ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Rocket quest crashes and burns

Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2007 3:34 PM by Alan Boyle


Chris Jonas

Armadillo Aerospace's Mod lunar lander prototype
goes up in flames Sunday during a final launch attempt at Holloman Air Force Base, N.M. This
photograph was taken from almost a mile away.


Armadillo Aerospace's yearlong quest to win a NASA-backed prize ended today in a blaze - not exactly a blaze of glory, but a fire that caught the attention of the thousands attending the X Prize Cup air and rocket show here at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.

The blast marked the second year in a row that the Texas-based Armadillo team and its popular leader, millionaire video-game programmer John Carmack, fell just short of snaring $350,000 of NASA's money in the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge.

No injuries were reported, and Brett Alexander, the X Prize Foundation's executive director for space prizes, said Armadillo's spindly Mod rocket craft did not appear to be totally destroyed. Nevertheless, the fiery end came as a deep disappointment to the Armadillo rocketeers, who thought they were virtually assured of winning something at this year's X Prize Cup.

"Today is officially a bad day," Alexander quoted Carmack as saying.

The Lunar Lander Challenge, which is backed by a total of $2 million in potential prizes from NASA's Centennial Challenges program, is aimed at encouraging innovations that could lead to more efficient landers for exploring the moon and other planets. By that measure, this weekend's event was a success, Alexander argued, because of the money spent by Armadillo and its competitors to develop new rocket technologies.

"It's many, many times the $2 million already, and they [NASA officials] haven't spent a dime," he said.

The challenge calls for rocket-powered craft to lift off from one launch pad, rise to a height of at least 50 meters, move over to another pad 100 meters away, land and refuel, then retrace its steps back to the beginning - all in 150 minutes or less. The Level 1 challenge requires 90 seconds of rocket-powered hang time, and offers a $350,000 top prize. The Level 2 challenge raises the bar to 180 seconds of flight, with a landing on a rugged, moonlike surface.

Seven seconds away from victory
Nine teams signed up for the challenge this year, but Armadillo was the only one to have its vehicle ready for the contest. In fact, Armadillo had two vehicles registered - the Mod (short for modular rocket) for Level 1 and another rocket craft called Pixel for Level 2.

Armadillo got to fly only the Mod this weekend. The team made four attempts to win the prize over the past two days: The first launch was aborted before it started, due to concerns about a balky ignitor. During the second and third tries, the Mod rocket made the first leg of its required round trip successfully, but was not able to complete the return trip. In both cases, the engine suffered a "hard start" and was fatally damaged during flight.

Carmack came the closest to victory during attempt No. 2, when he kept flying the vehicle by remote control despite the engine damage. The Mod was within seven seconds of satisfying the 90-second flight requirement, but the engine gave out and the craft fell to the ground.

The fiery end
For the fourth and final attempt, Armadillo team members cannibalized the rocket engine from Pixel, installed it on the Mod and revised their procedures in hopes of avoiding engine damage. The plan was take more time to flush out the fuel lines and engine chamber at the halfway point. But Armadillo never got that far.

Just seconds after the countdown ticked down to zero, the area around the Mod erupted in flames. "On ignition, they obviously had an explosion or something in the engine," Alexander said.

"The engine blew up. We had a hard start. ... It actually tore the engine loose," Armadillo team member Russ Blink told me later.

The Armadillo team evacuated the scene and declared an emergency. However, the blaze burned itself out within minutes - even before the fire crews arrived, Alexander said.

Blink said the team was still tracking down the root cause of the hard start. "There's some little gremlin that got us, and we need to get it out," he said. It could be a combination of factors: Some rocketeers suggested that the atmospheric conditions in New Mexico, which is arguably drier and dustier than Texas, might play a role.

"This weekend, we've had more problems that we've had in the last six months. We know what went wrong, but not why," Neil Milburn, Armadillo's vice president, said in a statement from the X Prize Foundation

Alexander said Carmack and the Armadillo team could have installed a spare engine on Pixel and made an attempt Sunday night to win the Lunar Lander Challenge's $1 million prize. "John elected not to go," Alexander said.

Blink said team members decided against another attempt in part because they feared the same engine problem might just crop up again.

There's always next year
The $2 million in prizes will roll over to next year, Alexander said. That would give new hope to other rocketeers, who widely expected Armadillo to walk away with at least one prize this year.

