ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The year in space

Posted: Friday, December 21, 2007 6:00 PM by Alan Boyle


ESO
An image from the European Southern Observatory
shows a three-galaxy merger known as the Cosmic
Bird or the "Tinker Bell Triplet." Click on the image
for a bigger view, or click here for more from ESO.

When historians look back at 2007 - the 50th anniversary of the start of the first space race - they may well pick this date as the start of a second international space race.

The past year's developments may not have brought one event as dramatic as Sputnik's launch back in 1957. But when you start looking at the highlights, the big picture points to a complex international effort aimed at pushing forward on the final frontier.

The past year provided plenty of examples of scientific cooperation as well as strategic competition in space. Which trend will dominate in 2008? That's one of the big questions ahead.

2007 marks the 10th anniversary for our annual Year in Space roundup, in which we ask msnbc.com's users to help us pick the top developments of the past year and the top trends for the year to come. Last year, I think the voters got it exactly right: You said this year's big trend would be the proliferation of international space missions, including the first lunar probes sent out by China and Japan.

Those missions signaled a friendly space race aimed at scientific exploration. But the past year brought more worrisome developments as well, headed by China's shootdown of one of its own satellites in January. Beijing has insisted that its space aspirations are totally peaceful; nevertheless, the incident sparked fresh concerns about future anti-satellite battles.

Highlighting the strategic value of its satellites, the Pentagon conducted its own tests of a satellite rendezvous system this summer and moved forward with plans for a new generation of spy satellites. Russia's leaders, meanwhile, harbored suspicions about what the Pentagon was up to.

Speaking of Russia, that country's space program appears to be slowly rebuilding as well, fueled by oil money as well as renewed national pride, in part spurred by the Sputnik anniversary. Forward-looking highlights include last month's announcement on the construction of a new Far East spaceport and the upcoming Russian-Chinese mission to a Martian moon.

When the subject turns from global competition in space to cooperation, the best symbol is shining in the sky most nights nowadays. The international space station grew brighter over the past year, thanks to newly installed solar panels - and the orbital outpost is due to become even more international next year with the arrival of Europe's Columbus orbital laboratory and the first pieces of Japan's Kibo lab.


NASA / ESA
CLICK FOR AUDIO
SLIDE SHOW:
 Watch
visual highlights from the
past year in space.

The space station isn't the only place where science is going international: Ground-based and space-based astronomy is an increasingly international game as well, illustrated by the picture of a "cosmic bird" gracing the top of this page. The picture, showing a rare triple merger of galaxies 650 million light-years away in the constellation Sagittarius, was taken by a telescope built in Chile and managed by Europeans. The resulting image was fleshed out using additional data from South Africa, Finland and NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope.

Every week brings astronomical revelations from international collaborations - ranging from the two most famous U.S.-European space probes, the Hubble Space Telescope and the Cassini orbiter at Saturn, to what's essentially a scientific Olympic village of telescopes on Hawaii's Mauna Kea volcano.

So where does the United States stand in this arena? For now, NASA is still setting the pace - but the agency's top officials are looking over their shoulders. Administrator Mike Griffin's recently observed that "China will be back on the moon before we are," and America's space effort is facing what could be a troubling spaceflight gap between the scheduled retirement of ths shuttle fleet in 2010 and the first flight of the Orion crew vehicle in 2013 or later.

Congressional watchdogs have already raised questions about NASA's plans for Orion's launch vehicle. What's more, the newly passed omnibus spending bill could cause problems for the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program, or COTS, which is NASA's $500 million Plan B for resupplying the space station.

The worst-case scenario could leave California-based SpaceX as the only NASA-funded company building an orbital spaceship for the 2010-2013 time frame, space industry consultant Charles Lurio observed. "As much as I like SpaceX, and I like them a lot, we can't leave them in the field as the only one tackling the most ambitious and most visible symbol of a new space project," Lurio told me.

Griffin has already signaled that he won't abandon COTS.

