ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Cloned cats that glow?!

Posted: Thursday, December 13, 2007 2:35 PM by Alan Boyle


AFP / Getty Images

CLICK FOR VIDEO: Photos from South Korea's Ministry of Science and Technology
show cats with a gene for producing red fluorescence protein. The cats appear
normal in visible light, at left, but their skin glows red under ultraviolet light, at
right. Click here or on the image to watch the video from NBC's TODAY show.


South Korean scientists say they have cloned cats whose genes have been altered so that they glow in the dark - taking advantage of a technological twist that could someday be used to make more dramatic genetic changes in all sorts of creatures.

A research team at Gyeongsang National University, headed by Kong Il-Keun, produced several kitty clones in January and February, the government-managed Korea.net news service reported Wednesday. This week the scientists showed off the cats, which now weigh about 7 pounds (3 to 3.5 kilograms) and glow a dull red under ultraviolet light.

"The ability to manipulate the fluorescent protein and use this to clone cats opens new horizons for artificially creating animals with human illnesses linked to genetic causes," the Ministry of Science and Technology said in Wednesday's report.

The procedure for cloning a cat has been around for six years, and Kong himself first performed that particular feat back in 2004. What's noteworthy about the newly reported twist - other than that glow-in-the-dark kitties are really cool - is that scientists fiddled with the donor cat's genetic code, then passed those changes on to the clones.

Here's what the researchers say they did: They took skin cells from Turkish Angora female cats and used a virus to insert the genetic instructions for making red fluorescent protein. Then they put the gene-altered nuclei into eggs for cloning. The cloned embryos were implanted back into the donor cats, which effectively became the surrogate mothers for their own clones.

Four kittens were born by Caesarian section, but one of them died during the procedure, according to the Korea Times. The fact that the kittens' skin cells glowed under ultraviolet light served as evidence that they were really gene-altered clones.

Assuming that the results are confirmed, Kong's cats would join mice and pigs in the glow-in-the-dark clone menagerie. The implication is that if you can pass along the easy-to-recognize coding for fluorescent markers through cloning, you could eventually pass along more complex genetic coding.

Theoretically, you could add in the coding for an endangered species, producing cloned hybrids to boost the gene pool for Sumatran tigers, Iberian lynxes and the like. You might even stick in the coding to give other creatures human diseases, so that they can be studied without raising the level of ethical concern that comes with human experimentation. (I realize that there's a different set of ethical concerns about such trangenic experiments, however.)

Most provocatively, animal clones might be genetically altered to produce human body parts. Does that sound like a way-out science-fiction plot? Well, it's already happening, and sparking an unsettling debate.

This week's report doesn't mean that glow-in-the-dark pets will be waiting under the Christmas tree anytime soon. There are a few caveats surrounding these cats:

  • This research came to light through press releases rather than peer-reviewed articles, and many of the details still have to be published and replicated. It doesn't help that South Korea was ground zero for the biggest scientific scandal in cloning just a couple of years ago. You'll want to wait for confirmation before you put too much stock in Kong's glowing reports.

  • Even if the results are confirmed, they represent just one more small step in the long march of genetic progress. Those cool fluorescent proteins merely serve as a guide for more substantive genetic modifications.

  • Even if glow-in-the-dark cats become routine in the laboratory, that doesn't mean they'll hit it off as housepets. Glow-in-the-dark fish have been offered commercially for several years - but they're still illegal in California and many countries, due to concerns about genetically modified organisms. What's more, it costs tens of thousands of dollars to produce just one run-of-the-mill, non-glowing cat clone - a price tag so hefty that it's not commercially viable.

To my mind, the best place to look for a cute little ball of glowing fur is your local pet adoption center - plus an outlet that sells glow-in-the-dark cat collars. What do you think? As always, feel free to weigh in with your comments below.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

QQ. It's a scientific experiment that can one day lead to many great things. You shun things such as this, but go ahead and research the origin of many things you hold dear and couldn't live without. Might as well go live in a cave.
What about Glofish, which you can buy at a local pet store (in some states), which basically did the same thing?
For the above comments:

If you all could CONSIDER the possibility that perhaps by cloning cats and testing on them, then rather than making them glow, we could be curing them of ailments or eventually finding out a cure to cancer through genetics testing?  Wow, a few cats glow, ok, I get that, but as the article stated, there are to be multiple genetic changes made in the future.

