ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Lucrative liftoffs lined up

Posted: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 11:34 PM by Alan Boyle

The space shuttle Discovery's flight to the international space station isn't the only NASA-backed mission lifting off this week: In Utah, a laser-powered robot just barely missed winning $500,000, while a lunar lander prototype has gotten the all-clear to go after a chunk of the $2 million that the space agency is putting up at this weekend's X Prize Cup in New Mexico.

The near miss came at the Space Elevator Games, which are aimed at developing beam-powered robots and super-strong tethers that could someday be used in interplanetary missions. Eventually, such technologies could open the way for developing a space-elevator system for transporting payloads into orbit cheaply.

Last year, the University of Saskatchewan's robot climber, powered by focused sunlight, came oh-so-close to winning the top prize in the NASA-supported Beam Power Challenge. This year, in Farmington, Utah, the same team of students and alumni showed off a next-generation climber that was powered by laser. To be in the running for a prize, the contraption had to pull itself up a fabric ribbon at a rate of at least 2 meters (6.5 feet) per second.

Saskatchewan's robot made it up to the top in 54 seconds during its best run on Monday - a performance that would have won the prize last year's best. Unfortunately, the bar was raised over the past year. Saskatchewan missed the required minimum pace by just a few seconds - although the ribbon was still getting its final official measurement on Tuesday.

There were likewise no winners in the other NASA-backed challenge at the Space Elevator Games, known as the Tether Challenge. The unwon prize money, which amounts to $1 million, will roll over to next year's games.

Check out Ted Semon's Space Elevator Blog for the full story from Utah.

The Utah contests were part of NASA's Centennial Challenges program, modeled after the $10 million Ansari X Prize for personal spaceflight and the Pentagon's prize program for autonomous road vehicles (which is building up to its next running next week). NASA has paid out prize money in two Centennial Challenges so far: $200,000 for the Astronaut Glove Challenge and $250,000 for the Personal Air Vehicle Challenge.

Yet another big check might be written in New Mexico this weekend, when rocket-powered landers will be put to the test in the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge.

Texas-based Armadillo Aerospace is considered the favorite to win at least one of the prizes. Like Saskatchewan's robot-building team, the Armadillo rocket-building team fell just short of finishing in the money last year. Since then, Armadillo has made much progress and also suffered setbacks.

A big milestone came last week, when Armadillo's prototype rocket ships had to fly qualifying runs to get their launch permits from the Federal Aviation Administration for this weekend's X Prize Cup. The qualifying flight was a success, as shown in this Armadillo MPG video clip. As a result, this week the FAA announced that the permit was awarded.

At one time, nine teams were vying for the Lunar Lander Challenge money - but seven of the teams bowed out, and the Acuity Technologies team seems unlikely to get the required clearance by Saturday. That would leave Armadillo Aerospace as the sole competitor.

Armadillo's MOD lander would go after the $350,000 offered in the Level 1 contest - which calls for making a rocket-powered trip from one pad to another and back, spanning 100 meters (yards) and rising to 50 meters for at least 90 seconds of hang time. The Pixel lander would go after the $1 million top prize, which requires 180 seconds of hang time and sets out a more rugged lunar-style terrain for landing.

Check out Clark Lindsey's RLV and Space Transport News for more on the buildup to the Northrop Grumman Lander Challenge.

The lunar-lander contest is this year's X Prize headliner, but it's not the only attraction at the Wirefly X Prize Cup, which is being held this year at Holloman Air Force Base near Alamogordo, N.M. There'll be rocket demonstrations, airplane flyovers and space exhibits galore.

The festivities kick off on Wednesday and Thursday with the International Symposium on Personal Spaceflight. Over the next few days you can expect to hear much more about the push to put regular people into space - including updates on Rocketplane's suborbital spaceship and the privately backed Teachers in Space program.

Watch this space for the daily rocket reports from New Mexico.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Actually Pixel will be used for the Level 2 contest since it has more fuel capacity.  The new MOD vehicle will be used in the Level 1 contest since in only has to stay aloft for 90 seconds.

Thanks, Danny, I did type that wrong ... missed that in all the back and forth over Pixel, Texel and the Modules. I've corrected the reference in the item above. Sorry about the mistake.

Addendum / erratum: I also bungled a reference to the Quad's thruster system. Four tanks, plus attitude control jets, but one engine and not four thrusters. Other folks called me on it in comments added below.