"We will, of course, comply with the laws that are passed, but we certainly will redress this issue with Congress," he said in an agency statement. "NASA will fight for this program, which is critically important to America’s future as a spacefaring nation. COTS is intended to help spur the development of commercial space capability, particularly transportation services to and from the international space station, which would enhance strategic U.S. access to Earth orbit and ultimately provide substantial savings to taxpayers."

Looking beyond COTS, I'd have to say that the past year has been tougher than expected for spaceflight entrepreneurs. July's fatal accident at a Mojave rocket test site cast a pall over Scaled Composites' efforts to develop the SpaceShipTwo rocket plane for Virgin Galactic's space tourism service. The timetables for spaceship development had to be set back, not only for Virgin Galactic, but for other companies as well. Perhaps next year will be the breakout year.

And speaking of next year ...

Every December since 1997, we've presented five prospects for the top space stories of the year that's ending - and five potential trends for the year to come. It's up to you to decide the winner in each category. The international space race may have served as an overarching theme for the year, but there are plenty of highlights (and lowlights) to choose from:

Now for the top trends of 2008:

  • Assault on Mars: The Phoenix Mars lander is due to touch down in May, beginning a search for water and life's other building blocks in the Red Planet's north polar region. Meanwhile, the never-say-die Spirit and Opportunity rovers seem likely to start their fifth Earth year of exploring the Martian surface.

  • Fixing Hubble: NASA's final Hubble servicing mission, set for August or later, could be the most-watched shuttle flight ever. 

  • Space station spurt: If future shuttle flights follow NASA's timetable, the international space station will grow to include those European and Japanese laboratories by the end of the year, setting the stage for doubling the outpost's crew capacity in 2009.

  • New Space gets real? The dawning of the age of commercial passenger space travel has been two years away for at least a decade now. Will the next year bring the rollout of an actual passenger-worthy spaceship? Or will the new age still be two years away in 2009? 

  • Next step at Saturn: The Cassini orbiter's four-year primary mission at Saturn is due to end in July, and everyone expects the mission to be extended for a closer look at two Saturnian moons: Titan, which has mountains and hydrocarbon lakes; and Enceladus, which boasts geysers of water ice. Don't forget to vote for Saturn's greatest hits by Dec. 30.

  • ... And more: A total solar eclipse will draw astronomers from around the world to the Arctic, Russia, Mongolia and China on Aug. 1. After this year's partly successful test flight, SpaceX is scheduled to launch its Falcon 1 rocket on what could be its first orbital flight in early 2008, and then give the larger Falcon 9 its maiden launch later in the year. If I'm forgetting anything else, just let me know below.

Now it's your turn.

Go to our Live Vote page and register your vote for the top space story of 2007 and the top trend for 2008. I'll amend this item on Jan. 2 to reflect the winners.

I'm not planning any new postings to the Log between now and then, although I'll be checking in on the comments and passing along your perspectives - not only on the year in space, but on the Weird Science Awards and our annual science and religion symposium as well. So here's wishing you a Merry Christmas, a joyous Kwanzaa, a Blessed Muharram and a Happy New Year. And a fantastic Festivus for the rest of us.

Update for 2:45 a.m. Dec. 22: I fixed a reference to COTS to read "million" instead of "billion" - let's hope I don't get a lump of coal in my stocking because of that gaffe.

Update for 9:30 p.m. Jan. 16: I listed the winners in a different posting on Jan. 2, but just to keep the record straight, the top stories of 2007 were China's space ambitions and the explosion in extrasolar planets. The top trend to watch in 2008? Paying a final service call to the Hubble Space Telescope, naturally. Thanks to all who voted.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

same to you, Alan...thanx...I'd be wackier than I am without CosmicLog...
If, just "If," the universe started with the big bang, I remember someone talking about the rubber band effect - that the universe collapses back to the big bang effect and everything starts over again.  "If" this were true would we ever begin to know when anything started?
I think less elitists will dominate space, more robots and lots more automatic machines. Maybe some success on cosmic travel but not full blown space travel. As always - even better footage, shots and astronomy that will maintain the interest in space that will get continued budgets for millions of experts (new and old university graduates in the science/space field) But I think your column will be the star! Merry Xmas!
Fairies...We don't need no stinking Fairies.