"I would expect that next year there will be more than one team competing," Alexander said. He noted that two or three of Armadillo's rivals "got very close" to being ready to launch this year.

Although the NASA money is still waiting from them, the other entrants in the Lunar Lander Challenge took no joy from Armadillo's loss.

"It's painful, even for us other competitors, to see that," said Dave Masten, president and chief executive officer of California-based Masten Space Systems.

Paul T. Breed, the senior partner in the father-and-son team at Unreasonable Rocket, was distraught when launch commentators asked him to react to the Mod's fiery end. "I know how hard they worked," he said.

Paul A. Breed, the 20-year-old junior partner, said Armadillo "definitely deserved to win." As he reflected on the day's events, the younger Breed referred to Murphy's Law - the observation that if anything can go wrong, it will.

"Things go wrong," Breed said. "Murphy loves rockets."

Other tidbits from the X Prize Cup:

  • The X Prize organizers joined forces with Holloman Air Force Base this year to produce a show that was, if anything, dominated by military aerial displays rather than rocket demonstrations. The precision aerobatics, ear-shattering flyovers and choreographed parachute maneuvers were clearly the biggest crowd-pleasers - and at times the effect reminded me of a show put on jointly by the math club and the varsity football team. But the turnout appeared to please both sides: This weekend's attendance amounted to 85,000, including 6,000 students who came out for Friday's education day, said Brig. Gen. David Goldfein, commander of the 45th Fighter Wing at Holloman. Representatives of the air base as well as the X Prize Foundation said they'd be interested in putting on the same sort of event next year.

  • The sponsorships for next year's event will likely have a different look, however: Alexander noted that that Wirefly, the telecommunications company that had been the cup's title sponsor, was enmeshed in financial difficulties and did not end up contributing to the event. Northrop Grumman's agreement to sponsor the Lunar Lander Challenge runs out this year - and it remains to be seen whether that sponsorship will continue. The challenge itself, however, will be offered through 2010 under the terms of NASA's Centennial Challenges program.

  • The Pete Conrad Spirit of Innovation Award, named after the late Apollo 12 astronaut, recognizes concepts devised by high-school students to accelerate the personal spaceflight industry. This year's first-place winner was Michael & Talia of Los Angeles, a team that proposed a concept for sunglasses that can monitor vital signs in space. Those team members received a $5,000 grant from NASA and a spaceship trophy by artist/aviator Erik Lindbergh. Second place (and a $2,500 NASA grant) went to GADastro of Northbrook, Ill., which conceptualized a self-healing material to maintain safety in space. Third place (and a $1,500 NASA grant) was given to PenguinED of Friendswood, Texas, which conceptualized a company to work with schools on space education.

Last updated at 7:20 a.m. ET Oct. 29

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

What a heartbreak! I'm so sorry to hear that Armadillo came away empty-handed again this year. Best wishes for next year to John Carmack and his team.
jeah that's a pity that that was happened again, but John can read up on what has gone wrong and try better next year. All the best for next year, John.
I hardly accept the results after such combined efforts had been executed. I believe the cause lies between cheap electromechanical ignition system and/or specific fuel condition which is subject to the right temperature at the instant of press to start!!!
It's a great pity, but I think they had no one but themselves to blame.  

Last year, they had a vehicle (Pixel) that all but did the deed.  They simply needed to practice more with that very same vehicle (maybe build another backup or two), perhaps make some design and operational tweaks - and the prize would have been theirs.  

Instead, they went to a quite different design, the MOD.  This rocket is supposed to be part of their scalable, "modular" vehicle - that's fine.  But spending all kinds of time and money on making this new configuration work like a lunar lander made little sense - especially when they literally had a "bird in the hand".

If the prize itself was really important to them, they should have spent the past year really wringing out their almost-there vehicle, and worked on their rocket module as a separate deal.  Oh well.
Rockets are a waste of time.
Click my name, and follow the links for a better way.
To those who feel this is shameless self-promotion, I can only say have a look, remain objective, and realize that the earliest of the guys involved in space programs knew that rockets were the great limitation.
I seriously believe that Gaia Two is superior to any other concept out there...and, yes, Kids...they're all still concepts...
Fall into Space
It was good seeing the high turnout of people for the combined Air & Space Expo here in Alamogordo.  Our remoteness and isolation somewhat limit having a really large amount of people at any one time, but it's also the reason why this area has been used for the last 60+ years for some of our nations leading R&D and T&E of major air & space programs.  Holloman AFB and the White Sands Missile Range combined make up one of the most versitile test ranges in the world.  And even though history was not made this weekend, it did make for a highly entertaining and educational couple of days.
One of the main problems is rocket science is complicated.  Rocket launches get delayed for technical reasons all the time.  This contest specifically requires the event occure in a narrow window of time.  If the prize were paid independent of when during the year or where it was tested the prize would have been won already.
I spent the decade of the 1960s in aerospace and defense, part of it at the Cape on a launch crew.  This kind of disappointment hurts.