I'm all in favor of stepping up robotic space exploration, despite a nostalgia for the "old" dream of doing it with manned ships. Robots are cheaper, since (as a source in one of your earlier articles pointed out) robots don't care whether they return from a mission. On the other hand, excluding humans from space exploration (ex-cept as Earth-based engineers and programmers), removes all the heroism associated with the enterprise.

As for the tethers for those robotic "space elevators," they would not only have to be incredibly long, but incredibly strong, too. What would they be made of? Titanium or some other hard metal (which are expensive, and would also have to be sent up as a payload) or some kind of plastic/synthetic composite (which probably would be less expensive and easier to transport, but would probably not be as durable? Also, how would the robotic cargoes be "loaded"? Would both ends of the tether have to be secured, from an orbiter to the surface? How could that be done?

As for the automated vehicles idea, I'm leery of it, though it's been around in fiction for quite a while (Heinlein and Niven come to mind). To make automated cars a reality on a large scale, the system would have to be almost 100% fool-proof, otherwise few people would accept it. For one thing, driving is one of the individual freedoms all Americans look forward to and enjoy. For another, I'd think most people would rather risk being injured or killed and have some control over a car than take the same risks and have no control.  Of course, millions of people fly in air-planes each year, so maybe I'm wrong. I just don't like it when anybody else is driv-ing or piloting except me. At least on an airliner, you know there's a real pilot at the controls, not just some computer (which, like the robot space explorers men-tioned above) couldn't care less whether its passengers arrive at their destination in one piece.        
One further correction concerning Pixel. It is a Quad-tank design not a "quadruple-thruster".  There is but one main truster.  The four cold gas attitude control jets don't count either.  
If humans are ever to survive we had better start exploring other planets and the solar system NOW !

But with today's lame propulsion technology I wouldn't build your hopes and it seems as the people in space research as well as private companies just dont get it.

Here is a propulsion technology that will save mankind.

http://nlspropulsion.net

enjoy
It's encouraging to see the level of commitment these groups have in their participation in all the different advance technology contests.  Private industry is going to be what gets our space program back on line.  China, Russia, Japan, India, and other space race countries don't have the private sector backing that we have here in the US to support their space programs.  As we slowly shift to more corporate funding versus whole-sale government funding of space programs, I think, in the long-term, we will come out on top as the dominate player in near-orbit space operations and far-reaching space exploration.  For those countries that choose to work with us as a team, they'll reap the benefits as well.  For those that don't, I believe that their government funded space programs won't be able to keep up the pace they are currently going.  The thing to remember about a space race is that it's not important who's currently ahead, it's who can make it to the finish line.
Alan, I believe Pixel has four tanks but only one engine.
here's the solution...
http://www.smythspace.tv/howto.html
it has more to do with Humanity's hopes and dreams than it does with NASA's plans...but, they could help if they chose...the more the merrier...
less than a million $, if NASA will provide the ride as a gesture of good will...it will cost them absolutely zero...when's the last time they had an offer like that...?
Steve Smyth...What does a cheap foam satelite have to do with the future or developing new technology to get us there?

As far as the Lunar Lander Challenge, I hope Armadillo can make it happen this year.
Todd...you make it sound kinda cheesy...don't you think that garnering NASA's assistance in projecting a ray of hope would be a boon to makind?
Besides, even if it is a cheap, cheesy, logo plastered, foam satellite, there ain't no other ones like it...kind of a sculpture in space...a landmark...a beacon...a roadside attraction...good for the tourist trade...like the golden arches...what have you...
Also, if you'd read the rest of the website, you'd see that the pic is just one possible configuration...and...repeat...and...the vehicle can return to Earth without ablative or dissipative damage...don't you think that might be worthwhile?
Thank you for your interest...
Steve
Steve,

I applaud your thinking, but your comments sound like you suggest that you believe your way is the only way.

Lend some constructive and appreciative comments to those other ideas that are being worked on. Like Armidillo's lander and the hard work and innovative thinking they have put into it, Like Bigelow's inflatable modules that may have originated from NASA but they have made many modifications and have many patents from their own hard work.
again, Todd...you need to catch up here...when Bigelow first announced, I suggested an inflatable version of Gaia Two be launched like a Givens Life Buoy...the fabric would be coated on the inside with a catalyzed resin, which would cure when the action of the balloon popping open in the vacuum of space initiates the process...again...the vehicle could be recovered...nobody else has even come close to that... Branson's returnable whirlygig is a high flying aircraft...not a spacecraft. [...]
Again. An all me kinda statement. I think I have ascertained what you are. (Place my own add here and put up my blinders)


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=427706

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google