How about the Hummingbird Galaxy.

Or the Butterfly Galaxy.
" 'If' this were true would we ever begin to know when anything started?
Howard Davenport, Iowa"


"If" the Big Crunch were to occur in a universe your question about "know(ing) when anything started" would be irrelevant to any being that existed in that universe as they could not pass through the boundaries. Any resident will have been baked, irradiated & crushed into an extremely tiny area along with every bit of matter & energy that existed in that universe.

The only universe relevant is the one you reside in. Copious evidence shows it started roughly 14 Billion years ago.
A possible development for 2008: If Mars gets pasted with the asteroid headed its way, and we get to see the incident and aftermath, then perhaps we'll see some more intense interest detection of possible Earth-bashers, and maybe even some funding for deflection schemes. Hopefully we can use a Tunguska event on another planet to get this going, rather than waiting for one to happen here.

And, being an astronomically based event and so appropriate here, a joyous solstice season to one and all.
Alan, you accidentally wrote that COTS is a $500 billion program. I wish! Of course it's really "only" $500 million.
Nice article.  Very informative.  I hope this continues to get hits despite being posted on a Friday evening before a holiday.
Howard Davenport wonders about the origins of the Universe.  Logically, without using some of the far-out theories but only the commonly accepted everyday variety, we are now in an 'expanding' phase of the universe, but could anticipate a future 'contracting' phase if gravity continues to act as it has in the past.

'Dark matter' and/or 'dark energy' - nature unknown at present, but presumed real by some observations - is required to balance the equation by which the universe will show sufficient mass to eventually start contracting again.

When the mass of the entire universe is condensed into one Black Hole, gravity will continue to implode the structure, while the opposing force will grow relatively within it until that force overcomes gravity and blows everything back into existence, the 'expanding universe' again.  

If that happens, then the universe itself is eternal.  Think of it as God's heartbeat.

Alan,
About this statement,
"..{COTS]...which is NASA's $500 billion Plan B for resupplying the space station."
1. Its 'million' not 'billion'!
2. Even by Griffin's measure, it's supposed to be 'plan A,' with the Orion as Plan 'B', since you simply can't afford to keep the station going given the cost of an Orion flights.
Of course, many of us out here believe that Orion shouldn't have _any_ place in supplying the station, but Griffin keeps saying that the NASA vehicle is his backup in case private industry is not able to build a satisfactory station support vehicle.
Which is just as absurd as saying circa 1958 that the government had to have a national 'hi-fi' audio product manufacturing program just in case the private sector wasn't up to it ... Of course, if COTS is defunded enough (and it may be already, with all due respect to SpaceX) Griffin's assertion might turn out to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Many thanks to Bill and Charles for pointing out my bonehead "billion" error. This isn't the first time I've grossly overstated the COTS figure. Maybe it is just a case of wishful thinking on my part, or maybe I just have those Old Space billions on my mind.  ;-)
I wonder if the reason we can't detect dark matter is it doesn't behave in a way we can detect as yet. Suppose dark matter were to exceed the speed of light as its usual speed. Detection would be difficult.

Also, while the big bang may have created the universe, it has also been shown the universe is not slowing down, but accelerating. Which means in the far distant future, the universe will be a cold, dead place. Sad to think.
"that the universe collapses back to the big bang effect and everything starts over again"

The idea of a 'cyclic' Universe isn't new, but not only does there not seem to be enough matter in the Universe to slow its expansion to a stop, and eventual collapse (which we've known for some time), but the rate of expansion seems to be *increasing* instead of gradually slowing, but never to a complete halt (which we've learned fairly recently, and 'dark energy' is the term curently given to whatever unknown force or effect appears to be causing this)