Such changes could lead to:
Making cats free of allergens to make all owners able to handle them.
Open us up to the world of other animals and SAFELY changing them.
Leading us to some major scientific breakthrough, such as a cure for cancer.
The list goes on and on.

So, just because glowing cats may be cool or not your cup of tea, look past the CATS' point of view and look at the scientific point of view.
Marin, price rarely drops with demand ... it drops with availability.
So many negative comments. Obvisously the ultimate point of this was not to create cats that glow under ultra-violet light, but to see if genetic code could be successfully modified. The fact that it was cats and that the modification was to the flourescent protein is inconsequential. Scientists can learn from this success and try similar experiments that result in different modifications.

Studies like this will lead to a cure for things like cancer.


all of you people who are vilifying this research... understand that this type of research is done to better understand the process so that they can help PEOPLE!! quit your crying, damn! so they made some glowing kitties... the cats dont actually glow, you have to shine an ultraviolet light on them to get them to glow, they dont just glow in the dark, and why care if they did??? let science learn, let science improve for the benefit of us all!! you all will change your tunes in 20 years or so when your kidney or liver fails and you are sitting on a donor list interminably, while research like this may be able to cut out the need for human donors, and waiting lists! maybe it wont be like that, maybe it will work like that who knows for certain? quit crying about this and that, ... ohh these poor kitties... they wouldnt exist if not for the experiment, never forget that, they were made for a purpose, let them serve it for the possible betterment of us all! personally i wish that the religious and other fanatical zealots that are too scared of change would shut their traps and let the rest of us benefit... and btw i want mine in green :p
I'm all for genetic, cloning, stem-cell research and the like. However, experimetation without some controls seems like a script for disaster, especially trangenic manipulations. That particular realm needs to be monitored by the global community, if at all possible.
I would love to have a glow in the dark baby.  That way when my 1 year old wanders the streets at night I could spot him.  Now if they could just gentetically engineer him to stop pooping...
i think thats pretty ridiculous, we as the human race should really get our priorities straight
Why dont we just leave everything alone? I mean, come on, people. Fire, don't control it, dont fiddle with nature... but we did anyway.. We are a species of thinkers and changers and movers. If not for those of us that create and make things new and better, we would still be living the stone age. So to all you people that can't see that progress is the only way the human moves... OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!
how do u get the cats to glow? was it an accident or was it the cloning?
Here's the situation-  The lights go out and your flashlight is broken...  Darn it, where'd the kitty go?
It's a way to cut down road kill. But you people have to remember that they said they glow only under ultraviolet light, so they won't just glow naturally when you turn off your lights in the living room.
These glow cats should be given important names.
they would be fine in the night in the wild, they glow under blacklights. i think they'd be fine in my hippie uncle's attic...
For all the individuals who don't understand why science performs experiments:

1. You didn't read the article - this experiment is a stepping stone to conduct more complex experiments next.
2. Sell your house and move into a mud hut - everything in your home that makes you comfy was the result of technological experimentation.
3. Don't ever go to the hospital, unless you are in a 3rd world nation - Medical advancements that have continually raised life expectancy, eliminated or mitigated diseases or simply keep your children from dying from the common cold are the direct result of medical experimentation.
4. Don't claim 'God doesn't want science...' and then go to your mega-church that has all of the latest bells and whistles. Visit a simple church in the Appalachian Mountains and you'll realize that science has brought comfort and luxury to your house of worship.

