ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Hubble probes a comet's heart

Posted: Thursday, November 15, 2007 2:30 PM by Alan Boyle


A. Dyer / Alberta, Canada
Comet Holmes appears in all its fuzzy glory with a faint tail trailing off to lower right
in a picture taken by Canadian amateur astronomer Alan Dyer on Nov. 1.

Comet Holmes is turning into the star of the night sky, thanks to a huge cloud of dust that makes it look more like a cosmic fuzzball than a dirty snowball. But all that dust has obscured the things you usually expect to see in a comet, such as a tail and a bright nucleus. Now the Hubble Space Telescope has cut through the clouds to make out the structure of the comet's dusty heart.

The comet was a run-of-the-mill celestial traveler until Oct. 23, when the object suddenly flashed to a million times its previous brightness. Scientists assumed that a chunk of the nucleus - the "dirty snowball" at the heart of every comet - had broken off and disintegrated. (Check out this mini-graphic to learn more about the anatomy of a comet.)

The debris from the breakup spread out to become a hazy cloud surrounding the nucleus, and astronomers say the sunlight scattered by all that ice and dust is responsible for Comet Holmes' fuzzy brightness.

Over the past three weeks, Comet Holmes' cloud of haze has spread out to a diameter of 900,000 miles (1.4 million kilometers), which is wider than the diameter of the sun, astronomers at the University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy noted this week. That's not unprecedented for a comet, but this cloud has such a spherical shape that it's easy to imagine the comet as an insubstantial, ghostly star haunting the constellation Perseus.


H. Weaver / JHU-APL / NASA / ESA
CLICK FOR DETAIL
This Hubble view shows a bow-tie structure in the
cloud surrounding Comet Holmes' nucleus. Click on
the picture to see Hubble's view in a wider context.

Hubble has been periodically checking in with Comet Holmes, and its latest picture - taken with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 on Nov. 4 and released just today - shows an intriguing bow-tie shape at the core of the dust cloud. "We may finally be starting to detect the emergence of the nucleus itself," Hal Weaver of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, who led the Hubble investigation, said in today's news release.

The bow tie indicates that about twice as much dust lies along the east-west direction as along the north-south direction - hinting at the genesis of the breakup. In Hubble's Oct. 29 image, astronomers could see three spurs of dust emanating from the center, and an Oct. 31 image revealed an outburst of dust just west of the nucleus.

Ground-based imagery reveals that Comet Holmes' cloud is offset somewhat from the nucleus. That serves as an additional hint that a large piece broke off and disintegrated after moving some distance away.

Although the comet doesn't yet have a well-defined tail, you can see one forming to the lower right of the nucleus in an image captured by Canadian amateur astronomer Alan Dyer. In fact, comets can have two tails - one composed of dust, the other of ionized gas. This picture of Comet Hale-Bopp provides another classic view of the double-tail effect.

For additional perspectives on today's Hubble picture, click on over to the European Space Agency's Hubble site as well as Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory.

Comet Holmes is now 149 million miles (238 million kilometers) from Earth, and that means Hubble should be able to spot features as small as 33 miles (54 kilometers) across. Even that resolution won't be fine enough to resolve details of the nucleus itself. But there are other ways to unlock the secrets of a comet's heart.

Before last month's brightening, astronomers estimated that the nucleus was just 2.1 miles (3.4 kilometers) across, based on its brightness. Once the dust clears a bit more, they should be able to get a fix on how much of the nucleus is still left - and fill out the story behind the breakup.

In the meantime, Comet Holmes should be visible to the naked eye for weeks longer. It helps to get away from city lights and peer into clear skies. Bring along a pair of binoculars or a small telescope if you can. This weekend, the annual Leonid meteor shower reaches its peak - and seeing the comet in all its fuzzy glory provides just one more reason for getting out and looking up.

Update for 7:45 p.m. ET: JHU's Hal Weaver added some new angles to the tale of Comet Holmes during an interview with Reuters. He said astronomers suspect that volatile ices within the nucleus heated up during the comet's swing around the sun, building up pressure that was released months later by an explosion.

The explosion might have sheared off a pancake-shaped slab of the nucleus that crumbled to dust and created the bright cloud of debris.

Weaver noted that Comet Holmes went through a similar outburst in 1892. Astronomers thought that earlier display might have been caused by a collision with another celestial object - perhaps another comet, or a small asteroid. The collision was thought to have sliced off a piece of Holmes' nucleus that slammed back onto the main body, throwing up a spray of dust.

"Now we step forward to 2007, and the same thing is happening again," Weaver told Reuters. "It indicates that the [earlier] hypothesis is incorrect."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

And there shall be signs in the heavens!
There have been signs in the heavens throught the entirety of human history.  Only now we know what they are.

So don't be concerned.  Go out and look, the comet is quite a sight.
And there have been "signs" for many years past and many years to come.  Stop quoting your fiction, this is science.
Holmes is definetly a breakthrough!  Thank the gods for the Hubble!  When are we putting a scope on the ISS?
Signs? Signs of what? Crazy people infiltrating MSNBC's space blog? OK.
There are signs in the sky? Good heavens, we're doomed! Quick, everybody look busy!
TO GO WHERE NO MAN HAS GONE BEFORE SPACE ITS BEAUTY,ITS MISTERY HOW WE ALL WONDER KEEP REACHING AND KEEP US ALL INFORMED THANKS FOR ALL THAT YOU SHARE AND INSPIRE.
These things never tell the clueless which way to look....
Lou wrote: "Stop quoting your fiction, this is science."