I'll throw in a quick addition.  The world's first consumer products made from ingredients flown in space were introduced this year.  Microgravity Enterprises introduced Antimatter and Space2O to the average consumer.  I hear it's outselling Red Bull in NM.  As a disclaimer - I'm hooked on Antimatter so I'm biased.
I love looking at all the beautiful images that are now available to anyone with a computer. They are awe inspiring and stunning to observe.
However I have a question for anyone who may offer me a good explanation to an obsevational puzzle. If the farther we are looking out into space, the farther we are looking backward in time? Why are all the gallaxies and images the same? There seems to be no progression  of development to the universe. Almost as if everything came into being ,as is, at the same instant.
There do seem to be a lot more quasars at longer look back times.  And our understanding of the big bang is that it did not happen in some particular place in space, but "everywhere at once".  
"Why are all the gallaxies and images the same? There seems to be no progression  of development to the universe. Almost as if everything came into being ,as is, at the same instant. "

that's probably because it takes thousands of years of existence to notice any changes in development.. a couple thousands years to a galaxy is probably the equivalent of 5 minutes to you and me..
In a world flooded with information, both factual and false, this is a great place to keep abreast of the latest--and the reactive pulse of viewers.
My thanks,
Ben
Don't forget that the Rocket Racing League is still determined to hold its first race in 2008, perhaps as early as March. Although the first team to join the league- Leading Edge Rocket Racing- dropped out in May, there are still four teams determined to get rocket-powered planes into the air, with more than a dozen in the planning stages. While some observers find the whole idea a waste of time, money and rocket fuel, others see it as a way to create enthusiasm for rocket technology and eventually, rocket-powered passenger planes that will transport people and cargo to any point on the planet in a matter of hours.  Like the early days of prop-driven airplane races, supporters hope that the RRL will capture the public’s imagination and lead to bigger and better things for rocket aviation.
"A possible development for 2008: If Mars gets pasted with the asteroid headed its way, and we get to see the incident and aftermath, then perhaps we'll see some more intense interest detection of possible Earth-bashers, and maybe even some funding for deflection schemes. Hopefully we can use a Tunguska event on another planet to get this going, rather than waiting for one to happen here."

One would hope. But on the other hand, who remembers the fragmented comet that we watched hit Jupiter?

However, in that case, Galileo had not yet arrived on station. There are several Mars orbiters operating now, that could give us clear images of the area, before and after.

If, of course, the impact actually does occur...

Frank Glover mentions that the "expansion" of the universe appears to be accelerating instead of slowing down.  But we are observing that effect in the most far away galaxies, when they could be expected to be still in the early stages of the expansion, 8 to 14 billion years ago; we have no idea what those galaxies actually look like now, nor how fast they are moving at the present time.  

Alan has posted composite pictures of stellar events which science thinks may show "dark energy/matter."  The conclusion has not been declared as absolute as yet.  But there is something there and enough of it would eventually enable gravity to overcome the expansion force and begin to pull everything back together again.