All told - if you don't like science and the benefits it provides, then feel free to go to any 3rd world nation and lead science-free lifestyle. I suspect most of you will cherry-pick which scientific benefits you like, and then cherry-pick scripture to bash everything else.
Cool.  This really isn't news or new though.  So far we have fluorescent Zebra fish, rats, mice, pigs, and now cats.  Awesome. These things are simply demonstrations to show that the technique for introducing genes works.  Apparently it does, I just wish they would stop announcing it in the news - it freaks all the lay-people out and that's bad for funding.
Who ever thought of cloning innocent animals iz CRAZY!!!!! Its just gonna end up in huge scientifical matter that will make america different forever!!!! THESE PEOPLE ARE CRAZY!! i say that again cause i really mean it!!! i like to use explanation marks but for this i really need this . i think whoever thought of this needs to be like instatutionalized or somthing!!! why mess with the worlds beautifal animals????? i just don`t understand it!
I hate how everyone is so small minded, hello, they changed the genetic code of an animal with no (apparent) flaws, they just glow in the dark, yes, but with the knowledge that it can be done what else can be done. Grow new organs for people who need them, if I remember correctly there are 70,000 people on the list of people who need kidney's, could be more. There's nothing wrong about it, in my opinion.
You people are missing the point... It is not very important that they've cloned glow in the dark cats but rather the fact that they have altered a cats DNA and still cloned it...
I can only see this as having a huge advantage for humankind. We would have options which were never available for any living thing (as far as we know) for the past 500 + million years !!!

Sure in the first couple of years (before these techniques can be perfected) we might make a mess out of certain clones, and some will die.. but it would be well worth it if we can replace body organs, or help people in wheel chairs and so on... The opportunities are endless... In the future when we've perfected these techniques It can be a huge advantage not only for humanity but for all living things...


As far as we know of life on earth, things took a very long time to change (evolution) and how many animals are now extinct because nature couldnt alter their genes fast enough to help them survive ??

I believe this is our purpose and the reason why we are here to be able to control how long we live, and to be able to heal ourselves if we are sick, to not have to suffer anymore if your child/mother/brother etc.. dies...

Since life has existed here on earth, one living thing must eat another living thing with feelings, and emotions and so on just to survive... There isnt even another choice but to cause harm to another living thing just to eat and survive... I believe that all that can be changed in the future, and the only way to change things for the better is to perfect all these diff. technologies...
Exactly what it is, a scientific experiment, just one step forward in making life easier... !!!
nice post Hypocrite-Free USA.
The word "God" does not belong in any comment or article dealing with science.  A few hundred years ago it was against "God" to suggest the earth was round, that gravity existed, or that the earth wasn't the center of the universe.

Religion will always fight against science. Religion draws its power from faith, which is beliving something without proof.  Science seeks to explain things using facts and proof which destroys the need for faith.
Ok...this is very sophisticated and interesting that they are doing this genetic research but i think they should'nt have done it on kittens! i mean think about how much torture the poor things must have gone through! their living things too! they have feelings! i'm wondering why they did'nt just clone lizzards or  something! O well.
can i have one ^_^
Oh, dear lord. I dislike animal testing so much. So now they decide to clone them!? It's like the same thing.... I know they are trying to help the human society, but I REALLY dislike the fact that they also want to give animals human sicknesses? Those poor animals.

But I have a very raw feeling that somewhere, someday, those animal testing will go wrong, and something bad will happen.

But I do find it strange for the fact that they let something like this go out in public.... strange.....
Undesirable interference into the natural genetic structure to form queer fish in this mundane world is an unethical and sinister-looking scientific effort
The South Korean scientist must be mad. They altered one of the cutest animals. IT IS SICK! They should not be allowed to do this.
This latest product of the rising bio-industrial technocracy is a product designed to foster public acceptance of the same genetic engineering and cloning technologies that are now being widely applied in agriculture and that are leading us toward a veritable genetic apocalypse.
I see the point that some people are tying to make, which is that it is a new advancement in science. However cloning is going far enough but puting glow in the dark genes go to far. we are interferring with the laws of nature...with the laws of evolutionBesides if they were to make such an advancement why didnt they just keep it a secret as not to get the whole world angry like what is happenning right now.
The success of the Koreans is to be applauded, for genetically modifying any organism, from a bacterium to a cat is not small feat. For those concerned about marketing of the RFP (red fluorescent protein) cats, I seriously doubt that such animals will ever make it onto the market. The idea of using RFP as a marker allows the scientists to monitor the progress of their cloning techniques. Once the procedure is modified to maximum efficiency, scientists interested in probing the genetic components of disease will be able to adapt those procedures to other genes of interest.
Alan,

You must have an opinion on the many comments here attacking the scientific process?  As we go deeper and deeper into our Wal-Mart economy, we seem to have less time and less money to give to the pet causes of these individuals.  I think we need to generate more scientific jobs, not less, for our scientifically and mathematically challenged students.  How about shedding some light on the subject in a featured article?
excuse me if i am contradicting myself but people are complaining about wasting money. However technically it isn't really our money it's South Korea's. we should start to mind our own buisness and not worry about worldly problems...America seems to have a problem with that.
To all you critics and quakers out there, just grow up and embrace the future.  Obviously there need to be ethical limits so that experimenters don't create dysfunctional, tortured creatures just to get one with market potential, but outside of that the objections are juvenile at best.  