The mention of Murphy's Law reminded me of what in those days we called O'Toole's Commentary on Murphy's Law: "Murphy was an optimist."  Better luck next time, guys.
It is a shame. I applaud their effort and hope they will try again next year.
Who are they kidding by reinventing the "wheel". This technology is available for the past 40 years. As soon as "big guys" will step in to the picture the Armadillo's and alike will find out that they have just wasted their time and money. There is no Wright Brothers, Xerox and Apple "garage" startups in the air-space business today. The field requires never ending capital and "mind" resources that only the government can afford. I do not see anyone bringing a new technology in to the light. I build and launch rockets with my son. So what. Should I be considered an air-space “Start-Up”?
Well, this IS rocket science after all.

Literally.

We can only be glad that there were no casualties nor injuries in this dissapointing accident. Best of luck to Armadillo next year. Winners are not the ones who never lose, but the ones who keep trying until they succeed.
I'm not sure this helping or hurting.  The colonization of space should be a worthy and WORLDWIDE goal but we seem more interested in occupying Iraq and Iran than reaching out into space and actually learning/doing something, arguably for the same cost!  I'm not sure NASA even knows what it want's to do when it gets to the moon other than plant another flag.  It's um... universal knowledge that you have to know what you wish to do before you actually attempt it or brain storm at possible solutions.  An inter-orbital transit sled (for massive amounts of supplies) to go between earth and lunar orbits with re-usable landing ships is better than an Apolo re-run.

 
They did an excellent job and I am sure they will be back, hopefully with some competition to make the event more exciting. Or better yet, they will ignore the competition entirely and work on their suborbital tourism business. They really don't need the money and the came so close to winning anyway.
BTW, I think that Mr. Al-Bidal is right, their supplier may have changed the fuel composition so that the engine did not work properly, kind of like trying to run a race car on low octane regular.
The more I think about it...this is not about proving we can put whirlygigs in space...it's about expansion of the human spirit...and until we get that straight, we ain't goin' nowhere.
Tne guy who wrote about playing rockets with his son, and wanting in on the New Space Race has the idea.
"This contest specifically requires the event occure in a narrow window of time.  If the prize were paid independent of when during the year or where it was tested the prize would have been won already."

If these are meant to prototype technology to be used operationally in space, turnaround time *is* important. Ask any commercial transportation (not just aerospace) operator. (remember thattht shuttle was originally billed as flyable again in two weeks...has it come close?)

"Who are they kidding by reinventing the "wheel". This technology is available for the past 40 years."

Um, why didn't aircraft development stop at the DC-3? We have the benefit of, what did you say, 40 years of new technology? No one expects to fly exact copies of Grumman's Lunar Module today, or later (Even Orion only *resembles* Apollo)

And yes, if you and your son launch rockets outside of the strict power and burn time limits of model rocketry, *with the intention of eventually developing a commercial product,* you ARE a 'start up.'

This is rocketry R&D in the open, not unlike the air races of the 1930's. And one expects things to occasionally break:

http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=4836

Yes, go look at Steve Smith's web site. "If I had a rocket, this is what it would look like." Great stuff. Solves all kinds of problems, at least on paper. On paper, I'm a genius too. So why am I so afraid to go into the lab and blow myself up? Maybe being a genius isn't good enough. The difference between knowledge and wisdom. Knowing how to do somthing is not the same as actually doing it. The latter takes guts and determination. The former only requires a library card. So, pictures really are worth a thousand words. But that's all they're worth. Even very pretty pictures.
Geez, Guy...who said anything about not doing it?...you did...whassupwidat?
Got a spare $mil?
We're there if ya do.
Thanks for the positive input...but it ain't a rocket ship...first and foremost...this ain't about rocket science.
I do not believe anyone with a spare million dollars will invest in something that is that "pie in the sky". I think you are on your own to raise that money Steve.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=435383

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google