As a BTW, we can "see" both the extreme 'east' side and the extreme 'west' side stars in a distant spiral galaxy at the same time.  Simultaneous supernovas occurring there, would be seen here as simultaneous, but to each other and their respective neighbours they would seem separated by many years.
Mark Wakely - An excellent point, however, there is 1 correction - its now 6 teams, not 4, that RRL has.
I wanted to point out that the current ISS commander, Peggy Whitson, is the first female commander of the station - another first in 2007.
Glover, Emery, etal.,
 Recent observations, that led to the accelerating expansion conclusion, are based on the fact that they found very distant galaxies (hence, way back in time) are not moving
away (due to expansion then expansion) as fast as nearer galaxies (more recent in time); hence, a speed up (acceleration, speed increase) has occurred as time
has advanced since the start of the universe, The Hubble parameter (used to be called the Hubble Constant) is smaller way back in time (more distant galaxies) than earlier in time (nearer galaxies), hence, showing an increase in speed (acceleration) as time advances since "big bang".
For nearer galaxies, a graph of speed vs. distance is closely a straight line (constant slope, what Hubble found and why word "constant" used). As distance to galaxies increases, far beyond what Hubble was able to observe, the early-on straight line begins to have a smaller slope (bends in downward direction), hence, the need to change from "Hubble Constant" to "Hubble parameter". Hubble's "constant" did not stay "constant" (got smaller)as looked further out into space, back in time (things were expanding slower way back then).
Another point that is essential to prevent many wrong ideas is that the SPACE between galaxies is expanding and causing the appearing motion (speed), NOT the galaxies having higher intrinsic speeds (we are not looking at a situation where a "velocity filter" (faster moving stuff out distances slower like in an explosion). This "space expansion" can exceed the speed of light and, therefore, we will never be able to see any galaxies beyond the theoretically observable (up to where recession speed matches maximum speed of light), expanding, universe (this was a possibility, however, if the universe ever entered a "big crunch" phase), because, beyond the theoretically observable universe, this expansion speed exceeds the speed of light (information transmssion), thereby, preventing such distant light orinformation from ever getting to us with the speed of light being smaller than the speed of expansion, "way out there". Anyone "way out there" won't ever observe us (our galaxy) either because we will be in a faster-than-speed-of-light-expansion region from them, just as they are for us. Based on these facts, some conjecture that the universe (including beyond the observable universe) may be infinite, but SCIENCE does not (can not) go there (prove it)because SCIENCE requires OBSERVATION and observation is not possible.  Soooooo, here is where dreamers, believers, people of faith, science fiction writers, etc. can have all the fun they please without science ever being able to legitimately interfere.
 Happy NEW YEAR to ALL. Remember, there is plenty in our observable universe to keep us having plenty of scientific fun (probably as long as humans exist) and no science can legitimately stop us from having ideas about what is beyond our observable (scientific?) universe.
I believe the term "Space Race" is obsolete.  A race implies there's going to be a winner.  A winner of what?  We won the race to the moon, China is going there because they believe there's profit to be made from it.  We're probably the only country who's not looking at space with a profit margin in mind.  Sure, we have some private companies that are focusing on long-term profit from their ventures, but what are our governmental long-term objectives?  For the past 50 years, the taxpayers of this country have put a lot of money and faith in our space program and what have we gotten in return?  A few large companies have made billions, their top executives have made millions, they've kept a lot of people employed, some terrific new technologies has been developed, and some new scientific revelations have been realized.  Still, what have we got to show for it "space" wise - an aging space shuttle fleet, the ISS (very little return on investment so far), and no clear plan on where we're going with our space program.  I say we focus on the moon and mine it for anything that can turn a profit.  Then we should focus on Mars and the Asteroid Belt for mining.  If we focus on the profit margin, space exploration will take place and will advance, and not at the expense of the taxpayers.    The NASA has shown it's ineptness and inability to do the job.  We need a new vision.  Let's hope our government pulls is head out of you know where and starts focusing on what's important, putting the country back in the black again instead of always being in the red.  We were founded on capitalism and we need to get back to our roots.  I'm backing a new space slogan, "Profit from Space".  What say yea?
 
Profit from space is the only way that we will get back into the business of getting off this rock before the phrase 'eggs in one basket' comes right back to bite us. Hopefully, 2007 WD5 will impact with a good showing at the tail end of January and heads will go up once more, and stay up this time.
The funding arguments are pure farce! Consider the costs incurred in war to the measly $16B for NASA. Factor in the money paid back into the economy by NASA employees and all sub-contractor awards and their salaries too, and the cost is pitiful to date.
More discussion about this on Newsvine where I have initiated a group called New Horizons. All are welcome to join the debate.
When the mass of the entire universe is condensed into one Black Hole, gravity will continue to implode the structure, while the opposing force will grow relatively within it until that force overcomes gravity and blows everything back into existence, the 'expanding universe' again.  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=530247

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google