"We're messing with things we don't understand"?  Yes, that's why it's called science - the quest for knowledge and ways to apply it.  If you're afraid that  God or the Flying Spaghetti Monster encoded secret tripwires in our DNA to trigger the End of Times once we learn something Man Was Not Meant to Know, then you are messing with something you don't understand - the line between fantasy and reality - and should perhaps content yourself with American Idol and pro wrestling.

And if you're afraid of all the horrors, weapons, and methods of social and mind control that will come from progress in biological science, you won't get anywhere whining about it and calling for limits.  Knowledge, like life, goes everywhere it possibly can, so we would all do far better to anticipate the nightmare scenarios and encourage research into countermeasures than futilely block anything with negative potential.

Don't live in fear of the future, trying to restrain evolution - that way lies the Dark Ages.  Run toward the future with joy, because every problem you know and can conceive of will be solved in time.  Yes, the solutions will only create an exotic new set of problems, and that is the infinite wonder of human destiny - we can have a future that does not end, and does not repeat.  That is the promise of science.  And if we choose such a future, it will be ours.
Are you people really that stupid? They aren't making them glow for the purpose of making them glow. They're making them glow for the purpose of tangibility. You can't prove that an anti-cancer gene is working... because you won't always get cancer. You CAN, however, prove if a glowing-under-fluorescent-light gene is working... Because they will always glow under the particular light.

If you feel like bringing God into an argument, then get off the computer, turn off your lights, walk into the middle of nowhere and be one with nature... because if you believe that this isn't a viable scientific endeavor, then you also shouldn't be allowed to use other "experimental" equipment that the world could, now, not function properly.

Stupidity and religion don't go hand in hand, just stupidity and overly religious idiots.
first, the cats don't glow in the dark.  They glow under ultraviolet light. second the research is done because nobody wants to die.  do you?
Will this be considered an invention or discovery?
Ok you box of "ROCKS"!  UV light is NOT visible by the average human, unless they too have been genetically altered.  You will not see these kitty's glowing in the dark unless you use a "black light" or something similar.  To the naked eye, these cats do not "glow"; they just needed some kind of genetic "bookmark" to make sure that the changes they were making were confirmed.  Once they make confirmed "controlled changes" such as a gene that makes them glow in UV light, then they can move forward to see if they can clone a pig with a human heart so we can give heart recipients a bigger chance of survival.  So far they have 3 completely different species that have sucessful case studies for changing one gene in 3 animals.  They are not making changes in animals to put in the commercial market to give the average idiot something to "ohhh and awe" about.  
Cats are companion animals. NOT ornaments or novelty toys. This is absolutely awful. Only a depraved mind would think of doing this. And buying one supports animal cruelty.
Are there any volunteers that would like to enroll themselves in this research group, "IN the Name of Science?"  No, I didn't think so... so why don't we just throw in some creature,who doesn't have the option to choose for itself, instead.
Yay! Eugenics in animals! What's next, strobe cats for raves? I can't wait!
I probably should make a couple of things clearer... First, about the cat that died. It wasn't killed in the course of research, it was just born dead. That's one problem with the cloning process: The success rate is pretty low. The South Korean reports don't indicate how many nuclear transfers were done, but it typically takes a lot of tries to get pregnancies to term, and it's not surprising if some of the pregnancies don't result in live births. That's why reproductive human cloning is such a bad idea.

