Bigfoot has already been to mars?
This may not be true because it might be due to the optical images produced by the wind effects. It is only an image formed there can be such many type of images formed. There is no evidence how clearely it is an women..By declaring only image formed on the MARS cannot be a birth of women on the planet. According to me its contaminent to say that its evidence for it as too it can be an optical image caused due to wind....!

This was a comment from my side Sir.

Thank u Sir.
If Anything I Think a "Wind Carved Rock" would be an Excellent collectable. It would Be Unlike any other, for the Wind is much different there & the Sand it raises.
YEAH BOI!!! This is cool stuff
I believe that this could simply be the work of the government hiding us for things "for our own good". Like the ufo sightings in Texas. I heard the air force simply called it some of their jets. Still makin my own speculations but not entirely sure yet.
Looks like this object is a simple simulacra, another to add to the big list of unidentified objects being photographed on Mars. We will never know for sure until it is actually seen/studied first-hand by the first Marsonauts.

What is truly remarkable in all of this is that Humans can not help having the natural tendency to see humanoid features where none exist. :)
This morning, my fiance' was looking at the picture and I glanced from it across the room and asked her, 'what is that? Bigfoot on Mars?' we both got a good laugh at it.
Well, it is dang interesting.

With the higher rez image pointered to by E-Z-B, I can't quite see the "sculpture" in it anymore. But, with exposé, encrusting by mineral deposition is known to conceal underlying feature detail. Especially if submerged for any length of time. As is observed, terrestrially.

I wanted to point out about three other interesting tidbits.

1. It is equally curious to me, that a navigator of the rover might see this image and then just drive off. If it were me at the stick, seeing this thing would have made me divert from the agenda... screw my supervisor.

2. Notice the shade and hue of the surrounding media, and then the object itself. Clearly, a different material than the prevailing. Also, see the (cobalt?) blue dusting toward the bottom of the object, not as consistent on the top. {or is it copper ore and badly RGB'd?} Where did this lesser common material come from?
All in all, it looks like Obsidian to me.
On Earth, the artists of early civilizations would drag more interesting material for their works from hundreds or thousands of miles away, just to add a little "Flair" to the finished piece at its ultimate destination.

3. JUST below the 'sculptured' figure, is an irrationally well proportioned 'inverted "tilde'" Looks altogether to me, like an hieroglyph, Maybe a demonstrative mark of fluid nature. A symbol for Water...
Of course there is life on other planets. And to who ever it was who said evidence of life on other planets would rec havoc on religious believers, I would have to say that it would only confirm that the universe is created by an intellegent being. As for life on mars, I don't know. Is this a rock I don't think so, maybe several rocks at different distances from just the right angle. Maybe it is something more. But definitely this is a big universe and I don't think God created all those stars just so we have something pretty to look at. There are other worlds with God's children on them.
I believe in "visitors." They stop by my place frequently. They trust that I will not "give them up" They are friendly. They don't wish to hurt us. They are only looking for ways to help their species survive. All they need are a few samples for scientific research. Anyone willing to donate? Just email me at jbwhseman@yahoo.com. I'll send ya info on how to apply. They trust us. Why can't we tust them?
We discussed the Martian Sasquatch image that was shown on TV back in 2004 on a blog with many other fossilized looking rocks at the Spirit Landing site. Amazingly all the fossil looking rocks we saw in the last four years thus far developed from the Mars Exploratory Rovers, MER, raw images at (http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit.html ) were mostly located around its landing site - kind of a Martian graveyard of fossil looking rocks. Attached is a skeleton looking rock on Mars in lower right of the image .

http://uplink.space.com/attachments//
25786-Timy-and-friends-2P13108521.jpg


Another fully petrified look at another Sasquatch looking rock is here:

http://members.cox.net/skyclimbers/2P130014475EL5M1.9.jpg

Here are some more links of color images from Spirit and Opportunities rovers developed from the MER JPL raw images, have fun…

http://uplink.space.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=sciastro&
Number=1358&page=18&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=12&vc=1


http://uplink.space.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=sciastro&
Number=381751&page=4&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=1


http://uplink.space.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=sciastro&
Number=347015&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=


http://uplink.space.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=sciastro&
Number=1358&page=18&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=1&vc=1


http://uplink.space.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=sciastro&
Number=137121&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=1&vc=1


http://shineinnovations.com/new_page_8.htm
my question is WHY are we looking at something TWO INCHES BIG without using this better technology to explore already enigmatic areas identified by a scale of this figure's detail covering TWO MILES? i mean, if our technology is so much better that we see this thing in a two inch area, where before we had less than 1/1000th this detail, why are we still only going after random samples? is it so important to use the speculation of our world's scientists to disprove things that can easily be observed and proven or disproven with their actual existence a few years later?
I don't understand, it must be magic!
When I first saw this on TV out of the corner of my eye I laughed so hard! Yes, it would be cool if they could just backtrack the rover but remember these photos were taken "last November". Is that 2007 or '06? That's a long way to backtrack. That's a lot of expense and lost new science, mapping etc., just for a good close up at a curious looking rock.
I want to beleive. I think this is the best comment that can be made to this picture.
I dismiss the last post that says the 'rock is too small to be an alien life form' as who are we humans to say what size aliens might be..
it is only when all probable explinations are eliminated that we should start waving the alien flag. although in this case as it looked 'humanoid' it is fair to think ' oh crap we're not alone' at least for the first 30 seconds.
I think it looks like jesus Maybe NASA should put it up on eBay
No one has mentioned the green patch just below the mountain peak which apears to be shallow water. (About the 3/4 mark horizontally along the image at the top)
Of course there's life out there.  People who say we are alone cannot be taken seriously.  But this Mars game playing with 2D photos is just a bit wierd -- peole need ot get a life.  I am sure the Scientific Team is doing proper scrutiny of the photos, and input from the dubious side of the press or from well-intentioned but hopelessly ill-equipped individuals is a distraction at best.  I am confident remnanants of former Martian life will be found, and perhaps even live examples, but these rovers, as spectacularly successful as they are, simply would be courting an astronomical long shot to find some artifact suggesting life or artificial origin up there.  I'd stake my bets on earth-like planets light years distant -- the life signatures from atmospheric analysis of these small rocky worlds would be more convincing to me, and we shoud have the capability to find them sooner than anything live or formerly live on Mars comes up.  Pity we don't have a photo of the same patch of land from another angle to shut everyone up.
in the pic the "mermaid" looks like its thinking....hmm, something has to be done with this place.
Your eyes do not deceive you. . . its all in how your brain perceives the data that your eyes deliver.  Something to think about.
If it is a living creature it would have to be a very tiny one.
im sorry... its a rock.

albiet it looks like  a mermaid.. but comon.. do you see any water around?

not to mention that mermaids are not, specificly, a proven form of life on ANY planet.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=604838

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google