One person's fiction is another one's truth. There's nothing wrong with what Concerned Citizen wrote. In fact, it's very appropriate. Quit trying to bully people for expressing their views.
um ya stop the fiction and just enjoy the beauty of a dieng comet. for with death life comes anew.
And if you found the right picture of Hale-
Bopp, you could see a third tail composed of sodium.
Finaly the HST got in on the act. I haven't seen a hubble shot of this until now and I sure have done some searching. Its hard to believe the actual comet is maybe 10 km's in diameter.
Dear Clueless: Never fear! If you follow the first link in this item, you'll find a little sky map and story that should give you a general clue.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21551743/

This information from Sky & Telescope should also be very helpful:

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/home/10862521.html

And there's this guide from Astronomy magazine:

http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=6183

Heavens Above provides a continuously updated locator map (once you log in):

http://www.heavens-above.com

Really, you can't miss it if you know generally where the constellations Cassiopeia and Perseus are. If you have some good pictures of Comet Holmes, please, please send them along to us using our FirstPerson tool ... we'll share them with everyone next week:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20205619/

Sorry everyone, but you'll have to get used to calling it "Cecilia's Comet"; I showed it to my 3 yr old thru my small scope and now it's "her comet".
Could someone please point this hapless retiree in the right direction.  I have the binoculars and need to know where to point them.  Thanks
Dear Her Daddy, it is more than time for Cecila to have a comet named after her.  Following a long tradition of professors taking credit for their student's work, it is only her due.
I am just grateful to be able to see them @ all-God has given us this gift so quit c/o & enjoy it.  I have gotten to see Hale-Bopp, Halley's, & Holmes in my lifetime-who knows what others I will get to see B4 I die? The top photo is great. Wish I was that good w a camera & the night sky. Happy Thankgiving everyone.
Here are 2 links depicting the orbit of the comet in relation to the earth. Both are very informative. You can see Holmes is a periodic comet that hangs around the inner planets and Jupiter and rather inclined to the orbital plane or ecliptic.

http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?
sstr=17P;orb=1;cov=0;log=0#orb


http://www.shadowandsubstance.com
Gang, I forgot that we have a bulletin board where you can discuss your sightings. If you look up high in the northeast sky a couple of hours after dark, it should be easy to spot the cute little fuzzball. It's rather hazy, doesn't jump out at you, but you can definitely tell it's something unusual. Here's the address for the discussion board:

http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/
thread.aspx?boardid=793&threadid=442294
Where is it?  I look NE and its not there
I can't find it. Maybe it blew up.
There are a few no lifes everywhere and in every blog so here is no exception. Enjoy the heavens and don't give others a hard time for being themselves. You may one day find yourself looking to those that "Watch the Heavens" to save your skin.
Please, when are astronomers going to acknowledge the electrical nature of comets?  Holmes never gets closer to the Sun than the orbit of Mars, what makes anyone think that it is hot enough out there to vaporize water ices?  Further more, these people are basing all their conjectures on the "Dirty Snowball Theory of Comets."  The fact is that, probes to Comets have shown that their surfaces are no different than assorted asteroids, and other small bodies in the solar system, so now they've moved the ices hidden in the interior, because they are trying to salvage their pet theory, no matter what the facts indicate.  What makes a celestial body into a "comet" is an elliptical orbit that forces it to encounter changes in the ambient electrical (plasmaspheres of the sun or planets) environment.  This particular comet is under great electrical stress forcing it to fission, its' surface being made into an extremely fine dust through the process of EDM (electrical discharge machining.)
Why don't we all just relax and enjoy the wonder of it all.
We know a comet could spell doom as it did in 10,900 BC over North America or Siberia in 1908.  We know these things are made of ice and rock.  We know that when light hits them, they jet off some of their matter.  We have high power lasers.  So why don't we use one of these things for target practice and see if we can affect its trajectory?
If Comet Holmes had brightened before, I would have concluded that LGM's  or George Bush as well as GW were behind it!
"Holmes never gets closer to the Sun than the orbit of Mars, what makes anyone think that it is hot enough out there to vaporize water ices?"

Physics.

Even on the surface of Mars, water sometimes warms enough to melt. There are orbital observations that strongly suggest it's happened in some localites very recently.

AND rermember that in vacuum (and on most of Mars, the atmospheric pressure is low enough for this to happen pretty quickly) water sublimes directly from a solid to a gas, just as frozen CO2 (also known as 'dry ice') does, even at one Earth atmosphere.

It doesn't have to warm to 212F out there, it just has to get a little above freezing and there you have it.

Water vapor.

Any chance this comet hit an asteriod?

On a side note, real Scientists are open to all beliefs that have not been disproven yet.  No matter if they do not align with their religious beliefs.  Only ignorant people would put someone else down for their beliefs!

Also, all real astronomers believe in a god of some sort...
"We know that when light hits them, they jet off some of their matter.  We have high power lasers.  So why don't we use one of these things for target practice and see if we can affect its trajectory?"

None of these lasers could deliver meaningful energy at those distances. As a weapon, they need only burn holes in the relatively 'soft' targets of thin metal rocket bodies, already carrying signifigant amounts of solid or liquid fuel. Even at close range, those same devices would be delivering pinpricks against a multi-megaton object, and any effect would be lost in the 'noise' of the very same natural outgassing you refer to...

In other words, it would be like using a machine gun against an already erupting volcano.

Serious deflection would take nukes. Pure and simple. (and depending on the composition of the object, maybe not even that would be very effective)



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=468450

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google