Second, these cats indeed were cloned not to create cute pets, but to test an experimental technique. These cats are not for sale. The purpose of the glow-in-the-dark gene, as others have noted, is to provide a marker to confirm that the gene transfer technique actually worked. This sort of thing has been done with other species as well (not always with cloning, though). The scientists' aim is to conduct the procedure with the particular species that would be capable of mimicking a human disease. It just so happens that glow-in-the-dark cats are, to most people, cuter than glow-in-the-dark mice or pigs - so that's where the "awwww" factor comes in. (And I admit it, that adds an extra twist when it comes to writing about it.)
wow!
I am stupefied at these comments.  How inarticulate, lazy and lacking in critical thinking skills.  

Welcome to America where we all "talk" just to "see" ourselves talk...
Anyone read Michael Crichton's "Next"? That's the first thing that came to mind when I saw this article.
They don't cloe cats to do it.  They are after some end.  The lead scientist is using this as a way to further some other experiment he plans on doing.   The future of cloning will always be clouded between those that think they are helping mankind and those that believe it is hurting mankind.   NO good can come from owning day glo cats or electric eels that power your christmas tree.  That article reminded me of a matrix movie.   We need to stop this in America and enforce customs laws to prohibit entry of these animals.  I hate to say it but Bush is right.  no cloning.  RL
Everyone who says this is a waste of money is forgetting something...it's their money, not yours.  The Korean Scientists have a right to spend their money the way they want.  Some have said they should be spending their money on cancer research or feeding the world.  Bet those people have money in the bank, and, what they do spend, would be considered extravagent wastes, by most Korean Citizens. (US citizens are bying cell phones to surf the web on a 2inch screen, rather than investing in solving world hunger!)  go figure
I do not understand why, what appears to be a majority of people who have read this article, cannot get past the idea that this is simply a "glow in the dark cat created for fun as a look what I can do I'm god" kind of situation. I see the scientific merit of this experiment and as long as it is done responsibly I don't see anything wrong with it. I would like to point out that do not like to see any animal hurt or killed unnecessarily(as a matter of fact I have two cats that I love dearly) and I still see nothing wrong with this experiment. I believe God gave us permission to use animals in a manner that help us, be it with work, transportation, food, or other necessities (e.g. research that could help others and save lives), so long as our intentions are good. As long as these animals are treated with respect and provided proper care (and I highly doubt they would ever just release them into the wild) I agree with what is being done, especially when the future benefits of this type of research are considered. Quite franly, if it were not for scientific exploration and experimentation I don't believe most of us who have read and/or responded to this article would be here, either online or even alive. As for the fact that one of the cats died during delivery, I think it is important to point out that animals die during birth all the time and, who knows, even if these kittens weren't clones the same cat having a normal litter of kittens could have lost one during birth. Overall I think that this research, if true, could some day provide many people with lifesaving benefits that not only increase life span but the actual quality of that life. I have known people who would have benefitted from what this research could provide (a gradmother with Parkinson's Disease who could have lived longer if better treatments were available, a grandfather who has to spend 6 hours, 3 days a week at dialysis who could do things he longs to do now, but can't ... if only he had a way to improve his kidney function or who knows, even grow a new one his life would be drastically different in a positive way). I applaud this researcher for coming up with a creative way to measure the success of his experiment without negatively impacting the animals' normal functioning in a major way (it's not like they grew an extra head or leg or anything like that ... they glow, which means, as long as they are not in the dark they are just like any other cat). I hope some time soon we see the benefits this type of discovery can provide for the human race, that way when anyone receives medical attention, or when international relief organizations provide food and medical attention to people starving, etc. they might also be able to provide them with new medical technology that makes their lives better thanks to what was started with a couple of glow in the dark cats.    
I would just like to point out that, in the midst of all of this talk of cats as companion animals, South Korea is a different culture in which different animals are considered "pets." I do know that in South Korea dog is considered a delicacy (my friend's brother who was stationed there as part of the US Army, ordered food in a resturant without knowing what he was ordering, and ending up getting a cooked dog head on a plate) and I believe I have heard that some people there do eat cats. Consequenlty, I think it is important to consider that this experiment was conducted in a country with a culture much different than ours and we should not judge them using our standards when considering the type of animal they seclect to do the experiment on.
Maybe human-kind could be better served if these scientists spent their time working on curing Parkinsons, MS, MD, cancer, etc etc etc, rather than wasting their time creating genetically-altered glowing cats.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=514602

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google